In response to a comment above, the Jews are indeed smart, productive and creative and have given the West an almost inexhaustible list of brilliant scientists, writers, composers, artists, and so on. They were largely assimilated into Europe and yet were almost wiped out. In the years since, tens of millions of Muslims have been imported into Europe in their place. And what have they given us? Not much, apart from Islam, terrorism, widespread sexual abuse and denigration of women, threats to homosexuals, contempt for our values and way of life, ‘honor’ killings, fixed marriages, FGM, etc. And to think that the Muslim Council of Britain actually announced a few years back that Muslims had no intention of integrating with us because they did not like us or our values.
Hirsi Ali’s incisive article also alludes to something that is not mentioned anywhere near enough, namely the fact that when Mohamed and his band of brigands were a minority, they reassured the Jews of Medina that they would not be harmed, but of course once critical mass had been achieved, the Jews were massacred, with the Prophet himself beheading 100s of them (according to some sources including his own Muslim biographers.). This is the role model Muslims worship and appears to be the template for conquest that many aspire to follow.
The media’s unrelenting focus on far-right anti-Semitism is a smoke-screen and a disgrace given that all the real attacks, including defenestration of little old ladies in Paris and the murders of Jewish school children etc. have been committed by Muslims. A few weeks ago the Muslim murderer of an elderly Jewish woman was acquitted on the grounds that he was rendered irresponsible by his consumption of cannabis, triggering protests already forgotten by the media.
Muslims have been successful in suppressing criticism or deflecting it by focusing on so-called Islamophobia (actually a very rational fear) and perceived micro-aggressions such as ‘staring hatefully at women dressed in the burka etc.” In reality, I think most of us are just astounded that anyone would want to dress like that. If Muslim men find it so difficult to resist the slightest temptation offered by a glimpse of female flesh or hair, perhaps they should be the ones walking around veiled, preferably with a ball and chain attached to the ankle.
This is all part of tried and tested tactics. In reality, Europeans remain highly civilized (supine?) and very few Muslims have been subjected to any violence at all despite the endless list of terrorist attacks on European soil. If the same had occurred in Pakistan, for example, there wouldn’t be a single Christian or European left alive in the whole country. We should have realised the dangers back in 1989 when the riots and book burnings over The Satanic Verses erupted.
As for the Palestinian issue, most “Palestinians” were probably Jews, Christians or pagans before they were converted at the point of a sword way back when. They have been speaking an alien language and living according to the dictates of an imposed religion and culture for many centuries. They were colonized long ago but cannot see it with their own eyes. It is a tragedy indeed that young Palestinian children are killed by Israeli bombs, but the fault lies first with the members of Hamas who fire rockets at Israel’s urban communities on the slightest pretext while hiding among their own civilian communities, knowing full well that this will inflame tensions and stoke further hatred of Israel; and second with all the people who vote for Hamas knowing full well that it is anti-Semitic and desires the destruction of Israel. If far fewer Israelis are killed during these conflicts, it is solely because the Israeli government, unlike Hamas, does all it can to protect its citizens.
It never ceases to amaze me that a country with roughly 6 million inhabitants, not all of them Jews, is portrayed as the oppressor, yet is surrounded by tens of millions of people who have wished to see it destroyed ever since its foundation.
People like Bella Hadid are beyond the pale. Instagram etc. is a cesspit of hatred and bigotry. This whole business sickens me.
“Europeans remain highly civilized (supine?) and very few Muslims have been subjected to any violence at all”
Except, of course, the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the bombing of Libya, the Western-backed war on Yemen, …
Who by the way dislike most of the things the west , especially the arts community do-it has no place in their culture.Strange coincidence that lockdown has hit the arts community , musicals , art galleries , book shops etc hardest and their left wing mayors seem in no hurry to create a tourist friendly enviroment to bring them back .Yet who are the main cheerleaders for Palestine- equity , the actor’s union. Their careers need cities for live performances but they are the ones help turn them into enclaves for newcomers who don’t go in for singing , dancing and twerking.
Easy and predictable response. Few European people (and you know full well that I mean the ‘man in the street’ who exacts no revenge for terrorism atrocities and not our governments) I know of supported wars prosecuted by governments that have long been beyond our control. Mendacious T. Blair should have been tried for war crimes, as well as for treason in lying to his country and leading it into an entirely unnecessary war that has wreaked the most terrible havoc and whose consequences are still unfolding almost twenty years later. Whatever did he mean by 45 minutes, by the way? I never understood it. Did it mean 45 minutes from the moment that Saddam would announce his intention to fire his non-existent WMD at us?
Few ‘men in the street’ supported these wars? Wasn’t Blair voted back into office after invading Afghanistan and Iraq?
As for “Easy and predictable response,” my comment concerned Muslims being subjected to violence by Europeans, which your reply does little to address, beyond asserting the UK is not a democracy and hence its citizens are not responsible for its war crimes.
I can see your point about voting Blair back in, but the country had only got rid of the Tories a few years earlier and no one wanted them back at that point. I really don’t think the war influenced many people when it came to voting, all the more so as many in both major parties voted for it. Leaving that aside, I was quite obviously referring to our own rather calm behaviour regarding the Muslims who live among us, who one could expect to be the targets of reprisals given the terrorist attacks on home soil of recent years (we would definitely not be safe in any of their countries), and not to Muslims in other countries who have been killing each other (and many 1000s of Christians in Nigeria right now, something else the media chooses to ignore) without our help, as well as invading the rest of the known world, over the last fourteen centuries.
It seems to have escaped everyone’s attention that virtually the only colonial power to have retained its major possessions is the Ottoman Empire, but Erdogan is very adept at exploiting European guilt while deflecting criticism of his own country’s actions, like many others at the moment. I am sure you know Constantinople was not always Turkish, and neither was the rest of the country. 1453 is not so long ago, given that Europeans are still castigated for 1492. And let’s not leave out the more recent genocide of Armenian Christians.
This appears more and more like a long struggle between civilizations that began well before the Crusades, though that is always ignored in discussions of the Crusades, and the Muslims have never swallowed the line that we’d reached the end of history. They’re playing a long game and anyone who cannot see that is incurably naive.
You may well have been ‘referring to our own rather calm behaviour regarding the Muslims who live among us,’ but that’s exactly my point in a way – ignore the very real violence European nations inflict on Muslims in order to claim ‘Europeans remain highly civilized.’ Believe them or not, but groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS explicitly linked their attacks in Europe to the invasion of Iraq. We ignore this at our peril.
Right! So the attack on the Two Towers occurred after the war in Iraq, to name but one of many atrocities committed all around the world by Al- Qaeda and other groups, including attacks in a long list of countries that have nothing whatsoever to do with the West’s lunatic excursions into the Middle East. As for ISIS, they’ve killed far more Muslims, Yazidis and other peoples than they have people in the West. Don’t try to link ISIS activities to any form of rational response to the West. Their desired goal, and let’s hope it is unachievable, is to have the entire world living in a Caliphate under Sharia law, and apologists like you won’t be able to save your skins whatever you say to explain away their actions, in the event that such an abomination ever comes to pass.
No one has “ignored” the wars in the Middle East, and you can see from my comments that I am very aware of them, but what exactly would you have me do about them? Instigate a bombing campaign of the Houses of Parliament? Vote Green? Vote for Sadiq Khan? I am utterly powerless, like every other ordinary human being living on this benighted planet. I don’t wish ordinary individual Muslims any harm, but I certainly don’t want them imposing their religion in my country. We spent centuries throwing off the shackles of religion, and now we’re filling our countries with people who would happily impose their twisted religious values on all of us given half a chance.
Neither I nor anyone else has “ignored” those wars, as you well know. What do you require people to do about it? There’s nothing anyone can do, whatever party one votes for. People vote largely on domestic issues in general elections. And yes, stating that ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorism is a result of Western intervention is a form of apologia for or excusing of their actions, which are not focused solely on the West and have been going on in one form or another for a very long time. Our ongoing conversation is pointless as neither one of us will ever agree with the other. I am sure we’ve both got better things to do than while away our time on here, but I’ll leave the last comment to you.
ISIS was funded and armed by Saudi and Qatari money: both allies of the UK and also Israel while we’re at it. Al Qaeda/Nusra were armed and even trained by the CIA in one of the most expensive regime change policies they have ever undertaken. The latter fighters were being patched up in Israeli hospitals and even visited by Netanyahu whilst recovering. Priti Patel was over there trying to foist our tax money on Israel for these highly dubious activities.
The Mancester bomber: a UK “asset” in the destruction of Libya, part of the “Birmingham Brigade” (may have got the name wrong) of jihadis we used to bring down a secular Arab country.
We are DEEPLY enmeshed in this, and have been for decades. To pretend otherwise is stupid.
Hezbollah helped defeat ISIS along with the Russians: the UK and USA did practically nothing in this respect.
To lump all these people together is wrong, and to lump them with the Palestinians – as nearly all posters are doing here – is wrong also. Theirs is a separate struggle to attain freedom in their own homelands. We would and should support them honestly in this struggle for justice, and if our political system were not so corrupted (by many of the above actors), then perhaps we would have done so by now.
The different sides in Syria civil war are very complicated-my enemy’s enemy is my friend-wasn’t that Lawrence of Arabia use of bedouins in WW1? However there seems a newer more fundamentalist version of islam whose members claim brotherhood with others in the world ( rather than main loyalty to a particular country ), so each conflict west gets involved in offends them? Doesn’t this make some of them the enemy within , something our politicians don’t seem to have grasped.
It’s a good point.
Well, there was a good point in there, briefly, About an ancient faith’s great philosophical disputes, its multifaceted modern political reality, and hopefully a brief illumination into the depths of their ignorance.
Too bad you couldn’t stop grinding those axes long enough to actually make it. Might have meshed quite well with the case it seemed like you were going to make for the merits of the Palestinian cause. Before you didn’t.
Just sort of restated the things you believe, (you think the cause just, quelle suprise).
Then whined about those nasty “above actors” (golly, all of em?) who’s bribes are the only reason the course of international politics hasn’t already bent itself to your unerring sense of justice.
Now obviously I disagree with you, but I truly write the following for the sake of those whose cause you’ve taken it upon yourself to champion.
Take up birdwatching or something, the Palestinians have enough problems as it is.
Muslims ,at every level of radicalism and religious feeling are aggrieved not because Western governments deposed Saddam but because they are losing the 1300 hundred years plus war between Islam and the west ( Christendom as was)
It is absurdly naive to think a less interventionist foreign policy is going to assuage that sense of humiliation and victimhood .
Muslims don’t apologise for or feel guilty about the wars of conquest of Mohammed and his followers . On the contrary they are brought up to believe Islamic hegemony is the law of God !
Yes maybe it wasn’t the most diplomatic thing to say ,given the way the Crusades have been portrayed in the west and the Muslim countries , but that’s my point . There is general agreement in the west that the Crusades were a bad thing , whereas the wars of aggression by Islam are excused or ignored in the West and gloried in by contemporary Muslims
However the BAME narrative that all was peace and happiness before bad whites came is not true either is it ? The religion of peace manages to create enough pieces without help from other nations. I also didn’t know there was a UN directive saying western countries must behave ethically while the rest can do what they want? Surely all humans are as good or bad as each other ?
I think it’s rather well known that Al-Qaeda’s biggest attack on the West occurred long before the invasion of Iraq. As for the “western backed war in Yemen,” surely you ought to add the Iranian thugocracy to those backing the Yemen war. In Libya (and Iraq) the goal was to remove brutal dictators, who also inflicted lots of misery on their citizens. As for Afghanistan, the invasion was called for by the 9-11 attacks. And by the way, what’s your point? Is it to support vicious terror attacks on innocent people in the West?
Is it also well known that Al Quaeda was set up by the CIA and Osama Bin Laden was an operative?
How did they know where to bomb those Afghan cave hideouts? Because the CIA built them in the first place.
Slaughter Muslims around the world and then wonder why some go mad and try to kill you. Cause and effect.
Yemen has been under air and sea blockade since the war began. While Iran sides with Ansar Allah, it’s very hard to imagine significant amounts of weaponry getting through. The US, UK and France, on the other hand, are known – known, not suspected – to have supplied billions of dollars worth of arms, as well as assisting with training, maintenance, targetting, surveillance and intelligence.
Why is it so hard to imagine significant amounts of weaponry getting through to Yemen, which is fairly close to iran, when thousands of Iranian rockets managed to get into Gaza, which is far away and blockaded. And who do you think arms Hezbollah?
Who says the Gazan rockets came from Iran? Not even the Israelis claim that. They and the Palestinians say they’re made in Gaza, which is why they’re fairly crude, often lacking a warhead.
Yes, create an environment of hated of followers of a religion! My, how history repeats itself, and the rest as they say is lies, propaganda and injustice.
The religion hated today is Islam and the poor Palestinians die and suffer because most of them are Muslim, because of it.
The Palestinian Christians are just collateral damage in the carnage because their existence challenges the narrative that, this is not a colonial war by an apartheid regime which occupies and colonises Palestine, but a new crusade against 6 million men, women and children, who, even under Israeli military rule, present a threat to humanity and the entire planet because of their religion.
Where did we hear that before and where did it take us?
At least 20 percent of Israeli citizens are Arab, most of them Muslim. Many of them serve (voluntarily) in the Israeli military. So if Israel is trying to convince the world that they’e out to get Muslims, they’re not doing a very good job of it.
Yes, of course, ignore the fact that Israel controls all the Palestinians in historic Palestine, but only accords civil rights to a small number of them. That way you can pretend that all is fine and dandy. Meanwhile, HRW, Bt’selem and the UN, and all the South African veterans consider that it IS Apartheid.
A bit childish . So Israelis more than anyone else should be able to recognise murderous antisemitism when they see it is an obvious response .
Both claims ignore the possibilities that negative historical experience can induce paranoia and cloud judgement
Also implied is the connection between supposed oppression and personal probity . Yes let’s all bow down before Mugabe and Winnie ‘necklaces ‘ Mandela
Might be wise to remain silent until you’re as well educated in these matters as Andrew.
You really do sound a bit naive.
I understand what you mean by ‘invasions’. When USA and certain European countries ‘invade’ it’s always been decided beforehand with the shadowy powers that rule the country that’s to be ‘invaded’ for…whatever reason. Mineral resources. Regime changes. Power shifts.
I don’t really understand your point. You seem to agree the invasion of Iraq was just that, an invasion, and what’s more carried out by countries that are not democracies, and for reasons entirely different to those they proclaimed. Why on earth would blowback not be expected? Various Western intelligence agencies and analysts predicted it.
Good post. My family are Greek and there is still the race memory of 400 years of Ottoman oppression, plus the constant threats by Ergogan to Greek and Cypriot territorial integrity today. It never ends and casts a shadow over Greece, as well as the Balkans.
Blair, Bush & the Australian PM John Howard were all voted back in after those lie engendered wars.
Only the voters of Spain threw out the party supporting them.
I’m fine with backing out of those nations entirely. Will that stop the violence? The leading killer of Muslims is other Muslims, over differences like Sunni vs Shia. The Saudis and Iranians hate each other, to the point where the Saudis will make common cause with the Israelis.
Easy line of course, but the same idiot line could be levelled against Christians in the last century (big time!), and where exactly does it get us? Nowhere.
You might be on to something. The most persecuted people on Earth are Christians. Perhaps we need to rediscover our Judaeo-Christian heritage and wage holy war on all those who persecute us?
Religions do tend to stick together. Judaism is quick to take any attack on Jews as an attack on all followers so it is not surprising Muslims do the same.
It is perhaps less common with Christians because the religion has evolved much more and is more enlightened than the others, which remain powerfully tribal in nature.
Way to unflatteringly compare two major world relgions with Christianity.
And Christianity arose from Judaism, so presumably would have retained at least some of its “tribal” characteristics.
Islam, however, is by far the most revenge-obsessed and aggressively expansionist of these three religions. Obviously that’s not saying that all or even most individual Muslims are like this. But as a religion, it is what it is. Its name doesn’t mean “peace”, it means “submission”.
Well, by that argument, I might ask you whether you expect Europeans to ‘ignore’ the violence and provocations committed on actual European soil. And of course, by and large they do, which proves my original point. Alternatively, should the Israelis just ignore Hamas missiles? Furthermore, no one is comfortable with it, as I have already said, but you have failed repeatedly to give any answer as to what we should actually do about it.
It wasn’t an argument about historical acts of invasion etc., because that could lead us back to any number of invasions and colonisations throughout the turbulent history of European-Middle Eastern relations. And of course many people appear to see history as starting only very recently, rather than, for example, 1400 years ago, with the invasion of much of the known world by Islam, the source of many current problems. Prior to that of course, the Persians invaded Greece among other places, and were paid back in kind by Alexander. We could go on forever with this line of thinking, but it wasn’t my point, which you subverted with your false explanation of Islamic(ISIS etc) violence in Europe and elsewhere.
Good post. The eruption of Islam onto the world stage and its rapid and violent conquest of settled and civilized peoples was the most catastrophic series of events in history.
Israel’s regular destruction of civilan buildings in Gaza has nothing to do with religion. It is all about asserting dominance and quelling resistance to the continuing occupation and land theft. Hamas rockets are their only means of resistance.
Hardly any of the Muslims we have in the UK (and I would agree, we have taken too many) are Palestinians, but communities feel touched, just as the Jewish community in the UK would feel touched if the UK were to put pressure on Israel.
Exactly, we don’t do indiscriminate reprisals on British Muslims, we attack Islamic terrorism at its source. Unfortunately we so fall over backwards to let Muslims know we’re not against them we sometimes fight *on behalf* of Islamic terrorists such as in Libya and Syria. The most radical Muslims in the West are the youngest and we’ve got a demographic timebomb ticking and many anti-West western anti-Semites who think they can harness it to serve their ends.
The opening sentence about the wealth of benefits that the Jews have given to the West offers the clearest hint as to why anti-Semitism has become so widespread. Jews have become assimilated into the cultural, scientific and social framework of our society and they did so by seeing no contradiction between following their faith and accepting the status quo. This has proved hugely rewarding for all concerned, but it has resulted in their being viewed as part of the establishment and therefore qualifying as legitimate targets for the rabble of influencers and discontents who have annexed social media.
Of course the anti’s claim they aren’t against people personally but their ancestoral country ( strangely don’t seem so bothered about ‘bad’ behaviour in other countries) -though if Europeans had to seek sanctuary in the middle east that is the only country most people would find tolerable to live in -as human rights especially towards women isn’t great in rest of that region.
Is it not racist to ascribe to followers of any group, including a religion, greater intelligence and ability? All religions have contributed mightily to the development of our modern world and that includes Judaism.
However, if we are to resort to such comparisons, historically their ‘gifts’ are less than Islam has given the world, and much less than Christianity.
But does it matter what members of this or that religion achieve? And is any achievement an excuse for behaviour?
Not according to just principles which all religions would support. The key issue is the injustice wrought against Palestine, which the writer wishes to pretend is sourced in the threat of Islam. The achievements of Jews is irrelevant in that context.
It might or might not be racist to ascribe to followers of any group, including a religion, greater intelligence and ability. But that wasn’t the issue and was not what I was doing. I simply stated that the Jews are smart, productive and creative and have given the West an almost inexhaustible list of brilliant scientists, writers, composers, artists, etc. If you think that Islam has made an equal contribution to the West, particularly in the modern era, then you are deluded. And I might add that whatever gifts the European Jews have given the world, they didn’t do it by invading first.
