Subscribe
Notify of
guest

54 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter LR
Peter LR
2 years ago

So, no heads have rolled at the FBU for wasting membership funds then? I bet they’re really chuffed seeing you on GB News now too! Keep up the diversity, Paul – diversity of thinking and ideas.

Kevin McCann
Kevin McCann
2 years ago

Congratulations Paul. I was delighted to read this good news yesterday. Justice and free speech have prevailed thanks to your persistence, commitment and integrity.

John Riordan
John Riordan
2 years ago

Has anyone at the top been fired, dismissed, fined, or even so much as identified in this? No, obviously.

Until people who abuse their power like this are punished, this sort of thing will continue. It is of course indefensible that it has happened at all, but this is where we are now: a hopelessly delusional and corrupt Europhile class lashing out with anything to hand at the democratic majority which put a stop to their grossly self-serving complacency and sense of entitlement. It will not go away until they are actually scared to behave as they presently are.

Last edited 2 years ago by John Riordan
Samir Iker
Samir Iker
2 years ago

The Left has no shame, tolerance or wisdom.

Also, to add, would be interesting to see how many years, decades go by before these EU supporting idiots give up.

Last edited 2 years ago by Samir Iker
Roger Sponge
Roger Sponge
2 years ago

Delighted by the judgement.

Brian Hunt
Brian Hunt
2 years ago

I’ve read your excellent book, Despised, why the modern left despise the working class, and your experience with the FBU is a good example of why the left has become a cult that shuts down anyone who thinks and talks against the party line.

Sharon Overy
Sharon Overy
2 years ago

I had allegedly breached a union policy stipulating that FBU officials must not engage in joint campaigning with traditional opponents during the referendum (that the rally in question was taking place three years after the referendum and was therefore plainly beyond the scope of the policy seemed to cut no ice with my accusers).

They were obviously of the opinion that the referendum had yet to have a result, no doubt because the ‘correct’ one had been unforthcoming.

Congratulations on your legal vindication. I hope it doesn’t cause ‘difficulties’ for you in the future.

Andrea X
Andrea X
2 years ago

Excellent news.
I wonder, did you get compensation?

Michael James
Michael James
2 years ago

How did the fascist Left manage to get control of the FBU? If it’s not representative of the FBU membership, why can’t it be ousted?

John Hicks
John Hicks
2 years ago

A rare triumph over the thugs that too often manage the Herd. Without the likes of Paul Embery to challenge them we are all diminished. Thanks you had the opportunity; and that you did. And that we can read about it too.

Stephen Rose
Stephen Rose
2 years ago

Very good news, in these unsettling times. I hope your display of courage and integrity becomes the standard for your union and the Labour movement as a whole.

Albireo Double
Albireo Double
2 years ago

Paul, my wife and I greatly enjoy your writing and have huge admiration for the fight that you have fought. Well done indeed.

The left needs people like you more than ever right now, due to the rapid and continuing descent into babbling insanity by the “illiberal liberals”.

Bernie Wilcox
Bernie Wilcox
2 years ago

Well done Paul. I see that the so-called left wing press (Morning Star and Socialist Worker) along with the illiberal liberal press (Guardian and Independent) haven’t considered this newsworthy enough to report on.
Sums these New Stalinists up.
Tankies the lot of them.

Richard North
Richard North
2 years ago

There is a need to name and shame the officials involved, and, if they are elected, campaign against them, defeat them, and run them out of town. If they are not, de-select the elected officials who protect them.

Claire D
Claire D
2 years ago

Congratulations Paul and best wishes to you and your colleagues.

John Urwin
John Urwin
2 years ago

Well done Paul – in 1978 I was a trade union representative in an engineering company which was a very interesting and rewarding experience even though on one occasion it unfortunately involved a short strike. You hit it on the head in saying that your job is to represent and support the members, which in the case of the FBU also benefits the public. Perhaps as some rise up the union hierachy there is a tendency to forget that and become a political animal?

Edgar Wallner
Edgar Wallner
2 years ago

Excellent news and congrats for fighting this.It would be even more significant if you stood for the top position of the Union and, if elected, brought about the main objective of the Union which is ensuring the best for its members, instead of political posturing and wasting members’ funds.

Jon Redman
Jon Redman
2 years ago

Wasn’t our movement supposed to defend the principles of free speech and the right to dissent?

