Now, Washburn has said that this is all a lie. He claimed that the two of them spent three days together at the Sunset Marquis and hammered out the new plot and agreed that Washburn would do the bulk of the writing. Washburn claimed he had been given a time limit of a month — the clock was ticking — and he had spent the entire time writing and rewriting the script. When he was finished, according to Washburn, Cimino and Carelli took him to a cheap restaurant somewhere on the Sunset Strip where Carelli told Washburn: “Well, it’s fuck-off time.” And Washburn was fired.
Washburn saw this as a classic Hollywood situation: you get a dummy to write the goddamn thing, then tell the dummy to go fuck himself, then put your own name on the dummy’s script, and make sure the dummy never comes back. Washburn admits he was so tired that he didn’t really care if he was fired. He’d been working 20-hour days for a month and was completely burnt out. He left LA the next day, got on a plane and flew back to Manhattan.
EMI was surprised by the new The Deer Hunter script and how it turned one man into three — and how these men now worked in a steel town in Pennsylvania and were all drafted into Vietnam. In the original script it is Mike, played by Robert De Niro, who stays in Vietnam and Christopher Walken’s Nick who comes back to the steel town and returns to Linda (Meryl Streep). It is Mike who meets his tragic fate at the Russian roulette table and not Nick. Cimino revised all this, but the Writer’s Guild of America in their arbitration process awarded Washburn sole screenplay by credit and the original authors of the script The Man Who Came To Play were given story credit along with Michael Cimino. Cimino was pissed. But he had a movie to make.
The Deer Hunter started shooting in June of 1977, and it took six months to complete at double its original budget. The cast, along with De Niro and Walken, was made up of John Savage, John Cazale and Cazale’s girlfriend at the time, Meryl Streep, who De Niro recommended to Cimino after seeing her in a play. Streep didn’t really respond to the role of Linda — she saw her as a vague, stick girlfriend — but Cazale was dying of lung cancer and she took the role so she could be near him on set.
There was an arduous year of post-production — the film editor Peter Zinner, who won an Oscar for his work, was handed about 110 miles of printed film to edit. This was a monumental task in 1978. How did so much film get shot, one wonders. How did the already large budget double? The answer is Cimino had become obsessed. He was now a film artist who wanted to create a masterpiece, something that could be compared to The Godfather and The Godfather Part II — movies that are looked at as the pinnacle achievements of the New Hollywood.
The wedding sequence that opens The Deer Hunter was supposed to be about 20 minutes long but in the finished film it’s over 50 minutes and it’s grand and ominous. Visconti would be proud. Cimino’s instincts were so right: to give us this much time to spend with these characters until the horror of Vietnam interrupts everything and destroys their lives. The moviemaking in the wedding sequence and then in Vietnam is monumental. An artist has painted this movie and seems to know exactly what he’s doing with every brush stroke, every camera pan, every edit.
The first cut of The Deer Hunter was three and a half hours. EMI and Cimino were pleased with it but executives at Universal, the studio which had bought the film before production and were releasing it in the United States, were not so enthusiastic. According to an exec at EMI, the Universal contingent were shocked and thought the use of God Bless America in the final scene was anti-American. They really did not like it and they really didn’t like it any more when it was cut down by 30 minutes to just over three hours. Michael Deeley, the EMI executive who had overseen the film’s production, said that he realised too late that Universal was the wrong home for The Deer Hunter.
The head of Universal at that time was Thom Mount, who has described the post-production process on The Deer Hunter as a continuing nightmare from the moment Cimino finished it to the day it was released. Cimino was wedded to every single frame he shot. He was an artist obsessed with his own creation.
When The Deer Hunter was released in December 1978, it was given just a one-week run in two theaters in North America: one in New York and one in Los Angeles. The one in Los Angeles was The National in Westwood, which, along with the Village, was the grandest of all the theaters in LA. It was always a thrill, no matter what was playing, to go see a movie at The National: even if we had no interest in a particular movie and it was playing at The National, we’d still go.
