X Close

Minority women can think for themselves Black and Asian people are expected to toe the Left's line on race and racism

Priti Patel, accused of 'gaslighting'. Credit: Peter Summers/Getty

Priti Patel, accused of 'gaslighting'. Credit: Peter Summers/Getty


June 17, 2020   5 mins

The backlash against Priti Patel and Munira Mirza has been something to behold. Mirza, recently appointed to run the Government’s new Racial Inequality Review, has been described as a ‘racial gatekeeper’, among other things; Patel has been accused of ‘gaslighting’ by Labour MPs after talking about her own experiences of racism.

I feel it especially because I have something in common with Patel and Mirza: we are all ethnic minority women who do not accept the standard leftist view of racism.

In 2010, I spoke out about the state of our education system at the Conservative Party Conference, criticising the ‘culture of excuses’. For some, this was the worst thing I could do. No matter that I am not nor have ever been a member of the Conservative Party, nor that I feel passionately that we should all be floating voters, especially minority groups.

I would never be forgiven by some people, who just couldn’t understand why an ethnic minority person would have sympathy for Conservative policies. At best we’ve been hoodwinked; at worst we must just be plain evil. It often feels like we are not allowed to think for ourselves, outside of the orthodoxies set down by Left-wing political groupthink.

My experience ten years ago is why today I have the greatest sympathy for Conservative MPs like Priti Patel and Kemi Badenoch. I know how I have been treated for simply being supportive of Conservative policies — heaven knows what actual Tory MPs from ethnic minorities must have to endure. Mirza has been working with the Conservative Party for many years and her simple appointment to this role has enraged her detractors. For them, a ‘good’ ethnic minority is one who always toes the leftist line.

In the days of fighting to set up my school, and in our first few years of establishing ourselves, I received racist emails and threats of violence — from the Left. There were protests outside my school and abuse was shouted in my face from militant union members opposed to free schools.

My detractors tried hard to discredit me in ways that made sense to them. There was even a running Wikipedia battle over my heritage, a wiki-war lasting for years. It was regularly edited to state that I was of Indian descent, while some people claimed my ancestry to be Indian Ugandan, and therefore (given the historical legacy of Idi Amin, who drove most of the Asians out), that I must hate black people. It was utterly absurd, and I didn’t know from one day to the next what race my Wikipedia page would say I was.

While it seems a bizarre thing to fight over, some opponents clearly believed that my criticisms of the education system and my support for free schools could be discounted if I wasn’t black. So, play around with my Wikipedia page, make me Indian with a couple of keyboard strokes, and suddenly not only have they wiped my mother out of existence, but my words don’t really matter anymore. (For the record, my mother is black Jamaican and my father is Indian Guyanese.)

This accusation of “not being black enough” raised its ugly head when Priti Patel was accused of distracting from the racism facing black people by highlighting her own experiences — as if somehow her struggles were worth less because she is of Indian heritage (indeed her parents were from Uganda). That being called a ‘Paki’ as a young girl wouldn’t have had the same crushing, hurtful impact as any other racial slur. Similarly, Munira Mirza has been accused of not being able to understand the experiences of black people because she is of Pakistani origin.

The hierarchy of race is inextricably tied up with the totem pole of oppression. Blacks are at the top. Then come the Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. Then the Indians, I guess, saving the least oppressed for the Jews or the Chinese. Your position on the oppression totem pole is directly related to how well or badly your group is thought to be doing, educationally and in the workplace. Is more of your group proportionally in prison than another group? Is more of your group failing at school or excluded? Are they underrepresented among CEOs and other masters of the universe?

The worse these average outcomes, the better your claim to the top spot on the totem pole, and the less likely your experiences of racism will be dismissed like the Home Secretary’s was.

The recent protests inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement should have provoked serious conversations about the meaning and impact of race; we all need to explore the nature of racism and what to do about it.

But it is clear to me, from the black boxes on Instagram to the meaningless supportive BLM statements on corporate websites, that few people are interested in examining race in our own society. Most people want an easy fix, a stamp of approval that will allow them to be branded a non-racist so that they can go back to their normal lives, satisfied that they are a good person (and certainly better than Tories).

This is not even remotely helpful to anyone, it’s simple box ticking; but the desire to signal ‘anti-racism’ instead of just not being a racist is so prevalent that at times I wonder whether human beings have the capacity to distinguish between the two: the signal and the reality.

