November 1, 2024 - 6:30pm
Marital status has become a proxy for political beliefs, cutting across other factors in party affiliation including age, gender and class.
Republicans are more likely than Democrats to be married, at 65% compared to 50%, according to a new research brief from the Institute for Family Studies. The trend has grown stronger since 2000, when there was roughly only a 10-percentage-point gap, despite a decline in marriage for members of both parties. Further, the majority of married adults report being “very happily” married, but Republicans have an 11-point advantage, at 65% compared to 54%.
In this year’s election, one of the key stories has been the gender-based polarisation of voters, with young women shifting significantly to the Left and young men to the Right. The abortion issue has played into this dynamic. The new analysis, however, demonstrates that this only applies to unmarried women, and 63% of married women aged 25-44 are Republicans.
In response, Democrats are trying to win over married women. One new Kamala Harris ad, voiced by actress Julia Roberts, suggested that married women may need to hide their votes from their husbands, drawing on the narrative that the election is largely a contest between men and women. “In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose,” the ad says of the ballot box, “no one will ever know… Vote Harriz-Walz.” But this research undercuts that idea, revealing that a majority of married women are Republicans.
Married men under 45 are also more likely to be Republican than Democrat, at 55% compared to 42%. Much like the partisan gender gap, the partisan marriage gap is stronger for young Americans, particularly for those with university degrees.
The trend holds true when broken down by social class. Poor and working-class adults have seen a significant decline in marriage rates, but within this group the marriage rate is more than 10 points higher for Republicans in every age category.
The study’s authors attribute the partisan marriage gap to Left-wing social values among Democrats. Because Democrats place less value on marriage, monogamy and fidelity, they get married less, they argue. At the same time, the party’s embrace of extended school closures during Covid-19 and lax policing rules proved off-putting to “family-minded” people, the authors write. “Most progressives today do not think that ‘children are better off if they have two married parents,’ even though the science points clearly in the other direction,” they claim, citing research which concluded that social, emotional and safety outcomes are better for children of married parents.
Gallup analysis from July found that a partisan gap in marriage rates opened up in the Eighties, as marriage became less common within both parties, but the trend was about twice as pronounced for Democrats. The lifetime marriage rate for Republicans fell from 90% in 1965 to 67% today, whereas the Democratic marriage rate fell from 90% to 49%.
“For a long time, we thought the rise of singles in America would give Democrats a big demographic advantage in the presidential election,” Brad Wilcox, IFS fellow and University of Virginia professor, told UnHerd. “But there is a real chance we will see a South Korea-style election next week where a clear majority of married Americans vote Republican and a large minority of single men who feel alienated from the Democratic Party vote for Trump.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIn the mid nineteenth century the Russians extorted a huge area of Siberia and Manchuria from Qing China.
The Chinese have not forgotten and want it back.
Putin’s attempts to bring China “on board” show signs of increasing desperation. President Xi is a much more skilled operator and his using of Russian aggression as a lodestone for further Chinese expansionism has the rest of the world watching with obvious interest. Both Putin and Xi know this.
Now is not the time, i feel, to be less than diplomatic with China. We’re all aware of its failings with human rights, and we’re doing well in the UK to have taken the necessary step of abandoning Chinese input into our 5G networks. The voices from politicians to rescind the invitation of China to the Queen’s funeral are, however, foolish and lacking in political savvy. Such an invitation isn’t an endorsement of the Chinese regime, but the absence of an invitation would be a snub that would reverberate around Beijing.
Biden’s Forcing Russia into China’s arms is showing major signs of increasing negative effects on global balance of power.
Next Biden’s Insane closing of SWIFT may well rush the loss of USA Global Reserve Currency status.
Biden and his equally corrupt mini-me, Boris, are about to bankrupt Eu and UK between the mad and self harm of the covid response, and then having to get into the war which was none of their business.
The Big guy gets his 10%, I wonder if Boris, the little guy, gets 2%?
Biden is the single most destructive force in USA in its history. Boris can claim the same for his – and Truss is saying how great Boris was at covid and this insane war! Truss is bad news. She has them readying the printing presses for Overtime……
You’re sounding very much like Soviet blather about their nation “overtaking and surpassing the West.” It was the basis of all Soviet propaganda.
Up until the year 1991…
There is another possibility, if Russia is humiliated in the Ukraine.
Russia is a vast country (the world’s biggest, about 70 times as large as the UK) with a sparse population and enormous untapped resources, especially in Siberia. These resources would be of great benefit to a country that is rapidly industrialising and has a very large population. Furthermore, much of Russia outside of Moscow is neglected and economically run down.
An economically-damaged, militarily-humiliated Russia might be vulnerable to Beijing’s ‘Belt and Road’ programme, or something like it (for diplomatic reasons China would not want to make it too obvious that it regarded Russia in the same light as central Asia). Although China would not (at this stage) want to meddle in European Russia, Siberia would be a good candidate for Chinese ‘development’.