But you are not alone in such a delusion. The object of Islamic Studies departments and numerous scholars and writers around the world is to flog us the idea that Islam has been nothing but beneficial to all the countries it has invaded since the death of the Prophet in 632 until we all accept it, because perhaps then we will accept more readily their religion of peace and tolerance when they are once again in a position to impose it. And I say all that as someone who has visited mosques and has an appreciation for Islamic art among other things.
The entire Islamic world consists of countries that were invaded, colonized, and converted by Arabs, and they are still under the thumb. Curious that we never discuss that. Ask ordinary Iranians what they really believe and which festivals they prefer when the big brother theocracy isn’t on their backs and they’ll tell you – their own native religion of Zoroastrianism and the Festival of Fire. Only 5-10% of them even go to the mosque, according to some counts, which is a source of great displeasure for the zealots.
I have taught many Iranians, some of them Christian converts who can never return to their home country. . All of them were immensely proud of their wonderful ancient Persian civilization. Not one of them liked Islam or the Islamic Republic.
I have known and worked with Iranians in the past and heard similar stories. Likewise for my father, who had Iranian colleagues when he was working in Kuwait back in the 1970s. I remember one of them, a nice chap named Baram, who later moved to the UK. He was very proud of his Persian origins and would get very indignant if anyone suggested that Iranians were Arabs. Persian civilization is fascinating. I think it was in an excellent book by Michael Axworthy titled Iran: Empire of the Mind, which I read about 12 years ago, that I read that only 5-10% of Iranians go to the mosque.
There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the world and Muslims have won, as a proportion, 1.4% of the Nobel prizes.
There are around 13 million Jews in the world and Jews have won, as a proportion, 20% of the Nobel prizes.
A bit of a difference, don’t you think?
Going back in time, the Muslim world adopted the printing press in 1725. The Christian and Jewish world had been using it since its invention in 1440.
Going back further still, the “zero” which Islam claims to have invented came from Hindu India.
I won’t delve into the ancient Greeks, Romans and Persians, etc. because almost all civilizations have stood on the shoulders of these giants for the furthering of knowledge.
Cherry-picking much? Cambridge Uni alone has won more than a whole host of countries combined.
Where 99% of Nobels are won is USA/Europe, the most advanced and wealthy countries, like Norway itself.
Thank you for your series of ripostes to Athena Jones. You’ve saved others the trouble. Some commenters are irredeemable. No knowledge of history or the much bigger picture, just a half-crazed, inarticulate and unrelenting focus on one group of people at one point in time and their supposed status as the victims in all this.
More people ought to be aware of such matters as how, for example, the PLO ruthlessly took the Lebanon as the base of its activities back in the 1970s and 80s and brought about the destruction of that beautiful country. The Jordanians had more sense than to let the Palestinians abuse them in the same way, even though that country has a large Palestinian population.
I don’t think Jews are necessarily more intelligent than anyone else, in the sense of some innate inherited biological quality, but they do seem to have a culture that emphasises learning, and they are over-represented among leading scientists and cultural figures (20% of Nobel prizes have gone to Jews). I agree with Andrew there. Which in no way excuses Israel’s actions against Palestinians. On that, I fully agree with you.
Excellent article and excellent comment by Andrew.
I do wonder when we might see a tear shed by our “progressive” community, for the 1000’s of Palestinians killed in Syria by fellow muslims – just a recent example of how they are treated in the region, and not bey Israelis and/or jews. My guess is – for the most part – those deaths just don’t resonate for those who want us to believe they genuinely care for the hapless of Gaza.
Keeping in mind that a) numbers of civilians/kids killed by Israel is always inflated by the ‘Gaza Health Ministry (aka Hamas)’, and b) some of the fatalities were by Hamas bombs, a significant percentage of which fell within Gaza.
I’d like to learn more about the convicted murderer allowed to go free.
As you might discern from my other Comment here, I’m trying to form an honest opinion on the conflict as it now stands.
I came to this article again as a friend told me how many comments I’d had, so I am surprised to find that anyone is still reading this six days later.
In response to your comment, I would say that this forum is not really a good place to form an opinion about such a complex issue. All you can really do is read reliable sources as much as possible, and dig into the history as far back as you can, and then draw your own conclusions. Really, it is far too serious and contentious an issue to come online and read other people’s heated comments, including my own, and then form an opinion. And whatever opinion you do ultimately form, it will be nothing more than a talking point concerning a subject that is perhaps best left unaddressed by people who can bring no solutions to the table or do anything else about it.
As regards my own opinion, however well or badly it may be expressed, and however much I may have read around these matters, it is merely that. An opinion that has no influence on events. I would only add that the general tenor of my contributions to this article is that Muslim conquest is at the root of this problem (and many other problems around the world today). For example, if they had never invaded and imposed their religion on a large part of the known world, most Palestinians today might still either be Jewish or Christian, or – much less likely – pagan, or perhaps simply free to choose their own beliefs, and hence this particular problem would not exist. This evidently reflects my own dark view of the growth of a fanatical, repressive Islam in Europe, a development I do not welcome, and which should be of far more concern to Europeans than what is happening in Palestine, although there are links between all these issues. But obviously, many people these days prefer not to look too far back into the past, except where it concerns the iniquities of European colonialism, of course.
The article itself is about the resurgence of antisemitism in Europe, which has little to do with Palestine (or the far right) and lots to do with the increasing number of antisemitic Muslims coming into Europe, many of them incapable of contributing to our societies given the high rates of unemployment and increasing automation and their own antipathy towards the West and the western way of life.
So, as regards the case of the Muslim man who threw an old Jewish lady from the balcony of her flat, it occurred about two years ago, while his trial took place only recently. He was acquitted on the grounds that his excessive consumption of cannabis had rendered him paranoid and psychotic and thus irresponsible for his acts. He is currently undergoing psychiatric observation. Of course, he already had quite a few convictions for previous crimes to his name. All this led to a few demonstrations and gatherings in several cities in France, but it has all been quickly forgotten by the media.
Here is a link to the case on the French Wikipedia site, which I imagine you can convert to English: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Sarah_Halimi
It is not the only case of its kind, and of course there is widespread fear among the French Jewish community these days.
I hope my reply is of some help to you.
In the U.S. the Interfaith Councils are lergely a front for militant Islam.
JP Martin
2 years ago
This piece hit me hard because, working in higher education, I am surrounded by so many loud and proud antisemites (including an alarming proportion of visible minorities). Opinions that were once shameful are now fashionable. I have heard casual comments from ‘reputable scholars’ that would make Goebbels blush. My fear is that we no longer have the tools to fight back against this pernicious brand of hatred. We are in an age of ignorance, immorality, and fanaticism.
My colleagues are clever. They know the rules and they know how power operates within the university. They are very skilled at walking the razor’s edge – some of them seem to really enjoy it – and they know when they can do what they want because someone else isn’t in a position to challenge them.
It’s not usually that clear cut. Mostly they repeat antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories. As an example, when a colleague mentioned he was attending a conference in Israel another replied that the Zionists must be paying him a lot. Just this week a colleague posted on social media that she didn’t care how many Israelis get bombed to death by Hamas. The same colleague has a habit of saying that the Holocaust was not a unique historic event and is given too much importance.
She risks nothing at all, hers is the allowed view , when people complained about Oxbridge lecturer the college supported her.. An old lady who suffered in one of the camps in WW11 has put her experiences online as an educational tool-she has suffered vile abuse. The BBC employs people who think this behaviour is acceptable.
They only seem interested in appealing to people who are part of their group ( who probably have dinner parties & don’t watch television anyway). The average person who would think ‘you can write/say that’ is just totally ignored.
I’m still looking for the quote that would make Goebbels blush. This is the closest, and it’s deeply disturbing.
“a colleague posted on social media that she didn’t care how many Israelis get bombed to death by Hamas”
But not quite in Goebbels’ league. Depends on the context, I guess – if she said something like “I don’t care how many, it’s still not as many as the number of Palestinians the Israelis bombed to death” then it’s rather less disturbing – or perhaps disturbing on a different level.
Referring to Israeli conference organisers as Zionists, while a strong signal that antisemitism may be at work, is not remotely in Goebels’ league.
As for “Holocaust was not a unique historic event” – it’s far from the only historical genocide (or the largest), though in 20th Century Western “civilisation” it may well be – and as such, it used the industrial scale methods available to our civilisation. Not a Goebbels level claim, however. Not even a David Icke.
As for its being “given too much importance” – we should not forget or repeat it – but nor should we forget or ignore genocides and wide-scale slaughter such as happened in Rwanda and Burundi in recent years, or the 20th Century mass slaughter (admittedly less ethnically motivated) in Cambodia or the Soviet Union, or the genocide of around one million Armenians in Anatolia earlier that century, or the current treatment of the Rohingya (or the Karen) in Myanmar, or the Uighur in China. I have spoken to people from other ethnic groups who consider the fixation on the Holocaust as being very Eurocentric. I believe it is quite in order to remember horrors recently perpetrated on our continent – but we must not negate other mass slaughters, or miss the lessons they have for us.
Nobody serious in the Jewish community or in the holocaust-commemorating community discounts the other genocides that have taken place in the 20th century (and now in the 21st). That being said, it is precisely the “Industrial scale methods” — as well as the intense racial aspect, down to the 1/4 Jewish level — that make the holocaust distinct from other genocides, not its “eurocentredness”.
If you believe that cheering for the deaths of Israeli civilians is “supporting Palestinians in their struggle”, then I can see why you find yourself disagreeing with many on here.
You’re wasting your time. Paul Wright is someone who think philo-semites (i.e. people here on UnHerd, including myself, who have simply expressed their appreciation for Jews’ contribution to our civilization.) are as creepy as anti-semites. Like many, he has forgotten that this article is about a ‘resurgence’ of antisemitism on European soil, which has little if anything to do with the Palestine question and everything to do with the age-old Muslim hatred of Jews. As a result, many European Jews, including those in France and England, are packing their bags and leaving, while of course more and more Muslims are arriving. That is a tragedy, but he doesn’t care. Like many he uses the Palestinian issue as a screen for his own antisemitism,and in that respect resembles Hamas when they hide behind their own citizens to fire rockets at the hated enemy.
In response to the ‘charge’ of philo-semitism, I can only say that I was actually unaware of the Jewishness of great artists like Kafka, Mahler (a convert anyway) and many others, including Bob Dylan of all people, when I was first moved by their works. I certainly have no desire to be a jew, a phenomenon addressed in Howard Jacobson’sThe Finkler Question.
I have heard casual comments from ‘reputable scholars’ that would make Goebbels blush.
Could you tell us what they said roughly? Are you meaning that reputable scholars in UK universities recommended genocide? (It is hard to think what would make Goebbels blush other than something like that.)
I’m in Higher Education too, and experience the same, particularly in fields that are non-scientific. One professor at my college committed suicide recently. Instead of grief at his passing, there was joy at his death because he was considered ‘right-wing’. I was quite taken aback by the level of hatred I was witnessing, particularly in light of the fact it was coming from a group of people who pride themselves on their care and compassion.
That is so upsetting and I believe it could happen where I work too. If ever someone exhibits the slightest evidence of political independence, the whispering campaigns start.
Colleges seem to be a lost cause. The only thing is to defund all but the main courses, but political weakness (as this would raise unemployment figures) won’t allow this. Students who don’t fit in with this ethos are better off taking a degree on-line.
The ‘opposition’ will have to organise themselves. Famous academics who have been cancelled could give on-line courses and tuition , but the students,after completing their degrees, would then need to seek work in a like-minded enviroment .In America certain states seem to be dividing up as red or blue-thats not so easy in our small country whose central control all seem to lean towards the left. Perhaps move to another country?
Some people have been taking their medical degrees in eastern european countries-mainly because its cheaper. That part of the world seems to value the traditional , so if you want to study an actual subject ie music that might be the place to go.
Unherd is running an interview with a father who has taken his daughter out of school & is considering setting up his own school.As the university system has all the aspects he dislikes in her school education , he will then have to consider where she takes her degree.
Our democracy is being hollowed out from within. We elect ‘conservative’ governments that are in office but not in power as they’re more afraid of these political psychopaths that run the institutions than anyone. The centre has not held.
JP Martin (and other readers) – just to say I asked a question to you but it is being held up for approval.
My question is similar to another, so you have already answered it.
By the time it gets through moderation, I will look like a clown who cannot be bothered reading other comments!
Annoying!
Last edited 2 years ago by George Bruce
Fraser Bailey
2 years ago
Yes, it is all utterly terrifying and has been happening for some years now. Jews everywhere are under attack from the far-Right, pretty much all of the Left, and of course your old friends the muslims, of whom there are now tens of millions throughout the West, and whose long-term play for global domination is going very well indeed.
Of course, one can understand why the Left and the muslims hate Jews. The Jews are astonishingly smart, productive and useful people. In other words, everything that the Left and the muslims are not. These people will always hate Jews and there is nothing you can do about that.
As such, it is the failure of the knuckeheads on the far-Right to overcome their anti-Jewishness that most distresses me because it undermines their (sometimes) valid points around immigration and various other subjects. They should be encouraging Jews to bring their productivity and intelligence to their countries and societies, because those countries and societies will be so much stronger and better for that productivity and those societies.
Utter nonsense, or are you being sarcastic? Islam did not even exist in the Dark Ages, if by that that you mean from the time the Romans left Britain to about the eighth century, during which time monks all over Europe were busy preserving knowledge. All the scribes and scholars who saved the classical texts in the Muslim world were Jewish and Christian anyway, but it was the Muslim invasion of Constantinople in the mid-15th century that caused thousands of scholars to flee to Italy, taking with them their copies of the classical texts, and inadvertently kick-starting the Renaissance.
You don’t need to erase history to make your points. Islam is widely regarded by historians as having transferred the knowledge of ancient Europe and Asia (including our numbering system, which originated in India) to the Europeans of the middle ages. there’s no need to denigrate what Islam did in the 9th-12th century in order to critique what Islam has become today; the Islamists’ actions and words certainly provide all the ammunition.
I am not erasing history. I responded to the previous comment, which claimed that Islam saved “us” during the Dark Ages. It did not, as it did not exist at that time, and did not arrive in Europe (Spain) until roughly 730, on the point of a sword, whereupon the emerging Spanish civilization was erased for seven centuries. The rest of my points are valid, and I was not denying the contribution of Islam in diverse areas including mathematics. That was scarcely the point of my response. But I suppose you’ve swallowed the kool aid of Islamic studies departments around the world and believe El Andalus was a was a golden age of scientific ingenuity and tolerance. Well, there are plenty of sources that prove otherwise, including many Muslim ones. It’s odd how centuries of Islamic imperialism get wholly ignored at a time when there is so much focus on European imperialism, is it not?
El Andaluz, while it was ruled by the Ummayads, WAS a RELATIVE haven of tolerance and ingenuity, certainly compared to what was going on in Christian Europe at that time. All that ended after the Almoravid invasion, but again, ignoring history to score points in the present isn’t particularly edifying. As for “supposing” what I believe or don’t believe, you do know what happens when you ASSUME, right?
Point scoring is exactly what you are doing. All of the Islamic houses were invading powers and colonizers. The period that is widely held up as some sort of beacon of tolerance, and of which I am very well aware, was very short-lived anyway. The notion that it was a relative haven is contestable; It was still an oppressive colonial power in which Spaniards were third-rate citizens who paid the jizra, among other less benign things. The idea that it was tolerant is being swallowed wholesale in Europe and elsewhere. I remember in Paxman’s series Empire that at some point he asks an old Egyptian (I think) man what he thought of the British, clearly hoping to wheedle out of him a response to the effect that they been at least in some respects a force for the good, to which the man sagely and tersely replied that the British did not belong there, end of story. The fact that the period of tolerance did not last long is the lesson to take home with us.
Ah bless you, you patronizing person! John Gribbin, in his marvellous book Science: A History uses 1453 as a handy starting date for the revival of Western Europe (and he’s not alone in that view), though of course many Greek-speaking scholars who had seen which way the wind was blowing had obviously stared fleeing to Italy before then, and plenty of other developments had been going on in Europe for centuries as I have pointed out in other comments here. Do I really have to try to explain the whole complex history just to avoid your kind of ignorant patronizing comment.
Is this part of the new re-writing? There used to be a comedy show ‘Goodness , Gracious , Me’ where the old man claimed anyone or anything , Shakespeare , railways etc was invented by India.
I agree wholeheartedly that islam is problematic, but you have lost me with “Arabs are hardly useless people.” I am sure you had something in mind, so perhaps you could explain.
No, I’m genuinely confused by your comment. When I think of, for example, Jewish people, I see that they (in the 21st century) are very prominent in law, medicine, science, music (to name but a few) but when I think of arab nations the only thing that springs to mind is oil – and they neither developed, discovered nor exploited that. I am sure they as a group cannot be not useless (few human beings are, and probably fewer ethnicities – though quite what ‘useful’ is in that context is difficult to define) and but your description of ‘hardly useless’ implies some talents or abilities beyond the norm.
Of course, if we reduce the ‘useful’ criterion to “What do they do?” There are any number of peoples where the answer is “not a lot” – Zulus? Australian aboriginal peoples? Native Americans? Inuit? Oddly enough, even though I cannot define what they “do” I regard all these groups with some admiration and even affection (hopefully not in a patronising way, though I appreciate that is a risk.) The world would be a poorer place without them.
Well I didn’t intend to imply they have talents beyond the norm, just as you have acknowledged that as a group they are not useless. The original post implied Jews are an inherently useful people whereas Muslims are useless which I don’t think is true at all.
You are of course correct that certain groups have contributed little to the development of civilization but it is my understanding that this correlates highly with the resources which were available in the region of the world in which they evolved.
I don’t want to labour the point, but the original post talked about muslims, and your response was that Arabs are ‘hardly useless people”. These are two different groups : not all Arabs are muslim, not all muslims are Arabs. Again, the original comment said that ” The Jews are astonishingly smart, productive and useful people.” I take it that you have no quibble with that observation, even if you disagree that “this is everything that the Left and the muslims are not.”
Interesting and thought-provoking post. Should we value people in terms of what they “do” (e.g. the UK. for the industrial revolution, the Greeks for almost every intellectual innovation in the ancient world) and what they contribute to the development of civilization, thereby instrumentalizing them, or should we value them just for what they are? Australian Aborigines are adept at living in a dry and relatvely waterless environment and would still have done very well without the arrival of Europeans, and high but isolated civilizations like the Incas might have continued if the conquistadors had not turned up. We have to be careful with the latter, though, because the Mayan civilzation imploded and collapsed through self-inflicted ecocide (a lesson for us!), long before the arrival of Europeans..
Agreed. I find it very difficult to understand people like Bernie Sanders in the U.S.A. Self-hating Jews are as much an enemy of civilization as Islam is.
My comment that you replied to is now ‘awaiting’ days after going through ok , so it seems some people actually go through comments manually & stop anything they don’t like.Strange how all this censorship has emerged with covid-sensitive little virus isn’t it?