My movie-mad friend and I — we were 14 — bought advanced tickets for the Saturday matinee. Four of us went with his parents, who had to take us because The Deer Hunter was R-rated. We sat in the last row and the movie began, no trailers, in 70mm. It remains one of the most powerful and overwhelming experiences I’ve ever had. The Russian roulette sequence was so suspenseful, so violent — no one had ever seen anything like this — that I was terrified, wiped-out.
Of course the literal-minded press complained that there weren’t any recorded cases of Russian roulette in the Vietnam War, but Cimino said The Deer Hunter was a personal and an autobiographical film. This is the kind of film an artist makes. The Deer Hunter for Cimino was not political, polemical or supposed to be historically accurate. This is what an artist says. And Cimino sometimes teasingly defended these scenes by saying he had news clippings from Singapore stating that Russian roulette was used during the war though never showed these clippings to anyone. Cimino was a prankster and liked to make fun of the press and toy with them. This is what an artist does. I’ve done it before. Often you can’t help yourself. You think: they need to be tricked. They need to learn a lesson and get fucked with a bit. You think: why do we even have to talk to them?
In some factions — and this is so tiresome — The Deer Hunter was called a racist movie because of its depictions of the Vietnamese soldiers who torture the Americans. The whole film was apparently a racist rewriting of that tragic war. But Christopher Walken has said that while making the movie no one ever mentioned Vietnam — it was simply a war film and Russian roulette was its metaphor. Michael Deeley, that EMI exec, also said that The Deer Hunter wasn’t really about Vietnam but about how individuals respond to pressure in an unworthy war and how they face the horrible choices presented to them.
The Deer Hunter is a parable and many Vietnam veterans who responded favourably to the film thought the Russian roulette sequences were a valid allegory. Maybe not the liberal entertainment press who, despite admiring the film, kept pushing the racist angle. But this is what an artist is often up against: a wilful misreading of your intentions in order to satisfy someone’s own ideological outlook. This is so boring and it was happening in 1978 just as it happens now. Some things don’t change.
That the movie was originally released in just two theatres in December — in order to qualify for Oscar nominations — was the brainchild of a flamboyantly gay Grease producer called Allan Carr. He had become a fan of the movie at early screenings and devised a PR campaign that would ensure the movie would be talked about and then rereleased nationwide at the end of February, when we saw it again at The Village Theater and where it played even more powerfully.
My friends and I were in awe of this movie. And most critics were too, with many of them writing that The Deer Hunter was the best American epic since The Godfather. Roger Ebert called it one of the most emotionally shattering films ever made and David Thomson has called it one of the great American films of all time. It was nominated for nine Oscars and won five: Picture, Director, supporting actor for Walken, editing and sound. De Niro, Streep and John Savage were also nominated for their performances — as was Vilmos Zsigmond’s extraordinary cinematography.
And this sweep at the Oscars happened despite a pushback campaign against the film once the nominations were announced. It was spearheaded by Warren Beatty, a famously liberal Hollywood insider, whose comedy Heaven Can Wait was also up for nine Oscars and was competing with The Deer Hunter in many of the same categories. Jane Fonda, the star of Coming Home, another Vietnam War film that was The Deer Hunter’s main competition at the Oscars that year, also criticised the film for its racism in public, even though she had never seen it. There were demonstrators outside the auditorium where the awards were given out. Robert De Niro was so anxious over the controversy that he decided not to go and stayed in New York, but then Jon Voight was the heavy favourite to win for Coming Home that night, which he did. A week after that Oscar ceremony, Cimino, newly minted as New Hollywood’s latest boy wonder, flew to Montana to begin shooting his follow-up to The Deer Hunter — a movie called Heaven’s Gate.
***
Heaven’s Gate was a script Cimino had written in 1971 called The Johnson County War, a western set in 1892 about cattle barons versus immigrants that didn’t get any traction because no stars wanted to sign on. It was shelved, but in the days leading up to the 1979 Academy Awards, when it seemed certain Cimino would triumph and The Deer Hunter would win him both a Best Picture and a Best Directing Oscar, United Artists was convinced to resurrect what was now called Heaven’s Gate, starring Kris Kristofferson, Christopher Walken, Jeff Bridges and John Hurt.
