In the closing weeks of the presidential election, Democrats and their allies are promoting pornography access in an attempt to court young male voters.
The Freedom to Watch PAC boasted this week of reaching 5 million swing-state viewers through ads on porn websites. “The campaign specifically targets young, non-college-educated white males, a demographic that has shown increasing support for Donald Trump,” the group’s press release read. “We’re targeting guys who don’t find the last 12 years of anti-Trump messaging from Democrats particularly persuasive,” the PAC’s founder added. The 10-second ads tell viewers that Trump and J.D. Vance will ban porn, and warn that their state could be next.
On a Monday podcast appearance, Kamala Harris’s vice-presidential pick, Tim Walz, expressed support for pornography access and portrayed Republicans as wanting to crack down on various freedoms. “You may think right now that they’re not coming after you,” he said of young, disaffected male voters, citing Republican support for abortion restrictions. “What you view in your content as an adult,” he added, “they think government should make all these decisions.”
The conversation illustrates the Democrats’ broader effort to brand themselves as the party of freedom and privacy. On a similar note, a new ad from Progress Action Fund titled “Republicans rubbing you the wrong way” shows a young man masturbating while watching pornography before he’s interrupted by an unnamed member of Congress, who announces that Republicans are “banning porn nationwide”. And earlier this month, the pornography industry began pouring money into ads on explicit websites. More than a dozen pornographers joined together for a $100,000 ad buy warning that “conservatives are planning to criminalize porn”.
The more ribald components of this presidential race reflect Democrats’ eagerness to win back young male voters, a once reliably blue demographic which is now increasingly moving to the centre and the Right. But pornography itself has only recently come to be a Left-wing issue.
In the late 20th century, the anti-porn push was led by feminists such as Andrea Dworkin, who argued that pornography dehumanises and exploits women. More recent anti-pornography activism skewed Left, using social-justice talking points, including complaints about the fetishisation of gay and transgender people and the promotion of unhealthy female body standards. However, the most influential report on the pornography industry in recent years came from the New York Times’s Nicholas Kristof, a liberal, exposing the industry leader Pornhub as being rife with child sexual abuse content.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI don’t understand why porn is permitted in the first place. If a person goes out in public naked, he is fined for lewdness/indecent exposure. And certainly, prostitution is considered illegal because many of us in society see the harmful effects of having an intersection of money and sex. And pornography is nothing more than lewdness, indecent public exposure, and prostitution– all broadcast through camera into our American households. And worst, there is no way to prevent children in the school from having direct access to it on their phones. Porn should be banned, or it is fair to say that it will be a major part of the decline of Western Civilization.
Some of us support the principle of freedom. I guess you don’t.
The same freedom argument could be used to support total deregulation of the labor market, with no minimum wage, health or safety standards. In fact it was regularly used that way in the first 30-40 years of the 20th century. To the extent porn is an exploitive and abusive industry (and it is in large part) it can and should be heavily regulated.
What would be wrong with requiring age verification, and requiring every site owner to guarantee the age and informed consent of every performer in every video they host? There’s no freedom to profit from or consume videos including trafficking victims, minors, and people who didn’t consent to the posting (e.g. revenge porn).
An individual can go to jail for possessing one instance of child porn, why shouldn’t a website be shut-down for displaying it and profiting from it?
Yes, there may well be arguments for some regulations. Of course, no-one should be forced to take part. My objection is to the idea that pornography of any kind should be banned.
Well it should be banned. It dehumanizes and degrades human beings. As Andrea Dworkin said, “Porn is the theory; rape is the practice.”
Andrea Dworkin said a lot of daft things.
Porn is the theory; rape is the practice.
That’s part of the problem; just saying something doesn’t mean it’s true, no matter how slick it sounds.
I agree, everyone should walk around naked to avoid such issues.
Porn for young white men and decriminilised weed for young white men.
How insulting is that?
It will act as a driver for more scholarly, journalistic articles in cerebral magazines such as vox asking “where have all the decent men gone?” I suspect the conclusion will be some way departed from this particular policy.
Darkness.
Anyone voting Democrat needs to have their hard drive checked. These paedople really have lost the plot.
An exercise in flagging hard drives, perhaps?
The 10-second adstell viewers that Trump and J.D. Vance will ban porn, and warn that their state could be next.
The Democrats really do have a low opinion of Americans. They think this is the way to reach the minds of young American males, that all they care about is access to porn.
Let’s see: easy access porn for aimless young white guys and easy access weed for aimless young black guys. What an uplifting campaign.
Why has Harris not been harmed by being descended from slave drivers , compensated by the uk government when they abolished slavery . Is it because they were Irish slave owners , not English, and the Irish have their own victim status ?
They’re so full of sh*t. They think no one can see their barren souls.
Desperation.
Maybe Kamala is thinking of an alternative career when she losses the Presidential election
I’m sure there’s masochists out there who’d pay good money to be talked at by her.
And they call Trump supporters garbage. Porn is the root of human trafficking. If women think it’s liberating, it’s only because men’s lewd behavior is still praised at their expense. Porn offers nothing of value to society as it strips away the ability for many to find and maintain loving relationships. Those relationships are the foundation of our society, not men hiding in their basements pleasuring themselves.
A lot of young men, including those who actively consume porn, hate it and resent its influence. I don’t know if this is exactly a winning strategy.
Banning free speech is not a problem for Dems, but banning porn is a bridge too far.
This has to be the most vacuous, disingenuous and squalid campaign ever, yet still the elite media campaigns for Harris in the apparently genuine belief that Trump is a Fascist
Keep the proles docile with Soma…
Trump should run an ad saying “The Dems want you to live in your Mom’s basement, watching porn and smoking weed. I want you to go out, get a job, find a girl and get some. Who’s on your side?”
I’ll buy that for a Dollar!
Who would have guessed Tim Walz is a perv?
Bribing voters with their own money is so 20th century socialism; today they bride them with dopamine!
Not so much promoting porn as much as placing adverts on the platforms and a few platitudes about freedom of choice then? I’m sure any Trump-leaning, blue collar young men logging on for a crafty ‘Sherman’ will be less than pleased when an image of Kamala Harris pops up, even in the sidebar.
Depends , I think there is a peculiar sub-genre of porn aimed at people who like that kind of thing
This is completely revolt. I wish Andrea Dworkin was still alive – she would let them have it.
Really, and that would make all the difference.
Rope for him!
For clarity, Pornhub voluntarily blocked their various sites in protest of the age verification requirements. They were not banned. This article appears to be deliberately disingenuous, and certainly misleading at best.Carry on.