No. It was supposed to empower union thugs at the expense of everybody else. Unions have generally only ever defended free speech with which they agreed, and the “right to dissent” from opinions with which they did not. They only behave as they did here when they expect to get away with it. Scargill organised armies of murderous thugs in the 1980s so he could do the same thing.
Unions are all about the abuse of power in pursuit of personal greed at the expense of consumers. London Tube drivers are paid £60,000 a year for a part time job because if they don’t get what they want, they can abuse commuters and the economy.

Bernie Wilcox
Bernie Wilcox
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Redman

Really? I didn’t realise that Scargill was guilty of conspiring with other to arrange murder. No doubt he bribed the powers that be to ensure he wasn’t charged ?

Jon Redman
Jon Redman
2 years ago
Reply to  Bernie Wilcox

Not what I wrote. Good try though.

Galeti Tavas
Galeti Tavas
2 years ago
Reply to  Jon Redman

Jon, I wrote similar to you, citing Unions actions and how destructive they are, and am ‘Awaiting for Approval’, I suppose till Monday.

As a society we have so many self inflicted pathologies that I think we are the end days of Rome, and unions are one of the very big ones.

What the teaching Unions have done to the education of the children in all the West shows the Unionized teachers have come to despise the ones they are supposed to help. The ‘Rust Belts’ encircling the middle of UK and USA are because of militant Unions.

Currently Government Debt is: USA, 113%, and UK, 105% of GDP – it will not be able to recover from this when you add in the ‘Unfunded Mandates’ of ‘state pensions’ (SSA) (USA 130 ? Trillion$), Elder medical, Government Pensions, and so on. Take a city like LA, their state workers Unions have driven their pensions so high the city is permanently crippled by them. All the things the city could use their tax base for is swallowed by the insane pensions the Unions extorted. Same with Government workers everywhere – Unions are the most destructive force which is organized today. Turkey has the highest final pay pension in the world, at 100%, but Greece fallows soon – this is Unions.

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
2 years ago
Reply to  Galeti Tavas

It’s not the unions fault cities and countries can’t manage their budget. Unions exist to ensure their members receive the best pay and conditions they can get, nothing more.

sethsteele2
sethsteele2
2 years ago
Reply to  Galeti Tavas

Teachers unions are supposed to be looking out forstudents? No, they look out for teachers interests solely and unfortunately they haven’t been doing a good enough job (Batley) at doing that here recently.

Ever heard of a students union? Those are the people who look out for students.

Richard Riheed
Richard Riheed
2 years ago

Congratulations, Paul. The FBU must have been very badly advised to let it get to a tribunal. Waste of member’s funds. In in 1980’s I was a member of Equity, the actors/entertainers/theatre workers union. It was a closed shop then -ridiculous. I remember one Socialist Workers Party Union activist requesting all the cast and crew of the West End production we were in to gather together after one matinee. He asked us to ‘generously contribute to the construcion of a memorial statue to Leon Trotsky in Moscow.’ We all laughed at him and he couldn’t understand why. Unions can be great for the basic things: pay, conditions, advice, etc. – leave the politics alone.

Cheryl Jones
Cheryl Jones
2 years ago

Labour USED to be quite vociferous voices against the EU. The idea that supporting Leave is automatically bad and against the interests of the union is absurd. I really don’t understand the slavish devotion to a bureaucracy in Brussels

Juliet Garnett
Juliet Garnett
2 years ago
Reply to  Cheryl Jones

Two reasons come to mind. Money and power. Everything the EU does is designed to wrought power away from Nation States. It’s been doing this in every sphere of life for years. Law, Security, the economy, finance etc., etc. It’s not always obvious especially where policies are welcomed and beneficiaries/supporters believe it was only possible thanks to the EU.This may well be true but there are always ulterior motives at play when the EU intervenes in nation states. The Regional Development Fund is a case in point. Regions across the UK have benefited but if you study the language of policy documents over the years & cast a critical eye over what has and hasn’t been funded, the aim to reduce the power of states through decentralisation is clear. Funding is conditional on supporting the EU’s values & aspirations, flying flags, etc.
Similar conditions are placed on the numerous organisations and pressure groups that have benefited enormously from EU membership for whom aiding the development of civil society is a central tenant.The EU encourages cross border networking (a good thing) and sponsors inumerable conferences to this end. Organisations from member states and across the globe can apply for EU grants/funding to facilitate attendance. I imagine they leap at the chance and who can blame them. The opportunity to address large audiences with regular jaunts abroad must be hugely empowering at best & engender a sense of importance in some that isn’t deserved.
But just Google EU & civil society or funding for same and the EU’s power grabbing aims become clear.