United Artists approved a budget of $11.6 million and offered Cimino complete artistic freedom. The studio was coming off a heady run: it had won the Best Picture Oscar three years in a row, with One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, Rocky and Annie Hall, and it was considered the go-to studio in a town for filmmakers who didn’t want to be constrained by the politics and bureaucracy and interference of some of the other bigger studios. This was the headiest time in Cimino’s career: he was offered the most freedom as an artist, and he took full advantage of it. He was going to paint the screen with not only the most amazing western ever made but one of the grandest achievements of the New Hollywood. It would be the ultimate auteur movie, aiming not only for a stunning work of visual art but also a violent and popular movie that would connect with a mass audience.
Cimino was drunk on the possibilities and when a filmmaker becomes this obsessed with a movie, the first thing to go out the window is judgment. There was only one thing that United Artists asked of Cimino, and that was to have his film ready to premiere in December — to make sure it was eligible for a truckload of Oscar nominations and also have it play during the lucrative Christmas season.
But by the sixth day of filming, Heaven’s Gate was already five days behind schedule. Cimino had become an artist whose fanatical attention to detail led to an entire street being built to his precise specifications, and then being torn down because it just didn’t look right. The artist’s mania was settling in. An entire tree that Cimino approved of was cut down and moved in pieces and rebuilt in a courtyard in Oxford, England, where the opening Harvard graduation scene takes place. An entire irrigation system was built under the land where the climactic battlefield scene would unfold so that it would remain vividly green.
But why not? This was the era where Francis Ford Coppola shot a million feet of footage for Apocalypse Now. Kubrick had shot almost as much footage for The Shining. Spielberg had lavishly overspent on 1941. Even Martin Scorsese had spent $20 million on Raging Bull. What was United Artists supposed to do except trust the artist they hired to make the movie they agreed upon?
But Heaven’s Gate was soon haemorrhaging money, and by the time Cimino was finished with principal photography he had shot more than 220 hours of footage. The movie was costing around $200,000 a day to produce at one point. But Cimino was in the grip of something: he wanted to make his perfect movie and soon he was demanding up to 50 takes of individual scenes. Cimino had become the kind of director who delayed filming for the day until a cloud that he liked rolled into frame. Actors and musicians who had been brought to Montana where most of the movie was shot would wait around and end up stranded, endlessly waiting to be called to shoot their scenes that never materialised. John Hurt, who plays Kristofferson’s best friend, temporarily left the set to shoot David Lynch’s The Elephant Man and claimed no one noticed that he’d been gone.
Heaven’s Gate didn’t finish shooting until March 1980, and ended up costing $44 million dollars, four times the agreed budget. Cimino then locked himself away with his editor — William Reynolds, who had edited The Godfather and The Sound of Music — and worked obsessively on putting the movie together for its new release date: Thanksgiving weekend, 1980 — a year after the original release date.
After I watched it for a third time during lockdown, I think Michael Cimino had convinced himself that he’d created a masterpiece, and that all the expense and hard work and time spent had been worth it. And though there are dozens of images in Heaven’s Gate that are as stunning as any ever shot and there is undeniable genius in it, the movie does not work.
In late June 1980, Cimino previewed a rough cut for the execs at United Artists that ran to 5 hours and 25 minutes, with Cimino promising to cut about fifteen minutes. UA flatly refused to release the film at that length and conspired to fire Cimino. Cimino finally relented and said that he could re-edit the film to about 3 hours and 40 minutes, but no less. In the end, he cut it down to 3 hours and 39 minutes.The premiere took place on November 19 at a theater on the Upper East Side in New York, packed with celebrities including the stars of the movie. During the intermission, Cimino noticed no one was talking excitedly to him or drinking the complimentary champagne. He went up to his publicist and asked why everyone was so glum and subdued and the publicist reportedly told him: “Because they hate the movie, Michael.”