If you genuinely believe that people only disagree with you because they are weakminded or evil, then there is no hope that you will be able to understand or engage with your “opponents”. So what are you doing? Virtue signalling?
Philo-semites are almost as creepy as antis. As anyone reading this thread would see. The author attracts these people in spades.
Vivek Rajkhowa
2 years ago
And of course whenever politicians call out anti semitism they have ro call out non existent islamophobia , so they don’t lose their base of support. Pathetic.
It’s also very disingenuous. The same people who had neuralgic reactions whenever anyone dared say ‘all lives matter’ during the BLM protests are now telling us that ‘all hate matters’. Why does it pain them so much to admit the existence of antisemitism? The answer is fairly obvious.
Islamophobia is a thing, you’ve just revealed it by denying it. Similar to the worst anti-semitism, always denied to exist by the most rabid anti-semites.
Anti-Muslim prejudice surely exists. Islamophobia is a made up term that means little, as “fear of Islam” — which is how islamophobia is defined — is a legitimate fear of Islamism, a political doctrine that supports jihad and is being weaponized to defeat Israel and undermine the West.
Islam is not the same as Islamism. Many Muslims have no time for the latter, but could hardly be called Islamophobic.
George Bruce
2 years ago
The resurgence of anti-Semitism Europe, in many ways, is unsurprising; it has been simmering under the surface for over a decade.
I do not like this sentence, which I will put down to carelessness. The word resurgence gives the impression – one that the mass media does its best to promote – that it is the same people as in the 1930s – Europeans de souche – who are the anti-semites in Europe, whereas anyone who is really watching knows it would be 80% or 90% or more, recent immigrants, particularly of the ROP persuasion, and their offspring.
Carelessness, perhaps, but I believe the author truly understands the nature of the problem. With that said, ‘resurgence’ also implies that it went away at some point. The facts support your comments but, in my own life, I have witnessed more of the leftwing variety. Neither group has managed to corner the market and they seem quite happy to share it.
Tom Lehrer had a satirical song called “Prejudice” many years ago, though I haven’t been able to find it on the internet for years now. Briefly, it was about whilte, black, , brown and yellow people hating each other , ending with “Andeverybody hates the Jews!”
Sadly, that seems to be increasingly true…
Its odd coincidence that Max Mosley , son of Oswold has just died. The media seem to want to suggest the entire British aristocracy supported him in the 1930’s wheras the Mitfords were a very unusual family and P G Wodehouse would not have dared mock the movement in the character of Roderick Spode if it were so popular.
We knew someone who was a social worker /home help & one of his old ladies recalled an incident in the 1930’s where Mosley’s lot marched through their streets. The j lads came with their cricket bats & they chased mosley’s lot away-much to the amusement of the people who lived there. Both Waugh & Churchill campaigned to help Wodehouse , but was not to be until 1970’s-it was a complete discrace considering what he & his wife went through
You think that a high percentage of Muslim immigrants in the UK are Palestinian ?
John Lewis
2 years ago
Don’t forget the huge contribution of “The Squad” whose relentless anti-Semitic narrative goes unchallenged by their party leadership and the US media. Their words and the taciturn acceptance if not outright encouragement reverberate around the whole world.
Also never forget that over 90% of UN resolutions condemning individual countries are gleefully passed against Israel.
They have condemned anti-Semitism. I’m not sure their criticism of the Israeli human rights record (whether you agree or not) constitutes anti-Semitism.
You have a point on the UN though.
their “critiques” of anti-semitism ring hollow; they support BDS but no similar measures against other countries, — that’s double standard. they call Israel and only Israel “nazi” and “apartheid” — that’s demonization. They say Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea” — that’s delegitimization. Anti-semitism through and through.
How about the human rights records of islamic countries? Do they allow Jews, Christians or other non-Muslims to live in their countries?
Why should Jews not have their own ancestral land of Israel? It isn’t as if they have laid a claim to any other country.
It is as if the 2000 Camp David negotiations never happened. Except that they did. The Palestinians were offered their own state three times. Once at Camp David, six months later at the Taba Conference and later in the 2007 Olmert offer. The Palestinians did not say ‘ok but” or ‘that’s a good start” or “we accept subject to revision”. They said no. That’s where we are now.
Camp David was rejected by both sides. Taba was rejected by Ariel Sharon, not the Palestinians. Olmert was rejected by the EU and many others as inadequate. Israel has never offered a coherent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital and close to 1967 boundaries. The Arab world has offered that. Israel’s rejection is the problem.
The Arab world never offered anything without the stipulation of “right of return”. That’s why no peace agreement has ever been reached, because there’s no way Israel would ever be OK with that. It’s a far more deal-breaking issue than East Jerusalem being the Palestinian “capital”.
Yes, right of return is a difficulty, but most think a compromise is possible: a few return and the rest get compensation. Try offering it. But clearly East Jerusalem and nearly all of 67 borders is essential. A Bantustan is not remotely sustainable.
The border is your classic ‘wicked’ problem. There are 3 options out the current impasse:
A – Israel cedes the entire WB.
B – Israel cedes the WB minus the border areas.
C – Israel cedes WB but retains military control of Jordan river.
Israel has a strategic need to control the Jordan river – it is ‘vital ground’ in military terms. They don’t trust the Palestinians not to let hostile enemies into the WB, therefore ‘A’ is untenable.
B & C look, with justification, like a Bantustan.
Short of a credible (ie. US/UK) international monitoring force on the border, I don’t see a way out.
People are uninterested in facts on this thread. It’s comic given that Unherd is supposed to cater for slightly brainier people than the Daily Heil, but there we go.
jamie.shotter
2 years ago
Brilliant and incisive.
Paula Jones
2 years ago
“one of the West’s most famous celebrities”
Really? I had no idea who she was. I really must get out more – or, then again, maybe not.
Perhaps it is just a product of time and advancing curmudgeonness but I have learned just how unimportant celebrities are.
Bronwen Saunders
2 years ago
Whenever I get drawn into a discussion of the Israel-Palestine conflict, I generally find it helpful to ask those who champion the Palestinian cause about all the other populations that were expelled and/or displaced at around the same time. Among them were the millions of Muslims who were forced out of India and had to settle in Pakistan, for example, or the Hindus and Sikhs who moved in the opposite direction, or the hundreds of thousands of Germans who having been thrown out of Czechoslovakia and Eastern Prussia had to start again from scratch, or the 800,000 Sephardi Jews driven out of Arab countries, or, a couple of decades later, the Asians thrown out of Uganda. What is so tragic about the Palestinians? Why does the clock have to be turned back to accommodate them, and not, say, the Sephardi Jews or the Ugandan Asians? Or, to put it another way, why have the Czechs, the Russians, the Pakistanis, the Indians, the Greeks, the Turks and the Ugandans – among many others – been forgiven for having rid themselves of an unwanted ethnic group in their midst, while the Israelis have not? Could it be because the Israelis are Jewish?
Could be. Or it could be because the Israelis wouldn’t last three days without the billions of dollars per year the Americans are pumping in to keep them afloat. I don’t think those other countries did what they did on welfare payments from the west.
Israel gets from the US 3 Milliard $ a year as credit to buy American arms with. Israel’s yearly budget is 300 milliard $.
I wouldn’t call 1% of the budget, all of which to be spent on US arms, “keeping them afloat”.
Best example is Armenians from a number of Ottoman places, accompanied by a million strong genocide – but they get no coverage.
Matthew Freedman
2 years ago
It’s all pretty scary. Basically the antizionist far-left is saying that I as a British citizen should be bullied, discriminated against and harassed to put pressure on Israel to stop existing. Has any of these people come with a plan for coexistence.
No one says that even remotely. In what way are you discriminated against? In your work? Housing? Have you been deported like the Windrush people?
Walter Lantz
2 years ago
I agree that the extent to which the willfully naïve or intellectually stunted buy in to anti-Semitic social media garbage is pathetic but I just assume it’s the same crowd that looks to Gwyneth Paltrow for the latest animal/vegetable/mineral cure-all that can be inserted in the old woohoo.
To me what is worse is how our institutions are either actively contributing or quietly abetting the direct indoctrination of children.
This item from a Toronto newspaper last week “An educator with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) is under investigation after he allegedly sent a virulently anti-Israel manual out to teachers that suggests a documentary and a book about a terrorist, recommends children’s books that characterize Israelis as thieves and murderers, and gives advice on how to teach students about the hateful Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel” The distributor of the pamphlet identifies as “queer latine transformer”
His/theys/its job at the school board? “part of the Board’s Gender-based Violence unit, whose core function, according to TDSB online materials, is to prevent and address “gender-based violence, homophobia, sexual harassment, and inappropriate sexual behaviour by students towards other students in schools.”
It’s bad out there.
Real bad.
However it is this educator & his like who get on council boards & arrange for towns & cities to take in the most anti-social , anti-western groups, which unsurprisingly dis-stabalizes areas. People move out and the newcomers cost a lot in benefits but always vote in the ‘right’ people. Job done as far as educator is concerned. Where does he & his family live-somewhere nice & expensive & gated,
Yes, it’s extrordinary how many people are out there who are rabidly anti-Israel – as in, against its very existence – yet insist that they have nothing against Jewish people. In what universe does that make sense?
A lot of people just go with the flow. To try to retain self esteem they convince themselves they believe what they do through morality, not fear.
The BBC’s drip fed anti-Semitic coverage of Israel is the single biggest factor for the growth in anti-Semitism in Britain. It’s what happens when an institution is captured by the anti-west left.
If its existence requires brutal occupation, Apartheid, and regularly bombing its neighbours, then yes, there’s something fundamentally wrong with that.
It’s a curious thing – Corbyn may have seemed like an outlier for being so open about his view toward Jews, but he is closer to the rule than the exception. As events in the US and abroad have shown, and as multiple Dems in Congress and their media acolytes have parroted, anti-Semitism is very much in vogue on the left. What few “moderate” Dems may exist are petrified to say anything for fear of facing a primary challenge, which is not exactly a profile in courage.
Kremlington Swan
2 years ago
Sometimes I think the best thing to do would be to find a secluded spot on this earth and wait for the sh)t to hit the fan.
As far as I can tell the world is becoming madder. Some day, hopefully after I have died, a humanity splintered into fragments is going to indulge in an orgy of violence which has no precedent in our history.
Reason, or thinking, seems to be in retreat everywhere, while wild emotion seems to be in the ascendancy. It may even be that people are becoming less human and more like animals. If that is unfair to animals, then maybe more like demons, or devils.
Perhaps we are being diverted away from the goal of the Kingdom of Heaven on earth, and toward the creation of Hell on Earth. It certainly sometimes looks that way to me.
I wish I could recommend your post several times over.
G Harris
2 years ago
Simplistic, but when I was a kid, I was taught and learnt that two wrongs don’t ever make a right.
True then, true now.
This sort of behaviour is never, ever excusable but it is all but inevitable, whatever anyone likes to imagine.
The long running sore of the Palestinian Question, whether we like it or not, is at the heart of this and is consistently hijacked and name checked as the ‘justification’ for these unspeakable acts of hate and division across the world.
Whether you personally believe that some of these misguided people who do so are ‘ill-informed’ and ‘under-educated’ like Ali is a moot point I’m afraid, and whether naive narcissists are driven by a natural political compulsion to conspicuously ‘defend the oppressed’ so that they can ‘virtuously’ Tweet about it later for public consumption or just pure unadulterated apparently religiously inspired hate doesn’t change one iota the many decades of the failed reality on the ground to find a lasting solution in Palestine.
A solution which, unfortunately, is now looking further away than ever and looks like it will be even harder to achieve as positions on both sides clearly harden against a two state solution and become even more deeply entrenched.
Nevermind the situation in the immediately surrounding countries bordering Palestine becoming ever more tenuous.
Much then as I deeply admire the fiercely brave Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and granted she does allude to this very point in the article, this is more largely unhelpful, good vs bad, finger pointing ‘whataboutery’ which, though I’m sure will find a willing audience in some quarters on here doesn’t and, more importantly, won’t really challenge this unfortunate trend in the grand scheme of things because the underlying cause that profoundly, if not exclusively informs it is unlikely to go away anytime soon.
You are absolutely correct that it’s an invention. If Egypt and Jordan had offered citizenship and full rights to all the Palestinian refugees in the areas they occupied from 1948 to 1967, and left Israel the hell alone, there would probably be peace in the region now. All being Arabs, culturally and linguistically, assimilation would have been quick. There would be no issue with Jewish Israeli settlement in the West Bank, because it would still be under Jordanian control, so strictly off limits to settlement. The Jordanians and Israelis would probably have long since hashed out a peace agreement allowing Israelis to freely visit the Western Wall and the Temple Mount (two of the holiest sites in Judaism) and possibly other holy sites, without being harassed or attacked. There would probably still be some on both sides who didn’t like it, but it would be mostly accepted as the status quo. And Gaza would be a non-issue, basically just a part of Egypt, possibly, owing to its fabulous beaches, with a thriving tourist trade.
The so-called long-running Palestinian issue could be solved — and could have been solved — at a moment’s notice if there were a Palestinian leadership sincerely interested in ending the conflict by making peace with Israel. No such leadership exists now, or has existed ever. Pressuring Israel won’t work, because the only concession the Palestinian leadership will accept, given their maximalist, loser-take-all demands, is an Israel that allows 5 million Palestinian “refugees” to return, which is a recipe for Israel’s dissolution, which no Israeli government could ever agree to. Until the Palestinians come to the table with sincere, realistic demands, the situation will not change, regardless of how much the rest of the world stamps its feet.
You have sent me off on a quest but still the major counterpoint to this is that the Jewish population between the 1917 Balfour Declaration and 1947 was extremely small in relation to the existing Muslim Palestinian population.
Hardly a counterpoint, since I wasn’t arguing history. I wonder if there are any other states who legitimacy you question on the basis of history going back 70 to 100+ years. Or any country who territory you claim belongs to others because they had more people on that land prior to its settlement and/or conquest.
‘Hardly a counterpoint, since I wasn’t arguing history’
I would say you are, but I can see why you might seek to claim otherwise.
Israel is not only a uniquely novel nation state, it was founded on a defined territory at a time where its now native people might now form the majority but most certainly didn’t by a significant margin at its relatively recent inception.
Biden vote frauded his way into Office and the stunning peace deals Trump achieved will not be built on, in all probability they’ll be reversed. The only way America will be America again is a civil war to topple the Vote-Fraud-in-Chief, and that’s not going to happen. Should. But it won’t.
For me, those who complain about antisemitism (especially in respect of complaints about the behaviour of the state of Israel) and who lament how Israel’s critics are uniquely obsessed with the world’s only Jewish state… would carry more weight if they also showed some concern for the plight of the Palestinian people, and did not defend even the most egregious actions by Israel.
Those (Palestinian, Jewish, or Trans) who care only about one group’s oppression are not, I feel, concerned about oppression and injustice, so much as about the rights and power of their own “tribe” – which is not the same thing at all.
I’m very much afraid that Mr Harris is right about the reducing likelihood of real peace there any time soon.
Boiling it down, it is about equality before the principles of the law, entirely regardless of ethnicity. Group A vs Group B.
Whilst the law itself might be unequivocal, who it applies to and when is a movable feast in the case of the Palestinian/Israeli Question.
Criticism of the actions undertaken by the state of Israel against Palestinians are often deliberately conflated with the highly emotive charge of anti-Semitism when the actions themselves are difficult, if not impossible to justify on purely legal grounds.
As I’ve repeatedly said before, Israel is not going anywhere, anytime soon and nor should it, but this puts ‘the state of Israel’ in an almost unique position in the world compared to all others, even other ‘theocracies’, and gives it, in effect, a Get Out Of Jail Free card to act with impunity, but one can’t help think that there is a price to itself and to its people for continually opting to play it.
The threat to Israel is an existential one. There are approx. 13 million Jews in the world, around half of them in Israel, as opposed to 1.5 billion Muslims throughout the world. If Jewish Israel falls, there must be no illusion that that is the end of it. What begins with the Jews will not end with the Jews.
You completely mischaracterize support for Israel as “tribal”. No doubt some people are motivated by that but by far the Jews and non-Jews who support Israel do so because they understand the situation Israel faces. And no, most don’t simply accept “the most egregious of Israeli actions” but the truth is that other than some crazed right-wing settlers, Israelis by and large want peace, which is much more than you can say for the other side.
The solution to the Palestinian question is simple. The Palestinian leadership needs to — for the first time — commit itself to negotiating sincerely to end the conflict. Unfortunately, they are still trapped in their ridiculous maximalist, loser-take-all demands that include essentially the dissolution of Israel as a Jewish state, and so the problem lingers. It’s not the solution that’s difficult. It’s the Palestinian loser-take-all attitude.
So you seem to be saying, and correct me if I’m wrong, that uniquely because of the Palestinian immutable ‘position’, the situation is insoluble?
Hamas’s in Gaza being different from the PA’s in the West Bank, with the former demanding the complete destruction of Israel and the latter not necessarily, but both demanding the repatriation of around 5m Palestinians across Palestinian territories, which includes the state of Israel and which would lead to its dissolution?
Ian McKinney
2 years ago
Thank you to the author for this well reasoned well constructed piece.
Cycle Calves
2 years ago
*useful idiots* and *Liberals* are the sorts of lemmings that are so easily influenced by “Influencers”.
Whether it be Snookie or Khloe – it shows the severe lack of actual intelligence amongst the Twitter, meme, TikTok set. Large swaths of people that cannot form an opinion longer than what fits on a bumpersticker.
Compounded by their so-called Woke / Tolerance = which is 100% tolerant of ONLY those that 100% agree with their groupthink. Human beings do not and will not “all just get along”.
Ignore human nature at your own peril…
Ian Perkins
2 years ago
“Despite the horrors that culminated at Auschwitz, anti-Semitism has been haunting our societies for years” That seems a bit of an understatement. Hasn’t it been around for centuries?
I see what you mean. The wording still seems a bit strange, as does the implication that centuries of anti-Semitism might be expected to disappear after Auschwitz.
Jorge Toer
2 years ago
I will said, thanks for you courage,to be a women writing this ,in very
dangerous times,is coming up the truth ,all ways.is the only way to be free.
Kremlington Swan
2 years ago
None of this can happen without those who adopt these extreme positions imagining themselves superior.
This is the imagining of moral superiority. You can’t commit any of the murders, nor chant any of the chants, without being firmly convinced you are superior to those who are the targets of your condemnation.
Certain belief systems, secular and religious alike, are so seductive because they convince the follower that he or she gains superiority by the simple fact of belonging to a particular group, or converting to that group. Such a follower is then free to hate as much as he likes, as long as he hates the approved target. And that target is defined for him, so not only is he relieved of the burden of thinking for himself, moral autonomy is taken out of his hands, so much so that it isn’t even an option for him any longer.
How do you make people understand that when this happens someone ceases to be an individual in the true sense of the word, and even loses the potential to become more individual?
Peter Shaw
2 years ago
I sincerely believe that the ignorant ‘ Palestine ‘ supporters are unwittingly encouraging a nuclear war. If Israel is ever attacked by its surrounding nations as in past wars, and appear to be on the verge of victory, Israel will justifiably resort to the use of nuclear weapons. Once that happens, the whole world can hold its breath. If we allow a second Holocaust of Jews, it is only right that it is a Holocaust that consumes us all.
