(Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

This is quickly turning into a lost year for many of us, a suffocating interregnum between normality and whatever semblance of our old lives we can claw back in 2021. Until there is an effective vaccine for Covid-19 — or at least until effective anti-viral treatments are able to reduce its impact on vulnerable populations — there is unlikely to be any return to the life we took for granted a mere six months ago.
This paralysing lack of certainty means carefully laid career plans have gone out the window. Owen Griffiths, a graduate who recently achieved a first in his degree at Bournemouth University, had a job lined up at a communications company but he tells me the employer “pulled the plug last minute because of budgetary uncertainties”. He has since sent off more than 150 applications and had numerous interviews for PR/public affairs firms. But so far to no avail.
Graduating during a recession can leave a lasting impact. According to the Brookings Institute, the combined graduate classes of 2008, 2009 and 2010 in the United States lost more than $330 billion in earnings over the 10 years following the global banking crash. On average, workers who graduate into recessions have lower earnings and worse professional prospects than their peers who finish university during better times.
My personal story resembles that of many other millennials. I went to university during the great expansion of higher education in the mid-2000s. I entered university during a time of boundless economic optimism when Tony Blair’s New Labour government had proclaimed an end to “boom and bust”. And yet, a few years later I emerged from university into the biggest recession since the Second World War. The subsequent wage slump saw workers taking home less pay in real terms than they had when Blair won his second general election victory in 2001. Between 2008 and 2013, the real median hourly wage for 25-to 29-year-old UK graduates fell by just under 20%.
Moreover, while increasing numbers of people are going to university — in 2017/18, 50.2% of English 17- to 30-year-olds had participated in higher education — the median wage differential between graduates and school-leavers has stayed at around 35% for the past 20 years, leaving some, such as the writer David Goodhart, to question whether university is the best career route for many young people. As Goodhart writes in his new book, Head, Hand Heart, some young people who end up taking obscure subjects at second-rate universities “are not suited to higher education and would do better going straight into jobs”.
After finishing university myself, I managed to secure my first journalism jobs off the back of dozens of painstaking applications. There were nearly 70 graduates competing for each vacancy at the time and I felt more than a little lucky. Like many others of my generation, I spent the proceeding years accumulating a modest material stake in society. By the final three months of 2019, average weekly pay for British workers adjusted for inflation had risen to £512 — the highest since March 2008. But the rising tide did not lift all boats at an equal rate. Pay for workers in their thirties remained at 7% below the pre-crisis peak in 2019.
With hindsight, perhaps workers such as me should have been more grateful. Just two months into the new decade and Covid-19 was surreptitiously spreading among the British population. Six months on and Britain is tentatively leaving a recession so severe that it is without historical precedent. With winter approaching and further lockdowns on the cards, we don’t yet know whether the economy has hit rock bottom. And with so much economic uncertainty in the air, students are having to reassess their futures as graduate schemes are postponed or cancelled.
“I had secured myself a good position in a graduate programme but because of the current economic circumstances around Covid-19, my position was cut,” one recent graduate tells me.
The graduate, who asked to remain anonymous, says he lives in one of Scotland’s “most impoverished council areas, Inverclyde, and so [the] general outlook around here is pretty poor”. He’s since taken up a temporary job as a customer service adviser because he has a young son — “so being out of work just isn’t an option”. He tells me he is “really not enjoying it” and is considering applying for work at a nearby Amazon warehouse.
Elsewhere, jobs that would have attracted perhaps a dozen applications before the pandemic are today attracting thousands of job-seekers as unemployment climbs (the biggest rise in unemployment so far has been among 16- to 24-year-olds, 76,000 more of whom are unemployed compared to 2019). This figure is expected to rise significantly as furlough finishes at the end of October.
Every graduate I spoke to for this piece had seen offers of work placements vanish since the start of the year. Sabrina Miller, a journalism graduate who at the beginning of 2020 had several work experience placements lined up, has seen them all cancelled.
“I’m nervous about the fact that I haven’t had much work experience,” she tells me, “and nervous about the uncertainty and instability in the print journalism industry at the moment.”
Sabrina is realistic about the situation but disappointed nonetheless. “People are dying, I’m not pretending that graduates have it worse at the moment,” she admits. “[But] it’s annoying and frustrating for people on the bottom rungs.”
Previous recessions bear out the lasting damage downturns can do to a person’s long-term career and earnings prospects. As the Resolution Foundation recently noted about the aftermath of the 2008 crash, “many of those who entered the labour market during the crisis have seen their pay packets permanently scarred”.
