Amersham Old Town is calmly beautiful: a tourist’s imagining of an English town, not a venue for something as vulgar as politics. On the Saturday before the by-election it sags under heat as residents sit outside independent coffee shops in their uniform of blue shirt and ironed shorts (men) and pale linen dresses (women).
This is the land of plenty at the end of the Metropolitan Line. The charity shop has a wedding hat section. There is a bespoke gentleman’s tailor and a town museum, so you can investigate Amersham’s plenty of yore. The Britain in Bloom awards are stacked vertically on a post by the Old Market. These golden discs, and the pride in the physical perfection of Old Amersham that they convey, are an indication that Boris Johnson’s luck might sag there this year. Is the Prime Minister conservative enough for Amersham Old Town? They doubt his dedication to their bloom. These are visual lands: you see it in the costumes, the cars, the homes, and the rage against HS2, currently being hewn into the hill beyond their paradise. They hate HS2 with the fervour of children because they usually have their way in everything, and in that is the possibility of rebellion.
If Amersham Old Town is in denial about it being 2021 — it is largely medieval with fiercely repointed Georgian frontage — so are most of its voters. I wonder if the residents consider the Chiltern Hills to be an extension of their gardens; they are enraged about HS2 because it will benefit the Midlands and the North and leave them and their excellent transport connections with a glut they did not seek. Benjamin Disraeli similarly courted the working classes from nearby Hughenden Manor, but perhaps the descendants of his voters have forgotten this happy coalition of manor and slum. HS2 is the only teardrop spilling onto their plate, and this, not pandemic, is the story here. Pandemic was unfortunate, but they are vaccinated now, and the shops are open.
There is jeopardy for the Prime Minister, then: when Dame Cheryl Gillan, Conservative MP for Chesham and Amersham, died in April, a by-election was called, scheduled for Thursday. Gillan’s majority was immense, a blue hill in a land of hills: 16,223 in 2019, or 55.4% of the vote. If you listen to constituents the result was barely conscious. As a pub landlord says from behind his tidy bar: “I vote Conservative. If you ask me why I vote Conservative I couldn’t give you an answer.” He makes it sound like an existential question singular to Tory Buckinghamshire: “Why do I vote Conservative? I think the majority of people don’t really look into that much – of why they vote.” He tells me he was born to a working-class family in Wales — his Welsh-based family have “nothing” — lives in a £1 million house in Chesham Bois, drives a new Range Rover and educated his children at private schools. Then two elderly ladies come in for lunch, and we must stop talking, because he is busy spoiling them with a professionalism that looks like rapture. He has been working since 5am — he works hard — and he is almost the most analytical voter I meet, but this election is about flowers and potholes.
The Tory majority is vast, but the Liberal Democrats sense an opportunity to beat the new Conservative candidate, one Peter Fleet, formerly of the Ford motor company. His centre of operations is a flat above an award-winning iron mongery in Amersham; from here he rides out to promise mitigation of the impact of HS2, a national park in the Chiltern Hills and a crack-down on anti-social behaviour (he is against it).
To combat him, there are 500 Liberal Democrat activists in Chesham and Amersham, placing banks of posters near notorious potholes. It is uncanny, and I wonder if they are consulting psychologists. Hit a pothole and you see a Liberal Democrat poster or, more likely, four Liberal Democrat posts. “The roads,” I am told by an upper-middle-class woman, “are shit”. I fantasise their slogan changed to: “Potholes winning here.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe“…There is a Cassandra here: Brendan Donnelly, a former Conservative MEP who is standing for Rejoin EU. He sits outside a coffee shop in Chesham and tells me that Brexit will hit us like a thunderstorm soon enough…”
Yes, Brendan, we should ‘Rejoin EU’, and the best way to achieve this is to introduce primary statute that anyone with the surname ‘Donnelly’ and the christian name ‘Brendan’ should automatically be made an MEP so they can rightfully keep feeding at the trough that keeps on giving.
What an amazing article! you sure as hell would not recognise Amersham if the name were removed, Heronswood or Virginia Water maybe. Amersham has a high percent of social housing and even old council stock compared to most of the home counties. It has many Traveller families, mostly settled after WW2 but still carrying on the feuds and alliances of yesteryear as well as new ones with the many incoming Urdu speakers and East Europeans. As with many London satellite towns the large houses and council’s tendency to prioritise flower pots over schools and housing give a veneer of wealth. The majority don’t get to share this or enjoy London wages and are stuck in local jobs from minimum wage to a little over living wage. Back to the Guardian, Tanya where this sort of fantasy is their reality.