This tick-box race culture goes hand in hand with the oppression Olympics. Hierarchies of race are the easy bingo card that allows ethnic people to be ticked off on a sheet. Chinese? Sorry, only 2 oppression points for you. Black? Wow, that’s 10 points! You go straight to the top! This is why, if you are merely interested in appearing to be non-racist, rather than actually being a non-racist, you will buy into the idea of this totem pole of oppression. You will ignore that race and class are so much more complex than this.

My father was of Indian heritage, but he came from a much poorer environment than my black mother and grew up without any shoes. Life is more complicated than the tick-box culture allows, but if your only interest in race is to do enough to signal to everyone that you aren’t a racist, then you will promote that hierarchy enthusiastically because it is the perfect prop for your non-racist dissimulation. It doesn’t require any thought or effort.

The reality of being anti-racist requires years of reading and discussion, befriending a variety of black people, including ones who think differently from you politically (oh the horror of it) and really coming to terms with one’s own uncomfortable feelings around race. Signalling requires a black box on Instagram and instantly everyone approves of you. You can see why most people choose the simpler option.

In fact, spending a lifetime helping black boys realise their potential, something Black Lives Matter should approve of, instead of earning me adoration as a black box on Instagram does, has given me many enemies. My 20-plus years of improving young people’s lives is meaningless next to the superficial letters of support for BLM, because making a useful difference to people’s lives is less important than being seen to do so. It is a wonder why anyone ever does anything truly good at all.

But there is one way of being anti-racist in a very simple and real way that takes no time at all. Allow Priti Patel, Kemi Badenoch and Munira Mirza the right that so many white people enjoy and take for granted: the right to think for themselves.


Katharine Birbalsingh is the founder and headmistress of Michaela Community School, a free school established in 2014 in Wembley Park, London.

Miss_Snuffy

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

64 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dougie Undersub
Dougie Undersub
3 years ago

As usual from Ms Snuffy, a blast of common sense.
In addition to ditching the oppression Olympics, we also need to scotch the notion that racism is something that only white people exhibit towards non-whites. In fact, it permeates in every possible direction.
The casual enslavement of domestic servants from SE Asia by rich, Gulf families is racism and I have witnessed savage racism from N African Arabs towards sub-Saharan Africans. No continental solidarity there.
Is the hatred of the English displayed by many SNP activists racism or merely xenophobia? Overall, not much chance of a kinder, gentler politics emerging anytime soon.

Brian Dorsley
Brian Dorsley
3 years ago

It’s what’s known as oikophobia: placing other cultures on an idealistic pedestal while demonizing your own culture (or the subset that doesn’t blindly follow your own way of thinking).

mark taha
mark taha
3 years ago
Reply to  Brian Dorsley

I’ll remember that word-although Gilbert and Sulivan put it better!

Mark Corby
Mark Corby
3 years ago

You know the answer to the rhetorical question you finish with, don’t you?
If not, yes off course it’s racist. The SNP are polluted by spite and consumed by envy, and who can be surprised, given the miserable state of North Britain? A North Britain they are rapidly turning into a pseudo Gaelic hell hole.
As John Cleese reminded us recently the definition of a Scottish Presbyterian was “someone who has a nasty, sneaking feeling that someone, somewhere is having a good time”. Well those days are long past, and you are correct in your assumption that there is no chance of any gentler politics emerging soon.

David Morley
David Morley
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark Corby

“As John Cleese reminded us recently the definition of a Scottish Presbyterian was “someone who has a nasty, sneaking feeling that someone, somewhere is having a good time”.”

Borrowed from Mencken who applied it to puritans more generally.

Mark Corby
Mark Corby
3 years ago
Reply to  David Morley

Thank you. I shall remember to use it for other candidates in future.
What about this ‘woke’ mob, they seem devoid of any humour?

Fraser Bailey
Fraser Bailey
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark Corby

They are indeed devoid of all humour. Just ask Konstantin Kisin.

Mark Corby
Mark Corby
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Bailey

Yes, precisely the sort of man we need to “ruffle a few feathers”.
Humour is supreme in both attack and defence.

mark taha
mark taha
3 years ago
Reply to  David Morley

My general attitude to religion.