In contrast to the politics of a decade ago, there seems to be a broader consensus today among policymakers about the need for the government to make fiscal interventions to shore up the flailing economy. The austerity approach that followed the 2008 crash had already gone out of fashion by the time of the 2016 Brexit referendum, replaced by a new awareness in Westminster about the plight of the ‘left-behinds’ in the provinces.
Covid-19 has ripped up what remained of the old neo-liberal economic consensus — though what will replace it we do not yet know. However it seems likely, as I wrote for UnHerd in June, that the post-Covid landscape will resemble the post-World War Two era more than the economic status quo born of the 2008 recession. Boris Johnson has already promised that workers will not face another round of austerity in the aftermath of the pandemic.
Another major difference between the class of 2011 (the year in which I graduated) and the class of 2020 is the crippling uncertainty facing today’s cohort of graduates. Even during the worst days of the 2010s when Eurozone economies teetered on the brink, there was a sense that normalcy would soon return in the form of economic growth.
The resultant inability to plan ahead has arguably contributed to a rise in mental health problems among Britons of all ages since lockdown began in the Spring. Young people are being blamed for the recent spike in coronavirus cases. Yet it is the young who are arguably making the greatest sacrifice in putting their prime years on hold for the sake of older generations who enjoyed those same opportunities — unencumbered by draconian lockdowns — in the past. According to a recent study, young people, women and those with young children, saw their mental health worsen the most during the recent lockdown.
“There’s no sense of progression. I think the stagnation has really, really hurt a lot of people,” says Owen Griffiths when I ask how his friends have been coping.
To the government’s credit, Johnson has promised to help young people with a £2 billion scheme to get them into jobs. This represents a welcome break with the policies of the previous decade when it felt at times as if slogans such as ‘The Big Society’ were deployed to offload problems back onto local communities.
But for the graduates I spoke to it is the prevailing uncertainty that’s having such a brutal impact on wellbeing as we head into winter.
“I’m not fussed about not being able to make enough money to live on,” says Thomas Hollands, a 2019 graduate who was furloughed from his consulting job in March and who tells me he’s been doing “various random things” since then to bring in a modest income.
“The thing that stresses me out is not being able to see three or six months into the future. That’s the scary thing. You’re looking forward and there’s nothing.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe“the US does not require illegal immigrants to be vaccinated to enter the country, and it does not demand they be vaccinated once they are in.”
This is kafkaesque
I agree, I can only hope that the execrable Nadal is too injured to play as well. Nice to know that the CDC, like the rest of Liberal government, remains out of touch and – what’s the word? – f*cking stupid.
Perhaps Djokovic can walk in and claim asylum and get bussed to the tournament by Texas.
Sports aside, there are thousands of US citizens whose families comprise non-US citizens. Myself and my family are not vaccinated, by choice. My husband cannot come to visit his children, or help with property maintenance, travel, etc. in the US, as he has been doing for many years now. Yet I can visit his country any time (an EU country). The poisonous disgust we feel for the current administration is immeasurable. I can abide a degree of evil, but when combined with sheer stupidity, no.
It is a joke. I won’t watch the tournament because of it and I am a tennis fan. That’s the only recourse, don’t watch and make your voice heard. They may not listen but maybe they will.
The only choice is in November when the elections will allow the new version of the Nuremberg Trials to begin gathering data as I recon the Bio/Pharma/Medical Industrial Complex, and all their captured Political and Commercial lackeys, are responsible for many millions of deaths, Billions dropping down a level in income, and the global economy to soon crash.
“All tyrannies rule through fraud and force but when fraud has been exposed, they must rely exclusively on force.” Orwell
We have reached a tipping point in the West, where “1984” is now our playbook.
Even Orwell’s novel didn’t reach the level of tyranny of this regime.
I will NOT watch one match. It is only an attempt to keep Mr. Djokovic from winning the tournament and from accumulating the most Grand Slams. It is VERY IMPORTANT for every one NOT to watch a Single match and definitely to NOT attend. Put your Money and Time where your Belief’s and Heart are.
Such hypocrisy! I won’t watch the tournament either. Might watch the final for a bit but this is absurd, unfair, un-american. Good luck Novak down the road be strong.
I wouldn’t watch Wimbledon because of the sleazy British governments outrageous influence to force the exclusion of Russian and Belarusian tennis players, and I won’t watch the US Open for their idiotic and grandiose vaccination rules for non-US players which defies any measure of logic or common sense (which is the norm for government bureaucracies). And I like tennis. Can the sport of tennis really afford to repel some of their somewhat select fan base over such stupidity?
Russian and other players were excluded because they refused to condemn Russian genocidal aggression in Ukraine.
There is no comparison with Djokovic being excluded from GS this year, when he was allowed to compete in 2021.
If these supposed vaccines really work (like in preventing transmissions and getting ill), why is his participation a problem?