The critical reception the following day was an avalanche of negativity. The New York Times called it “something quite rare in movies these days: an unqualified disaster”. Instead of reviewing Heaven’s Gate as a flawed ambitious epic — with some of the most gorgeous cinematography ever seen in an American movie — it was reviewed mostly as a business story, with everyone blinded by the cost rather than what was in the movie itself. When he realised what was happening — that his movie was being cancelled! — Cimino complained that it wasn’t finished yet and that he had been pressured to cut the movie for a Thanksgiving release. After a one-week run in New York, Cimino and UA pulled the movie.
Cimino recut it down to 2 hours and 29 minutes and it was released in late April 1981. It might have been shorter, but it was far worse than the original version — which, despite being a mess, has a feeling and coherency that is lacking in the truncated version. Roger Ebert proclaimed it was still one of the most scandalous cinematic wastes he had ever seen in a consensus reappraisal. The film closed in two weeks having only grossed $3.5 million.
In the years since, there has been a major reassessment of Heaven’s Gate and what Cimino was trying to do. This began in the mid-Eighties, with European critics such as Robin Woods calling Heaven’s Gate one of the supreme achievements in Hollywood cinema. David Thomson called Heaven’s Gate “a wounded monster” that demands re-exploration. Martin Scorsese has said that it has many overlooked virtues. And it must be said that it does have a few overlooked virtues and that it does play better today that it did 40 years ago — its grandeur has become more powerful as the notions of movies are dying. But the damage to its reputation and to Cimino had already been completed in the early Eighties. The New Hollywood that thrived in the Seventies, where directors were often given free reign, had a stake driven into its heart. The New Hollywood was officially over. A decade of high-concept movies followed, negotiated by agents and lawyers as well as a return to studio control.
Heaven’s Gate damaged Cimino’s career considerably, but he still worked throughout the Eighties. It wasn’t until 1996, after a series of flops, that Cimino made his final film, Sunchaser, starring Woody Harrelson, with a budget of $31 million and only grossing $21,000. This was when Cimino supposedly snapped: reports of him arriving to set late, seemingly under the influence of drugs. The editor on Sunchaser said that Cimino emanated an eerie, freaky vibe and that he had his face covered during the editing process with a handkerchief. Over the years, I always wondered what happened to Cimino. He very rarely opened up or gave interviews after Heaven’s Gate. And yet colleagues and financiers and executives and producers continued to talk about him: vain, self-indulgent, egotistical and megalomaniacal. How can one make a movie like The Deer Hunter and then nothing else that remotely rivals it? The rest of Cimino’s movies are mostly bad; in fact, all of them are bad to one degree or another. How did Cimino get so lucky that one time out?
He seemed to be an incredibly intelligent man: his tastes were wide-ranging and he had real moviemaking fever. But something went wrong. Something got fucked up. And I think part of it was that he was working in the wrong business and believed that the sheer force of his talent was going to keep the lights on — that no matter what, his talent was going to let him thrive in the jungles of Hollywood. In the end he became a recluse of sorts, hiding in his Beverly Hills mansion on Coldwater, looking, on the few occasions he was spotted, as if he were transitioning into a woman. He died in 2016 but no one knows how or from what — the cause of death was never revealed.
He once said: “When I’m kidding, I’m serious, and when I’m serious, I’m kidding. I am not who I am and I am who I am not.” To me, this sounds like an artist.
Listen to The Bret Easton Ellis Podcast here.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIt has always puzzled me that Heaven’s Gate has such a horrendous reputation. Okay, so it sunk a studio. But it’s an okay film, not great or anything, just okay, if a bit boring; it also has a good cast. But it is far better than many films released around the same time. It’s not as good as undisputed classics like Caddyshack, Flying High (what you in the revolted colonies call Airplane), The Blues Brothers, The Big Red One (not the director’s cut), Breaker Morant and The Empire Strikes Back, among others. But I certainly prefer it to the very ordinary Ordinary People, and the over-raised Raging Bull, and a host of other slop released at the time.