Derek M
Derek M
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark Corby

,,,well I’m a Presbyterian and I’m very happy for people to have a good time, indeed if the pubs open I will be joining in, but then I’m not Scottish so maybe that’s the difference

Mark Corby
Mark Corby
3 years ago
Reply to  Derek M

I am very glad to here it. Until David Morley so kindly corrected me I had always thought it applied exclusively to Scotch Presbyterians.
Mencken was obviously relying on his American experience I suppose.

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 years ago

Also colourism in the sub-continent and the Caribbean. There’s a very good article in Cricinfo (of all places) about this.

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 years ago

Why isn’t this woman in the House of Lords as Education Secretary?

Fraser Bailey
Fraser Bailey
3 years ago

Yes, I have said for some time now that Katherine should be in charge of education for the UK. She is perhaps the most inspiring person I have ever seen interviewed on various podcasts etc. And a real hero for the way in which stands up to the left-wing bullies and assorted race grifters.

Mark Corby
Mark Corby
3 years ago

Because she would be utterly wasted there. She should be PM, she is perfectly qualified, don’t you think?

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark Corby

Well, that too, but it would be a shame not to use her relevant expertise.

Vicki Robinson
Vicki Robinson
3 years ago

I think the left have developed a mindset of, ‘We are the good guys and over there are the evil Tories (boo, hiss)’. It prevents them from seeing their own weaknesses.

Some on the left really don’t like it when people from less well-off backgrounds do well. A young man in my area was discouraged from applying to the highly regarded Slade School of Fine Art by his lefty teacher who actually told him it was elitist and he didn’t stand a chance. Fortunately he applied anyway. Some on the left need to take a good look at themselves.

Incidentally, the hierarchy of oppression tends to exclude the white working classes who face disadvantages. I do wonder what the people in red wall areas such as Bolsover and Redcar make of the idea that they have white privilege.

Alex Mitchell
Alex Mitchell
3 years ago
Reply to  Vicki Robinson

Of course they don’t like it. The poor tend to vote left and the better off right (except tech billionaires). It is not in the interests of the left for people to better themselves because they lose punters. Keep em poor, keep em on their side

Peter Dunn
Peter Dunn
3 years ago
Reply to  Alex Mitchell

Though rhe 3ducated left make samb sure they scoop up the majority of public sector/academia jobs with the f….g eye-watering large salaries..

Colin Sandford
Colin Sandford
3 years ago
Reply to  Vicki Robinson

It’s the politics of envy.

Jonathan Marshall
Jonathan Marshall
3 years ago
Reply to  Colin Sandford

Envy and hatred are the driving forces of the Left.

Richard Morrison
Richard Morrison
3 years ago

An excellent article, except for the last line “the right that so many white people enjoy and take for granted: the right to think for themselves.” For white people too there is a concerted attack on their right to think for themselves. Activist authoritarians feel entitled to condemn, as wicked, anyone with a different, including any more complex view of history, and indeed anyone who does not accept the mantra that anything done by white people was both privileged and racist and therefore (even when it might seem to have been beneficial and indeed part of the gradual progress towards democracy, human rights, the rule of law, universal education or public health) to be erased from history.

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 years ago

Yes. The verbs in that sentence should be in the past tense.

Colin Sandford
Colin Sandford
3 years ago

I was under the impression that ‘the right to think for ourselves’ has now been banned and it is only practiced by subversives.

mark taha
mark taha
3 years ago

YOU’RE right-I suspect that being too outspoken has held me back in life.Among many other things!

Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 years ago

‘saving the least oppressed for the Jews or the Chinese’

Well, actually, no. Bottom of the pile are the whites, which is why the white working class are always bottom of any league table for exam results and university entrance.

Marie Morton
Marie Morton
3 years ago

Excellent piece. I would add further that the woke left makes assumptions about white people too. We are all lumped together as if our experiences are the same – yet for working class people we have very different experiences. So my dad growing up in the hungry 30s won a scholarship but they couldn’t afford the uniform and his mum died when he was 10 as they couldn’t afford a doctor (1938). As a child we had no car , telephone , washing machine or holidays (till at 13 we had a week in a caravan – this was the only holiday all 4 of us went on ) – this was the 70s. Furthermore my friends came from a wide variety of backgrounds – skin colour was not something that was important to me – like Martin Luther King I feel that it is the content of your character that is important not the colour of your skin.

