This year’s G7 is already proving problematic. It’s not only that we don’t know when or where it’s going to take place; the guest list is also in question. President Trump wants to shake it up: “it’s a very outdated group of countries… I don’t feel that it properly represents what’s going on in the world.”
He’s a little bit right. And so he proposed to invite Russia, India, South Korea and Australia too — as “guests”. This, he contends, would counter the might of China and might re-energise the group.
The first to complain was Canada’s Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau. He did not actually say he would boycott the summit if Russia attended, but he said there would have to be “many discussions” first. The UK was next. A spokesman for Boris Johnson conceded that it was customary for the host country to invite others to participate as guests and that the UK would “look at the detail of what the US is proposing”.
But our statement went on to say that the UK would not support Russia’s readmission to the G7, because there was “no evidence of changed behaviour”. In so saying, though, it went further than Donald Trump had done, because while he has in the past mooted the return of Russia to the G7, his latest proposal, to invite Russia as a guest, can be seen as an attempt to avoid the issue of whether Russia should be reinstated after its indefinite suspension over the annexation of Crimea in 2014.
And then the EU’s high representative, Josep Borrell, picked up the baton, saying that the format of the G7 was not for the summit chair to change. “The G7 cannot become G8… until Russia changes its course.”
In fact, the G7 host does have the discretion to invite additional guests. But somewhere along the way, the distinction between Russia being invited as a guest and being reinstated as a full member has been lost. Not that Russia would necessarily even want to be reinstated at what used to be seen as — but is no longer — the world’s top table.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeTrump evidently does not understand the G7 or why it exists, what with his ignorant “outdated” remark and his innovative list of guest countries to the upcoming meeting. So many countries; no hiding of the elephant in the room. If membership of the G7 is to be extended, as it should, the first country on the list is China, not (his trying hard to befriend) Putin’s Russia.
These powerful countries groupings should:
1) be geared towards solving specific global challenges (and there’s no lack of those, but we could start with pandemic readiness, nuclear war, climate change, bio/genetic warfare, superintelligence, and out of earth colonization),
2) include the top 10 countries in terms of last 12 months GDP, population size and military power (metric tbd), weighted equally, and
3) exclude ideology of any type. In order to solve these huge problems, it’s irrelevant if the country is communist, capitalist, catholic, muslim, or whatever label they or others like to place on them.
In these terms, for example, Australia is just, well, irrelevant.