THE Holocaust was not the *first* time Jews were slaughtered in great numbers …
Forgiving that minimization, why would it be RIGHT for everyone to die if a “second Holocaust of Jews” were to happen?
hayden eastwood
2 years ago
Thank you Ayan, what a fantastic, well written piece.
vince porter
2 years ago
There was always be useful idiots. And, contrary to what is implied in the expression, they are more dangerous than comic. Far more dangerous.
Galeti Tavas
2 years ago
Just another grievance article from the ‘Grievance Industry’, you can spot them by the unbelievably jargonistic grievance language the writer above uses:
“story-lines of our time: the narrative of the oppressor versus the oppressed, of the coloniser versus the colonised, of the genocide perpetrator and system of supremacy.”
Pure Liberal/Lefty speak, a set of trigger words we are supposed to be conditioned to regurgitate pre-absorbed responses to.
Just say what it is you want to say without dropping into the Uni-speak, anti-bias training language. I can’t stand the new way of talking of struggles has become code words, it is an entire industry now days, Critical Theory, 1619, BLM de-colonizing, de-gendering, using the jargon devalues any argument.
Paul Goodman
2 years ago
Do you mean like Manchester Arena, Westminster Bridge, Borough market, Charlie Hebdo, la, la, la?
when you fire rockets at Israel, don’t be surprised when they fire back.
Jorge Toer
2 years ago
Im surprised from the comments,,(thanks)reality&truth is rejected,,the status of consciousness is (0)cero.
A old adagio said,,the intelligence is limited,,,the stupidity not.
peterdebarra
2 years ago
… “” when the guests insist on re-arranging the furniture – then the host should express concern and act “” – Nietzsche.
When the priest is decapitated on his altar, in a flood of blood, amid arab kill shrieks—
Zap Zenn
2 years ago
I don’t have to ‘hate’ an entire culture in order to strongly disagree with the actions of their leaders. Being ‘anti-oppressionist’ doesn’t align me with any particular race, ideology or religion. ‘Hamas is a Terrorist Organisation” declares the opposition. If I were having the shit bombed out my arse on the Gaza strip I might have a name for those responsible too. Where’s the straight thinking in all of this?
There isn’t any. There are a lot of extremeists posing as moderates on this thread.
David Fitzsimons
2 years ago
o
Last edited 2 years ago by David Fitzsimons
Scott Norman Rosenthal
2 years ago
In all fairness, Jews in the Arab World were, overall, well-treated until the founding of Israel. Muhammed’s 2 massacres of Jews were, right or wrong, for military purposes.
Many right-wing Jews physically attacked dissenting Jews during the ’80’s. I myself was attacked 4 times. This led to many Jews speaking out more and more against Israeli policies.
At this time the situation has spiraled out of control.
Niobe Hunter
2 years ago
Bella has a lot of skin in this game. Her father claims to be the hereditary ‘Prince of Galilee’ and sheik of some part of Palestine. So in a’free’ Palestine , Bella could hope to be a ? princess?, anyway to be able to command a lot of peasants to do her bidding and supply her with goodies.
Free Palestine. But only a bit.
Lee Jones
2 years ago
It seems grotesque that one of our (by that a mean inhabitant of this planet) few truly humane, insightful and rational thinkers should receive 300 comments, 90% of which seem to display such a wealth of degenerate self absorption. It’s not all about YOU! As my wiser grandmother would say (definitely wiser than me, she would she would have laughed at you, and not engaged. But this is the current cesspit, so hey ho).
Judy Johnson
2 years ago
Ali mentions the young followers of influencers. Are they inevitably just the young or do older people follow influencers also?
Scott Norman Rosenthal
2 years ago
However, Israel has so very much for which to account. I was myself assaulted 4 times years ago for publicly critisizing Israeli policy. Is it a wonder that many people today are fed up with Israel? Now Hamas appears as a salvation for Palestinians. Israli policies should have changed long ago.
LCarey Rowland
2 years ago
Not a good sign. This contention might ultimately be the death of us all.
Francis MacGabhann
2 years ago
I wonder if Unherd is aware that the spelling of “anti-Semitism”, as used in this article, is considered anti-Semitic by some?
An article about false narratives regarding this conflict that somehow still manages to push the laughable idea that Israel is the victim of the situation and not the aggressor actively occupying someone else’s land and choking the life out of the people who life there. “Arabs and Israelis” have not been fighting for thousands of anything as Israel is a modern invention, plonked down on existing national structures to resolve a problem after WW2.
The tensions between Islam, Christianity and Judaism are a seperate although important issue.
mac mahmood
2 years ago
The whole business of Israel is based on false narratives. Yet there is no shortage of people who support its deadly activities!
Ron Carlin
2 years ago
How does having to censor one’s thinking, for example that Palestine should be free from the river to the sea, in case some bigoted anti-semite interprets it for his own ends, differ from having to censor ones criticism of fundamentalist Islam in case we get a Fatwa?
There is clearly a grave and increasing problem of anti-Semitism in the world today (as there is also with Islamophobia). But analysis of this problem is not helped by confusion with anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel. The slogan “Free Palestine” which illustrates the article is not anti-Semitic; Palestinians in the occupied territories are clearly not free, so calling for their freedom does not imply any prejudice against or maltreatment of Jews. Even the slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is only anti-Semitic if by that it is meant the expulsion or genocide of Jewish residents; for some it merely means a single state with equal rights solution. Confusing these issues not only makes fair analysis more difficult, if anything it encourages anti-Semitism…
Giles Chance
2 years ago
Jews living in Israel and outside it should ask themselves: “Why is anti-Semitism on the increase ? ” I can tell them why. Many ordinary people, without any preconceptions about or even knowledge of the Middle East, or of Judaism or Islam, are just sickened by the unfairness and brutality handed out to the Palestinian Arabs by Israelis. The situation in the areas controlled by Israel seems to be as unfair and as inhumane as any apartheid system. I won’t go into the history of the story since the 1890’s, how Jewish freedom fighters or terrorists forced the British hand in 1948, and so on. Just focus on today. Articles like this one above don’t make any difference because they don’t address the issue. Anti semitism is not going away until a lasting settlement is achieved, with which all sides feel happy. Maybe thats not achievable, in which case Israelis will have to continue to build bomb shelters.
As a Jew living in Israel I hope I represent the opinion of some of us when I say:
a) your ignorance is showing
b) the way to address this ignorance is definitely not by swallowing whole what the media serves you daily – but this subject is too big to go into in detail here, where all I want to ask is this:
c) For the sake of the argument let’s say Israel is as horrible a place as you impute. Why are Jews living outside Israel the target of hate crimes, when you don’t see Chinese people attacked for -say- their treatment of Moslem Uighurs?
Why aren’t Turks attacked for their (real!) atrocities against the Kurds and the human rights abuses against their own people?
Why aren’t Arabs attacked for… Well, the list of wrongdoings by their various governments is too long, and well known. So-
Why the Jews? Why only the Jews?
Do non-Jewish Israelis enjoy the same rights as Jewish Israelis? I think they don’t , but if I’m wrong, I apologise. If they don’t, then that has to change. This might not fix anti-Semitism, but it’s certainly going to help, a lot.
For the answer to your question, read “The Merchant of Venice” by Wm Shakespeare.
Non Jewish Israelis do indeed enjoy the same rights as Jewish ones- they can vote and be elected, they serve in all branches of the
public and private sectors, and they are protected by the same rights in front of the same courts.
Re Shakespeare – what are you saying here – that Jews are persecuted because they are greedy money lenders,who demand a pound of Christian flesh in lieu of the money?
If that is your assertion than (apropos WS): By the pricking of my thumb, you’re antisemitic scum. So why don’t you trot off to one of the Nazi sites, where you’ll fit right in.
Last edited 2 years ago by Esther W
Athena Jones
2 years ago
Why or how can it be anti-semitic to fight to free Palestine? Anti-semitism is a hatred of Judaism and its followers, Jews.
What is anti-semitic about a just cause to free 6 million Palestinian Christians and Muslims from Zionist Israeli occupation and colonisation. To pretend that it is denies every principle of justice and betrays all those who have suffered from true anti-semitism throughout history. It debases the very meaning of the term and renders it worthless.
More troubling than Israel’s war crimes and human rights atrocities to maintain occupation and colonisation of Palestine and to deny millions justice, freedom and human and civil rights, are those like Ali who are prepared to sacrifice any and all principles of an enlightened Western world, out of a hatred of Muslims.
No-one of conscience or integrity, who believes in principles of justice, rule of law, democracy, human rights and common human decency can question the justice of the Palestinian cause and to seek to do so, through the exploitation of a fear of Islam is just wrong.
The Palestinians are scapegoats, hoist on the petard of propaganda and fear. Whatever the reasons, whatever the history, no-one in our modern world has a right to occupy and colonise another people and treat them as Israel does the Palestinians. Certainly not if they want to call themselves a Western democracy as Israel does. And no amount of wrong committed by any religion gives us the right to condemn all followers because of it.
Israel is condemned as a colonial, military, apartheid State, not because it has mostly Jews as citizens.
I can and do question that part of the Palestinian cause which is to deny the Jews a state in Israel.
I question the conscience and integrity and racist tendencies of those who support that part of their cause.
Further I question the Humanity of those who can see no nuance and peddle the unbalanced and false narratives.
As everyone knows a Palestinian State has been available since ’48 on the basis of mutual peace.
Happily electorates across the west are rejecting the Corbynista rhetoric in favour of governments who support Israel’s right to exist in peace and defend itself and supply arms to effect that in whatever circumstances prevail.
Israel’s actions stimulate anti-Semitism. If Israel wishes for its people, and for Jews everywhere, to live in harmony and peace with their fellow man, then a peace treaty between the state of Israel and its neighbours is a necessary precondition. Such a settlement is very hard to achieve, but with the co-operation of all the major powers, plus the local players, it is possible.
What makes you think anti-semitism would go if Israel did not exist? Antisemitism existed long before Israel was created so cannot be attributed as the cause.
“Palestinians” (who were given that name only in the 1960s, by the PLO) have any number of other Muslim-majority countries in the ME to move to. They are particularly closely related to Jordanians.
Jews,. however, have only Israel, their ancestral land, to call their own, and they have developed it,. turning it into a modern, technologically advanced and forward-looking country, making the desert bloom.
Would you deny the Jews, who have suffered so much throughout history, the land that was theirs thousands of years before the advent of Islam?
Janice, I’m afraid that all of that is completely irrelevant. Israelis have to come to terms with reality. It’s taken many, many years but that’s what we are getting to now. Reality, for the Jews and the Israelis, means finding a peaceful and sustainable settlement. It will have to be policed by the major powers, including of course the US. The tectonic plates underlying the Middle Eastern equilibrium are shifting, and Israel can’t rely on the same international apathy and US support, come what may, as it has done for so long. For its own sake, Israel has to wake up, smell the coffee, and get to work.
The plates have indeed shifted. The UAE, Morocco and Sudan have made peace with Israel. What else has changed? You have been listening to the wokery. Have a look at what the actual government officials have been saying. “not Hamas” to quote Joe.
““Palestinians” (who were given that name only in the 1960s, by the PLO) have any number of other Muslim-majority countries in the ME to move to”
I think you will find NO COUNTRY in the region, or the world, will take the Palestinians. They do work on work visas around the region, but must leave when its terms finish – as they are not thought to be a group which will add prosperity and civil order to anyone who takes them.
Yes the action of these individuals is despicable and disturbing. But don’t you feel disturbed by the Israeli Government ‘s actions too? They never apologise for how many innocent lives they take everyday in the name of security? Their use of disproportionate , intemperate “shock and awe” tactics , causes outrage is that really so surprising? Especially when the casualties are innocent children? Or Is the Israeli Government beyond reproach?
By definition their policies could be said to be simply pro-semitic, so does that make anyone calling them out an anti semitic? As for being under attack from the far right did you miss seeing Tommy Robinson the BNP and NF shoulder to shoulder at the pro Israel rally? I didn’t think that they did multiculturalism generally speaking? Or am I missing something?
Ah, the false equivalence. Maybe you can parrot some in the American media who see the Iron Dome as a problem because it apparently prevents more Israelis from being killed. And what does “disproportionate” even mean? No one has ever won a fight, a battle, a war, or even a ball game by relying on proportionality.
The Israeli Government is not beyond reproach but it’s hard to avoid killing children when Hamas base themselves in schools and hospitals, using children and adults as human shields.
I am much more disturbed by the fact that the Iranian Government executes minors in amongst the 267 executions last year. So by comparison you are being disproportionate. I wonder why?
This person deserves an answer only if he/she can indicate that he/she shows the same concern for innocents taken in other conflicts, e.g. Turkey vs. Kurds, Russians vs. Chechens, Syrian civil war, all of which took far far more innocent civilian lives, including women and children, than all the encounters between Israel and Gaza put together. But something tells me this concern for innocents only reveals itself publicly when the perp is Israel.
If Israelis wanted to use shock and awe they would use it. What they use now is the smallest fraction of their destructive capability, so what you write is factually inaccurate. Israel acts with the kind of restraint which should serve as a model for others. unfortunately all it seems to do is further enrage its enemies.
If your idea of restraint is to kill and maim and dispossess fewer civilians than you could, you should not expect too much appreciation from the victims and their relatives. That is not the sort of restraint that should serve as a model for the rest of humanity.
Wouldn’t you be enraged if it was your relatives who had died in the attacks?
The rage it produces, and the long-lasting loss and injury, is precisely the problem with this strategy of “restraint”.
Francis MacGabhann
2 years ago
Has anti-Semitism spiked? Or has the definition of it just been widened out so far that literally any criticism of any Jew by any Gentile for any reason at any time is now “anti-Semitism”?
But the question does not seem to be “are more Jews being violently attacked in broad daylight” – so the issue of whether anti-semitism is increasing depends fundamentally on the definition of anti-semitism you’re using.
I think you have a point. Tolerance to any criticism, in this world of cancellation, is close to zero. This is more than obvious on this forum and this site which started as an appealing open-minded platform for anti-conformist and challenging opinions and which quickly evolved into a reactionary, antivax, islamophobic tribune.
Islamophobia is a bogus term used out of either ignorance or dishonesty in that in conflates bigotry towards Muslims with valid criticism of such ‘cultural enhancements’ as has been clearly outlined in the first comment by Andrew Grant Dutch.
It is however, an unfortunate fact that any criticism of such behavior including a stated disinclination to integrate with their host societies can result in promoting a widespread hostile attitudes towards all Muslims.
Nevertheless, given the choice of making no criticism to avoid promoting negative attitudes thus ensuring such behaviors will remain unchecked, or criticizing some egregious and appalling behaviors, then I favor the latter course.
I’m not convinced it’s an entirely bogus term. To illustrate, let’s switch the outgroup – how about
“Anti-semitism is a bogus term used out of either ignorance or dishonesty in that in conflates bigotry towards Jews with valid criticism of the state of Israel.”
Either term can be misused – but that does not render the concept bogus.
Anti-zionism now means anti-semitism in the new definition the Labour Party had to sign up to. Still, I think true anti-semitism is on the increase, because it’s not that easy for a simple man to resist the anti-semitic tropes when he has a bomb on his head and his oppressors proudly claim they are Jewish.
I doubt you or any other British person has had a bomb on your head, yet you proudly proclaim your antisemitism.
Last edited 2 years ago by Vilde Chaye
Dennis Boylon
2 years ago
Israel is a settler colony and apartheid state. The last of its kind. The majority of this article has nothing to do with the Israeli and Palestinian conflict but the picture at the top suggests somebody supporting Palestinian human rights supports murder? It starts off with a completely unrelated murder by some whacko to imply that that a billion Muslims are violent and evil. The West has been waging war in tbe middle east and destroying entire countries in an attempt to control its resources and maintain its position of dominant power. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan. Or were they just spreading “freedom”. Lol
Do you think it is logically to call a people who existed as a dispersed, minority across many countries, often treated as outsiders “settlers” for regathering in their homeland for their own protection. I’m not necessarily a Zionist, but it is wrong and immoral to call everyone from a Jew who’s ancestors relocated from Germany to Palestine because he had had his citizenship stripped from him in the Nuremberg laws to a Mizrahi Jew who’s ancestors got expelled from an Arab-Muslim majority country a “settler” for moving to Israel which was willing to take them in is. You far-left antizionists are not progressive. You need to take a long hard look at yourselves and ask yourself why you are dehumanising people who already have been displaced enough in history and have survived the last 2000 years as a cultural minority, moving on when tolerance failed and passing on their culture from generation to generation without the benefit of it being all around.
Israel is a settler colony and apartheid state. Having repeated the talking point, can you back it up? The Muslims with the most individual liberties in the Middle East are the ones living in Israel. A billion Muslims are not violent and evil, but a big number is and an even bigger number is either okay with the violence or too scared to criticize it. I agree about leaving the ME to its own devices. It won’t stop the violence, though.
In response to a comment above, the Jews are indeed smart, productive and creative and have given the West an almost inexhaustible list of brilliant scientists, writers, composers, artists, and so on. They were largely assimilated into Europe and yet were almost wiped out. In the years since, tens of millions of Muslims have been imported into Europe in their place. And what have they given us? Not much, apart from Islam, terrorism, widespread sexual abuse and denigration of women, threats to homosexuals, contempt for our values and way of life, ‘honor’ killings, fixed marriages, FGM, etc. And to think that the Muslim Council of Britain actually announced a few years back that Muslims had no intention of integrating with us because they did not like us or our values.
Hirsi Ali’s incisive article also alludes to something that is not mentioned anywhere near enough, namely the fact that when Mohamed and his band of brigands were a minority, they reassured the Jews of Medina that they would not be harmed, but of course once critical mass had been achieved, the Jews were massacred, with the Prophet himself beheading 100s of them (according to some sources including his own Muslim biographers.). This is the role model Muslims worship and appears to be the template for conquest that many aspire to follow.
The media’s unrelenting focus on far-right anti-Semitism is a smoke-screen and a disgrace given that all the real attacks, including defenestration of little old ladies in Paris and the murders of Jewish school children etc. have been committed by Muslims. A few weeks ago the Muslim murderer of an elderly Jewish woman was acquitted on the grounds that he was rendered irresponsible by his consumption of cannabis, triggering protests already forgotten by the media.
Muslims have been successful in suppressing criticism or deflecting it by focusing on so-called Islamophobia (actually a very rational fear) and perceived micro-aggressions such as ‘staring hatefully at women dressed in the burka etc.” In reality, I think most of us are just astounded that anyone would want to dress like that. If Muslim men find it so difficult to resist the slightest temptation offered by a glimpse of female flesh or hair, perhaps they should be the ones walking around veiled, preferably with a ball and chain attached to the ankle.
This is all part of tried and tested tactics. In reality, Europeans remain highly civilized (supine?) and very few Muslims have been subjected to any violence at all despite the endless list of terrorist attacks on European soil. If the same had occurred in Pakistan, for example, there wouldn’t be a single Christian or European left alive in the whole country. We should have realised the dangers back in 1989 when the riots and book burnings over The Satanic Verses erupted.
