X Close

I will never give up on Chelsea Loyalty has become an underrated virtue

Once a blue, always a blue (PIERRE-PHILIPPE MARCOU/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Once a blue, always a blue (PIERRE-PHILIPPE MARCOU/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)


May 6, 2022   4 mins

“The famous Tottenham Hotspur went to Rome to see the Pope” we sometimes sing at the Shed End at Stamford Bridge. I probably shouldn’t tell you how it goes after that. It’s certainly more profane than sacred. Suffice to say the Holy Father is less than effusive in his welcome to the North London visitors. The Pope loves Chelsea, so the song goes. And so do I.

But recently moving house has posed something of a challenge to the Chelsea love in my household. We now live a stone’s throw from Brentford’s new stadium. And my boys have decided — perhaps to rile their father — that this is where their loyalty now lies. Local, family-friendly, plucky underdogs come good, and not owned by a KGB asset — I see the attraction.

Last month, I went to see my team get smashed by Real Madrid. The man sitting in front of me spent the whole game making hand gestures at the away fans. He hardly watched the football. It was as though he was only there for the loyalty, that order of belonging that is premised on a strong sense of them and us. He didn’t watch as Real striker Karim Benzema produced a masterclass of finishing. Chelsea was his family, his whole life I imagine. As his face contorted in rage at the celebration of the away fans, I began to reflect on what a terrible club I support.

I have always known we are a rotten lot, corrupted by bad money. Our owner made his billions in the wild east of perestroika. Despite having gone to prison in 1992 for the theft of government property, in 1995 he was allowed to buy half of an oil company for $100 million in a rigged auction. Abramovich has admitted in court that he paid billions of dollars in bribes to acquire Sibneft. Ten years after he bought it, he sold it back to the Russian government for $13 billion.

Abramovich’s co-investor in Sibneft was Boris Berezovsky. Abramovich and Berezovsky fell out, with Abramovich’s friend, Vladimir Putin, siding with Abramovich. Berezovsky survived a number of assassination attempts by Russian agents. Several of his friends and associates, like Alexander Litvinenko, were murdered or died in suspicious circumstances. Berezovsky apparently hanged himself in 2013, though the coroner recorded an open verdict. It’s all very dodgy. And as FSB agents were roaming London, Chelsea were doing very nicely thank you on the pitch. During Abramovich’s time as owner, the club won 18 major trophies. Our rivals accuse Chelsea of having bought all this silverware on the backs of the ripped-off Russian public — and perhaps even a few dead bodies under a flyover somewhere. And they may be right. Our owner is now sanctioned, his assets frozen.

I wish this was the end of the catalogue of accusations against my terrible team. I might be happy enough to sing about the Pope’s welcome to our Spurs rivals, but the gas noise that Chelsea fans used to greet Tottenham players as they emerged onto the pitch — a reference to the gas chambers — was so disgraceful, I probably should have walked out there and then, never to return. If the Jewish Roman Abramovich did one thing good, it was that he stopped the fans doing this. Mostly stopped.

Surely my boys are right — lovely Brentford would be a better fit, especially for a man of the cloth. So why do I still support them? Out of a sense of loyalty, I suppose. “Once a blue always a blue,” as Chelsea star Mason Mount proudly proclaimed.

Loyalty has long been seen as a virtue. We criticise friends when they are not loyal and praise our dogs for being so. Loyalty names a kind of perseverance in human relations, something without which human society would be based on a succession of short term alliances or contracts. Some may say that it is an outdated virtue, one that is rooted in the relationship of subject to monarch, or vassal to lord — oaths of loyalty having a terribly feudal feel, out of place in a democratic society. That said, the importance of family bonds is still something most of us would subscribe to; loyalty to family members, even those who are embarrassing or morally suspect.

My mum used to propose a toast on family occasions: “Here’s to us and balls to the rest,” she would say, raising a glass. Feels a bit like the Shelbys now I come to write it down. But it was intended and received as a kind of “welcome home” family hug. It was that kind of sentiment that kept us together. Loyalty is often love in its least attractive form.

That’s something of the moral valence of “Once a blue, always a blue”. Except, if press rumours are to be believed, midfielder Mason Mount might be about to become a Red, with Liverpool leading the pack to secure his signature. And it’s not good timing ahead of the FA Cup final next weekend, when a worn-out Chelsea are, I expect, going to be crushed by Liverpool.

I don’t expect an iota of sympathy, especially not on Merseyside. Back in the Eighties, Chelsea fans would enthusiastically wave £50 notes at visiting Liverpool supporters. As I looked down at my programme, embarrassed, pretending I wasn’t with them, Chelsea would sing “Get a job, get a job, get a job”. Liverpool fans would chorus back: “Thank you very much for paying our dole.” That was 1-0 to them.

I say this through gritted teeth, but I don’t really blame Mount for seeking fame and (greater) fortune on Merseyside, despite all his badge-kissing expressions of Chelsea loyalty. The days when a player like Tony Adams spent all his playing career at one club (19 years, Arsenal) are pretty much gone. For Mount, as for pretty much everyone else these days, the “once a blue” line doesn’t have quite the same gravitational pull as it once did. Capitalism dissolves human relationships. As Marx put it in The Communist Manifesto: “The bourgeoisie, whenever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal and idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties… and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self interest, than callous ‘cash payment’.”