Clive Mitchell
Clive Mitchell
3 years ago

Brilliant piece. It exposes the whole hypocrisy at play within the BLM movement and the dictatorship of the left.

David Morley
David Morley
3 years ago

It often feels like we are not allowed to think for ourselves, outside of the orthodoxies set down by Left-wing political groupthink.

White people have a similar (but less severe) experience of being told (usually by other white people) to listen to black (or POC) voices. There is the clear assumption that all black people and people of colour will have exactly the same opinions. And they will all agree with the white person telling you to do the listening.

Decades ago attitudes on the left to working class people were similar. Any working class person who didn’t toe the line was a class traitor or suffering from false consciousness. I can easily imagine them hunting around for evidence that someone who disagreed with them was in fact middle class. Even if they themselves were privately educated.

Paul Theato
Paul Theato
3 years ago

“The recent protests inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement should have provoked serious conversations about the meaning and impact of race; we all need to explore the nature of racism and what to do about it.”
That sentence is the only misstep in an otherwise good article. From everything I’ve read, BLM and Antifa are hard-left Marxist organisations and it was the shocking, videoed death (potentially homicide), apparently caused by a Minnesota policeman, of the career criminal George Perry Floyd that gave them and far-left movements everywhere the excuse they needed to whistle up the mob (black and white) to burn down and loot businesses, murder and attack people (black and white) across the world, attack and maim police officers (black and white) everywhere and launch a full frontal attack against culture, history and free speech in Western civilisations. We should not be discussing skin colour because it has very little to do with what is going on. This is the year 2020. Things have moved on. We should be talking about how to rid ourselves of the far-left (and far-right), for whom skin colour is merely an excuse to assert ugly and provenly dangerous power, and about differences within groups such as attitudes towards free speech; education; parenting; integration, hard work, aspiration, acceptance, poverty, crime; etc., etc., ad infinitum, and agree what is acceptable and what is not – together.

David George
David George
3 years ago

I first saw Katharine Birbalsingh with Dave Rubin in that sublime discussion on Youtube; what a delight to see on UnHerd! Love and respect from (your childhood home) New Zealand.

We have a saying here that, if anything does, encapsulates her attitude and beliefs.

Te tiro atu to kanohi ki tairawhiti ana tera whiti te ra kite ataata ka hinga ki muri kia koe.
Turn your face to the sun and the shadows fall behind you.
Kia Kaha Katherine.

Adam Huntley
Adam Huntley
3 years ago

“Meaningless supportive BLM statements on corporate websites” is a pertinent observation. Isn’t it depressing that organisations now feel that signally their adherence to woke culture is a necessary part of their public relations?

2,

Paul Theato
Paul Theato
3 years ago
Reply to  Adam Huntley

Yes, and far worse than that it destroys freedom of speech for their employees, supporting the Marxists in their ultimate mission. One is not entitled to debate what is going on in a FTSE 100 company or other major corporation. Instead, one is forced to undertake mandatory ‘diversity training’ and to shut your mouth.

angersbeagle
angersbeagle
3 years ago

Great article by someone I have a lot of time for.
I love the term “Oppression Olympics” , it is amusing as things rooted in the truth often are.
However, you say in your last paragraph :
” Allow Priti Patel, Kemi Badenoch and Munira Mirza the right that so many white people enjoy and take for granted: the right to think for themselves.”
Well, the BLM mob have turned this one on its head….nobody will be permitted to think for themselves ……..and do not think you safe in later years, Offence Archaeology will be a degree subject before long.

Peter Kriens
Peter Kriens
3 years ago

Mixed feelings. Overall I am agreeing with the central thesis of it. However, I feel quite mixed about how it still feels like drawing the race card. For example:

Allow Priti Patel, Kemi Badenoch and Munira Mirza the right that so many white people enjoy and take for granted: the right to think for themselves

Why don’t they have that right? Someone on twitter has no power to deny you anything? If you take a public position then people might disagree. They might even yell at you, or make an attempt to insult you, but that is not denying. What kind of privilege does Boris Johnson have as a white man? I see a lot of people quite violently disagreeing with him, but you cannot say they deny him anything.

Don’t be so darned sensitive to what other people think of you. Engage the ones that respectfully disagree but ignore the idiots with their insults, you only empower them.

