Dancing in the streets: Moroccan and Israeli Jews observe Sukkot in Marrakesh. Credit: Fadel Senna/ AFP via Getty

There were 20 years of silence. And then, last week, Trump announced that Morocco and Israel would be resuming diplomatic relations. In a tweet afterwards, the President reminded the world that Morocco was the first country to recognise the United States as a nation, in 1777 and, simultaneously, urged for an international recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara.
Good news is flowing from the region: the Jewish state, also at the behest of Trump has established ties with Bahrain, the UAE and Sudan. Of course, the most recent news did not please everyone. Some frowned upon the fact that the US released the information before Morocco or Israel; others criticised the power imbalance between Morocco and Israel on one hand, and Palestine and Western Sahara on the other. The latter has been waging a war of independence against Morocco for several decades, led by a socialist separatist group with Islamist ties.
Hamas, naturally, is outraged and denounced the Moroccan treachery; while in its customary partiality against the Moroccan monarchy, the French media — both mainstream, such as Le Monde, and more independent sites such as Mediapart — quickly attacked both Trump and King Mohammed VI of Morocco for an agreement in which both Palestinian and Sahraoui self-determination was jeopardised.
This grumbling contrasts with the elation and relief felt by many Jewish families around the world as the first candle of the Menorah was lit, and by many Muslims in Morocco who can recall what things were like before the 1960s. Having grown up in Morocco, and with a father who remembers those happier times of coexistence, I was moved to tears by the sight of Israelis dancing in the street to traditional Moroccan song, waving flags of both countries and pictures of the King Mohammed.
Almost a million people in the Jewish state are of Moroccan descent, from families who were exiled six decades ago, a mere blip in time compared to the thousands of years they’d spent in the Maghreb. For them, as well as Jewish North African communities in France and increasingly in London, the deal is a hugely welcome Hanukkah gift during a difficult year.
The first Jews in Morocco were Berber, converted via commercial bonds as early as the 2nd Century BC. One of the most ancient synagogues is in Zagora; a funerary stone in the Roman ruins of Volubilis mentions Caecilianos, a member of the Jewish community, and some Jewish cemeteries have been in use for two millennia.
This original Jewish population was joined in the seventh Century AD by refugees from Spain escaping the persecution of the Christian Visigoth kings. By that stage the Maghreb had fallen to Arab invaders and provided a springboard for the conquest of Spain in 711, which would subsequently prove a more welcoming home to Jews for centuries. Yet Islamic rulers in Morocco had fits of intolerance, too: in 1033, Muslim chief Tamim Ibn Izri massacred 6,000 Jews in Fez and forced the surviving women and children into slavery.
The arrival of Spanish Jews after the Reconquista coincided with more peaceful relations, with this part of north Africa ruled by a succession of dynasties. Jews were dhimmis — forced to pay the jizya in order to be under the Sultan’s protection — but this status by no means excluded them from Moroccan commercial and political life. Paradoxically, because Jews worked in professions Muslims recoiled from for religious reasons, they found themselves in charge of essential diplomatic and commercial duties, at such a high level that they were called tejjar as-Soltan, the Sultan’s merchants.
Moroccan Jews were not just moneylenders, but also extremely skillful craftsmen and artists. Their contribution to music, architecture and literature was enormous and their relations with Muslim neighbours were often more than friendly. Depending on the area, Jews in Morocco received their religious education in Berber or in Moroccan Arabic — a language quite different from classical or literary Arabic — and wrote in Yehudia, a variant of Hebrew transliterated in the Arabic alphabet.
The unconditional respect of Hebraic customary law was inscribed in the Moroccan Constitution in the 1920s by which point, after centuries of rule by various Berber dynasties, the country was effectively under the control of France under a protectorate.
Yet things would deteriorate, and sharply, following independence and the establishment of Israel, and over two hundred thousand would flee, leaving behind them deserted mountain villages and empty shops and townhouses, so much so that only 3,000 Jews are now still living in Morocco.
