X Close

China’s ‘United Front’ is the centre of a global spy ring

Alleged Chinese spy Yang Tengbo.

December 18, 2024 - 7:00am

Other than to China watchers, the Communist Party’s United Front Work Department (UFWD) has until now attracted little interest, although Mao Zedong once described it as a “magic weapon” to increase the Party’s influence. That is set to change, for the cases of Prince Andrew’s friend and business partner Yang Tengbo and the alleged Chinese agent Christine Lee have suddenly thrust the UFWD to the forefront of British politics.

In a statement issued on Monday after he lost his legal bid against being banned from re-entering the country, Yang insisted: “I have done nothing wrong or unlawful and the concerns raised by the Home Office against me are ill-founded.” Earlier, while he was still fighting his case before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), a three-judge tribunal with access to secret evidence from MI5 and MI6, Yang’s lawyers said there was “no open source evidence” he was “linked to the UFWD”, and that he had “no connection” to it or the Chinese Communist Party.

The tribunal disagreed, its judgment stating that when British officials examined Yang’s phone as he was stopped at the UK border, it included a letter addressed to the UFWD in Beijing, as well as a text message in which he admitted being one of its overseas members, discoveries that justified excluding him on grounds of national security.

Yet this was nothing like the whole of it. I have unearthed evidence from the Chinese web that suggests Yang’s involvement with the UFWD goes significantly deeper — and spans the whole period that he was involved with the prince. What’s more, he repeatedly made speeches at UFWD events in China, during which he spoke of the need to “cultivate international talents”. He also gave interviews to the Chinese press in which he praised the CCP government and its “grand vision”.

Besides this, Yang became an honorary member of the 48 Group Club, a UK-China friendship organisation founded in 1949 that hosts events and publishes reports and blogs praising the Chinese leadership. Its website contains a star-studded list of fellows including Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson, who, the SIAC judgment says, “could be leveraged for political interference purposes by the Chinese State”. Also listed as a fellow on the website is Jonathan Powell, Blair’s former policy chief who is now Keir Starmer’s national security adviser. However, a Cabinet Office spokesperson denied this was true, telling me that “Jonathan is not and has never been a member of the 48 Group.”

The UFWD’s importance was highlighted in Hidden Hand: How the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World,  a book published in 2020 by the China experts Clive Hamilton and Mareike Ohlberg. A sprawling bureaucracy with many departments and offshoots, it has, they wrote, been central to the Communist Party’s mission for decades, practising “behavioural control and manipulation” while appearing “benign, benevolent and helpful”.

The group has always relied heavily on people of Chinese origin living and working abroad who do not formally work for the state — such as Yang. According to the authors, one of its main instruments in this field is the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), “a high-level advisory council that draws non-Party elements into the Chinese Communist Party’s orbit”.

Charlie Parton, who spent 22 years working in and on China for the Foreign Office and is now a senior adviser at the Council on Geostrategy, told me the key to understanding the UFWD is to see those who work with it as “agents of influence”. As such, besides shifting policy decisions, they act as “forward radars” for straightforward espionage, while helping to obscure the threat this poses.

In any event, Chinese media websites reveal that Yang was a delegate to the CPPCC in 2019. In March 2021, the Mandarin China Daily described him as “a representative of overseas Chinese” at the CPPCC and published an interview with him. In this, he hailed “the superiority of the Chinese system”, adding: “Over the past 100 years, the Chinese people have stood up, become rich, and become strong under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.”

A few months later, in November 2021, Yang was stopped and questioned by immigration officials when he tried to re-enter Britain, which had been his main home since 2002. It was then that some of the evidence of his involvement in the UFWD and his closeness to Prince Andrew were discovered on his mobile.

However, it did not deter him from taking part in further UFWD activity. One example was a speech he made at a CPPCC meeting in Beijing in November 2022. Billed as the chair of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce in the UK, he said: “China needs to cultivate world-class talents, and the international community needs to cultivate talents who know China.” Overseas Chinese like him, he said, had a special role in helping the country develop science and technology. The following March, then-Home Secretary Suella Braverman decided to exclude Yang from the UK permanently. This, SIAC ruled, was reasonable, fair and lawful.

The UFWD also figures prominently in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal judgment issued yesterday, which ruled that M15 acted lawfully when it named the Parliamentary lobbyist Christine Lee as a threat to national security. Lee’s son Daniel Wilkes worked for the former Labour MP Barry Gardiner, while she arranged donations of £420,000 to his office. Another beneficiary was Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey, who received £5,000. According to a statement by MI5 made in 2022, Lee had “knowingly engaged in political interference and activities” on behalf of the UFWD, and the tribunal ruled that this “interference alert” did not infringe her human rights, although she has not been charged with espionage.

The timing of the two cases could not be more sensitive. Although in November Starmer became the first British prime minister to meet President Xi Jinping for six years, the Foreign Office is conducting a “China Audit” covering every aspect of Britain’s relationship with Beijing.

“We should give Prince Andrew a medal,” Charlie Parton told me. “He’s managed to achieve since this row began five days ago what some of us have been urging for more than five years — getting a government to put threats from China at the top of the political agenda.”


David Rose is UnHerd‘s Investigations Editor.

DavidRoseUK

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Tyler
John Tyler
2 hours ago

Final paragraph says it all.

Mrs R
Mrs R
1 hour ago

In 2020/21 there was an outcry as to how Chinese influence in the university sector had been allowed to grow so dominant – nothing came of it because university leadership didn’t want to lose the funds that such investment brought them.
It could be argued that allowing such an outside power such influence over our universities has had a corrosive effect on our society. Universities are so entrenched in left wing/communist, anti- free speech, anti- western dogma they have become little more than centres for indoctrination and that is how so many, if not all, our institutions have been captured.

Last edited 1 hour ago by Mrs R
Richard Littlewood
Richard Littlewood
57 minutes ago
Reply to  Mrs R

It makes you wonder. The rot is so deep. Including in the Conservative party.
The unanswered question throughout Dorries’ books, is, Who is behind the sabotage of the Conservative party? What was their final end?
It is clear who the players are, although some couldn’t be named, for legal reasons.
The answer, she gave, was power games. But there in the background, was the horrible thought, if was foreign interference, spying.