PS: I sometimes imagine that Heaven’s Gate ended up as the TV series Deadwood.
Oh, I LOVE ordinary people.
In the seventies, the studios were all on the point of collapse for various historical reasons. Giving total control to the young lions wasn’t an artistic decision, it was a counsel of desperation — everything else has failed, might as well try this. It kind of worked, although nothing was ever the same afterwards. Cimino wouldn’t have got lunch money in any other period of Hollywood history, never mind the budgets he did get. He forgot — if he ever knew — the guiding philosophy of the movies: there’s no business like show business like no business I know. You will notice that in this equation, the word “business” appears three times.
What probably happened to Cimino was drug addiction.
Heaven’s Gate has some of the most astonishing sequences in cinema history, but Cimino thought that would be enough, that he didn’t need a script. It is as if he had a vision of a few spectacular scenes in his head, but nothing tied them together. It is impossible to know what is going on unless you know the history of the Johnson County war, and few people did. If he had taken the time to write a screenplay it would have been the masterpiece he envisioned.
Exactly, faux artists have there best days when on the new arms of intoxication, but when they cross the threshold of no return into rampant dependent addiction, they move towards insanity and either they double down and fade away or they give it up but give up there creativity too.
I’ve seen musicians like that. Basically an autistic wreck until they encounter weed, smoke for years, learn how to write music somehow, have a good go and then crumble to pieces when their twisted mind gives up on them. It’s partly to blame for the 27 club. Ultimately nothing lasts forever, especially drugged up lunatics. As much as I love say Hendrix or Cobane they were all mad and their exploration of drugs was a blessing and a curse: revelling madness for a moment in the big lights. There’s no escaping chaos and disorder, it will eat you.
Well, Bret —
Thanks for taking time to craft and tell an engaging story. It’s not the kind of thing I had planned to read about today, but I read the piece to the end. Your writing made it easy to follow the path … and to be curious enough to follow it all the way…
“Free rein.” Sorry; otherwise good.
“Heaven’s Gate” was bad, but it was no “Ishtar”
He was a monster of egotism. The arts are full of them.
Very enjoyable read.
The November 19th, 1980 premiere in New York for Heaven’s Gate must have been an excruciating experience for Cimino. “Packed with celebrities”, yet a pall of gloom had descended on the lobby during the intermission. At 3 hours 39 minutes-long, refusing the champagne to avoid drinking on an empty stomach, I imagine, while wondering how to get home after midnight, probably, were not conducive to a good night-out.
Had the premiere been a glamorous swords-and-sandals epic, and not a western, staged in the summer, then a very long premiere might have been more tolerable.
It’s amazing the amount of footage that does not make it to the final cut, especially prevalent, I imagine, in these latter-day auteur-movies. Perhaps such movies, on set, on location, slow and time-consuming, are prone to becoming depressing experiences: do many of the aspiring actors, who have a scene or two, wonder if they’ll ever pop up in the final cut? So they can prove to their friends and families that they did something worthwhile? Their morale must get easily sapped. Come the premiere, they or their friends with bigger roles, may take it out a little on the director: at least the mood at the reunion, as it were, is going to reveal its own verdict.
I can well believe that serious directors are vexed by clouds. I think many directors just give up. From every film from the early days on, it’s kind of dark when shot one way, and in the same shot or scene, unbelievably bright the other way. You see clouds, then the clouds suddenly scatter. Two actors are talking to each other. It’s horribly unreal.
Back to that November 19th premiere: the painful occasion it sounds like it was might in and of itself be a subject for a movie script. Re-imagined, perhaps, as in dramatised and “based on” and turned into a black comedy. Cimino had probably felt he was suddenly persona non grata at his own creation. Could something similar occur to the author of the Harry Potter series of books at a premiere for one of them today? For different reasons? There’s material right under the movie industry’s noses that is ripe for turning into something entertaining today, I would guess. That industry, as the prevailing winds of change imperiously implore it, needs to take a good look at itself.
Perhaps it’s easier with time having passed to look back and laugh a little.
One final thought: The Deer Hunter movie is a great movie. I’ve only seen it once, a long time ago. But “just one shot” turned out to be multiple shots – a long, long film. That’s just a dig. I think the movie spoke well to the widest possible audience: and that seems to happen very rarely, even in the best of times, but increasingly so in movies made these days.
Back in the 1980s, when reading the Guinness Book of World Records, I would have skipped through the pages, and I have always somehow recalled an entry for Heaven something. I think it was for Warren Beatty’s Heaven Can Wait (for a comedy with the most Oscar nominations ever?). It must have been that rather than Heaven’s Gate. The entry for the movie that had suffered the greatest money loss was Raise The Titanic, I’m quite sure. Perhaps, until now, on reading this very essay, I had never really heard about Heaven’s Gate. If I had read of it, and its having been made in 1980, I must have associated it with Heaven Can Wait. And it is true that every time I came across the Beatty movie, that is when it was mentioned in print or a snippet was advertised on TV, I have always in my mind associated his movie with a great financial loss. It can’t have been though, as it won so many Oscar nominations. The mists of time, the mists of time.
I’ll just add that one can, to a lesser or greater degree, be the author of one’s own fall. The grim reality is that Hollywood wasn’t completely mean or unreasonable.
I agree. A well-written and engrossing read.
While reading your post, I was wondering what director would wait all day for the right kind of cloud, only to find he needs to reshoot it, and I then remembered that he might shoot a scene 50 times. I doubt the clouds were as patient as the actors.
“Executives at Universal, the studio which had bought the film before production and were releasing it in the United States, were not so enthusiastic.”
One day someone should actually name these executives. They have power but are never named. Even journalism names the writers of the articles that so shape our lives.
Kudos to Unherd for doing that here with Michael Deeley at least.
What a super fascinating look into the world of Hollywood and an important life in art. Thank you BEE and Unherd, This is the sort of fare for which I joined Unherd, rather some of the navel gazing sub A level guff of recent months. If Hollywood allowed free rein (on the sole basis that the director is a sure fire money maker) the institution only has itself to blame for financial loss. For me Cimino remains a genius because of this one movie. Genius is not constrained, or defined by, further, repeated success. In my view the standout performance was that of John Savage, I can see Cimino in Savage’s every moment, and the ending God Bless America is a profound moment in cinema precisely because we dont know, or cannot be sure, what Cimino meant. As far as I know none of the actors in that scene have spoken about the director’s point. I compare it with Lean’s direction of Alec Guniness at the end of Bridge over the River Kwai. What, indeed, was the madness?
Yes, this is why I joined. However the sub a level guff recently caused me to cancel my subscription just a few days ago. More articles like this might cause a reconsideration. I’m not hopeful
“…someone who “loved blondes, Thelonious Monk, and drinking, preferably vodka”.”
I have to ask, why the Oxford comma? I thought that Thelonious monk was one of the “blondes” but when I looked him up I realized that was unlikely; but then I couldn’t make much sense of the sentence until I realized it was employing an Oxford comma 😀
Anyway, engrossing read, thank you.
Very funny! Thelonious Monk a blonde – that reading didn’t even occur to me.
For a deeper dive into the business and debauchery of New Hollywood, I highly recommend the autobiography of Julia Phillips, who died in 2002.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/You'll_Never_Eat_Lunch_in_This_Town_Again
John Savage wasn’t nominated for an Oscar for Deer Hunter, but the script was.
This essay seems so typical of what we have to read today. It seems to me that Cimino contributed towards his own demise because he was an “artist”. He took the money and did what he wanted but clashed with those who had the money. That’s an oldHollywood story.
Most of this essay is about what he did. But Bret doesn’t go on to explain, as he suggests he will, just who Cimino was and what he was, what made him tick. Near the end he begins to address it then closes off by saying he sounds like an “artist”. So, what is that? I’d hoped Bret might address that. Otherwise it’s basically a Wikipedia read.