As for the Palestinian issue, most “Palestinians” were probably Jews, Christians or pagans before they were converted at the point of a sword way back when. They have been speaking an alien language and living according to the dictates of an imposed religion and culture for many centuries. They were colonized long ago but cannot see it with their own eyes. It is a tragedy indeed that young Palestinian children are killed by Israeli bombs, but the fault lies first with the members of Hamas who fire rockets at Israel’s urban communities on the slightest pretext while hiding among their own civilian communities, knowing full well that this will inflame tensions and stoke further hatred of Israel; and second with all the people who vote for Hamas knowing full well that it is anti-Semitic and desires the destruction of Israel. If far fewer Israelis are killed during these conflicts, it is solely because the Israeli government, unlike Hamas, does all it can to protect its citizens.
It never ceases to amaze me that a country with roughly 6 million inhabitants, not all of them Jews, is portrayed as the oppressor, yet is surrounded by tens of millions of people who have wished to see it destroyed ever since its foundation.
People like Bella Hadid are beyond the pale. Instagram etc. is a cesspit of hatred and bigotry. This whole business sickens me.
Andrew agree with everything you write, Unherd should give you a column! Anthony
“Europeans remain highly civilized (supine?) and very few Muslims have been subjected to any violence at all”
Except, of course, the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the bombing of Libya, the Western-backed war on Yemen, …
“Invade the world, Invite the world” is a thing.
Who by the way dislike most of the things the west , especially the arts community do-it has no place in their culture.Strange coincidence that lockdown has hit the arts community , musicals , art galleries , book shops etc hardest and their left wing mayors seem in no hurry to create a tourist friendly enviroment to bring them back .Yet who are the main cheerleaders for Palestine- equity , the actor’s union. Their careers need cities for live performances but they are the ones help turn them into enclaves for newcomers who don’t go in for singing , dancing and twerking.
as with Japan for example?
Easy and predictable response. Few European people (and you know full well that I mean the ‘man in the street’ who exacts no revenge for terrorism atrocities and not our governments) I know of supported wars prosecuted by governments that have long been beyond our control. Mendacious T. Blair should have been tried for war crimes, as well as for treason in lying to his country and leading it into an entirely unnecessary war that has wreaked the most terrible havoc and whose consequences are still unfolding almost twenty years later. Whatever did he mean by 45 minutes, by the way? I never understood it. Did it mean 45 minutes from the moment that Saddam would announce his intention to fire his non-existent WMD at us?
Oops! I meant to ask if it meant we had only 45 minutes to take cover from the moment Saddam announced his intention to fire his WMD at us.
Few ‘men in the street’ supported these wars? Wasn’t Blair voted back into office after invading Afghanistan and Iraq?
As for “Easy and predictable response,” my comment concerned Muslims being subjected to violence by Europeans, which your reply does little to address, beyond asserting the UK is not a democracy and hence its citizens are not responsible for its war crimes.
I can see your point about voting Blair back in, but the country had only got rid of the Tories a few years earlier and no one wanted them back at that point. I really don’t think the war influenced many people when it came to voting, all the more so as many in both major parties voted for it. Leaving that aside, I was quite obviously referring to our own rather calm behaviour regarding the Muslims who live among us, who one could expect to be the targets of reprisals given the terrorist attacks on home soil of recent years (we would definitely not be safe in any of their countries), and not to Muslims in other countries who have been killing each other (and many 1000s of Christians in Nigeria right now, something else the media chooses to ignore) without our help, as well as invading the rest of the known world, over the last fourteen centuries.
It seems to have escaped everyone’s attention that virtually the only colonial power to have retained its major possessions is the Ottoman Empire, but Erdogan is very adept at exploiting European guilt while deflecting criticism of his own country’s actions, like many others at the moment. I am sure you know Constantinople was not always Turkish, and neither was the rest of the country. 1453 is not so long ago, given that Europeans are still castigated for 1492. And let’s not leave out the more recent genocide of Armenian Christians.
This appears more and more like a long struggle between civilizations that began well before the Crusades, though that is always ignored in discussions of the Crusades, and the Muslims have never swallowed the line that we’d reached the end of history. They’re playing a long game and anyone who cannot see that is incurably naive.
You may well have been ‘referring to our own rather calm behaviour regarding the Muslims who live among us,’ but that’s exactly my point in a way – ignore the very real violence European nations inflict on Muslims in order to claim ‘Europeans remain highly civilized.’ Believe them or not, but groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS explicitly linked their attacks in Europe to the invasion of Iraq. We ignore this at our peril.
Right! So the attack on the Two Towers occurred after the war in Iraq, to name but one of many atrocities committed all around the world by Al- Qaeda and other groups, including attacks in a long list of countries that have nothing whatsoever to do with the West’s lunatic excursions into the Middle East. As for ISIS, they’ve killed far more Muslims, Yazidis and other peoples than they have people in the West. Don’t try to link ISIS activities to any form of rational response to the West. Their desired goal, and let’s hope it is unachievable, is to have the entire world living in a Caliphate under Sharia law, and apologists like you won’t be able to save your skins whatever you say to explain away their actions, in the event that such an abomination ever comes to pass.
No one has “ignored” the wars in the Middle East, and you can see from my comments that I am very aware of them, but what exactly would you have me do about them? Instigate a bombing campaign of the Houses of Parliament? Vote Green? Vote for Sadiq Khan? I am utterly powerless, like every other ordinary human being living on this benighted planet. I don’t wish ordinary individual Muslims any harm, but I certainly don’t want them imposing their religion in my country. We spent centuries throwing off the shackles of religion, and now we’re filling our countries with people who would happily impose their twisted religious values on all of us given half a chance.
Neither I nor anyone else has “ignored” those wars, as you well know. What do you require people to do about it? There’s nothing anyone can do, whatever party one votes for. People vote largely on domestic issues in general elections. And yes, stating that ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorism is a result of Western intervention is a form of apologia for or excusing of their actions, which are not focused solely on the West and have been going on in one form or another for a very long time. Our ongoing conversation is pointless as neither one of us will ever agree with the other. I am sure we’ve both got better things to do than while away our time on here, but I’ll leave the last comment to you.
“going on … for a very long time” – yes, for about 1400 years.
I think you’re right that we’re unlikely to agree, but I appreciate your attempts to explain your point of view.
Likewise.One thing’s for sure – I doubt very much we’d come to blows if ever we found ourselves heatedly debating these issues over a pint in a pub.
ISIS was funded and armed by Saudi and Qatari money: both allies of the UK and also Israel while we’re at it. Al Qaeda/Nusra were armed and even trained by the CIA in one of the most expensive regime change policies they have ever undertaken. The latter fighters were being patched up in Israeli hospitals and even visited by Netanyahu whilst recovering. Priti Patel was over there trying to foist our tax money on Israel for these highly dubious activities.
The Mancester bomber: a UK “asset” in the destruction of Libya, part of the “Birmingham Brigade” (may have got the name wrong) of jihadis we used to bring down a secular Arab country.
We are DEEPLY enmeshed in this, and have been for decades. To pretend otherwise is stupid.
Hezbollah helped defeat ISIS along with the Russians: the UK and USA did practically nothing in this respect.
To lump all these people together is wrong, and to lump them with the Palestinians – as nearly all posters are doing here – is wrong also. Theirs is a separate struggle to attain freedom in their own homelands. We would and should support them honestly in this struggle for justice, and if our political system were not so corrupted (by many of the above actors), then perhaps we would have done so by now.
A ‘secular Arab country ‘ ? Sounds great ! Oh you mean Gaddafi’s Libya
The different sides in Syria civil war are very complicated-my enemy’s enemy is my friend-wasn’t that Lawrence of Arabia use of bedouins in WW1? However there seems a newer more fundamentalist version of islam whose members claim brotherhood with others in the world ( rather than main loyalty to a particular country ), so each conflict west gets involved in offends them? Doesn’t this make some of them the enemy within , something our politicians don’t seem to have grasped.
It’s a good point.
Well, there was a good point in there, briefly, About an ancient faith’s great philosophical disputes, its multifaceted modern political reality, and hopefully a brief illumination into the depths of their ignorance.
Too bad you couldn’t stop grinding those axes long enough to actually make it. Might have meshed quite well with the case it seemed like you were going to make for the merits of the Palestinian cause. Before you didn’t.
Just sort of restated the things you believe, (you think the cause just, quelle suprise).
Then whined about those nasty “above actors” (golly, all of em?) who’s bribes are the only reason the course of international politics hasn’t already bent itself to your unerring sense of justice.
Now obviously I disagree with you, but I truly write the following for the sake of those whose cause you’ve taken it upon yourself to champion.
Take up birdwatching or something, the Palestinians have enough problems as it is.
You’re an ISIS apologist and you should be ashamed of yourself.
I think various Western intelligence agencies warned of the likely blowback from the war on Iraq. I suppose they’re ISIS apologists too.
Ian, Nabeel Qureshi addresses this in his excellent short book, ‘Answering Jihad’.
Muslims ,at every level of radicalism and religious feeling are aggrieved not because Western governments deposed Saddam but because they are losing the 1300 hundred years plus war between Islam and the west ( Christendom as was)
It is absurdly naive to think a less interventionist foreign policy is going to assuage that sense of humiliation and victimhood .
Muslims don’t apologise for or feel guilty about the wars of conquest of Mohammed and his followers . On the contrary they are brought up to believe Islamic hegemony is the law of God !
George Bush was so proud of the Crusades he announced one for the twenty-first century.
Yes maybe it wasn’t the most diplomatic thing to say ,given the way the Crusades have been portrayed in the west and the Muslim countries , but that’s my point . There is general agreement in the west that the Crusades were a bad thing , whereas the wars of aggression by Islam are excused or ignored in the West and gloried in by contemporary Muslims
However the BAME narrative that all was peace and happiness before bad whites came is not true either is it ? The religion of peace manages to create enough pieces without help from other nations. I also didn’t know there was a UN directive saying western countries must behave ethically while the rest can do what they want? Surely all humans are as good or bad as each other ?
I think it’s rather well known that Al-Qaeda’s biggest attack on the West occurred long before the invasion of Iraq. As for the “western backed war in Yemen,” surely you ought to add the Iranian thugocracy to those backing the Yemen war. In Libya (and Iraq) the goal was to remove brutal dictators, who also inflicted lots of misery on their citizens. As for Afghanistan, the invasion was called for by the 9-11 attacks. And by the way, what’s your point? Is it to support vicious terror attacks on innocent people in the West?
Is it also well known that Al Quaeda was set up by the CIA and Osama Bin Laden was an operative?
How did they know where to bomb those Afghan cave hideouts? Because the CIA built them in the first place.
Slaughter Muslims around the world and then wonder why some go mad and try to kill you. Cause and effect.
Read the Quran. It will show you why (and how) they want to kill us.
silly person, the biggest slaughterers of Muslims — by far — are other Muslims. Western country rank way way down.
Yemen has been under air and sea blockade since the war began. While Iran sides with Ansar Allah, it’s very hard to imagine significant amounts of weaponry getting through. The US, UK and France, on the other hand, are known – known, not suspected – to have supplied billions of dollars worth of arms, as well as assisting with training, maintenance, targetting, surveillance and intelligence.
Why is it so hard to imagine significant amounts of weaponry getting through to Yemen, which is fairly close to iran, when thousands of Iranian rockets managed to get into Gaza, which is far away and blockaded. And who do you think arms Hezbollah?
Who says the Gazan rockets came from Iran? Not even the Israelis claim that. They and the Palestinians say they’re made in Gaza, which is why they’re fairly crude, often lacking a warhead.
Yes, create an environment of hated of followers of a religion! My, how history repeats itself, and the rest as they say is lies, propaganda and injustice.
The religion hated today is Islam and the poor Palestinians die and suffer because most of them are Muslim, because of it.
The Palestinian Christians are just collateral damage in the carnage because their existence challenges the narrative that, this is not a colonial war by an apartheid regime which occupies and colonises Palestine, but a new crusade against 6 million men, women and children, who, even under Israeli military rule, present a threat to humanity and the entire planet because of their religion.
Where did we hear that before and where did it take us?
sometime all one can say is “You have no idea what you/re talking about, yet it doesn’t seem to stop you.”
That is supposed to be an answer?
At least 20 percent of Israeli citizens are Arab, most of them Muslim. Many of them serve (voluntarily) in the Israeli military. So if Israel is trying to convince the world that they’e out to get Muslims, they’re not doing a very good job of it.
Yes, of course, ignore the fact that Israel controls all the Palestinians in historic Palestine, but only accords civil rights to a small number of them. That way you can pretend that all is fine and dandy. Meanwhile, HRW, Bt’selem and the UN, and all the South African veterans consider that it IS Apartheid.
And South Africans, more than anyone else, should be able to recognise apartheid when they see it.
A bit childish . So Israelis more than anyone else should be able to recognise murderous antisemitism when they see it is an obvious response .
Both claims ignore the possibilities that negative historical experience can induce paranoia and cloud judgement
Also implied is the connection between supposed oppression and personal probity . Yes let’s all bow down before Mugabe and Winnie ‘necklaces ‘ Mandela
excellent post, I agree entirely. The best posts on here have negative likes, so take that as a compliment!
Might be wise to remain silent until you’re as well educated in these matters as Andrew.
You really do sound a bit naive.
I understand what you mean by ‘invasions’. When USA and certain European countries ‘invade’ it’s always been decided beforehand with the shadowy powers that rule the country that’s to be ‘invaded’ for…whatever reason. Mineral resources. Regime changes. Power shifts.
I don’t really understand your point. You seem to agree the invasion of Iraq was just that, an invasion, and what’s more carried out by countries that are not democracies, and for reasons entirely different to those they proclaimed. Why on earth would blowback not be expected? Various Western intelligence agencies and analysts predicted it.
Good post. My family are Greek and there is still the race memory of 400 years of Ottoman oppression, plus the constant threats by Ergogan to Greek and Cypriot territorial integrity today. It never ends and casts a shadow over Greece, as well as the Balkans.
Zilch to do with Palestine.
On 36% of the vote – a quirk of our electoral system and labour has not won an election since.
Blair, Bush & the Australian PM John Howard were all voted back in after those lie engendered wars.
Only the voters of Spain threw out the party supporting them.
I’m fine with backing out of those nations entirely. Will that stop the violence? The leading killer of Muslims is other Muslims, over differences like Sunni vs Shia. The Saudis and Iranians hate each other, to the point where the Saudis will make common cause with the Israelis.
Easy line of course, but the same idiot line could be levelled against Christians in the last century (big time!), and where exactly does it get us? Nowhere.
You may be thinking of the 16th and 17th century . The wars of the last century weren’t about religion
It might stop some of the violence directed against the West.
Stop mass Muslim immigration would have curtailed most of it
He meant European muslims living in Europe. Please pay attention.
You might be on to something. The most persecuted people on Earth are Christians. Perhaps we need to rediscover our Judaeo-Christian heritage and wage holy war on all those who persecute us?
You could look at the last few decades of Western wars like that. George Bush did talk about a crusade.
You’re hanging rather a lot on one diplomatic faux pas
The people burning Christian churches in Palestine are Israeli settlers (numerous examples going back years): sorry to destroy your narrative.
Religions do tend to stick together. Judaism is quick to take any attack on Jews as an attack on all followers so it is not surprising Muslims do the same.
It is perhaps less common with Christians because the religion has evolved much more and is more enlightened than the others, which remain powerfully tribal in nature.
what a crock. “has evolved much more and is more enlightened” — if I hadn’t read your other silly posts I”d have thought this was just a joke.
Way to unflatteringly compare two major world relgions with Christianity.
And Christianity arose from Judaism, so presumably would have retained at least some of its “tribal” characteristics.
Islam, however, is by far the most revenge-obsessed and aggressively expansionist of these three religions. Obviously that’s not saying that all or even most individual Muslims are like this. But as a religion, it is what it is. Its name doesn’t mean “peace”, it means “submission”.
Cherie Blair made that howler I seem to recall .
Oh please. Israel is extremely violent, as all its neighbours will attest.
The state of Israel was born out of violence and terrorism.
Unbiased onlookers
Well, by that argument, I might ask you whether you expect Europeans to ‘ignore’ the violence and provocations committed on actual European soil. And of course, by and large they do, which proves my original point. Alternatively, should the Israelis just ignore Hamas missiles? Furthermore, no one is comfortable with it, as I have already said, but you have failed repeatedly to give any answer as to what we should actually do about it.
It wasn’t an argument about historical acts of invasion etc., because that could lead us back to any number of invasions and colonisations throughout the turbulent history of European-Middle Eastern relations. And of course many people appear to see history as starting only very recently, rather than, for example, 1400 years ago, with the invasion of much of the known world by Islam, the source of many current problems. Prior to that of course, the Persians invaded Greece among other places, and were paid back in kind by Alexander. We could go on forever with this line of thinking, but it wasn’t my point, which you subverted with your false explanation of Islamic(ISIS etc) violence in Europe and elsewhere.
Good post. The eruption of Islam onto the world stage and its rapid and violent conquest of settled and civilized peoples was the most catastrophic series of events in history.
Israel’s regular destruction of civilan buildings in Gaza has nothing to do with religion. It is all about asserting dominance and quelling resistance to the continuing occupation and land theft. Hamas rockets are their only means of resistance.
Hardly any of the Muslims we have in the UK (and I would agree, we have taken too many) are Palestinians, but communities feel touched, just as the Jewish community in the UK would feel touched if the UK were to put pressure on Israel.
They won’t ignore conflict either present or historical because many weren’t loyal citizens in the first place
Naive to let such numbers in
Exactly, we don’t do indiscriminate reprisals on British Muslims, we attack Islamic terrorism at its source. Unfortunately we so fall over backwards to let Muslims know we’re not against them we sometimes fight *on behalf* of Islamic terrorists such as in Libya and Syria. The most radical Muslims in the West are the youngest and we’ve got a demographic timebomb ticking and many anti-West western anti-Semites who think they can harness it to serve their ends.
Those who blether on about “hate” and ‘haters” are typically projecting. Almost certainly so in your case.
Those who evade the issue normally have something to hide. God bless.
The West fights on behalf of Jihadi terrorists, or uses them to achieve its own goals?
Ian, Nabeel Qureshi addresses this in his excellent short book, ‘Answering Jihad’.
The opening sentence about the wealth of benefits that the Jews have given to the West offers the clearest hint as to why anti-Semitism has become so widespread. Jews have become assimilated into the cultural, scientific and social framework of our society and they did so by seeing no contradiction between following their faith and accepting the status quo. This has proved hugely rewarding for all concerned, but it has resulted in their being viewed as part of the establishment and therefore qualifying as legitimate targets for the rabble of influencers and discontents who have annexed social media.
Very good point.
Of course the anti’s claim they aren’t against people personally but their ancestoral country ( strangely don’t seem so bothered about ‘bad’ behaviour in other countries) -though if Europeans had to seek sanctuary in the middle east that is the only country most people would find tolerable to live in -as human rights especially towards women isn’t great in rest of that region.
This is really quite brilliant
Is it not racist to ascribe to followers of any group, including a religion, greater intelligence and ability? All religions have contributed mightily to the development of our modern world and that includes Judaism.
However, if we are to resort to such comparisons, historically their ‘gifts’ are less than Islam has given the world, and much less than Christianity.
But does it matter what members of this or that religion achieve? And is any achievement an excuse for behaviour?