Perhaps Xi is biding his time, until the outcome of the war in Ukraine is settled. If Russia wins, Putin will be Xi’s best friend and a joint China-Russia geopolitical axis will emerge. If Russia loses, it will be a liability and China will extend its tentacles northwards.
Beginning to feel like this is also a proxy war for China. Just as the West thought the war would be a way to weaken Russia, China sees the war as a way to weaken the West. While Russia is depleting is military capabilities and future influence, the West depletes its economic power and future influence.
‘The enemy of my enemy is my friend’
When Biden set out to crush Russia he just made the real enemy of the world, China, stronger.
Absolutely correct. Astonishing that most have missed this.
Absolutely wrong. Astonishing that some think this is the case,
Well yes, sort of. Putin’s expansionism made it imperative to stop him, whatever the implications re China.
You have to shoot the wolf closest to the sleigh.
Err, Russia is NOT “depleting” its military capabilities. But it is completely destroying Ukraine’s capabilities and its obsolete NATO arms. You’ll note how little HIMARS are being crowed about these days.
Where do you get that disinformation from? The UK Military of Defence, which continue its bizarre daily briefings about a foreign conflict, as if it’s 1982 and we are steaming to the Falklands.
As to “future influence? Are you kidding. It’s the US/UK/EU/NATO which is peeing that away.
“Err, Russia is NOT “depleting” its military capabilities. But it is completely destroying Ukraine’s capabilities and its obsolete NATO arms. You’ll note how little HIMARS are being crowed about these days.”
You have absolutely no evidence to support this.
It was this Ukrainian weakness that made tehm retreat to Kuynsk and Izyum.
They may well fall back east of teh Oskil River.
When Ukraine ignominiously retreats to Moscow, we will know that Putin has won.
If Russia is doing so well why are they having trouble recruiting troops and keeping their forces in the field intact. Winning armies suffer less desertions than losing armies.
How’s the weather in Moscow this time of year, David Jack Smith, or should I call you Sergei?
Autocrats and their regimes have no friends; they don’t understand the concept. For them it is not a question of ‘How to win friends and influence people’, but ‘How to buy allies and manipulate people’.
Putin has been reduced to the rank of “Prince of Moscow.” As in the 14th Century, he is now the vassal of the new ruler of Central Asia–China.
As we see, Prince Putin must regularly go to do obeisance to the Khan. If he is obedient, the Khan may even grant him the title of “Grand Prince.” Perhaps a new cap even?
But if Putin displeases the Khan.
The Khan will just choose a new Prince.
It will be interesting to see how many centuries it will take Russia to free itself from their new “Tatar Yoke.”
Russia is a ethno-nationalist country believing slavs to be the superior race on Earth. China believes Han chinese to be the crown achivement of human evolution, Both countries are practically ruled by nazis. Of course they can’t get along.
It’s win win win for the west. Increased nato border with Russia with Finland and Sweden, bottling up their navy too; stronger Turkey controlling the Black Sea and taking on Russia in Azerbaijan; destruction of a huge proportion of Russian military; and unification of almost all the former Soviet countries, with increased military spending. And a largely unified west to boot. And then China, cursing Putin for doing such a great job on achieving these wins for the west – and delaying its takeover of Taiwan for 10 years at least – and by then India will be our barrier against Chinese expansionism as it stamps its rapidly increasing GDP and authority on Asia.
This article is nonsense Western propaganda…. Although recent Russian humiliations have left Xi Jinping visibly uneasy
Why is it western propaganda? The tone of Chinas comments have changed as the war has taken its course, from no limits of friendship through to being uneasy about the conflict. Your objections seem more to be based on your predetermined opinion than what has actually been said
Correct. To be honest, most people don’t really give a genuine crap about the conflict, and most likely couldn’t point to Ukraine on map. Even those with their virtue-signalling yellow/blue flags in their twitter bios.
They know nothing about the US engineered coup in 2014. The ethnic Russians killed since then. Ukraine’s flouting of the Minsk accords. That Ukraine is a sink of corruption and anti-democratic actions. The Nazi problem. The US inspired provocations. The real reasons for the conflict. Why it’s called a Special Military Operation, and the constraints that puts on Russia. The fact that most of the ground fighting in the Donbass region comes NOT from the large Russian regular army, but local militias with Russian air/ground support. Basic stuff like that.
Even so, the ridiculous government-controlled western corporate media agit-prop is the most insidious I have ever seen.
Ukraine is far better at PR Offensives, than military offensives.
Putin has been retreating for the last six months to LURE UKRAINE INTO A TRAP.
The tens of thousands of dead Russians, the thousands of wrecked Russian vehicles, and destroyed aircraft were actually ingenious means of lulling Ukraine into a false sense of security.
And once Ukraine takes Luhansk, Donetsk and Crimea THE TRAP WILL SPRING.
Wow so it’s local militias that have lost all those hundreds of tanks and guns, and 70,000 soldiers! There’ll be nobody left there to fight their war then.