There is a lot of cynicism about Westminster politics — and rightly so. The reality is that for too long, too many of our public institutions have been prioritising the wrong things and focusing on the wrong problems. Many of them simply no longer work as they should. They are short-termist, or too risk-averse, or overly bureaucratic.
But improving the quality of people entering into public life is one thing we can do something about. This isn’t just about individuals but about what, in earlier eras, might have been called political formation: the opportunity to chew over difficult ideas away from the interminable rush of news headlines and email notifications.
As the political scientist Adam Garfinkle has written, a major characteristic of post-Internet modernity is the loss of deep literacy: the type of learning that can only come from spending hours reading and thinking about ideas and society in depth. What has replaced it is shortened attention spans, quick “learnings”, and superficial understanding. This is the sort of thinking that is now pervasive in many of our institutions. To combat it will require massively expanding the horizons of British politics, in the search for both talent and ideas. But ideas don’t just matter in themselves: they are the foundation for success in practice. The great political leaders of the past weren’t just effective decision-makers and strategists: they were lifelong learners as well.
That is why Civic Future has today opened applications to our Fellowship programme: a year-long immersion designed to go alongside a full time job. The objective is to acquire deep knowledge and understanding in preparation for a contribution to public life. Fellows will learn about history and politics; philosophy as it applies to complex policy choices; science, economics, and practical ‘tradecraft’. It is aimed at those highly talented people who are considering entering into public life but have been unsure how to do so, or may never have been asked.
Over the course of the year (and at no cost to themselves), our Fellows will involve themselves in the most important debates of our time. They’ll hold discussions with thinkers, diplomats, scientists, and those with frontline experience — getting to grips with the governance challenges which will define Britain’s future.
At the end of the experience participants will have built deep and broad relationships, giving them additional confidence and invaluable insight for the rest of their lives. We’ll support them with mentors and career support, matched to whatever contribution they choose to make. A new talent pipeline for a new kind of leader.
In a few years we hope many highly talented people will have passed through our programme, in the process transforming their appreciation of what it means to enter public life in Britain.
Jack Hutchison is Programme Director at Civic Future
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeMearsheimer (and fellow travellers) frequently make assertions with no evidence. I am not pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian but I find it frustrating that so many assertions are not challenged with obvious counter arguments, if only to better understand Mearsheimer’s intended meaning.
You can’t kill an idea – Basque separatists, Badder Meinhof, Red Brigade, Nationalists in Japan/Germany?
Genocide in Gaza – at 20,000 civilians killed in a year it would take 300 years, at this rate, to equal the 6 million killed in the Holocaust.
Israel is losing in Gaza and Lebanon – evidence of Hamas or Hezbollah victories or territorial gains?
Ethnic cleansing in Gaza – we lauded the removal of up to 4 million Ukrainians from Ukraine but did not call it ethnic cleansing nor 1 million Syrian refuges. Only escaping Gazans are considered “ethnic cleansing”. Millions of Germans, Poles, Greeks and Turks were moved after the war, presumably to prevent further ethnic conflicts.
Illegal Settlements in the West Bank – and yet 10 million “irregular migrants” entered the USA in the last 4 years along with how many into Europe? We do not call these “Illegal Settlements”.
Right to a Palestinian State – with the exception of the approximately 70% of “Palestinians” that live in Jordan under Jordanian rule, with no vote and no state? No state for Basques, Catalonians, Kurds?
Killing Hamas or Hezbollah fighters creates more fighters in the future. If this statement is true then all armed struggle is self-defeating including the killing of Israelis by Hamas and Hezbollah. All armed conflict leads to unending war and therfor Germans, Japanese and Vietnamese must hate Americans and British for perceived past wrongs, this is not the case.
At 39.55 mins in…Completely opposite analysis (with satellite photos) https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/israel-inflicted-severe-damage-on-irans-missile-program-and-air-defenses-207aafae
Mearsheimer’s description of the recent Israel attack on Iran is contradicted by an article in the Wall Street Journal on Nov 2 that states that all three waves of Israeli jets reached their targets and that extensive damage was inflicted supported by satellite photos.