Congratulations if you made it to the end. I gave up here:
‘They hate HS2 with the fervour of children because they usually have their way in everything’
Give the girl a break .She did council houses to death last week in Mousehole (or perhaps it was Penzance) Tanya would rather slag off her social equals than patronise the proles
The voters of Amersham vote Conservative because Labour is profoundly evil and the Lib Dems profoundly irrelevant.
Potholes are the responsibility of the local council, not Westminster. I can’t think why a pothole would make anyone vote Lib Dem.
The 1st few paragraphs speak to me of an undisguised but subtle condescension toward the inhabitants of Amersham old town with their ‘uniforms’ and their ‘hatred of HS2 with the the fervour of children because they usually have their way in everything’ and ‘is in denial about it being 2021’. Such identity politics writ large?
Tanya contemplating Boris is experiencing what it felt like to be a Conservative contemplating Tony Blair in about 1996 or 1997. Why was it not as obvious to everyone as it was to Conservatives that this individual was thoroughly dishonest, mercenary, evil, morally incompetent and narcissistic to the bone? Why didn’t people get it? Why were they determined to overlook that he was a transparently crooked, venal, treacherous wrecker?
I still don’t know. Any sensible person today would agree that the Conservative ‘demon eyes’ Blair poster was a wholly fair and accurate characterisation. The thing is, it was also obvious at the time to some of us, but nobody wanted to hear it. They still voted for him, human slick of vomit that he was and is.
It’s the same today with Boris. The haters are adamant that he’s a liar, and they think that shrieking this should win every argument, and should have by rights propelled Khorbiyn to power. How baffling that it doesn’t work!
All I can think is that people perceive Johnson as a decent bloke genuinely doing his best for a country he is proud of; and that the people shrieking the hate are repellent ghastlies who are themselves the slicks of vomit, fit only to be ignored.
This might explain Johnson, but it doesn’t explain Blair.
Your Blair analysis is nonsense and the reason the poster backfired was because the electorate knew Blair was not a demon, but a decent man of moral standards who wanted to modernise Labour and to some extent, Britain. He certainly did not get everything right (and I never voted for his party) but he did much better than any of his successors so far.
Fixed it for you.
Seems to be Labour with its shoot-itself-in-the-foot policy again, here. They should withdraw their candidate, and actively support the best ABC candidate (Anything But Conservative), to give the best chance of precipitating a change..
(I lived in Amersham once. It’s nice, but it’s not Yorkshire …. )
The trouble with the left is that each little smithereen of it believes itself to be “the best ABC candidate” and hates all the others. So, other than relying on a fundamental lack of appreciation of the importance of hate to the left, a great suggestion.
True its not Yorkshire or even Derbyshire but has hills and dales and some good local fishing and breweries. Plus they are currently #1 in the Home Counties cricket league, and their Rugby team gave us Josh Lewsey. When HS2 is finished the trains will be quieter than the local moped kids…Its so different to Slough, Guildford, Bromley or other near M25 satelites. I’m sure you agree its got to be Tory win by a country mile with reduced majority to show our contempt for BJ and his covid antics.
Potholes et al are an indication of whether government really gives a S***.
The disaster pf covid-19 has really left many of us deeply disappointed in front line politicians and Ministers.
Pot holes are a matter for your local council. Go report them on the potholes report forms online, then the council are financially liable for damage done thereafter. Seems to sharpen their minds
Amersham is easily explained. HS2. Simples
Plus the loosening of planning policy which is perceived to be very damaging.
Opportunity, doubtless. But voters nationally see unprincipled opportunism in a party whose candidate in Chesham and Amersham opposes HS2 and housebuilding, because that is a vote winner in that constituency,but with the party supporting HS2 in Parliament together with a more liberal immigration policy, immigration being the key driver of population growth which, in turn, is the key driver of housebuilding. Yes, the LibDems are great at winning tactical elections, or where the demographic favours them, namely constituencies with a strong middle class, liberal vote. But if they get into government, then pushmipullyu politics doesn’t make for coherent government.