What happened with: Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me …

Go Away Please
Go Away Please
3 years ago
Reply to  Peter Kriens

That is well put. The other side doesn’t deny you anything. That is why what Priti Patel did was rather admirable. She refused to let the other side make her deny her her own voice and her own experience.

Greg C.
Greg C.
3 years ago

Admirable.

P C
P C
3 years ago

An excellent piece. When we see it published in the Guardian we’ll have progressed – just a little, but every step counts.

Fraser Bailey
Fraser Bailey
3 years ago
Reply to  P C

Believe me, nothing like this will ever be published in the Guardian, or broadcast on the BBC.

Juilan Bonmottier
Juilan Bonmottier
3 years ago

This just in from BBC online: “BBC commits £100m to increasing diversity on TV” -of course this ‘diversity’ won’t include writers like this one, or Candace Owen, or Patel, or anyone who represents actual diversity in thinking or opinion.

It’s a particular sort of diversity the BBC has a use for – the one that rounds all the ‘blacks’ up and makes them uniformly a class of victim.

The BBC wants the ones that make nice white middle class people of a leftist persuasion feel all warm inside -ones they can adopt as pet projects -and enlighten all us racist gentiles with their wisdom and beneficence.

The perverse racism inherent in all this seems to go completely over BBC heads -but presumably that’s because they are so busy gazing admiringly at their own halos of virtuousness.

Paul Theato
Paul Theato
3 years ago

Just one of several reasons why the BBC licence fee should immediately be cancelled and the corporation left to beg for private money like its twin, postmodernist sister, the Guardian.

Paul Ridley-Smith
Paul Ridley-Smith
3 years ago

Fantastic essay. It is assuring to know that each child (whatever ethnicity) that graduates from your school will have the capability for independent thought, hard work and be well prepared for society’s challenges. That’s a contribution way beyond social media sloganeering.

mark taha
mark taha
3 years ago

Yes-the aim of education should be to produce “a thinkin’ lad,A readin’ writin’ doubtin’ laddie” (

Pierre Brute
Pierre Brute
3 years ago

More of this lady, please.

Fitzroy Andrew
Fitzroy Andrew
3 years ago

I think the fundamental point – that there needs to be greater acceptance of diversity of opinion amongst different ‘visible minorities’ within those (our) communities – is well worth making. The Conservative Party has missed a major trick, for example, in not being able to tune into the resident social conservatism of many in the African-Caribbean community. There is a need for a more mature outlook than is often on display, and I agree that BLM have not always helped themselves in this respect.

I’m not sure I go along entirely with the analysis presented here – there is a lot more to ‘minority opinion’ that what we see and hear in political circles, and there’s a bit of over-reliance on that here. Elements of this piece seem to be more about playing to the gallery than advancing the argument for diversity of thought, but that’s just me so I’m not arguing that I’m right.

But there’s definitely a conversation worth having here, so good on the author and her work in education. More power to her elbow.

spencer_martin
spencer_martin
3 years ago

Race & class are inextricably linked as well as gender, to a lesser extent. Racists use racial slurs but when talking about wider attainment and representation in society – class (or who your parents are) has the impact. White privilege to a working class boy in a northern mining town is meaningless. White privilege because more of the upper class are white – that I understand.

jonathan.hoffman
jonathan.hoffman
3 years ago

Well said Madam! Please keep speaking out!

The attack on Patel by those Labour MPs was an utter disgrace

https://onthedarkside410122

t.kember1
t.kember1
3 years ago

My surname is a Huguenot name. The Huguenots were certainly oppressed, admittedly not by the British and it was centuries ago. Nevertheless, can I join the totem pole of oppression?

Andrew D
Andrew D
3 years ago
Reply to  t.kember1

What about Catholics? For three hundred years we were forbidden to practice our religion, required to attend the services of the Established Church on pain of fines or imprisonment, not allowed to own a horse worth more than £5, and not allowed to enter the professions, armed services or parliament. We demand reparations!

mike otter
mike otter
3 years ago

Another great article and evidence that freedom of thought can never be extinguished, regardless of whatever political movement tries to close society down. I would be keen to add that leftist political theory since Marx does hold that the colour of a man’s skin defines his character, the basic creed of historical materialism is that the conditions of history make one race superior to another. This explains their obsession with shades of skin colour and their frantic projection of their guilt and race based ideology onto the rest of us. To them the work of Richard Dawkins, Jared Diamond, Steven Pinker et al never happened. I am willing to bet that some of people who called me “tinker” and my wife “chinkie” at school have grown out of it, of those that haven’t i expect a few support the EDL but many more support Labour.