The initial anxieties of the Moroccan Jewish community had much more to do with the rampant hostility against Jews in Europe than with Morocco, although Nazi Germany’s attempts to spread its ideology had little success in this part of the world. Morocco’s king Mohammed V — grandfather of the present monarch — protected the country’s Jews during the Second World War, and when the Vichy-allied government attempted to impose ghettos in the country, Mohammed replied: “I entirely disapprove the new laws … and repeat what I have already said in the past, that the Jews are under my protection and that I reject any distinction that should be made among my people.” Morocco’s Jews survived, and in recent years there has been talk of making Mohammed V a Righteous of the Nations.
Following the war, the first Jews to leave the country did so in order to follow the dream of an independent Israel, but conditions at home were to drive many more away in the following decades.
In the aftermath of Moroccan independence in 1956, the leading party Al Istiqlal (“The Independence”) — still a major force in the country — emphasised national identity by making Islam the official religion of the state, and Arabic its primary official language. Not Moroccan Arabic, mind you, but literary or standard Arabic, which is to Moroccan Arabic what Latin is to French and is barely understood, let alone spoken, by most Moroccans.
It led to de facto estrangement of Berber, French and Spanish-speaking Jewish Moroccans. If this was still of little or no consequence to the inhabitants of once-heavily Jewish small towns such as Erfoud in the Sahara, it definitely felt painful to Jewish inhabitants of Casablanca or Rabat, who were in charge of important commercial or administrative duties.
Then, in 1961, Egyptian president Gamal Abd-El-Nasser’s visit to Morocco triggered the first wave of open hostility against Jews. As the Arab League tried to define itself in opposition to both western capitalism and Russian communism, Jews were stigmatised as non-Arabs, and erroneously perceived as too western to be Moroccan.
By this stage many Jews were trying to escape Morocco illegally, but as the tensions increased, it was getting harder to get official travel documents. Even phone calls and postal service was gradually restricted, not so much through legal enforcement as boycotts by Moroccan socialist organisations. Cornered by the Arab-promoting Istiqlal on the Right, and by the USFP (Socialist Union of the Popular Forces, founded in 1959) on the Left, the Jews quickly found themselves deprived of any strong political ally.
For many people it was a clear example of double-think. Muslim Moroccans would call for a boycott of Israel but at the same time maintain close connections with their Jewish neighbours as individuals. A militia, the Misgeret, was established to provide self-defence for Moroccan Jews, but it soon turned its activities towards helping them to secretly escape the country through the Mossad-backed Operation Yachin.
Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and King Hassan II — Mohammed VI’s father — would eventually negotiate a formalisation of this departure, Morocco asking for financial compensation given the loss in financial and human capital. Entire villages were encouraged to depart at once, torn from centuries of shared memories with little to no preparation. Within just three months in the summer of 1967 half of the remaining Jews left Morocco, and it was by no means a happy story. Once in Israel, Moroccan Jews had to take on new jobs, settling in towns that seemed to have sprouted up overnight in the desert, in tiny two-bedroom flats that looked nothing like what they had been promised. For many, the dream of the Promised Land turned to disappointment as they discovered something they never expected — European Ashkenazi racism against the Sephardic newcomers. A song sarcastically recalled “They asked me where I come from, I said I am from Morocco, they said ‘Leave’; they asked me where I come from, I said I am from Romania, they said ‘Welcome’.”
Today, one million Israelis are Moroccan by descent, including 12 current government ministers. Israeli Jews from Morocco are, on many levels, more Moroccan than the majority of Moroccans, who have since undergone 30 years of Arabisation and increasingly Islamisation that belies their Berber and multicultural identity. But it is through Morocco’s religious diversity that the kingdom can, with luck, fight religious fundamentalism imported from the Arabian Gulf.
Last year, in spite of the travel difficulties, 100,000 Jews visited Morocco, of whom 30,000 came from Israel. They came to visit shrines, pray in synagogues and recite the Torah near their ancestors’ graves; they came back to the land of their forefathers, and to keep alive something that might otherwise disappear. Moroccan Judaism has a lot to teach to religious scholars and Biblical specialists; but it also has a lot to teach about a lost civilisation of poetry recited to the tunes of the ‘oud, of Andalusian arts and crafts forgotten in years of wandering, of memories of shared jokes and shared tales. Moroccan culture and history would not be the same without its Jewish elements — including the philosopher Maïmonides, singers Sami Al Maghribi and Zohra el Fassia, or politician André Azoulay, current adviser to the king.
