Her Majesty’s Treasury is opening a “northern campus” — an effort to get long-term economic decision-making out of London.
As expected, the location has been confirmed as Darlington, on the banks of Tees. The choice is significant for several reasons. First of all, it’s in the North East (just about) — but also a stone’s throw from North Yorkshire. In fact, it’s just across the river from the Chancellor’s own constituency of Richmond. Teesside International Airport is close by, which commuting civil servants and visiting ministers will find convenient. Darlington is also handy for Barnard Castle — the well-known beauty spot and eye-testing centre.
Most importantly, Darlington is a town and not one of the north’s major cities. It’s selection over the likes of Leeds is a signal that the Government’s ambition to level-up Britain beyond the South East is not limited to the major urban centres.
We’ve had about 30 years of tarting-up city centres — and, while that’s welcome and necessary — it’s not enough. Also, it’s not that hard. Chuck in some regen money, open a new museum and relocate some public sector jobs and you’re bound to get some response — at the very least you’ll set-off a local building boom.
However, looking beyond the urban cores and university campuses, it clear that we can’t sustain a wider economy on lottery funds and the student pound. Rather we must unleash and invest in the productive energies of a part of the world that once literally made the modern age.
The Tees Valley is an especially interesting proving ground. Though it contains no cities, it is a compact area with a population of around 700,000 and a long-history of industrial innovation. It suffered badly as result of our national decision not to resist the worst effects of globalisation, but the potential for revival is clearly there.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeYou have to start somewhere, so good to see something beginning to happen.
How about (a slimmed down) House of Lords to Wakefield next ?
I agree. It is, at least, something.
Wakefield is far too good for most of that lot.
This is a rather uncharitable portrayal of the decision.
It would be worth looking at what happened when the “Manpower Services Commission” moved to Sheffield, or DVLC to Cardiff. Or other such moves. I am no expert in urban development, but my impression (and that is all) was that the MSC provided a much-needed boost to the Sheffield economy, playing a meaningful part in regeneration.
My aunt actually moved there as a consequence of that decision, so I got to know and visit the town. Although truthfully the only remarkable thing about it was the trams.
Quite. But that was then. It is a pleasant city today, much more economically successful. I wonder if anyone has properly examined the role of the MSC – quite a significant employer, if I recall – in reviving the sity centre?
So sort of like the tech industry is doing in California, moving to Texas and Arizona, getting out of the mess they made of their old nest.
Haha, but not really, this is tokenism, sending it off to the deprived parts like this, but not as you say, to Leeds or Bradford where it would make more sense, but where no one would want to move to from London.
Come off it Darlington needs a break. Nothing has really happened since 1825.
An influx of 700 or so ‘Epsom’ toffs should do the trick.
Even then (27 Sep) didn’t the train arrive late?