Jerry Smith
Jerry Smith
2 years ago

Congratulations on your victory, Paul, from a remainer. Just so people know you don’t have to agree with someone to support their rights!

Rod Hine
Rod Hine
2 years ago

Excellent news, Paul! Keep up the good work on Unherd & GBN, I always enjoy your work. I’m decidedly right-wing but also proud to be a floating voter, and will never vote merely along tribal lines. I have several times remarked that more people like yourself in the Labour party might persuade me to vote for them. Sadly a long way off, so I shall just have to stick with Boris as the lesser of two evils!

Cheryl Jones
Cheryl Jones
2 years ago
Reply to  Rod Hine

That’s exactly how I feel

Miriam Cotton
Miriam Cotton
2 years ago

The theory and practice of trade unionism are often very different things.

hugh bennett
hugh bennett
2 years ago

You said, “the ruling was a bittersweet moment for me“.
I can understand that, but I think you should pop at least one cork !
“The only victories which leave no regret are those which are gained over ignorance” .
Thankyou for not giving up, and thanks to the Judge, it helps restore a bit of hope that my grandchildren might yet enjoy the freedoms I have, we must never give in.
As to those who put you through this, and to date seem to have paid little price, one can only hope that there are indeed, springs without water and mists driven by storms, and black darkness reserved for them…..

Karl Juhnke
Karl Juhnke
2 years ago

Well done Paul.

Kristof K
Kristof K
2 years ago

Dear Mr Embury,

I hope you can accept My congratulations from a remain voter who is still pro EU and still, in absolute principle, pro union. The FBU leadership clearly treated you squalidly!  (Incidentally I do not believe the EU is anti-union.)

Prashant Kotak
Prashant Kotak
2 years ago
Reply to  Kristof K

What if a union in say, Germany, were to take an anti-EU stance, perhaps even campaign for Germany to leave the EU? Would that be tolerated?

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
2 years ago

Excellent news. Paul, you have the character who can earn respect for yourself and Trades Unions from across the political spectrum and and votes for the Labour Party.

Eddie Johnson
Eddie Johnson
2 years ago

Well if you won’t be celebrating then allow me to do it for you.
The implications had you lost were far-reaching and alarming.
And you represented yourself against a distinguished QC?
Brilliant.

Last edited 2 years ago by Eddie Johnson
Peter Mott
Peter Mott
2 years ago

So they got rid of Paul – will they pay compensation?

Chris Milburn
Chris Milburn
2 years ago

Wonderful to hear this!!!

R S Foster
R S Foster
2 years ago

…I share the pleasure of others in your well-deserved triumph. Excellent news…

Terry Needham
Terry Needham
2 years ago

Well done

Satyam Nagwekar
Satyam Nagwekar
2 years ago

Intersting. Where I work, you are required to take approvals from the internal risk team before taking any contentious position in the public domain even while speaking in personal capacity. I don’t think the FBU had any protocol like this.

Last edited 2 years ago by Satyam Nagwekar
Geoffrey Wilson
Geoffrey Wilson
2 years ago

Interesting. I suppose that work requirement prevents you naming and shaming your employer. I would be interested in seeing a legal opinion on this clear breach of public interest. Also, of course, my sincere thanks and best wishes to the author for his integrity and now success. Well done to him.

Satyam Nagwekar
Satyam Nagwekar
2 years ago

Or the employer’s clients and associates along with the stated position on certain matters.

Prashant Kotak
Prashant Kotak
2 years ago

What could possibly be contentious about publicly speaking from a pro-Brexit stance in your own time? I would say the contentious position would be to still oppose implementing Brexit when over half the country had already voted to leave. On the basis of their own actions, the FBU leadership should have dismissed themselves from their own positions for their stance.

Satyam Nagwekar
Satyam Nagwekar
2 years ago
Reply to  Prashant Kotak

Contentious from the organisation’s perspective given the legalities and brand-risk considerations. Some outfits are fanatical about any possibility of a blowback. There are several associations behind the scenes that are not common knowledge. Hence, this is the approach even for seemingly mundane stuff.