Although most still oppose ties with Israel, Moroccans on the whole appreciate the historical place of Jews in their society. When the position of Hebraic law was submitted to public vote in 2011, Moroccans chose to keep all the articles that ensure Jewish freedom of private and public religious practice, despite strong pressure from radical Islamists within the kingdom and abroad.
My father still remembers fondly how Muslim kids used to spend Jewish feasts with their Jewish friends, and hosting them in return during Muslim festivals. I’m moved whenever I hear the Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra play traditional Moroccan music — tunes celebrating beauty, love, wine and merrymaking, that are truly, authentically Moroccan, but which Moroccan youth have forgotten, and that fundamentalist Muslims frown upon.
And when I hear Sephardi grandmothers talking in Moroccan Arabic with that distinctive Jewish accent, either in Paris’s Sentier or on Brent Street in north-west London, I feel a kinship that is hard to put into words but that can move me to tears. And so in these troubled times, when anti-Semitism takes a new face, it warms my heart to see my native country welcoming back its most genuinely Moroccan citizens.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeAn inconvenient truth that practically all of our greatest pop’n’rock artists didn’t go to uni and that the post 92 meat grinder money making universities don’t give a toss about the students as long as the numbers are high, and in fact many students are thrown on the scrap heap
It has been obvious for some years that higher education in the UK and the US is primarily – and often solely – about money.
If you come out of university with a degree that does not gain you employment, you are forced to take any job available, however menial, Your schoolmates, on the other hand, have had three years’ experience in the workplace and so are at an advantage.
It is in the best interest of the students that courses are assessed and students are aware of the job opportunities that are available for graduates with only limited academic ability..
You are quite right Iris. In fact I’m reminded of the old joke ‘What do you say to a media studies/social sciences graduate? – A big mac and fries please.’
entrepreneurs who create the wealth that employs graduates more often than not, did not go to university… as has always been the case.. It is often just a wage slaves academy!
It’s very simple. Make universities responsible for student loans. That will encourage them to produce employable graduates. Close any university with a dropout rate of over 20%.
Carpenters, Plumbers, Electricians, Engineers, Transport Professionals, etc. Some need a degree, some need an apprenticeship, some need on-the-job training or vocational training. Far better than a degree in ” ” Studies.
I keep saying that there is nothing useless or non-vocational about a humanities degree per se. I read history at university, and I would defend that discipline against all-comers as being a training in considering evidence, establishing the relevant facts, and drawing conclusions, i.e. a training in reasoning, which is essential for any profession and especially for management and leadership roles. A high-level training in, say, mathematics, certainly imparts logical rigour and attention to detail, but it has little to do with the more intangible, but vital, skill of good judgement.
I agree, Jonathan, a good humanities degree from a good university is a valuable thing and usually leads to enhanced earning potential. Unfortunately, the reckless expansion of the sector has resulted in a profusion of graduates with second class degrees from third rate universities. This helps no-one, except of course the ridiculously well remunerated Vice Chancellors.
I believe it was Vince Lombardi who corrected the saying “practice makes perfect” to “perfect practice makes perfect”. If you are studying any subject to a high level, you will be developing valuable skills. If you are not, you may merely be practicing errors. In technical degrees the errors are immediately obvious and cannot be hidden.
I think you need both good judgement and some attention to detail (from your remarks I’m quite sure you have both).
However, there is a belief in this country (and the US and many others) that you do not need technical competence or experience in the relevant industry to be a good manager or leader – i.e. that “management” is a generic discipline that is portable across industries. I strongly believe this to be false and my experience in technology businesses shows that those which succeed and survive are the ones whos leaders have both deep domain (technical) skills and experience with leadership and management skills.
My experience is that the number of people with both exceptional technical and leadership and management skills is very small. But these are the people you certainly need these days.
