(Simone Padovani/Getty Images)

For many of us, early January is a difficult time. Credit card and tax bills are looming, waistlines are bulging, and it’s dark by 4pm. As I write, the cost-of-living crisis is hitting hard and strikes are paralysing public services. Half the country is doing Dry January, the other half is doing Divorce Month, and some unlucky sods are doing both simultaneously. Happily, though, austerity guru Jack Monroe has a new book, Thrifty Kitchen to cheer us all up.
Some of the suggested “home hacks” in this book have attracted particular mirth, seeming as they do to involve great effort and even high personal risk for exceptionally low reward. For instance, should you be desperate to get your hands on an egg ring — that is, a metal ring that helps you form perfectly round fried eggs — but unable to afford the £2.10 that would obtain you one from Amazon, Monroe suggests removing the lid and the bottom from a tuna tin, sanding the rough edges away, and washing afterwards to remove “any tiny dusty bits of metal”.
Should you be poor enough to lack a tin opener, meanwhile — currently on sale in Tesco for 60p — she suggests using a “small sharp knife that you are not particularly attached to, a hammer or mallet, a bit of vigour, some patience and a VERY steady hand”. As the internet has pointed out, combining both of these suggestions to produce an egg ring seems to make it likely that by the end of the process, you won’t be particularly attached to your fingers either.
It is hard to know to whom these tips are really addressed. It seems improbable that the average cash-strapped and harassed parent is going to need — or indeed have time for — any of them. The most obvious candidate for lacking a tin opener is someone homeless or in temporary accommodation, but having perfectly circular fried eggs is surely an unlikely priority here. Other tips in the book involve making firelighters by stuffing cardboard toilet rolls with tumble dryer fluff; filling worn-out socks with lavender for a microwaveable “hot pocket”; making a rolling-pin out of a glass bottle filled with ice; and gluing ring-pulls into your handbag to keep your sunglasses secure. Perhaps, then, the envisioned reader is a pastry chef living in the woods, but still with access to a lot of home appliances.
If you are familiar with Monroe, you’ll know that fearlessly confecting the imaginary habits of poor people is something of a habit of hers. If you aren’t: she’s a queer, tatted, highly articulate and Very Online single mum who mostly writes about low-cost food. Ten years ago, she stumbled into fame at the height of the government’s austerity programme by writing a blog post about not being able to feed her son or heat her home in Southend-on-Sea. Since then, she has authored several cookbooks and continued her blog, heavily mining her own lived experience to evangelise about how to eat cheaply and well when you’re hard up. Nigella Lawson is a big fan and offers a fulsome tribute in the new book.
These days, Monroe seems professionally wedded to a narrative of personal struggle and sudden dramatic changes of fortune, for better or worse. She has a huge Twitter following, regularly detailing physical and mental health challenges, struggles with alcohol, a rollercoaster love-life, and anecdotes that heavily imply that the wolf is never far from the door. She’s helped by a fluent writing style that cycles rapidly through a variety of clickable moods: cheerful resilience in the face of adversity, living-my-best-life showboating, sassy clapbacking, ruefully relatable parenting moments, and so on. In short, she’s the acceptable face of modern poverty in the eyes of many middle-class progressives — and they adore her for it.
Equally though, the very characteristics that make her so pleasing to some make her absolutely infuriating to others. And just imagine — some of these infuriated people are actually poor and/or working-class. It’s no doubt a hard job to stand in for an entire demographic in the public imagination but still, Monroe’s apparently inability to keep a story straight about whether she’s really a downtrodden victim of a cruel system or rather #winningatlife tends to get on the nerves of readers feeling permanently crushed by rising interest rates, rents, energy bills, and food prices. In the last year or so, an army of determined internet sleuths has arisen to challenge the official back story of poverty, obsessively documenting internal discrepancies within Monroe’s voluminous Twitter output, cross-referenced with her many heartfelt Guardian op-eds, interviews, and blog posts. Understandably wounded, the writer is now apparently psychologically locked into an escalating and ultimately unwinnable confrontation with a multi-headed hydra of critics on Twitter.
Personally, although I find Monroe’s online persona more grating than — as she might have it — a metal sheet into which you’ve just punched several large holes with a sharp knife, I don’t think she’s a deliberate scammer. She strikes me as more of a disorganised, constitutionally inconsistent type who can’t remember what she last said from one moment to the next. Either way, I’m not too bothered. I’m just grateful for the lolz provided by some of the recipes — and specifically, the juxtaposition of Monroe’s middle-class culinary sensibilities with her cheap, ultra-processed ingredient list.
Think Nigella-does-Asda. Descriptions of unctuous smatterings and glossy meldings are one thing when enthusing about béarnaise or Sachertorte, but they take on another register altogether when the subject matter is Sainsbury’s Baked Beans or Instant Mash. A much-derided blogpost of Monroe’s from last year suggests buying a tin of spaghetti hoops, washing the tomato sauce from the hoops, then grating some cheese on top to produce “Anellini Con Cacio e Pepe”. (Readers are also told that the washed-off tomato sauce can be reduced down “in a vigorous boil to concentrate it” to make something approximating tomato purée.) In the latest book, Monroe waxes lyrical about such culinary temptations as “moonshine mash” (Instant Mash mixed with pureed tinned sweetcorn), chicken cooked in Fanta, and cornflake ice-cream.
