So often portrayed as a rogue state, North Korea is actually hyper-rational. The regime tends to get what it wants — and, crucially, on its own terms. The awkward fact is, nuclear weapons make a nation very powerful. “We are talking about a country which has a similar-sized economy to Mozambique,” says Dr Andrei Lankov, director of Korea Risk Group. “Yet North Korea is playing a massive role in global politics, exclusively because of its nuclear weapons.”
North Korea has been a nuclear power for almost exactly 15 years — but in 2018, the nation agreed to put its nuclear ambitions on the back burner, in the first meeting between a Supreme Leader and an American President. Recently, though, the regime has been on a weapons testing binge. Two weeks ago, North Korea successfully tested a new “strategic weapon” — meaning one that can carry nukes — in the form of a hypersonic missile called Hwasong-8. It was the country’s third missile test in the space of a month, having earlier tested a new type of cruise missile, as well as a Hollywood-sounding system that launches missiles by train.
All this is just evidence of the military-powered petulance of a despotic regime, you might say. What Western commentators seem reluctant to point out, however, is that their neighbours on the other side of the Demilitarised Zone (DMZ) have been upping the stakes too. Few remarked upon the fact that the train-launched system test happened the same day that South Korea tested a submarine-launched ballistic missile, making it the first country without nuclear weapons to develop such a system.
Analysis tends to centre around the two Koreas as proxies of China and the United States. And in the West most have a binary view of the North as relentlessly aggressive and the South as virtuous yet besieged. But this flurry of weapons testing reveals a worrying arms race in which both nations are participating, as each side seeks more independence from their superpower of choice. It’s been a mere three years since Kim Jong-un and his counterpart Moon Jae-in first met — and promised to work towards reunification. Now, both are upping the ante in search of heavily fortified peace, as a new generation of leaders are stepping back from the long-held goal of returning to one Korea.
For the North, becoming a nuclear power was always an existential calculation — partly triggered by the US invasion of Iraq. One of many disastrous consequences of a disastrous war, the toppling of Saddam Hussein — and, later, Muammar Gaddafi in Libya — led Kim Jong-il to conclude that dictators unarmed with nuclear weapons get overthrown. But there are other, more oblique, benefits to having a nuclear armoury. Lankov tells me:
“They have used their weapons to squeeze aid from foreign governments which would not normally provide aid to North Korea, or at least would provide aid on conditions which the North Korean government does not see as acceptable, such as total monitoring distribution of aid to the needy population by foreign NGO workers.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeA very good article by “someone who knows,” but I would say that the situation is even worse than described here in multiple respects. Watch interviews with defector Yeonmi Park, conducted by Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan and others. She went into hospital for an appendectomy and saw rats eating the eyes from corpses in the hallway, and little children killing the rats for food. And Kim may be rational, but he was also reckless enough to poison his own brother with Vx in a crowded public space in a foreign country. And now this genius has the ability to blow up LA in 20 minutes. Would Kim sell excess nukes to Al Qaeda or ISIS? Must we let this situation obtain indefinitely?
For more insights into the regime, watch the recently-released (in the US) film “The Mole.” Really gripping.
The analysis above overlooks the implication of Covid on the DPRK. This has hit the country in three ways: (i) at a stroke ending the tourism industry that had been a valuable source of foreign currency; (ii) cutting off economic / trading links with China undertaken by the mass of individual traders and hustlers who can be seen at the border crossings and in Dandong in particular; and (iii) put the country in a heightened state of security to prevent viral transmission that would likely impact on the healthcare system and potentially undermine the regime.
All of the above creates an unsustainable situation and one that gets worse by the year as industry collapses and the emergent middle class gets increasingly disappointed and frustrated. Crucially that new middle class includes many of the traders who have the privilege to travel into China and with the basic awareness of the outside world. However even more significant is that they are young, without the restraint of the existing gerontocracy and impatient. Whereas previously they enjoyed a degree of upwards social mobility and western consumer goods now things have stood still.
In turn Kim has few options other than the tried and tested resort to military power. That in itself does not mean that he would seek a conflict with the south but the risk increases of a military accident, particularly if the south is also asserting its military prowess.
Most likely the military drills by both sides are for domestic audiences. South Korea would struggle to cope with re-unification of the peninsula, not simply because of the breath taking expense of rebuilding a national infrastructure but because of the difficulty of embracing north Koreans who would struggle psychologically if exposed to capitalism. The challenge of re-unification is massive and one that will become increasingly more difficult the longer it is left.
As regards China, the north Korean leadership resents being subservient to China and its people have been resentful of the influx of Chinese tourists. Which brings us to another consideration. China is currently flexing its muscles with regards to Taiwan. Is Kim trying to divert attention from this and to demonstrate his ‘independence’, possibly to secure more aid from the north? Does the threat of potential military conflict in Korea make conflict over Taiwan more or less likely and vice-versa? Ironically it might be the issue that brings the Chinese and Americans to a momentary rapprochement and ease tensions elsewhere.
In the meantime I would expect the DPRK to resort to yet more opportunist measures to secure foreign exchange. The sale of WMD to Isis or Iran (with whom it already has long established relations) seems highly probable.
In all of this Kim maintains the initiative because ultimately he knows that neither China nor South Korea want the DPRK to collapse and that neither the US nor South Korea will countenance the death of their soldiers / citizens. At least give Trump a degree of credit fr seeking a fresh approach because it seems to me that US foreign policy in respect of the DPRK has amounted to little more than kicking a can down the road and at some point it will no longer work.
DPRK in the Viewfinder – My tourist photos of North Korea and muses about the country (wordpress.com)
Very interesting article, but I am not sure quite what it is that North Korea wants. It seems to be a disaster zone without any positives or hope of redemption. And surely the testing of missiles, or alleged testing, is just as it was in the early Trump years, really a political test to see how Joe Biden reacts. Trump took no notice of this posturing and got the benefits; probably Joe, for all his wobbly ways, will play it just like Donald.
I think it does say what NK wants; “ensuring the regime survives”. By which it means not so much Kim Jong-un of course, but the ruling elite whose privileges depend on the status quo.
But, of course, a starving populace may make it difficult to survive, hence the periodic blackmail.
I agree that reunification looks unlikely. On the other hand no one on the morning of November 9th 1989 knew that the Berlin Wall would fall and the East German regime soon after.