Drahcir Nevarc
Drahcir Nevarc
2 years ago

Where do you work?

Bernie Wilcox
Bernie Wilcox
2 years ago

Why would speaking for the decision of the majority of the electorate possibly be controversial ?

Peter Mott
Peter Mott
2 years ago
Reply to  Bernie Wilcox

Well Leave/Remain is still pretty poisonous. Though whatever the risk of “blowback” from an employee taking a position the hassle over firsing him would be greater, surely? But why take the risk?

Cheryl Jones
Cheryl Jones
2 years ago

Why is supporting one option in a binary referendum more than another considered ‘contentious’ at all? This supposition that EU/left/Labour = ‘good’ and Brexit/right/Tory = ‘bad’ has to stop

Bill W
Bill W
2 years ago

I really enjoy your contributions on GB News. The best of British to you.

Bill W
Bill W
2 years ago

I really enjoy your contributions on GB News. The best of British to you.

A S
A S
2 years ago

This is a difficult comment to write and a bit (?) left of field. Even though I am an immigrant and non-white, I am starting to think .. about melting pots. I don’t want one homogenous melted pot world any more than I want only one color or only one type of food. Some diversity is good and interesting and too much starts to infiltrate into and alter the core of a culture. Sometimes this is good but it is certainly not always for the best. So selfishly, I have to say I would be quite dejected .. miserable even .. in a world without the British being British. I enjoyed visiting pubs in the UK with British people behind the bar. I liked visiting Europe and being able to go to a country without man purses. Simple joys. Not even mentioning the humor, books, music, TV shows, people. In fact, I forgive them for the whole taking over the world business. I enjoy seeing and knowing that Britain and British culture is preserved just the same way as I like knowing some national park or monument or treasure preserved even if I never get to visit it. Yes, I know Brexit is a lot more complicated than this. But whatever you guys do – stay British pretty please 🙂

Last edited 2 years ago by A S
A S
A S
2 years ago

This is a difficult comment to write and a bit (?) left of field. Even though I am an immigrant and non-white, I am starting to think .. about melting pots. I don’t want one homogenous melted pot world any more than I want only one color or only one type of food. Some diversity is good and interesting and too much starts to infiltrate into and alter the core of a culture. Sometimes this is good but it is certainly not always for the best. So selfishly, I have to say I would be quite dejected .. miserable even .. in a world without the British being British. I enjoyed visiting pubs in the UK with British people behind the bar. I liked visiting Europe and being able to go to a country without man purses. Simple joys. Not even mentioning the humor, books, music, TV shows, people. In fact, I forgive them for the whole taking over the world business. I enjoy seeing and knowing that Britain and British culture is preserved just the same way as I like knowing some national park or monument or treasure preserved even if I never get to visit it. Yes, I know Brexit is a lot more complicated than this. But whatever you guys do – stay British pretty please 🙂

Last edited 2 years ago by A S
T Doyle
T Doyle
2 years ago

Just shows how divisive and repressive the unions are.

Richard Lyon
Richard Lyon
2 years ago

I understand why he has to compliment the Fire Brigade. But we know that they refused to participate in efforts to maintain and provide additional services e.g. delivering PCs to schools during last year’s lockdown, in effect applying “work to rule”. Together with the Teaching Unions, they disgraced themselves.

Edward De Beukelaer
Edward De Beukelaer
2 years ago

This means there is hope and sometimes the justice system does work which makes it possible to have a democracy and a prospering society with a diversity of views necessary for progress and chances for all. Sadly in this process some will suffer along the way.
Things only change when new generations push out the ‘old farts’ who will use all the tricks to cling to their power.
….because the comments seem to come from anti-europe views here, I cannot help to throw this one in: Note…. I am pro-Europe… brexit has helped europe to mature a little. There is still much to do to better Europe and Britain could have played a big role there (sorry to see you go…) I do some lobbying in Europe to improve medicine (get away from the ‘industry of illness view’ to change to a ‘pursuing health point of view’) and I can see that the underlying narrative in Europe is strongly aimed in that direction, although ‘they’ do not know how to do it yet. This change should reduce the power of the industry lobby and be positive for all: better quality of life for all (really all). I hope Britain will take part in this change because medicine (in the very broad view) is in a very bad way…