Not according to just principles which all religions would support. The key issue is the injustice wrought against Palestine, which the writer wishes to pretend is sourced in the threat of Islam. The achievements of Jews is irrelevant in that context.
It might or might not be racist to ascribe to followers of any group, including a religion, greater intelligence and ability. But that wasn’t the issue and was not what I was doing. I simply stated that the Jews are smart, productive and creative and have given the West an almost inexhaustible list of brilliant scientists, writers, composers, artists, etc. If you think that Islam has made an equal contribution to the West, particularly in the modern era, then you are deluded. And I might add that whatever gifts the European Jews have given the world, they didn’t do it by invading first.
But you are not alone in such a delusion. The object of Islamic Studies departments and numerous scholars and writers around the world is to flog us the idea that Islam has been nothing but beneficial to all the countries it has invaded since the death of the Prophet in 632 until we all accept it, because perhaps then we will accept more readily their religion of peace and tolerance when they are once again in a position to impose it. And I say all that as someone who has visited mosques and has an appreciation for Islamic art among other things.
The entire Islamic world consists of countries that were invaded, colonized, and converted by Arabs, and they are still under the thumb. Curious that we never discuss that. Ask ordinary Iranians what they really believe and which festivals they prefer when the big brother theocracy isn’t on their backs and they’ll tell you – their own native religion of Zoroastrianism and the Festival of Fire. Only 5-10% of them even go to the mosque, according to some counts, which is a source of great displeasure for the zealots.
I have taught many Iranians, some of them Christian converts who can never return to their home country. . All of them were immensely proud of their wonderful ancient Persian civilization. Not one of them liked Islam or the Islamic Republic.
I have known and worked with Iranians in the past and heard similar stories. Likewise for my father, who had Iranian colleagues when he was working in Kuwait back in the 1970s. I remember one of them, a nice chap named Baram, who later moved to the UK. He was very proud of his Persian origins and would get very indignant if anyone suggested that Iranians were Arabs. Persian civilization is fascinating. I think it was in an excellent book by Michael Axworthy titled Iran: Empire of the Mind, which I read about 12 years ago, that I read that only 5-10% of Iranians go to the mosque.
There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the world and Muslims have won, as a proportion, 1.4% of the Nobel prizes.
There are around 13 million Jews in the world and Jews have won, as a proportion, 20% of the Nobel prizes.
A bit of a difference, don’t you think?
Going back in time, the Muslim world adopted the printing press in 1725. The Christian and Jewish world had been using it since its invention in 1440.
Going back further still, the “zero” which Islam claims to have invented came from Hindu India.
I won’t delve into the ancient Greeks, Romans and Persians, etc. because almost all civilizations have stood on the shoulders of these giants for the furthering of knowledge.
Cherry-picking much? Cambridge Uni alone has won more than a whole host of countries combined.
Where 99% of Nobels are won is USA/Europe, the most advanced and wealthy countries, like Norway itself.
what a silly little obsessed jew-baiter you are.
Thank you for your series of ripostes to Athena Jones. You’ve saved others the trouble. Some commenters are irredeemable. No knowledge of history or the much bigger picture, just a half-crazed, inarticulate and unrelenting focus on one group of people at one point in time and their supposed status as the victims in all this.
More people ought to be aware of such matters as how, for example, the PLO ruthlessly took the Lebanon as the base of its activities back in the 1970s and 80s and brought about the destruction of that beautiful country. The Jordanians had more sense than to let the Palestinians abuse them in the same way, even though that country has a large Palestinian population.
Philo-semites are almost as creepy as anti-semites. My rule of thumb is to treat each individual on his or her merits, end of story.
I don’t think Jews are necessarily more intelligent than anyone else, in the sense of some innate inherited biological quality, but they do seem to have a culture that emphasises learning, and they are over-represented among leading scientists and cultural figures (20% of Nobel prizes have gone to Jews). I agree with Andrew there. Which in no way excuses Israel’s actions against Palestinians. On that, I fully agree with you.
Excellent article and excellent comment by Andrew.
I do wonder when we might see a tear shed by our “progressive” community, for the 1000’s of Palestinians killed in Syria by fellow muslims – just a recent example of how they are treated in the region, and not bey Israelis and/or jews. My guess is – for the most part – those deaths just don’t resonate for those who want us to believe they genuinely care for the hapless of Gaza.
Go figure.
Keeping in mind that a) numbers of civilians/kids killed by Israel is always inflated by the ‘Gaza Health Ministry (aka Hamas)’, and b) some of the fatalities were by Hamas bombs, a significant percentage of which fell within Gaza.
I’d like to learn more about the convicted murderer allowed to go free.
As you might discern from my other Comment here, I’m trying to form an honest opinion on the conflict as it now stands.
I came to this article again as a friend told me how many comments I’d had, so I am surprised to find that anyone is still reading this six days later.
In response to your comment, I would say that this forum is not really a good place to form an opinion about such a complex issue. All you can really do is read reliable sources as much as possible, and dig into the history as far back as you can, and then draw your own conclusions. Really, it is far too serious and contentious an issue to come online and read other people’s heated comments, including my own, and then form an opinion. And whatever opinion you do ultimately form, it will be nothing more than a talking point concerning a subject that is perhaps best left unaddressed by people who can bring no solutions to the table or do anything else about it.
As regards my own opinion, however well or badly it may be expressed, and however much I may have read around these matters, it is merely that. An opinion that has no influence on events. I would only add that the general tenor of my contributions to this article is that Muslim conquest is at the root of this problem (and many other problems around the world today). For example, if they had never invaded and imposed their religion on a large part of the known world, most Palestinians today might still either be Jewish or Christian, or – much less likely – pagan, or perhaps simply free to choose their own beliefs, and hence this particular problem would not exist. This evidently reflects my own dark view of the growth of a fanatical, repressive Islam in Europe, a development I do not welcome, and which should be of far more concern to Europeans than what is happening in Palestine, although there are links between all these issues. But obviously, many people these days prefer not to look too far back into the past, except where it concerns the iniquities of European colonialism, of course.
The article itself is about the resurgence of antisemitism in Europe, which has little to do with Palestine (or the far right) and lots to do with the increasing number of antisemitic Muslims coming into Europe, many of them incapable of contributing to our societies given the high rates of unemployment and increasing automation and their own antipathy towards the West and the western way of life.
So, as regards the case of the Muslim man who threw an old Jewish lady from the balcony of her flat, it occurred about two years ago, while his trial took place only recently. He was acquitted on the grounds that his excessive consumption of cannabis had rendered him paranoid and psychotic and thus irresponsible for his acts. He is currently undergoing psychiatric observation. Of course, he already had quite a few convictions for previous crimes to his name. All this led to a few demonstrations and gatherings in several cities in France, but it has all been quickly forgotten by the media.
Here is a link to the case on the French Wikipedia site, which I imagine you can convert to English: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Sarah_Halimi
It is not the only case of its kind, and of course there is widespread fear among the French Jewish community these days.
I hope my reply is of some help to you.
This is simple hasbara boilerplate.
Thank you for your thoughtful and informative comment.
In the U.S. the Interfaith Councils are lergely a front for militant Islam.
This piece hit me hard because, working in higher education, I am surrounded by so many loud and proud antisemites (including an alarming proportion of visible minorities). Opinions that were once shameful are now fashionable. I have heard casual comments from ‘reputable scholars’ that would make Goebbels blush. My fear is that we no longer have the tools to fight back against this pernicious brand of hatred. We are in an age of ignorance, immorality, and fanaticism.
How does the institution you work for react to this anti-Semitism?
The UK Equality Act 2010 prohibits such acts, or is there such a prevailing climate of fear that no-one dares to challenge it?
My colleagues are clever. They know the rules and they know how power operates within the university. They are very skilled at walking the razor’s edge – some of them seem to really enjoy it – and they know when they can do what they want because someone else isn’t in a position to challenge them.
Does that mean that some of your colleagues openly condone anti-Semitism?
It’s not usually that clear cut. Mostly they repeat antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories. As an example, when a colleague mentioned he was attending a conference in Israel another replied that the Zionists must be paying him a lot. Just this week a colleague posted on social media that she didn’t care how many Israelis get bombed to death by Hamas. The same colleague has a habit of saying that the Holocaust was not a unique historic event and is given too much importance.
For a seemingly bright person to post that on social media is surely more than a bit dodgy.
Sounds naive maybe, but can you not report her anonymously to the university for posting things like that?
This person is highly respected in her field, actually. It would surprise if she hasn’t been reported before because her posts tend to vanish.
Screenshot and report anonymously would be my recommendation then.
She risks nothing at all, hers is the allowed view , when people complained about Oxbridge lecturer the college supported her.. An old lady who suffered in one of the camps in WW11 has put her experiences online as an educational tool-she has suffered vile abuse. The BBC employs people who think this behaviour is acceptable.
The BBC is becoming a hateful organisation – the British Biased Corporation.
They only seem interested in appealing to people who are part of their group ( who probably have dinner parties & don’t watch television anyway). The average person who would think ‘you can write/say that’ is just totally ignored.
I’m still looking for the quote that would make Goebbels blush. This is the closest, and it’s deeply disturbing.
But not quite in Goebbels’ league. Depends on the context, I guess – if she said something like “I don’t care how many, it’s still not as many as the number of Palestinians the Israelis bombed to death” then it’s rather less disturbing – or perhaps disturbing on a different level.
Referring to Israeli conference organisers as Zionists, while a strong signal that antisemitism may be at work, is not remotely in Goebels’ league.
As for “Holocaust was not a unique historic event” – it’s far from the only historical genocide (or the largest), though in 20th Century Western “civilisation” it may well be – and as such, it used the industrial scale methods available to our civilisation. Not a Goebbels level claim, however. Not even a David Icke.
As for its being “given too much importance” – we should not forget or repeat it – but nor should we forget or ignore genocides and wide-scale slaughter such as happened in Rwanda and Burundi in recent years, or the 20th Century mass slaughter (admittedly less ethnically motivated) in Cambodia or the Soviet Union, or the genocide of around one million Armenians in Anatolia earlier that century, or the current treatment of the Rohingya (or the Karen) in Myanmar, or the Uighur in China. I have spoken to people from other ethnic groups who consider the fixation on the Holocaust as being very Eurocentric. I believe it is quite in order to remember horrors recently perpetrated on our continent – but we must not negate other mass slaughters, or miss the lessons they have for us.
Nobody serious in the Jewish community or in the holocaust-commemorating community discounts the other genocides that have taken place in the 20th century (and now in the 21st). That being said, it is precisely the “Industrial scale methods” — as well as the intense racial aspect, down to the 1/4 Jewish level — that make the holocaust distinct from other genocides, not its “eurocentredness”.
Apologies – my reply is “Awaiting for approval”
I would report them for what is virulent antisemitism and hate speech.
Supporting Palestinians in their struggle is not hate speech, much as many on here would like it to be.
If you believe that cheering for the deaths of Israeli civilians is “supporting Palestinians in their struggle”, then I can see why you find yourself disagreeing with many on here.
You’re wasting your time. Paul Wright is someone who think philo-semites (i.e. people here on UnHerd, including myself, who have simply expressed their appreciation for Jews’ contribution to our civilization.) are as creepy as anti-semites. Like many, he has forgotten that this article is about a ‘resurgence’ of antisemitism on European soil, which has little if anything to do with the Palestine question and everything to do with the age-old Muslim hatred of Jews. As a result, many European Jews, including those in France and England, are packing their bags and leaving, while of course more and more Muslims are arriving. That is a tragedy, but he doesn’t care. Like many he uses the Palestinian issue as a screen for his own antisemitism,and in that respect resembles Hamas when they hide behind their own citizens to fire rockets at the hated enemy.
In response to the ‘charge’ of philo-semitism, I can only say that I was actually unaware of the Jewishness of great artists like Kafka, Mahler (a convert anyway) and many others, including Bob Dylan of all people, when I was first moved by their works. I certainly have no desire to be a jew, a phenomenon addressed in Howard Jacobson’sThe Finkler Question.
Could you tell us what they said roughly? Are you meaning that reputable scholars in UK universities recommended genocide? (It is hard to think what would make Goebbels blush other than something like that.)
I’m in Higher Education too, and experience the same, particularly in fields that are non-scientific. One professor at my college committed suicide recently. Instead of grief at his passing, there was joy at his death because he was considered ‘right-wing’. I was quite taken aback by the level of hatred I was witnessing, particularly in light of the fact it was coming from a group of people who pride themselves on their care and compassion.
That is so upsetting and I believe it could happen where I work too. If ever someone exhibits the slightest evidence of political independence, the whispering campaigns start.
Colleges seem to be a lost cause. The only thing is to defund all but the main courses, but political weakness (as this would raise unemployment figures) won’t allow this. Students who don’t fit in with this ethos are better off taking a degree on-line.
The ‘opposition’ will have to organise themselves. Famous academics who have been cancelled could give on-line courses and tuition , but the students,after completing their degrees, would then need to seek work in a like-minded enviroment .In America certain states seem to be dividing up as red or blue-thats not so easy in our small country whose central control all seem to lean towards the left. Perhaps move to another country?
to which country could common sense people move I wonder?
Some people have been taking their medical degrees in eastern european countries-mainly because its cheaper. That part of the world seems to value the traditional , so if you want to study an actual subject ie music that might be the place to go.
It would be a bit ironical as some people’s families fled those areas about 120 years ago for them to say ‘can we come back please?
Unherd is running an interview with a father who has taken his daughter out of school & is considering setting up his own school.As the university system has all the aspects he dislikes in her school education , he will then have to consider where she takes her degree.
Our democracy is being hollowed out from within. We elect ‘conservative’ governments that are in office but not in power as they’re more afraid of these political psychopaths that run the institutions than anyone. The centre has not held.
What horrible individuals!
JP Martin (and other readers) – just to say I asked a question to you but it is being held up for approval.
My question is similar to another, so you have already answered it.
By the time it gets through moderation, I will look like a clown who cannot be bothered reading other comments!
Annoying!
Yes, it is all utterly terrifying and has been happening for some years now. Jews everywhere are under attack from the far-Right, pretty much all of the Left, and of course your old friends the muslims, of whom there are now tens of millions throughout the West, and whose long-term play for global domination is going very well indeed.
Of course, one can understand why the Left and the muslims hate Jews. The Jews are astonishingly smart, productive and useful people. In other words, everything that the Left and the muslims are not. These people will always hate Jews and there is nothing you can do about that.
As such, it is the failure of the knuckeheads on the far-Right to overcome their anti-Jewishness that most distresses me because it undermines their (sometimes) valid points around immigration and various other subjects. They should be encouraging Jews to bring their productivity and intelligence to their countries and societies, because those countries and societies will be so much stronger and better for that productivity and those societies.
Well Arabs are hardly useless people, Islam is the problem rather than Muslims.
Yet Islam saved civilisation for us during the Dark Ages.
Utter nonsense, or are you being sarcastic? Islam did not even exist in the Dark Ages, if by that that you mean from the time the Romans left Britain to about the eighth century, during which time monks all over Europe were busy preserving knowledge. All the scribes and scholars who saved the classical texts in the Muslim world were Jewish and Christian anyway, but it was the Muslim invasion of Constantinople in the mid-15th century that caused thousands of scholars to flee to Italy, taking with them their copies of the classical texts, and inadvertently kick-starting the Renaissance.
You don’t need to erase history to make your points. Islam is widely regarded by historians as having transferred the knowledge of ancient Europe and Asia (including our numbering system, which originated in India) to the Europeans of the middle ages. there’s no need to denigrate what Islam did in the 9th-12th century in order to critique what Islam has become today; the Islamists’ actions and words certainly provide all the ammunition.
I am not erasing history. I responded to the previous comment, which claimed that Islam saved “us” during the Dark Ages. It did not, as it did not exist at that time, and did not arrive in Europe (Spain) until roughly 730, on the point of a sword, whereupon the emerging Spanish civilization was erased for seven centuries. The rest of my points are valid, and I was not denying the contribution of Islam in diverse areas including mathematics. That was scarcely the point of my response. But I suppose you’ve swallowed the kool aid of Islamic studies departments around the world and believe El Andalus was a was a golden age of scientific ingenuity and tolerance. Well, there are plenty of sources that prove otherwise, including many Muslim ones. It’s odd how centuries of Islamic imperialism get wholly ignored at a time when there is so much focus on European imperialism, is it not?
Excellent post.
El Andaluz, while it was ruled by the Ummayads, WAS a RELATIVE haven of tolerance and ingenuity, certainly compared to what was going on in Christian Europe at that time. All that ended after the Almoravid invasion, but again, ignoring history to score points in the present isn’t particularly edifying. As for “supposing” what I believe or don’t believe, you do know what happens when you ASSUME, right?
Point scoring is exactly what you are doing. All of the Islamic houses were invading powers and colonizers. The period that is widely held up as some sort of beacon of tolerance, and of which I am very well aware, was very short-lived anyway. The notion that it was a relative haven is contestable; It was still an oppressive colonial power in which Spaniards were third-rate citizens who paid the jizra, among other less benign things. The idea that it was tolerant is being swallowed wholesale in Europe and elsewhere. I remember in Paxman’s series Empire that at some point he asks an old Egyptian (I think) man what he thought of the British, clearly hoping to wheedle out of him a response to the effect that they been at least in some respects a force for the good, to which the man sagely and tersely replied that the British did not belong there, end of story. The fact that the period of tolerance did not last long is the lesson to take home with us.
Excellent post.
Ah bless ! So the Ottoman Turks kick-started the Renaissance (inadvertently )
Actually 1453 is a bit late for that chain of causation
Ah bless you, you patronizing person! John Gribbin, in his marvellous book Science: A History uses 1453 as a handy starting date for the revival of Western Europe (and he’s not alone in that view), though of course many Greek-speaking scholars who had seen which way the wind was blowing had obviously stared fleeing to Italy before then, and plenty of other developments had been going on in Europe for centuries as I have pointed out in other comments here. Do I really have to try to explain the whole complex history just to avoid your kind of ignorant patronizing comment.
Is this part of the new re-writing? There used to be a comedy show ‘Goodness , Gracious , Me’ where the old man claimed anyone or anything , Shakespeare , railways etc was invented by India.
No, it didn’t. Muslim armies invaded civilzed and settled countries and made dhimmis of their inhabitants.;
Yes it did. But that was then — more than 1,000 years ago — and this is now.
I agree wholeheartedly that islam is problematic, but you have lost me with “Arabs are hardly useless people.” I am sure you had something in mind, so perhaps you could explain.
What I’m confused are you saying all Arabs are useless people.
No, I’m genuinely confused by your comment. When I think of, for example, Jewish people, I see that they (in the 21st century) are very prominent in law, medicine, science, music (to name but a few) but when I think of arab nations the only thing that springs to mind is oil – and they neither developed, discovered nor exploited that. I am sure they as a group cannot be not useless (few human beings are, and probably fewer ethnicities – though quite what ‘useful’ is in that context is difficult to define) and but your description of ‘hardly useless’ implies some talents or abilities beyond the norm.
Of course, if we reduce the ‘useful’ criterion to “What do they do?” There are any number of peoples where the answer is “not a lot” – Zulus? Australian aboriginal peoples? Native Americans? Inuit? Oddly enough, even though I cannot define what they “do” I regard all these groups with some admiration and even affection (hopefully not in a patronising way, though I appreciate that is a risk.) The world would be a poorer place without them.
