If you have rented a property in the private rental market, you probably have a tale or few to tell of cowboy antics, dodgy contracts, sky-high fees, false promises, properties pulled at the last minute, infestations – I could go on. But despite the besetting issues facing renters, political discourse fixates almost exclusively on home ownership.
Don’t get me wrong, the focus on build, build, build is long overdue. Almost 90% of 18-34 year olds want to own their own home one day, yet more than a quarter believe they may never achieve that.1 According to the latest English Housing Survey, fewer than 60% of all private renters expect to buy in the future (though that’s not to say they all want to).2 I get it: home ownership is increasingly out of reach and not just for the young. Only among those aged 45 and above do you find more home owners than private renters, helping to explain the high levels of asset inequality.
But can we just pause a moment and recognise that for some people, even if we do achieve a massive increase in housing supply and a correspondingly large drop in prices, home ownership is still unlikely to be an option. It’s a point James Kirkup makes in his excellent essay for UnHerd: “better, longer tenancies and more social housing…matter much more to people with low incomes”.
Even those who go on to be homeowners will likely spend a decent chunk of time renting. Given the column inches dedicated to lamenting the plight of the first-time buyer, you’d be forgiven for thinking we’ve seen a dramatic drop in the age of those climbing the first rung of the property ladder. But the opposite is true. A decade ago the average first time buyer was 31, today its 32.3 True, the proportion of 16 to 24-year-old first-time buyers has plummeted since 1995-96, but the proportion of young people attending university has increased by almost 25%. Frankly, it’s not the case that early twenty-somethings are desperate to take on a mortgage fresh out of uni. Social norms are changing – getting married and having children happens later, buying a house slightly later fits that trend.
More people are renting for longer and housing costs now swallows up to half of a tenant’s income. That’s why, to paraphrase the Prime Minister, rental property prices and practices should be one of the burning injustices prioritised by the government.
“But building more homes will reduce rents”, you reasonably cry. Yes, absolutely, but the specific aim to increase supply in the letting market is rarely front and centre in the discussions on the housing crisis. The flagship announcement at the Conservative party conference this week was a £10 billion injection for Help to Buy. Setting aside the stupidity of an expensive policy that will exacerbate the crisis (supply and demand, Prime Minister?), the narrative, again, is all about buyers. Never renters.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe