American teenagers were forced to confront a very particular existential terror in 1997. It wasn’t your usual horror film, even though it did star Freddie Prinze, Jr. In Too Soon for Jeff he plays a high school senior who gets a crash course in both sex education and adult responsibility when his girlfriend gets pregnant. He doesn’t want to be a father, but it’s not his choice — and when his girlfriend insists on keeping the baby, poor Jeff has to kiss his future goodbye.
The overwrought morality play was shown in Sex Ed classes nationwide. And Jeff’s cautionary tale was hardly unique at the time. As Nineties America struggled with lingering anxieties over the AIDS epidemic and the loosening of sexual mores, the teen pregnancy rate was hitting an all-time high. This mix spawned a national purity panic — and with it, numerous after-school specials and made-for-TV movies that warned impressionable young people about the dangers of premarital sex.
While that message was nominally meant for everyone, we all knew who was really supposed to heed these warnings — and it wasn’t the Jeffs of the world. Girls were the ones in charge of saying no to sex, and it was girls who would suffer the consequences if they didn’t — in the form of not just unintended pregnancy but a reputational hit. Sex for guys was a biological drive; for girls, it was a mark of bad character, low morals, and an utter lack of self-respect.
And yet, even as Freddie Prinze, Jr begged the young women of the late Nineties not to ruin his life by sleeping with him, there was something else happening on television that spoke to better (and less prudish) days ahead. The year after Jeff hit screens, Sarah Michelle Gellar made her debut in a very different sort of teen drama — one with more cultural staying power than every after-school special combined. Twenty five years ago this week, Buffy the Vampire Slayer was born.
At first glance, Buffy was not just an archetype but a stereotype: the ditzy blonde cheerleader who, if she wasn’t ruining her boyfriend’s life by getting knocked up, was always getting stabbed to death within the first 15 minutes of your favourite horror franchise. But Buffy flipped the script: this cheerleader wasn’t slain. She slayed.
It’s important to understand just how shocking this was for the era, and how intentionally absurd. Just the words, Buffy the Vampire Slayer were a joke: when previews for the movie hit cinemas in 1992, audiences exploded in laughter the moment the announcer said the title aloud. And when the TV adaptation arrived in 1997, the whole enterprise still struck everyone as frankly goofy. In a representative review, The New York Times declared, “Nobody is likely to take this oddball camp exercise seriously, though the violence can get decidedly creepy.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeOk, I wasn’t the demographic it was aimed at, but I’ll admit, I loved it. It had snappy dialogue, charismatic leads, good plotting (generally), Anthony Head and Angel. What more could a woman (or over-grown school-girl at least) ask.
Yes! One can enjoy a show without worrying about whether or not it is “feminist”. If it entertains me, I don’t care.
Another stunning insight into male psychology lol.
You read and commented on the article, so you obviously found the subject interesting.
Not necessarily
Frivolous drivel of an essay. Especially it’s absurd conclusion that because Joss Whedon is a lech his work is tarnished. This essay is the embodiment of pseudo-insight of a killjoy midwit pretending to be intelligent.
Yaaaaaaawwwwwnnnnn…….
Oh dear – Unherd gets worse. Someone is seriously taking their eye off the ball letting stuff of this low quality get through.
My guess is that the main movers are getting bored and have their eyes on other projects.
Time to cancel my subscription
A “feminist” or a male fantasy? What’s the difference?
Since the end of the “Second Wave” feminism has been all about catering to male fantasies.
Does anyone honestly believe that Buffy would have survived as a franchise had she been a lesbian played by Queen Latifa? Now THAT would have been subversive!
When it comes to Girl Power, it’s all about the T & A.
Hugh Hefner was celebrated as a “feminist” for decades, despite being besties with Roman Polansky and Bill Cosby. And it turns out – oh shock! – that the Playboy mansion was a Barbie’s Dreamhouse for predators.
Girl Power!!!!
But hey, at least Hef didn’t s**t shame the Bunnies. He and his rich friends just drugged and raped and exploited them and stuff.
My feminism will include sexual exploitation or it will be trash!
For women on both sides of the political aisle it’s all about male fantasies.
Conservative women must cater to male fantasies in the kitchen, and “progressive” women must cater to male fantasies in the bedroom – as many bedrooms as possible if she’s a really “cool girl” (no kink-shaming, prudery, or pubes allowed).
There hasn’t been a genuine feminist movement since the 1980’s, which is why women in the USA are on the brink of losing their reproductive rights. But hey, at least we now say “pregnant people” instead of “pregnant women.”
Sorry Jeff – the cool girl will be having your baby.
“Buffy the Vampire Slayer” it made me laugh in 1992, and it makes me laugh now! The rest is entertainment and hot air, I am still laughing.
and yet simultaneously popular. A paradox?
At the time I remember it as seeming mildly, comically, subversive, with a cultic sex appeal for a certain type of male.
That aside, the appeal was the contrast of occult action going on beneath the banal surface of teen drama.
There is nothing subversive about a violent hot blonde who loves having sex with men. It’s an old male fantasy that Whedon exploited.
“It’s important to understand just how shocking this was for the era”
It’s not in the slightest bit important. And it wasn’t shocking.
This article feels like it’s going somewhere and then just… stops.
To be honest, I enjoyed reading this article more than I did the comments about how the West is to blame for Putin invading Ukraine and how Zelensky should just capitulate. THAT really was vacuous.
“Not only did Buffy sleep with Angel — her brooding, emo vampire boyfriend — in the second season of the show, but she kept on slaying after the act of love caused him to callously dump her, and go on a killing spree.”
Maybe I have a false memory here, but wasn’t the plot twist in their relationship that they couldn’t be together because when they were it sent him over to the dark side?
Anyway, why is Friends now unacceptable? I avoid that kind of news so had no idea it was excommunicated.
It was a good series but without Joss Whedon, it would have never happened.