The arabs?
Well I didn’t intend to imply they have talents beyond the norm, just as you have acknowledged that as a group they are not useless. The original post implied Jews are an inherently useful people whereas Muslims are useless which I don’t think is true at all.
You are of course correct that certain groups have contributed little to the development of civilization but it is my understanding that this correlates highly with the resources which were available in the region of the world in which they evolved.
I don’t want to labour the point, but the original post talked about muslims, and your response was that Arabs are ‘hardly useless people”. These are two different groups : not all Arabs are muslim, not all muslims are Arabs. Again, the original comment said that ” The Jews are astonishingly smart, productive and useful people.” I take it that you have no quibble with that observation, even if you disagree that “this is everything that the Left and the muslims are not.”
Interesting and thought-provoking post. Should we value people in terms of what they “do” (e.g. the UK. for the industrial revolution, the Greeks for almost every intellectual innovation in the ancient world) and what they contribute to the development of civilization, thereby instrumentalizing them, or should we value them just for what they are? Australian Aborigines are adept at living in a dry and relatvely waterless environment and would still have done very well without the arrival of Europeans, and high but isolated civilizations like the Incas might have continued if the conquistadors had not turned up. We have to be careful with the latter, though, because the Mayan civilzation imploded and collapsed through self-inflicted ecocide (a lesson for us!), long before the arrival of Europeans..
Agreed. I find it very difficult to understand people like Bernie Sanders in the U.S.A. Self-hating Jews are as much an enemy of civilization as Islam is.
There is an article in American Thinker 23rd May by Andrea Widburg which shows this strange behaviour very well
A microcosm of the larger fifth column that is the progressive left. The enemy within is always more dangerous.
My comment that you replied to is now ‘awaiting’ days after going through ok , so it seems some people actually go through comments manually & stop anything they don’t like.Strange how all this censorship has emerged with covid-sensitive little virus isn’t it?
If you genuinely believe that people only disagree with you because they are weakminded or evil, then there is no hope that you will be able to understand or engage with your “opponents”. So what are you doing? Virtue signalling?
He thinks his opinions are facts.
Which far right? Where is it?
Philo-semites are almost as creepy as antis. As anyone reading this thread would see. The author attracts these people in spades.
And of course whenever politicians call out anti semitism they have ro call out non existent islamophobia , so they don’t lose their base of support. Pathetic.
It’s also very disingenuous. The same people who had neuralgic reactions whenever anyone dared say ‘all lives matter’ during the BLM protests are now telling us that ‘all hate matters’. Why does it pain them so much to admit the existence of antisemitism? The answer is fairly obvious.
Precisely.
Islamophobia is a thing, you’ve just revealed it by denying it. Similar to the worst anti-semitism, always denied to exist by the most rabid anti-semites.
Do you also believe in anti-white too?
So just what is Islamophobia in your view? Does it include valid criticisms?
Anti-Muslim prejudice surely exists. Islamophobia is a made up term that means little, as “fear of Islam” — which is how islamophobia is defined — is a legitimate fear of Islamism, a political doctrine that supports jihad and is being weaponized to defeat Israel and undermine the West.
Islam is not the same as Islamism. Many Muslims have no time for the latter, but could hardly be called Islamophobic.
I do not like this sentence, which I will put down to carelessness. The word resurgence gives the impression – one that the mass media does its best to promote – that it is the same people as in the 1930s – Europeans de souche – who are the anti-semites in Europe, whereas anyone who is really watching knows it would be 80% or 90% or more, recent immigrants, particularly of the ROP persuasion, and their offspring.
Carelessness, perhaps, but I believe the author truly understands the nature of the problem. With that said, ‘resurgence’ also implies that it went away at some point. The facts support your comments but, in my own life, I have witnessed more of the leftwing variety. Neither group has managed to corner the market and they seem quite happy to share it.
They share a hatred of the USA – strange bedfellows
A hatred of civilisation, tradition, and beauty too.
Tom Lehrer had a satirical song called “Prejudice” many years ago, though I haven’t been able to find it on the internet for years now. Briefly, it was about whilte, black, , brown and yellow people hating each other , ending with “And everybody hates the Jews!”
Sadly, that seems to be increasingly true…
Its odd coincidence that Max Mosley , son of Oswold has just died. The media seem to want to suggest the entire British aristocracy supported him in the 1930’s wheras the Mitfords were a very unusual family and P G Wodehouse would not have dared mock the movement in the character of Roderick Spode if it were so popular.
I love Roderick Spode. And people thought Wodehouse was pro-Nazi.
We knew someone who was a social worker /home help & one of his old ladies recalled an incident in the 1930’s where Mosley’s lot marched through their streets. The j lads came with their cricket bats & they chased mosley’s lot away-much to the amusement of the people who lived there. Both Waugh & Churchill campaigned to help Wodehouse , but was not to be until 1970’s-it was a complete discrace considering what he & his wife went through
Certain groups pay them to be the victim-wonder what they’ll do when the circus moves on?
Deranged by Islam. And its anti-Semitic allies like you.
You think that a high percentage of Muslim immigrants in the UK are Palestinian ?
Don’t forget the huge contribution of “The Squad” whose relentless anti-Semitic narrative goes unchallenged by their party leadership and the US media. Their words and the taciturn acceptance if not outright encouragement reverberate around the whole world.
Also never forget that over 90% of UN resolutions condemning individual countries are gleefully passed against Israel.
They have condemned anti-Semitism. I’m not sure their criticism of the Israeli human rights record (whether you agree or not) constitutes anti-Semitism.
You have a point on the UN though.
their “critiques” of anti-semitism ring hollow; they support BDS but no similar measures against other countries, — that’s double standard. they call Israel and only Israel “nazi” and “apartheid” — that’s demonization. They say Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea” — that’s delegitimization. Anti-semitism through and through.
How about the human rights records of islamic countries? Do they allow Jews, Christians or other non-Muslims to live in their countries?
Why should Jews not have their own ancestral land of Israel? It isn’t as if they have laid a claim to any other country.
Yes, and countries like China are among those which condemn Israel every time, and yet nobody turns a hair.
Import the third world, become the third world.
‘Tell me what your company is and I’ll tell you what you are’
I read that last night in Don Quixote , quoted by Sancho Panza as an old saying
True.
Unfortunately!
It is as if the 2000 Camp David negotiations never happened. Except that they did. The Palestinians were offered their own state three times. Once at Camp David, six months later at the Taba Conference and later in the 2007 Olmert offer. The Palestinians did not say ‘ok but” or ‘that’s a good start” or “we accept subject to revision”. They said no. That’s where we are now.
Camp David was rejected by both sides. Taba was rejected by Ariel Sharon, not the Palestinians. Olmert was rejected by the EU and many others as inadequate. Israel has never offered a coherent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital and close to 1967 boundaries. The Arab world has offered that. Israel’s rejection is the problem.
The Arab world never offered anything without the stipulation of “right of return”. That’s why no peace agreement has ever been reached, because there’s no way Israel would ever be OK with that. It’s a far more deal-breaking issue than East Jerusalem being the Palestinian “capital”.
Yes, right of return is a difficulty, but most think a compromise is possible: a few return and the rest get compensation. Try offering it. But clearly East Jerusalem and nearly all of 67 borders is essential. A Bantustan is not remotely sustainable.
The border is your classic ‘wicked’ problem. There are 3 options out the current impasse:
A – Israel cedes the entire WB.
B – Israel cedes the WB minus the border areas.
C – Israel cedes WB but retains military control of Jordan river.
Israel has a strategic need to control the Jordan river – it is ‘vital ground’ in military terms. They don’t trust the Palestinians not to let hostile enemies into the WB, therefore ‘A’ is untenable.
B & C look, with justification, like a Bantustan.
Short of a credible (ie. US/UK) international monitoring force on the border, I don’t see a way out.
And what about the Palestinian need for security? Trust would be needed on both sides, but yes neutral international guarantors might help.
People are uninterested in facts on this thread. It’s comic given that Unherd is supposed to cater for slightly brainier people than the Daily Heil, but there we go.
Brilliant and incisive.
“one of the West’s most famous celebrities”
Really? I had no idea who she was. I really must get out more – or, then again, maybe not.
Ditto.
Perhaps it is just a product of time and advancing curmudgeonness but I have learned just how unimportant celebrities are.
Whenever I get drawn into a discussion of the Israel-Palestine conflict, I generally find it helpful to ask those who champion the Palestinian cause about all the other populations that were expelled and/or displaced at around the same time. Among them were the millions of Muslims who were forced out of India and had to settle in Pakistan, for example, or the Hindus and Sikhs who moved in the opposite direction, or the hundreds of thousands of Germans who having been thrown out of Czechoslovakia and Eastern Prussia had to start again from scratch, or the 800,000 Sephardi Jews driven out of Arab countries, or, a couple of decades later, the Asians thrown out of Uganda. What is so tragic about the Palestinians? Why does the clock have to be turned back to accommodate them, and not, say, the Sephardi Jews or the Ugandan Asians? Or, to put it another way, why have the Czechs, the Russians, the Pakistanis, the Indians, the Greeks, the Turks and the Ugandans – among many others – been forgiven for having rid themselves of an unwanted ethnic group in their midst, while the Israelis have not? Could it be because the Israelis are Jewish?
Could be. Or it could be because the Israelis wouldn’t last three days without the billions of dollars per year the Americans are pumping in to keep them afloat. I don’t think those other countries did what they did on welfare payments from the west.
Israel gets from the US 3 Milliard $ a year as credit to buy American arms with. Israel’s yearly budget is 300 milliard $.
I wouldn’t call 1% of the budget, all of which to be spent on US arms, “keeping them afloat”.
Your reply then is pure Whataboutery.
Best example is Armenians from a number of Ottoman places, accompanied by a million strong genocide – but they get no coverage.
It’s all pretty scary. Basically the antizionist far-left is saying that I as a British citizen should be bullied, discriminated against and harassed to put pressure on Israel to stop existing. Has any of these people come with a plan for coexistence.
No one says that even remotely. In what way are you discriminated against? In your work? Housing? Have you been deported like the Windrush people?
I agree that the extent to which the willfully naïve or intellectually stunted buy in to anti-Semitic social media garbage is pathetic but I just assume it’s the same crowd that looks to Gwyneth Paltrow for the latest animal/vegetable/mineral cure-all that can be inserted in the old woohoo.
To me what is worse is how our institutions are either actively contributing or quietly abetting the direct indoctrination of children.
This item from a Toronto newspaper last week
“An educator with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) is under investigation after he allegedly sent a virulently anti-Israel manual out to teachers that suggests a documentary and a book about a terrorist, recommends children’s books that characterize Israelis as thieves and murderers, and gives advice on how to teach students about the hateful Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel”
The distributor of the pamphlet identifies as “queer latine transformer”
His/theys/its job at the school board?
“part of the Board’s Gender-based Violence unit, whose core function, according to TDSB online materials, is to prevent and address “gender-based violence, homophobia, sexual harassment, and inappropriate sexual behaviour by students towards other students in schools.”
It’s bad out there.
Real bad.
However it is this educator & his like who get on council boards & arrange for towns & cities to take in the most anti-social , anti-western groups, which unsurprisingly dis-stabalizes areas. People move out and the newcomers cost a lot in benefits but always vote in the ‘right’ people. Job done as far as educator is concerned. Where does he & his family live-somewhere nice & expensive & gated,
Awful to dehumanise 50% of Jews in the only place they have. So wrong.
Yes, it’s extrordinary how many people are out there who are rabidly anti-Israel – as in, against its very existence – yet insist that they have nothing against Jewish people. In what universe does that make sense?
A lot of people just go with the flow. To try to retain self esteem they convince themselves they believe what they do through morality, not fear.
The BBC’s drip fed anti-Semitic coverage of Israel is the single biggest factor for the growth in anti-Semitism in Britain. It’s what happens when an institution is captured by the anti-west left.
If its existence requires brutal occupation, Apartheid, and regularly bombing its neighbours, then yes, there’s something fundamentally wrong with that.
Paedophiles for Palestine.
It’s a curious thing – Corbyn may have seemed like an outlier for being so open about his view toward Jews, but he is closer to the rule than the exception. As events in the US and abroad have shown, and as multiple Dems in Congress and their media acolytes have parroted, anti-Semitism is very much in vogue on the left. What few “moderate” Dems may exist are petrified to say anything for fear of facing a primary challenge, which is not exactly a profile in courage.
Sometimes I think the best thing to do would be to find a secluded spot on this earth and wait for the sh)t to hit the fan.
As far as I can tell the world is becoming madder. Some day, hopefully after I have died, a humanity splintered into fragments is going to indulge in an orgy of violence which has no precedent in our history.
Reason, or thinking, seems to be in retreat everywhere, while wild emotion seems to be in the ascendancy. It may even be that people are becoming less human and more like animals. If that is unfair to animals, then maybe more like demons, or devils.
Perhaps we are being diverted away from the goal of the Kingdom of Heaven on earth, and toward the creation of Hell on Earth. It certainly sometimes looks that way to me.
I wish I could recommend your post several times over.
Simplistic, but when I was a kid, I was taught and learnt that two wrongs don’t ever make a right.
True then, true now.
This sort of behaviour is never, ever excusable but it is all but inevitable, whatever anyone likes to imagine.
The long running sore of the Palestinian Question, whether we like it or not, is at the heart of this and is consistently hijacked and name checked as the ‘justification’ for these unspeakable acts of hate and division across the world.
Whether you personally believe that some of these misguided people who do so are ‘ill-informed’ and ‘under-educated’ like Ali is a moot point I’m afraid, and whether naive narcissists are driven by a natural political compulsion to conspicuously ‘defend the oppressed’ so that they can ‘virtuously’ Tweet about it later for public consumption or just pure unadulterated apparently religiously inspired hate doesn’t change one iota the many decades of the failed reality on the ground to find a lasting solution in Palestine.
A solution which, unfortunately, is now looking further away than ever and looks like it will be even harder to achieve as positions on both sides clearly harden against a two state solution and become even more deeply entrenched.
Nevermind the situation in the immediately surrounding countries bordering Palestine becoming ever more tenuous.
Much then as I deeply admire the fiercely brave Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and granted she does allude to this very point in the article, this is more largely unhelpful, good vs bad, finger pointing ‘whataboutery’ which, though I’m sure will find a willing audience in some quarters on here doesn’t and, more importantly, won’t really challenge this unfortunate trend in the grand scheme of things because the underlying cause that profoundly, if not exclusively informs it is unlikely to go away anytime soon.
There is no Palestinian question! It is an invention that generates revenues.
You are absolutely correct that it’s an invention. If Egypt and Jordan had offered citizenship and full rights to all the Palestinian refugees in the areas they occupied from 1948 to 1967, and left Israel the hell alone, there would probably be peace in the region now. All being Arabs, culturally and linguistically, assimilation would have been quick. There would be no issue with Jewish Israeli settlement in the West Bank, because it would still be under Jordanian control, so strictly off limits to settlement. The Jordanians and Israelis would probably have long since hashed out a peace agreement allowing Israelis to freely visit the Western Wall and the Temple Mount (two of the holiest sites in Judaism) and possibly other holy sites, without being harassed or attacked. There would probably still be some on both sides who didn’t like it, but it would be mostly accepted as the status quo. And Gaza would be a non-issue, basically just a part of Egypt, possibly, owing to its fabulous beaches, with a thriving tourist trade.
The so-called long-running Palestinian issue could be solved — and could have been solved — at a moment’s notice if there were a Palestinian leadership sincerely interested in ending the conflict by making peace with Israel. No such leadership exists now, or has existed ever. Pressuring Israel won’t work, because the only concession the Palestinian leadership will accept, given their maximalist, loser-take-all demands, is an Israel that allows 5 million Palestinian “refugees” to return, which is a recipe for Israel’s dissolution, which no Israeli government could ever agree to. Until the Palestinians come to the table with sincere, realistic demands, the situation will not change, regardless of how much the rest of the world stamps its feet.
Thank you.
You have sent me off on a quest but still the major counterpoint to this is that the Jewish population between the 1917 Balfour Declaration and 1947 was extremely small in relation to the existing Muslim Palestinian population.
Hardly a counterpoint, since I wasn’t arguing history. I wonder if there are any other states who legitimacy you question on the basis of history going back 70 to 100+ years. Or any country who territory you claim belongs to others because they had more people on that land prior to its settlement and/or conquest.
‘Hardly a counterpoint, since I wasn’t arguing history’
I would say you are, but I can see why you might seek to claim otherwise.
Israel is not only a uniquely novel nation state, it was founded on a defined territory at a time where its now native people might now form the majority but most certainly didn’t by a significant margin at its relatively recent inception.
Biden vote frauded his way into Office and the stunning peace deals Trump achieved will not be built on, in all probability they’ll be reversed. The only way America will be America again is a civil war to topple the Vote-Fraud-in-Chief, and that’s not going to happen. Should. But it won’t.
For me, those who complain about antisemitism (especially in respect of complaints about the behaviour of the state of Israel) and who lament how Israel’s critics are uniquely obsessed with the world’s only Jewish state… would carry more weight if they also showed some concern for the plight of the Palestinian people, and did not defend even the most egregious actions by Israel.
Those (Palestinian, Jewish, or Trans) who care only about one group’s oppression are not, I feel, concerned about oppression and injustice, so much as about the rights and power of their own “tribe” – which is not the same thing at all.
I’m very much afraid that Mr Harris is right about the reducing likelihood of real peace there any time soon.
Agreed.
Boiling it down, it is about equality before the principles of the law, entirely regardless of ethnicity. Group A vs Group B.
Whilst the law itself might be unequivocal, who it applies to and when is a movable feast in the case of the Palestinian/Israeli Question.
Criticism of the actions undertaken by the state of Israel against Palestinians are often deliberately conflated with the highly emotive charge of anti-Semitism when the actions themselves are difficult, if not impossible to justify on purely legal grounds.
As I’ve repeatedly said before, Israel is not going anywhere, anytime soon and nor should it, but this puts ‘the state of Israel’ in an almost unique position in the world compared to all others, even other ‘theocracies’, and gives it, in effect, a Get Out Of Jail Free card to act with impunity, but one can’t help think that there is a price to itself and to its people for continually opting to play it.
The threat to Israel is an existential one. There are approx. 13 million Jews in the world, around half of them in Israel, as opposed to 1.5 billion Muslims throughout the world. If Jewish Israel falls, there must be no illusion that that is the end of it. What begins with the Jews will not end with the Jews.
You completely mischaracterize support for Israel as “tribal”. No doubt some people are motivated by that but by far the Jews and non-Jews who support Israel do so because they understand the situation Israel faces. And no, most don’t simply accept “the most egregious of Israeli actions” but the truth is that other than some crazed right-wing settlers, Israelis by and large want peace, which is much more than you can say for the other side.
The solution to the Palestinian question is simple. The Palestinian leadership needs to — for the first time — commit itself to negotiating sincerely to end the conflict. Unfortunately, they are still trapped in their ridiculous maximalist, loser-take-all demands that include essentially the dissolution of Israel as a Jewish state, and so the problem lingers. It’s not the solution that’s difficult. It’s the Palestinian loser-take-all attitude.
