The reason why “we have it all backwards” is because it is women themselves who have viewed the male traits of being dominant, assertive, risk-prone, thrill-seeking, tough-minded, and emotionally stable as their pathway to economic success and independence.
How many women want to be labelled as submissive, non-assertive, overly cautious, timid, weak minded, and emotional. Not many I’m guessing. It’s hardly a recipe for success at work.
Male character traits are treated as the gold standard, especially by feminists (which is really ironic). So isn’t it obvious why women have been considered “other” and “less than?”
It’s because women themselves paint their sex as “less than.” The current focus on women’s sports and athletics illustrates this point. In arguing for separate events for women which exclude trans-women, women only confirm their “less than” status.
Last edited 10 months ago by William Shaw
William Shaw
10 months ago
The reason why “we have it all backwards” is because it is women themselves who have viewed the male traits of being dominant, assertive, risk-prone, thrill-seeking, tough-minded, and emotionally stable as their pathway to economic success and independence.
How many women want to be labelled as submissive, non-assertive, overly cautious, timid, weak minded, and emotional. Not many I’m guessing. It’s hardly a recipe for success at work.
Male character traits are treated as the gold standard, especially by feminists (which is really ironic). So isn’t it obvious why women have been considered “other” and “less than?”
It’s because women themselves paint their sex as “less than.” The current focus on women’s sports and athletics illustrates this point. In arguing for separate events for women which exclude trans-women, women only confirm their “less than” status.
The reason why “we have it all backwards” is because it is women themselves who have viewed the male traits of being dominant, assertive, risk-prone, thrill-seeking, tough-minded, and emotionally stable as their pathway to economic success and independence.
How many women want to be labelled as submissive, non-assertive, overly cautious, timid, weak minded, and emotional. Not many I’m guessing. It’s hardly a recipe for success at work.
Male character traits are treated as the gold standard, especially by feminists (which is really ironic). So isn’t it obvious why women have been considered “other” and “less than?”
It’s because women themselves paint their sex as “less than.” The current focus on women’s sports and athletics illustrates this point. In arguing for separate events for women which exclude trans-women, women only confirm their “less than” status.
The reason why “we have it all backwards” is because it is women themselves who have viewed the male traits of being dominant, assertive, risk-prone, thrill-seeking, tough-minded, and emotionally stable as their pathway to economic success and independence.
How many women want to be labelled as submissive, non-assertive, overly cautious, timid, weak minded, and emotional. Not many I’m guessing. It’s hardly a recipe for success at work.
Male character traits are treated as the gold standard, especially by feminists (which is really ironic). So isn’t it obvious why women have been considered “other” and “less than?”
It’s because women themselves paint their sex as “less than.” The current focus on women’s sports and athletics illustrates this point. In arguing for separate events for women which exclude trans-women, women only confirm their “less than” status.