So I will stick with this ghastly bunch, and won’t be crossing the bridge to Brentford — just as I won’t ever cross the Tiber to Rome, despite the Pope’s sometimes attractive embrace. Loyalty is one of those old-fashioned virtues that cements human relations, even if it means our loyalty to those who don’t really deserve it. Because for every boorish thug or Russian oligarch that wears the same colours as me, I still lie awake at night and dream of Hazard and Drogba and James. Once a blue, always a blue.


Giles Fraser is a journalist, broadcaster and Vicar of St Anne’s, Kew.

giles_fraser

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Martin Bollis
Martin Bollis
1 year ago

I went to my first Manchester City match in 1971 aged 15. It is hard to explain to unbelievers, particularly in our drab, sanitised, po-faced age, how thrilling a football terrace was to a teenage boy.

It had everything: fierce tribal loyalty signified by visible emblems (scarves in those days, not shirts), it’s own anthems, histories and myths. There was chest beating and regular shots of adrenaline. Even the occasional violence was thrilling and, despite the pearl clutching, fairly harmless involving only those who wanted to be there and rarely anything worse than a black eye.

I cheerfully chanted “we are the IRA” at George Best, after he received death threats from them, along with various, highly imaginative, songs about the Munich Air Disaster. Allowing yourself to be appalling, sometimes, should be a recognised human right. It’s cathartic.

I could afford to fund my 120 mile round trips to the home games, entry, a programme, and a few pints, on a paper round.

I blame the prawn sandwich eaters across the road for starting to move the game from a genuine working class community bonding phenomenon, to a slick part of the entertainment industry.

I know what the game is now, and don’t particularly like it, but that hook is so deeply buried, like Giles, it would just not be possible to support a different team.

An anecdote for ladies who find this hard to understand. In around 2005 a dinner party host asked the table “without thinking about it what, instinctively, is your life’s greatest moment?” My wife and I answered, simultaneously and without conferring, “Dickov’s goal at Wembley” (an injury time equaliser in the 1999 League 1 play off final.)

Those moments when your tribe triumphs, in the most straightforward uncomplicated way, are like no other.

Richard
Richard
1 year ago
Reply to  Martin Bollis

Great Post, Martin. As A Spurs fan, despite a football life of near permanent disappointment, punctuated by the odd victory or (rarely) cup triumph, I cannot get them out of my head. I wish I could, life would be SO much easier.

Dermot O'Sullivan
Dermot O'Sullivan
1 year ago

I’m a Chelsea fan and I make no apology for being one. Mr Abramovich has done the club a great service and his commitment to it will stand the test of time. BTW I’m not even English but a childhood experience accidentally made me a fan. Those self righteous politicians who demonise Abramovich now were only too happy to facilitate Russian money for decades but prevented me from attending a Chelsea match when I was in London a week ago. Hence, my ire!

What a cringing article.

Last edited 1 year ago by Dermot O'Sullivan
Ben 0
Ben 0
1 year ago

Spoken like a true fan – once a club ‘gets’ you your theirs for life. I speak as someone who was converted to an lfc fan way back in 1988 after their amazing season. Only to watch them lose to Wimbledon in the Cup Fina that year.
But I’ve been hooked ever since. YNWA

James Longfield
James Longfield
1 year ago

I don’t really understand why this article has appeared on UnHerd. Is it a slow news day? Is there some hidden message in the “I’m embarrassed I support a club owned by an alleged friend of Putin” narrative that’s meant to mean something? There are plenty of other dubious owners of Premier League clubs out there. Why not a serious discussion about all of this?

Dermot O'Sullivan
Dermot O'Sullivan
1 year ago

Spot on.

andy young
andy young
1 year ago

The problem with loyalty is a philosophical one. What exactly are you being loyal to? As the late, great, Brian Walden pointed out to the late, perhaps not so great, Roy Hattersley, what exactly is this Sheffield Wednesday that you so passionately support? If the players, manager, owners, kit, ground, all change, then what’s left? What if the owner changes the name?
Personally I support Norwich (yes, I know). But if they turned into something like, I dunno, Burnley (in its present incarnation) then I suspect my loyalty would slowly evaporate.

Dermot O'Sullivan
Dermot O'Sullivan
1 year ago

A great day for Chelsea and it’s my birthday!

Karlo Tašler
Karlo Tašler
1 year ago

Blind loyalty is the root of all wars.

Lewis Clark
Lewis Clark
1 year ago

Yeah well guess what? Your beloved football club will dump you as soon as you can no longer a match ticket or this year’s new ‘home’ shirt.

John Dewhirst
John Dewhirst
1 year ago

At least the author has the insight to recognise how his band of brothers is looked upon by others. Sad that he doesn’t have the capability to break the thread. It all sounds like a desperate attempt to identify with a mythologised and sentimentalised past. Ye olde Merrie Chelsea that never existed and never will.

George Bruce
George Bruce
1 year ago

Takes a long time to say what could have been said in a sentence. “Like the vast majority of wealthy clubs there are real problems of corruption, the presumably criminal past of the long-time owner (unlikely to just be stealing!) and all kinds of other Chelsea-related nastiness but I dont care." There, thats the article done.
Its interesting that "loyalty" ("loyalty" because often feigned, I think) to a football team is exempt from a lot of the restrictions placed on loyalty these days for most of us.
If a Russian is to say "we are getting a lot of bad press these days but I
m loyal to my country still,” well, I think we can see he or she will get some stick, and certainly wont be playing at Wimbledon.
If someone was to say they felt loyal to the "de souche" population of this country and its descendants, and not so much the newcomers, that
s not good either.
But football. The most unreasonable things become forgivable.