It is purely legal and political covid porn.
Governments cannot admit that their policies were wrong without being sued by business owners and others who suffered economically for no reason.
This is a U.S. Government policy (spelled Biden Administration), and the tournament is hiding behind the government. It is an assault against society, among the many crimes this illegitimate regime has inflicted on its citizens since seizing rule.
Spare me the pearl clutching, he just needs to get a shot to play. What a fool. Total comedy.
No, he would be forced to inject an unproven substance that has potentially very serious and adverse side effects, including myocarditis, which also has no benefit to the public (since we now know it doesn’t prevent spreading it or catching it), or to himself (since his natural immunity from having had it previously is stronger). Seems as if you’re the fool. Making a choice based on his long term health and his principles of liberty, over the pursuit of a historical legacy of major championships (as he obviously no longer needs prize money) is admirable, and most of us take pride in knowing there’s still big time athlete’s who value principles, health, and common sense over their own vanity and records.
Why must he? What difference will it make to anyone else if he doesn’t?
Guess you wouldn’t recognise a principle if it got up and hit you in the face.
If this seems irrational, and it is, the CDC got this nonsense rolling in the first place.
Clearly Djokovic stance on covid vaccination is quasi religious.
It is not difficult to get vaccine certificate without actually being vaccinated in many countries.
With Novak being National hero in Serbia, it would be very easy for government to make him vaccinated.
So i really admire Djokovic for taking this stance thus missing on two chances a season of winning GS.
As to idiocy of Australian and USA governments covid policies?
They are total fraud and disgrace.
“Science is not supposed to be religious dogma etched in stone, it is an ever-evolving knowledge base that changes and improves thanks to dissent and skepticism.”
The policy now applies solely to non-US citizens visiting via legal channels.
It was dropped for US citizens when the courts struck it down, and the fact that the border control cannot refuse entry to US citizens.
The problem is that border control officers have been granted way to much discretion to violate constitutional rights. They will seize phones and laptop computers capriciously, to rummage in them, and use the blackmail of summary deportation to get their way.
Such behaviour by government officials within the USA is prohibited on constitutional grounds, regardless of the citizenship of their victims. It is high time to abolish toleration of official caprice at the borders.
This policy is not only a disgrace to American sport it’s a disgrace to America. The CDC has declared that there is no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated yet the unvaccinated still cannot enter and Novak Djokovic (a man I greatly admire) is not the only one affected. Can anyone tell me why my daughter (double vaccinated over a year ago – caught covid in April 22) can enter the States whilst I, unvaccinated, caught covid in April 22, cannot enter the States? Quite honestly, the US appears a foolish, deluded and rather pathetic country at the moment and needs to get its act together pretty quickly.
Biden’s Democratic Party clearly hates America and is at war with her culture. People who love their country would never think of doing the things this regime is doing.
Has anyone else noted that the “US Open” is being sponsored by Moderna this year?
Hopefully his issue shines some light on the craziness of not being aloud into America if unvaccinated I’ve gotten COVID twice but still am not aloud to travel to the us and am in my 20s so not much risk either for my age group time to change the rules
there is no right to participate in a tennis match
get the goddam vaccine, or stfu
BooHoo! Poor little snowflake is not above the law. All of you clearly are experts in Infectious Diseases and Public Health.
I assume you are double vaxed and triple boosted Franky? Good luck with that as you await the fun part. Can you say deep vein thrombosis? Another libtard who watches too much CNN and worships Fraudci.
Fluckin idot…
Well, Park MacDougald may not be an expert but Dr Vinay Prasad, Associate Professor , Hematology Oncology Medicine Health Policy Epidemiology certainly is and he’s saying exactly the same thing about this stupid ban.
see: Let Djokovic Play – by Vinay Prasad – Common Sense
“Frank” reminds me of those die-hard Nazis who headed to Argentina after WWII. The poor little jerk actually still believes all the crap he was fed when the very “experts” he quotes are all ducking & diving & claiming they were just following orders.
can’t wait to see the actual greatest player of all time, rafa nadal, rack up another slam next month.
Nadal couldn’t beat Coric in Cincinnati last week, don’t hold your breath, as he’s not in top form. Djokovic will always have the edge on Nadal for all-time best, as even with Nadal’s large clay surface edge vs. him (and everybody else because he’s a clay court God), Djokovic still has the edge head to head and in finals. It’s close though, no question, Nadal’s a legend. Who really cares who ” the “greatest of all time” moniker gets bestowed to anyway, that’s all opinion and that will never be settled. It makes for fun bar arguments, but there’s nothing of value in it. They’ve both had amazing careers, it’s a shame we can’t see more of them in the twilight of their careers over government edicts of sheer stupidity.