We should not knock the uni’s. They do a remarkable job on their inmates, training them in the virtues of being hyper-sensitive non-resilient weaklngs, quick to take offence at almost anything, seeing micro-aggressions in the blink of an eye (someone else’s), for ever feeling ‘unsafe’, requiring an endless stream of trigger-warnings (from Beowulf through Lear — King , but probably Edward as well –to Pride and Prejudice and onward), shutting out debate, by violence if necessary, and so forth — and that is not to mention vilifying as much of our history as imagination can manage, and hating our country, all accompanied by narcissistic self-flagellation for white, or any other, guilt.
Do you want your, or anyone else’s, child to emerge from uni in that state, part of a failed generation?
Reopen polytechnics teaching career subjects at night school and day release
Sadly this educational fiasco can firmly blamed on John Major Esq, and his 1992 ‘Further & Higher Education Act’, and not on the wretched Tony Blair, as is so often assumed.
The damage done is probably terminal.
I think it began even earlier. It was in the late 1980s when I first noticed that even the dimmest offspring of the middle classes were going to university, and referring to it as ‘uni’.
It must have some relation to the destruction of the Tripartite education system. Once everyone went to comprehensives then they must all go to university. All that is needed is the willingness to drop academic standards and to drive up public and private debt.
The late 80s was when norm referenced marking was ditched,
The problem is exacerbated by the quasi religious desire to overrepresent certain groups at what were great institutions.
I would put forward the view that allowing polytechnics to become universities made little difference as they had long forgotten their remit of providing technical education and training with a vocational focus and had been churning out graduates in Marxist drivel for years. But you may have a point that Blair only ramped this up.
You are right to highlight John Major’s policies as starting the rot. It was under his premiership that the polytechnics, which provided excellent vocational training programmes and educational qualifications, including degrees, were converted into universities, many if not most of which became second rate and remain so to this day. Tony Blair substantially worsened the situation by decreeing that 50% of school leavers should attend university – an approach enthusiastically adhered to by David Cameron, who likewise tripped out on diversity and inclusion rather than academic prowess. Both Blair and Cameron introduced tuition fees, which have crippled many graduates with debts for degrees that they struggle to pay off in low paid job just above the threshold for non-payment.
The over-expansion of higher education in the UK is turning the country into what I would call a “Dunning-Krugerland” – i.e. a society with a huge number of people who are educated just enough to believe they are experts, but not sufficiently to realise they are not. Social media makes this painfully visible.
You can see the mediocrity and ignorance all around you. The quality of analysis, debate and discussion in newspapers, TV and radio is vastly inferior to the 1970s and 1980s. “Presenters” constantly interrupt and try to make it all about them and “build their brand”. No politician is allowed to talk for more than one or two minutes without some trite question or interruption. Almost all questions are leading ones. Original and challenging ideas are condemned out of hand.
It is time that universities suffered financial penalties if the graduates they produce are not up to scratch. Those that aren’t good enough need to close.
There is a real – and huge – opportunity cost in tieing up people and resources in wasteful activities. But even more so by mis-educating people – persuade me that the majority of today’s “protestors” and “campaigners” – the ones gluing themselves to roads – aren’t or negative value to society as a whole.
Then add in the massive student loan debt default being built up which will fall back on the taxpayer.
Blair may be gone, but the evil he engendered lives on.
You can defund the humanities at the government level without abolishing them. Plenty of people who do stuff in the humanities make their living by selling books, talks, and obviously, university courses. The “barbarous” idea that without government funding the humanities would disappear seems to imply that nobody cares about them and have to be forced to fund them, which if true, is by itself an excellent reason to defund them.
A reevaluation of the university system is long overdue. Humanities degrees have a place. Society should always be producing people who write well. I totally agree that where possible all degrees should entail a wage earning element as part of a condition for admission. I hope Sunak seeks to defund all these wacky lefty courses that exist now. I doubt this will happen however.
The Heritage Site | Adam McDermont | Substack
There is a simple way round all this – if you want to do a Humanities degree, then before you can do that, you do a year min three max, in the workplace, anywhere in the country, paid min wage, but with government provided student dorm style subsidised accommodation. Govt responsible for placing you, but system similar to UCAS. Businessess who take on young people at 18 in this way to get tax breaks. No such requirement on STEM degrees, for the simple reason that you would not want to lose any of the most creative STEM period in young people, which starts at around 18.
