The final round of the French presidential election is now less than three weeks away. A re-match between Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen is the most likely run-off scenario — and Macron is the runaway favourite to win.
But have we been underestimating Le Pen’s chances? The political scientist, Yascha Mounk has been talking to the “smartest, best informed people” he knows in France — and according to him they’re “freaking out”.
Looking at the polls, the gap between Macron and Le Pen is much narrower this year than it was over the same months in 2017. Five years ago Macron’s margin over Le Pen was more than twenty points, now it’s more like ten. And in the last few days, there’s been a further tightening:
France, Ifop poll:
Presidential run-off election
Macron (EC-RE): 53% (-5)
Le Pen (RN-ID): 47% (+5)
…+/- vs. 17-18 March 2022
Fieldwork: 31 March-1 April 2022
Sample size: 1,405
➤ https://t.co/L7xjOl7wZN… pic.twitter.com/SBqApjcYSO— Europe Elects (@EuropeElects) April 2, 2022
What makes Le Pen’s performance all the more surprising is the competition she’s faced from Éric Zemmour — her Right-wing rival for the populist vote. But as Benjamin Dodman of France 24 notes, Zemmour’s incendiary rhetoric has allowed Le Pen “to come across as more respectable and ‘presidential’”.
Responding to this unexpected threat, Macron’s supporters have attacked Le Pen’s new image as a “sham”, warning voters that she “hasn’t changed”.
But whether or not the Macronistes have genuine cause to be worried, it’s in their best interests not to freak out — at least not in public. Panic is usually a poor choice of mood music for an election campaign. It didn’t work for the British Conservative Party in 1997 when they literally portrayed Tony Blair as a monster; nor did the threat of a “punishment budget” help the Remain campaign in the 2016 referendum.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI don’t know if a Le Pen win would be better than a Macron win for France.
But there are recent cases where the disaffected have swung the election/referendum in ways that were not expected by the establishment mainstream. The disaffected have been neglected and ignored for years – it surely is democracy that their voices become numerous enough to be counted.
All the journalists reporting on the Hungarian election were suggesting Orban was in trouble and might well be defeated. In the event he trounced the opposition. The prediction of journalists and pollsters seem far to often to be tinged with what they hope might be the case rather than representing an accurate assessment. I have no idea if Le Pen will get in but don’t give much regard to journalistic predictions.
The overwhelming majority of journalists have opinions little different from government-emplioyed social workers.
Fortunate France, to have even the opportunity to vote for a credible nationalist candidate.
What did you smoke ?
It’s like labelling Farrage as a credible option as a Prime Minister in the UK !!
Should not “deplorables” in the headline be in inverted commas, or in fact not be used at all?
Also the word ‘deplorables’ in the title unnecessarily pejorative.
The world of woke could do with a shock: If only we had a Le Pen/Zemmour
Johnson should ditched, Hannan or Frost taken from the HoL to be PM, and Cummings reinstated as ‘Witch Finder General’ to slash & burn his way through the Civil Service, NGO’s, Universities and last but not least NHS.
Finally the Royal Navy should start doing what it paid for; Defending the Channel from invaders.
I don’t believe anyone will seriously challenge Macron at the end of the day.
I reckon the French will do the normal thing of getting their rebellious impulses out of the their systems in the first round, where Le Pen and Macron will leave the others in the dust.
Then Macron will win by a country mile in the second round – I simply don’t believe the French would take a risk on Le Pen at this point.
What have they got to lose?
Continuity at a time of acute crisis. I am no Le Pen fan and I think Macron is a vile and greasy smarm factory…but when there’s a huge security risk on Europe’s doorstep and possibly impending war, it is not the time for experimenting. It pains me too much to say I am hoping for a Macron win, so I will say I am hoping for a result which best promises stability.
When the situation is not good, continuity is not good. A stable descent into hell does not appeal to me. I prefer to take my chances with the “extreme right”. There is a huge security risk on Europe’s doorstep but there is already a huge security problem in France. I do not forget Boutcha and Marioupol but I remember the Bataclan and Samuel Paty (and so many more). I remember the areas that were safe ten years ago where I can no longer enter. Macron had five years and here we are. His attempts at diplomacy with Putin do not seem to have made a difference either. So he fails at home and abroad. Just this week a video is published of a handicapped Jewish man in Bobigny being killed by a passing tram while running from a lynching. The story was suppressed and only comes to light because of “extreme right” politicians. If it had been a mob of skinheads, it would have been front page news. This is France in 2022. We saw this before: Ilan Halimi, Sébastien Selem, Mireille Knoll, Sarah Halimi. The “extreme right” label is now meaningless. If I want to live in a country where women can walk in the street without being sexually harassed and religious minorities are not beaten by feral mobs, I am now “extreme right”?
Macron has done a terrible job with this war. The first one to deliver weapons to Ukraine and claim that the conflict would take a long time. There is no better way to maximize civilian casualties. As JP Martin says, a bad situation should not receive continuity.
And this rebellious impulse is exactly what made Brexit happen while people chose to stay in bed that Sunday in 2016.
Le Pen election is very much a possibility…….a scary one.
The title is misleading. Clinton’s coining of the word ‘deplorable’ was not describing the disenfranchised. She intended an insult to those supporting Trump. Le Pen appeals to those in France who feel Macron and his Parisian based clique ignore them. Quite different things and lazy subbing by Unherd.
I’m not seeing the difference – no doubt many American Trump-supporting ‘deplorables’ considered themselves disenfranchised and ignored by Clinton and her sort for quite a while before they were openly being insulted by her.
Could it be a Trump/Clinton re-run ??