Carolyn Jackson
Carolyn Jackson
3 years ago

A good article. However you state “In fact, spending a lifetime helping black boys realise their potential,”. What about helping white working class boys realise THEIR potential? They are the most marginalised and under-achieving group in this country.

Ruth King
Ruth King
3 years ago

Thank you for an excellent article. What really counts is working hard on the ground to give people inspiration and hope. I sometimes wonder how much more good could be done for society if people exchanged their (often excessive) time spent on social media to helping their communities. I also feel one important step we should push for in our schools is the study of empathy and active listening. Too often prejudice dominates in our world of “I’m right, you’re wrong, so shut up!”

Andrew Best
Andrew Best
3 years ago

White people at the bottom of the pile with our original sin of….
Being white
Of course white is a colour but that no longer matters as we are no longer part of the human race, just a collection of knuckle dragging scum and so we deserve everything that we get but that will backfire and already has as why should we make any effort any more when we will always suffer the original sin?
But I am white so I don’t matter!
P.s. I have seen you in multiple interviews online and you strike me as a very decent teacher/school head who is trying to the best for your pupils no matter who they are, full respect to you

mark taha
mark taha
3 years ago

I fully agree with KB that blacks and Asians can think for themselves and make their own minds up.I agree with her on some things-but my having once referred to her as Burbling Birbalsingh should indicate not on everything!

Roger Sponge
Roger Sponge
3 years ago

For how long can “British Asians” define themselves as “Asian”? Second, third or fourth generation? Forever?

What’s with BAME/BME? Lumping people together from myriad countries, cultures, languages, histories, religions under one classification is intellectual nonsense.

alistair.gorthy
alistair.gorthy
3 years ago

One can agree with the sentiment of the article, that the BLM protests have, in many cases, been a vehicle for the sanctimonious and and the criminal, but might I also point out that much of the heat generated by the Home Secretary stems from the far right political positions she has been identified with in the past.

Dr Alexander Texter
Dr Alexander Texter
3 years ago

Courageous article. If the writer worked in academia as I do her position would become untenable.

bob alob
bob alob
3 years ago

The Jews are not at the bottom of the oppressed list, they are on the oppressor list, “The reality of being anti-racist requires years of reading and discussion, befriending a variety of black people, including ones who think differently from you politically (oh the horror of it) and really coming to terms with one’s own uncomfortable feelings around race.” I have to take issue with this statement, to say someone cannot be anti racist without cuddling up to some black people is nonsense, it also implies everyone is racist until they have undergone a cuddling up as it were.

Peter Dunn
Peter Dunn
3 years ago
Reply to  bob alob

“The jews are on the oppressor list”
How come?

bob alob
bob alob
3 years ago
Reply to  Peter Dunn

Palestine, obviously.

mike otter
mike otter
3 years ago
Reply to  bob alob

I came across this whilst re-reading the original piece. Palestinians are oppressed by Israel. So Israeli Arabs, Christians, Atheists and Jews in the IDF and police do the hands on oppressing. You may not have realised this but if you did then your racism is of the worst and most extreme kind. As much a throw back to the 1930s as the British Labour Party.

bob alob
bob alob
3 years ago
Reply to  mike otter

I was just pointing out that Jews are no longer seen as oppressed by those in control of western culture and are seen as the opposite, I have no sympathy for the Palestinian cause since they are largely the architects of their own misery, certainly in more recent times, and as Rebecca Long Bailey discovered recently Israel is the only Jewish state in existence, and the defining line between what is Jewish and Israeli has become more blurred in recent times, the two are difficult to separate and this is where Labour have had difficulty.

bob alob
bob alob
3 years ago
Reply to  mike otter

Not my racism, when I say that Jews are on the oppressor list I am referring to those who practice identity politics, such as the Labour party, they obviously have antisemitism issues because of their support for the Palestinian cause, and see Israel, as the oppressors, Israel being the only Jewish state.

Sean V
Sean V
3 years ago
Reply to  bob alob

Thank you for so elequently reminding us why the Jews will always have a place on the “oppressed” list.