So you seem to be saying, and correct me if I’m wrong, that uniquely because of the Palestinian immutable ‘position’, the situation is insoluble?
Hamas’s in Gaza being different from the PA’s in the West Bank, with the former demanding the complete destruction of Israel and the latter not necessarily, but both demanding the repatriation of around 5m Palestinians across Palestinian territories, which includes the state of Israel and which would lead to its dissolution?
Thank you to the author for this well reasoned well constructed piece.
*useful idiots* and *Liberals* are the sorts of lemmings that are so easily influenced by “Influencers”.
Whether it be Snookie or Khloe – it shows the severe lack of actual intelligence amongst the Twitter, meme, TikTok set. Large swaths of people that cannot form an opinion longer than what fits on a bumpersticker.
Compounded by their so-called Woke / Tolerance = which is 100% tolerant of ONLY those that 100% agree with their groupthink. Human beings do not and will not “all just get along”.
Ignore human nature at your own peril…
“Despite the horrors that culminated at Auschwitz, anti-Semitism has been haunting our societies for years”
That seems a bit of an understatement. Hasn’t it been around for centuries?
I think she meant since Auschwitz, not before.
I see what you mean. The wording still seems a bit strange, as does the implication that centuries of anti-Semitism might be expected to disappear after Auschwitz.
I will said, thanks for you courage,to be a women writing this ,in very
dangerous times,is coming up the truth ,all ways.is the only way to be free.
None of this can happen without those who adopt these extreme positions imagining themselves superior.
This is the imagining of moral superiority. You can’t commit any of the murders, nor chant any of the chants, without being firmly convinced you are superior to those who are the targets of your condemnation.
Certain belief systems, secular and religious alike, are so seductive because they convince the follower that he or she gains superiority by the simple fact of belonging to a particular group, or converting to that group. Such a follower is then free to hate as much as he likes, as long as he hates the approved target. And that target is defined for him, so not only is he relieved of the burden of thinking for himself, moral autonomy is taken out of his hands, so much so that it isn’t even an option for him any longer.
How do you make people understand that when this happens someone ceases to be an individual in the true sense of the word, and even loses the potential to become more individual?
I sincerely believe that the ignorant ‘ Palestine ‘ supporters are unwittingly encouraging a nuclear war. If Israel is ever attacked by its surrounding nations as in past wars, and appear to be on the verge of victory, Israel will justifiably resort to the use of nuclear weapons. Once that happens, the whole world can hold its breath. If we allow a second Holocaust of Jews, it is only right that it is a Holocaust that consumes us all.
THE Holocaust was not the *first* time Jews were slaughtered in great numbers …
Forgiving that minimization, why would it be RIGHT for everyone to die if a “second Holocaust of Jews” were to happen?
Thank you Ayan, what a fantastic, well written piece.
There was always be useful idiots. And, contrary to what is implied in the expression, they are more dangerous than comic. Far more dangerous.
Just another grievance article from the ‘Grievance Industry’, you can spot them by the unbelievably jargonistic grievance language the writer above uses:
“story-lines of our time: the narrative of the oppressor versus the oppressed, of the coloniser versus the colonised, of the genocide perpetrator and system of supremacy.”
Pure Liberal/Lefty speak, a set of trigger words we are supposed to be conditioned to regurgitate pre-absorbed responses to.
Just say what it is you want to say without dropping into the Uni-speak, anti-bias training language. I can’t stand the new way of talking of struggles has become code words, it is an entire industry now days, Critical Theory, 1619, BLM de-colonizing, de-gendering, using the jargon devalues any argument.
Do you mean like Manchester Arena, Westminster Bridge, Borough market, Charlie Hebdo, la, la, la?
Unfortunately, that’s precisely what he means.
What do you mean by this?
when you fire rockets at Israel, don’t be surprised when they fire back.
Im surprised from the comments,,(thanks)reality&truth is rejected,,the status of consciousness is (0)cero.
A old adagio said,,the intelligence is limited,,,the stupidity not.
… “” when the guests insist on re-arranging the furniture – then the host should express concern and act “” – Nietzsche.
When the priest is decapitated on his altar, in a flood of blood, amid arab kill shrieks—
I don’t have to ‘hate’ an entire culture in order to strongly disagree with the actions of their leaders. Being ‘anti-oppressionist’ doesn’t align me with any particular race, ideology or religion. ‘Hamas is a Terrorist Organisation” declares the opposition. If I were having the shit bombed out my arse on the Gaza strip I might have a name for those responsible too. Where’s the straight thinking in all of this?
There isn’t any. There are a lot of extremeists posing as moderates on this thread.
o
In all fairness, Jews in the Arab World were, overall, well-treated until the founding of Israel. Muhammed’s 2 massacres of Jews were, right or wrong, for military purposes.
Many right-wing Jews physically attacked dissenting Jews during the ’80’s. I myself was attacked 4 times. This led to many Jews speaking out more and more against Israeli policies.
At this time the situation has spiraled out of control.
Bella has a lot of skin in this game. Her father claims to be the hereditary ‘Prince of Galilee’ and sheik of some part of Palestine. So in a’free’ Palestine , Bella could hope to be a ? princess?, anyway to be able to command a lot of peasants to do her bidding and supply her with goodies.
Free Palestine. But only a bit.
It seems grotesque that one of our (by that a mean inhabitant of this planet) few truly humane, insightful and rational thinkers should receive 300 comments, 90% of which seem to display such a wealth of degenerate self absorption. It’s not all about YOU! As my wiser grandmother would say (definitely wiser than me, she would she would have laughed at you, and not engaged. But this is the current cesspit, so hey ho).
Ali mentions the young followers of influencers. Are they inevitably just the young or do older people follow influencers also?
However, Israel has so very much for which to account. I was myself assaulted 4 times years ago for publicly critisizing Israeli policy. Is it a wonder that many people today are fed up with Israel? Now Hamas appears as a salvation for Palestinians. Israli policies should have changed long ago.
Not a good sign. This contention might ultimately be the death of us all.
I wonder if Unherd is aware that the spelling of “anti-Semitism”, as used in this article, is considered anti-Semitic by some?
nobody cares.
An article about false narratives regarding this conflict that somehow still manages to push the laughable idea that Israel is the victim of the situation and not the aggressor actively occupying someone else’s land and choking the life out of the people who life there. “Arabs and Israelis” have not been fighting for thousands of anything as Israel is a modern invention, plonked down on existing national structures to resolve a problem after WW2.
The tensions between Islam, Christianity and Judaism are a seperate although important issue.
The whole business of Israel is based on false narratives. Yet there is no shortage of people who support its deadly activities!
How does having to censor one’s thinking, for example that Palestine should be free from the river to the sea, in case some bigoted anti-semite interprets it for his own ends, differ from having to censor ones criticism of fundamentalist Islam in case we get a Fatwa?
Ask Salman Rushdie.
There is clearly a grave and increasing problem of anti-Semitism in the world today (as there is also with Islamophobia). But analysis of this problem is not helped by confusion with anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel. The slogan “Free Palestine” which illustrates the article is not anti-Semitic; Palestinians in the occupied territories are clearly not free, so calling for their freedom does not imply any prejudice against or maltreatment of Jews. Even the slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is only anti-Semitic if by that it is meant the expulsion or genocide of Jewish residents; for some it merely means a single state with equal rights solution. Confusing these issues not only makes fair analysis more difficult, if anything it encourages anti-Semitism…
Jews living in Israel and outside it should ask themselves: “Why is anti-Semitism on the increase ? ” I can tell them why. Many ordinary people, without any preconceptions about or even knowledge of the Middle East, or of Judaism or Islam, are just sickened by the unfairness and brutality handed out to the Palestinian Arabs by Israelis. The situation in the areas controlled by Israel seems to be as unfair and as inhumane as any apartheid system. I won’t go into the history of the story since the 1890’s, how Jewish freedom fighters or terrorists forced the British hand in 1948, and so on. Just focus on today. Articles like this one above don’t make any difference because they don’t address the issue. Anti semitism is not going away until a lasting settlement is achieved, with which all sides feel happy. Maybe thats not achievable, in which case Israelis will have to continue to build bomb shelters.
As a Jew living in Israel I hope I represent the opinion of some of us when I say:
a) your ignorance is showing
b) the way to address this ignorance is definitely not by swallowing whole what the media serves you daily – but this subject is too big to go into in detail here, where all I want to ask is this:
c) For the sake of the argument let’s say Israel is as horrible a place as you impute. Why are Jews living outside Israel the target of hate crimes, when you don’t see Chinese people attacked for -say- their treatment of Moslem Uighurs?
Why aren’t Turks attacked for their (real!) atrocities against the Kurds and the human rights abuses against their own people?
Why aren’t Arabs attacked for… Well, the list of wrongdoings by their various governments is too long, and well known. So-
Why the Jews? Why only the Jews?
Do non-Jewish Israelis enjoy the same rights as Jewish Israelis? I think they don’t , but if I’m wrong, I apologise. If they don’t, then that has to change. This might not fix anti-Semitism, but it’s certainly going to help, a lot.
For the answer to your question, read “The Merchant of Venice” by Wm Shakespeare.
Non Jewish Israelis do indeed enjoy the same rights as Jewish ones- they can vote and be elected, they serve in all branches of the
public and private sectors, and they are protected by the same rights in front of the same courts.
Re Shakespeare – what are you saying here – that Jews are persecuted because they are greedy money lenders,who demand a pound of Christian flesh in lieu of the money?
If that is your assertion than (apropos WS): By the pricking of my thumb, you’re antisemitic scum. So why don’t you trot off to one of the Nazi sites, where you’ll fit right in.
Why or how can it be anti-semitic to fight to free Palestine? Anti-semitism is a hatred of Judaism and its followers, Jews.
What is anti-semitic about a just cause to free 6 million Palestinian Christians and Muslims from Zionist Israeli occupation and colonisation. To pretend that it is denies every principle of justice and betrays all those who have suffered from true anti-semitism throughout history. It debases the very meaning of the term and renders it worthless.
More troubling than Israel’s war crimes and human rights atrocities to maintain occupation and colonisation of Palestine and to deny millions justice, freedom and human and civil rights, are those like Ali who are prepared to sacrifice any and all principles of an enlightened Western world, out of a hatred of Muslims.
No-one of conscience or integrity, who believes in principles of justice, rule of law, democracy, human rights and common human decency can question the justice of the Palestinian cause and to seek to do so, through the exploitation of a fear of Islam is just wrong.
The Palestinians are scapegoats, hoist on the petard of propaganda and fear. Whatever the reasons, whatever the history, no-one in our modern world has a right to occupy and colonise another people and treat them as Israel does the Palestinians. Certainly not if they want to call themselves a Western democracy as Israel does. And no amount of wrong committed by any religion gives us the right to condemn all followers because of it.
Israel is condemned as a colonial, military, apartheid State, not because it has mostly Jews as citizens.
I can and do question that part of the Palestinian cause which is to deny the Jews a state in Israel.
I question the conscience and integrity and racist tendencies of those who support that part of their cause.
Further I question the Humanity of those who can see no nuance and peddle the unbalanced and false narratives.
As everyone knows a Palestinian State has been available since ’48 on the basis of mutual peace.
Happily electorates across the west are rejecting the Corbynista rhetoric in favour of governments who support Israel’s right to exist in peace and defend itself and supply arms to effect that in whatever circumstances prevail.
Israel’s actions stimulate anti-Semitism. If Israel wishes for its people, and for Jews everywhere, to live in harmony and peace with their fellow man, then a peace treaty between the state of Israel and its neighbours is a necessary precondition. Such a settlement is very hard to achieve, but with the co-operation of all the major powers, plus the local players, it is possible.
What makes you think anti-semitism would go if Israel did not exist? Antisemitism existed long before Israel was created so cannot be attributed as the cause.
“Palestinians” (who were given that name only in the 1960s, by the PLO) have any number of other Muslim-majority countries in the ME to move to. They are particularly closely related to Jordanians.
Jews,. however, have only Israel, their ancestral land, to call their own, and they have developed it,. turning it into a modern, technologically advanced and forward-looking country, making the desert bloom.
Would you deny the Jews, who have suffered so much throughout history, the land that was theirs thousands of years before the advent of Islam?
Janice, I’m afraid that all of that is completely irrelevant. Israelis have to come to terms with reality. It’s taken many, many years but that’s what we are getting to now. Reality, for the Jews and the Israelis, means finding a peaceful and sustainable settlement. It will have to be policed by the major powers, including of course the US. The tectonic plates underlying the Middle Eastern equilibrium are shifting, and Israel can’t rely on the same international apathy and US support, come what may, as it has done for so long. For its own sake, Israel has to wake up, smell the coffee, and get to work.
The plates have indeed shifted. The UAE, Morocco and Sudan have made peace with Israel. What else has changed? You have been listening to the wokery. Have a look at what the actual government officials have been saying. “not Hamas” to quote Joe.
Janice, stop, please, we’ve moved on from the propaganda of ‘Exodus’ now. Thanks anyway.
““Palestinians” (who were given that name only in the 1960s, by the PLO) have any number of other Muslim-majority countries in the ME to move to”
I think you will find NO COUNTRY in the region, or the world, will take the Palestinians. They do work on work visas around the region, but must leave when its terms finish – as they are not thought to be a group which will add prosperity and civil order to anyone who takes them.
Excellent post.
Yes the action of these individuals is despicable and disturbing. But don’t you feel disturbed by the Israeli Government ‘s actions too? They never apologise for how many innocent lives they take everyday in the name of security? Their use of disproportionate , intemperate “shock and awe” tactics , causes outrage is that really so surprising? Especially when the casualties are innocent children? Or Is the Israeli Government beyond reproach?
By definition their policies could be said to be simply pro-semitic, so does that make anyone calling them out an anti semitic? As for being under attack from the far right did you miss seeing Tommy Robinson the BNP and NF shoulder to shoulder at the pro Israel rally? I didn’t think that they did multiculturalism generally speaking? Or am I missing something?
Ah, the false equivalence. Maybe you can parrot some in the American media who see the Iron Dome as a problem because it apparently prevents more Israelis from being killed. And what does “disproportionate” even mean? No one has ever won a fight, a battle, a war, or even a ball game by relying on proportionality.
The Israeli Government is not beyond reproach but it’s hard to avoid killing children when Hamas base themselves in schools and hospitals, using children and adults as human shields.
I am much more disturbed by the fact that the Iranian Government executes minors in amongst the 267 executions last year. So by comparison you are being disproportionate. I wonder why?
Whereas you seem to be shrugging off the fact that Israel kils tens and hundreds of Palestinian minors. Of course. “Self-defence”.
This person deserves an answer only if he/she can indicate that he/she shows the same concern for innocents taken in other conflicts, e.g. Turkey vs. Kurds, Russians vs. Chechens, Syrian civil war, all of which took far far more innocent civilian lives, including women and children, than all the encounters between Israel and Gaza put together. But something tells me this concern for innocents only reveals itself publicly when the perp is Israel.
If Israelis wanted to use shock and awe they would use it. What they use now is the smallest fraction of their destructive capability, so what you write is factually inaccurate. Israel acts with the kind of restraint which should serve as a model for others. unfortunately all it seems to do is further enrage its enemies.
If your idea of restraint is to kill and maim and dispossess fewer civilians than you could, you should not expect too much appreciation from the victims and their relatives. That is not the sort of restraint that should serve as a model for the rest of humanity.
Wouldn’t you be enraged if it was your relatives who had died in the attacks?
The rage it produces, and the long-lasting loss and injury, is precisely the problem with this strategy of “restraint”.
Has anti-Semitism spiked? Or has the definition of it just been widened out so far that literally any criticism of any Jew by any Gentile for any reason at any time is now “anti-Semitism”?
People are being violently attacked in broad daylight and you think the problem is definitional? A disgraceful comment.
Perhaps anti-Semitic?
that would be my guess.
I rest my case. Sorry, Vilde, but I’m just not feeling the guilt today. I’m Catholic. We learn to live with it.
Oh I rather think you came looking for it.
But the question does not seem to be “are more Jews being violently attacked in broad daylight” – so the issue of whether anti-semitism is increasing depends fundamentally on the definition of anti-semitism you’re using.
I think you have a point. Tolerance to any criticism, in this world of cancellation, is close to zero. This is more than obvious on this forum and this site which started as an appealing open-minded platform for anti-conformist and challenging opinions and which quickly evolved into a reactionary, antivax, islamophobic tribune.
Quite so.
That word would be “Islamophobia”.
Islamophobia is a bogus term used out of either ignorance or dishonesty in that in conflates bigotry towards Muslims with valid criticism of such ‘cultural enhancements’ as has been clearly outlined in the first comment by Andrew Grant Dutch.
It is however, an unfortunate fact that any criticism of such behavior including a stated disinclination to integrate with their host societies can result in promoting a widespread hostile attitudes towards all Muslims.
Nevertheless, given the choice of making no criticism to avoid promoting negative attitudes thus ensuring such behaviors will remain unchecked, or criticizing some egregious and appalling behaviors, then I favor the latter course.
I’m not convinced it’s an entirely bogus term. To illustrate, let’s switch the outgroup – how about
Either term can be misused – but that does not render the concept bogus.
Anti-zionism now means anti-semitism in the new definition the Labour Party had to sign up to. Still, I think true anti-semitism is on the increase, because it’s not that easy for a simple man to resist the anti-semitic tropes when he has a bomb on his head and his oppressors proudly claim they are Jewish.
I doubt you or any other British person has had a bomb on your head, yet you proudly proclaim your antisemitism.
Israel is a settler colony and apartheid state. The last of its kind. The majority of this article has nothing to do with the Israeli and Palestinian conflict but the picture at the top suggests somebody supporting Palestinian human rights supports murder? It starts off with a completely unrelated murder by some whacko to imply that that a billion Muslims are violent and evil. The West has been waging war in tbe middle east and destroying entire countries in an attempt to control its resources and maintain its position of dominant power. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan. Or were they just spreading “freedom”. Lol
All muslim countries are actually apartheid states.
This time we are in agreement.
Do you think it is logically to call a people who existed as a dispersed, minority across many countries, often treated as outsiders “settlers” for regathering in their homeland for their own protection. I’m not necessarily a Zionist, but it is wrong and immoral to call everyone from a Jew who’s ancestors relocated from Germany to Palestine because he had had his citizenship stripped from him in the Nuremberg laws to a Mizrahi Jew who’s ancestors got expelled from an Arab-Muslim majority country a “settler” for moving to Israel which was willing to take them in is. You far-left antizionists are not progressive. You need to take a long hard look at yourselves and ask yourself why you are dehumanising people who already have been displaced enough in history and have survived the last 2000 years as a cultural minority, moving on when tolerance failed and passing on their culture from generation to generation without the benefit of it being all around.
Excellent post.
Israel is a settler colony and apartheid state. Having repeated the talking point, can you back it up? The Muslims with the most individual liberties in the Middle East are the ones living in Israel.
A billion Muslims are not violent and evil, but a big number is and an even bigger number is either okay with the violence or too scared to criticize it. I agree about leaving the ME to its own devices. It won’t stop the violence, though.
I cannot ever, ever take anyone seriously who posts on a site like this and includes “LOL”. Talk about infantile.
Maybe you should lighten up ROFL
You hit the nail on the head, hence the dislikes!!