Wouldn’t it be easier to insist that Humanities and Social Sciences courses require 3 As at Alevel, one of which must be maths. Those that don’t are not eligible for Student Loans.
STEM and vocational courses and apprenticeships are funded as now.
The objective should be that only the very brightest and most committed do history or psychology etc and these courses make up 5-10% of university placements.
Crikey, the Maths stipulation would rule out literally everyone wanting to take a Humanities or Social Sciences degree. Of course, this is not necessarily a bad thing.
Latin in preference to Maths perhaps?
Nice idea
That would certainly have suited me. I was good at Latin, whereas my maths stopped when confronted with long division, aged nine.
There are quite a lot of people from the humanities side of things who have contributed greatly to society but were crappy at maths.
I like the idea of a higher grades requirement, but 3 As seems harsh. Perhaps allow leeway for a B or even a C if you get an A* somewhere else.
I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek but the grade requirement should be raised and the ratio of these courses to STEM/ vocational should be 1 in 10.
I also like the idea of people having to have a “difficult” A Level too – maths or Latin would be acceptable.
The current option of mediocre A Levels in psychology, English and media studies and then a 2:2 in sociology at the University of Nowhere is a waste of the student’s time and the taxpayer’s money.
Minimum university entrance requirement: one of: one A-level in a STEM subject, a qualification in a trade with work experience, a year in the armed forces or on a ward on the NHS, or a foreign language to B2 level. (I started the comment as a joke, then realised there might be something in it)
I agree there might be something to it.
From 2000 to 2016 I taught part-time at University of Bradford, Yorkshire UK. I saw the quality of the intake gradually go down during that time. Similarly, the motivation and enthusiasm of the students began to wane – it was totally pointless for at least a third of the students I reckon. And that was in engineering! Eventually the department was wound up and remaining staff redeployed. It was a standing joke that while the official entry requirement was 2 Bs, we would accept any student with 2 Ds who didn’t need life support systems. Just a failing industry doing the “bums on seats” exercise to justify it’s existence. The best teaching I ever did was three years (1973-1976) at the Kenya Polytechnic where the students were keen as mustard to learn real skills for their jobs in telecomms and electronics.
A very good blog, Frank, and spot-on with regard to our need for respected, high quality technical/vocational education, and on the fact that our universities are full of young people with no real interest in their studies, who also provide a depressing milieu for those fellow-students – and there are plenty – who DO have that interest. (And I speak as a former university lecturer). My only quibble might be regarding the German situation. Having just spent a week with two Germans, one of whom spent some time teaching in a technical school, I was made aware that lack of interest and motivation has also become prevalent amongst many young Germans in such schools.
The expansion of tertiary education was a genius move by Tony Blair. Get young people to take out huge loans to pay to remove themselves from the youth unemployment figures, at the same time creating a huge number of jobs for lecturers, most of whom would vote Labour. Brilliant.
Whether the degrees themselves would be useful for those taking them was beside the point.
Cracking good blog!
I’d welcome some kind of action around worthless degrees, but the idea that their worth would be decided on the basis of what kind of income the degree leads to is crazy.
Then what is your alternative ? How would you measure “worthless” ?
As a former full-time lecturer (second career after a lifetime in senior/top management) in a UK university business school and a BA graduate in English (from a world class university in its day), I feel I have some basis for adding to the discussion. Some points for consideration:
The fundamental purpose of the university is to be a collection of scholars looking for truth. And to train younger people to replace them, or who will benefit in their eventual work from learning from them.
That sound high-falutin’ but that’s it. The other things the university does stem from this basic purpose.
So a good program involves serious, rigorous thought, original ideas, involves people who are real scholars not just in one area but have a wide basis of scholarship.
The degrees that are worthless are those that undermine this. In humanities and sciences, those that have poor standards, mainly.
But also the proliferation of professional qualifications that are basically cash grabs by universities are a serious problem.
I utterly loathed every second of Kings College London… nearly as much as my fellows who actually wanted to be ‘ slisters’.. I did not finish the law.
Yeah