Once you have unscrewed your face, consider that the real attraction of Monroe’s writing for readers cannot possibly be that it gives impoverished people genuinely delicious things to eat, still less that it saves them lots of money. After all, no amount of repurposing stale cornflakes or fiddling about with ring pulls is going to make even the smallest dent in household bills these days. Rather, the main appeal of Monroe’s writing is surely that it taps into an old and perennially satisfying literary tradition, which for want of a better term I’ll call Thrift Lit.
In this genre, fearless housewives — often abetted by a calm and steadfast husband with carpentry skills — marshal all their domestic forces against a hostile local environment. They build shelters, repurpose natural objects into domestic ones, find ingenious uses for old things, and waste nothing. They pickle, salt, ferment, and store up for winter; mend, patch, darn, and husband; plant crops then tend and harvest them; look after animals. Slowly, over time, they produce gleaming, quiet, well-ordered homes in which to bring up docile children, safe little shelters from the chaotic storm of life outside, lit warmly from within. Classics of the Thrift Lit genre include The Swiss Family Robinson, the Little House On The Prairie series, and The Country Child.
Viewed in this light, despite all the contemporary trappings (non-binary, tattooed, neurodiverse), Monroe becomes a surprisingly traditional figure, grounded in Puritan values of self-restraint and respectability: a castaway, pioneer, or farmer’s wife, ingeniously building a succession of bright, glowing homes for herself and her child out of nothing, in the midst of a punishing economic wilderness. The virtues to which she exhorts us by her own alleged example are thrift and frugality, not as means to any further ends but as wholly satisfying moral and aesthetic ends in themselves.
Of course — because we are limp and useless spoilt softies who can’t do anything right — we get the heroes we deserve. Our own modern-day Ma Ingalls is a pale shadow of her stoic forebears in terms of stiff upper lip at least. Still, the appeal of her message is timeless, and a good one for a cold and pitiless January. You too can use your own resources to make order out of chaos. It may be a fantasy, but it’s a consoling one. And if that doesn’t help, there’s always the circular eggs with a light smattering of metal dust to look forward to.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeWell done Mr Gutman for having the courage of your convictions.
“In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), by George Orwell, the Two MinutesHate is the daily, public period”
Today I await the Two MinutesSelfHate becoming a daily school ritual. (those who are not White may do the Two Minutes Hate)
It may happen soon: https://www.city-journal.org/critical-race-theory-portland-public-schools
I grew up with three sisters. I think if I had been forced to attend a session like that and been treated that way I would still be in jail for slapping that b**** into the following week.
The teachers should quit rather than face this abuse.
The link you provide is truly terrifying; West civilisation is rapidly building its own funeral pyre.
It is so heartening to hear from a parent who genuinely loves their child and won’t let them be subject to propaganda.
Massive respect. Wonder if this got any mass press coverage over there as it should have. One of, if not the only, example of good people putting their foot down and having the integrity and decency to reject these quasi-religious fanatics and their grotesque, obscene, bullying BS. I dearly hope it’s the start of real substantial resistance. It makes me want to start a group to march against political indoctrination in the UK, which is the biggest threat to a stable, sane generation of people, and future ones after them that exists right now.
It’s not the old, fluffy liberalism we are facing. And we can all feel the hatred, malevolence, and toxic resentment of these despicable, damaged, anti-social nightmare group.
Political indoctrination and 1984 social engineering, domestic abuse, child abuse, those are critical things people should be striving for to change. Instead, we’ve got Antifa headcases in far too many positions of influence, and they’re utterly unable to keep themselves from abusing the minds of kids as soon as they get the chance. They only care about people using the right pronouns they demand be used for them and idiocy like that.
I left the UK for various reasons in the early 2000s. One reason was the children`s education.
I could see already the way it was going as I lived in London in a bourgeois area but with even then quite a lot of diversity. I do not really have the money without a struggle for the private sector, and anyway I prefer the state sector if it is run well.
I thought it would be a bad thing if frequently the children were to come home, tell me what they had been told about the world, and I would have to tell them that is not a fact, it is an opinion, and I believe it is wrong for the following reasons. It undermines their belief in authority at too early an age, and in fact it would be reasonable for a child to think the teachers were perhaps talking nonsense even about more factual matters like maths or physics.
I think I made a good choice – the country my wife was born in, where politics and ideology make little (although even here, a little) intrusion into the schools. I think they have had a good education – although no doubt many UK educators would be appalled at their lack of, or even opposition to, wokeness.
“I thought it would be a bad thing if frequently the children were to come home, tell me what they had been told about the world, and I would have to tell them that is not a fact, it is an opinion, and I believe it is wrong for the following reasons. It undermines their belief in authority at too early an age”
I never had a problem telling my son from a young age that his (London, state school) teachers could be wrong about stuff. Maybe that’s a bit aspergery, but he seems to have worked out ok – and he’s very adept at telling people what they want to hear.
It is a question of degree. To say that a teacher got a fact wrong or made a spelling mistake – fine.
To say that a large number of the teachers in a school are constantly repeating wrong things on important matters, and their views on life in general are valueless, nay harmful – that is different.
One memory my wife has was a primary school teacher telling her how lucky we were that the children in the school spoke lots of different languages – and of course, virtually daring my wife to disagree that there could be downsides to such a Tower of Babel. And that is just a minor example.
Where is this promised land, please?
Sorry, Jonathan, people I know might guess who I am. I will merely say it is not in northern or western Europe – but then you probably knew that!
But you know, maybe it could be lots of countries outside northern and western Europe and the Islamic and sub-Saharan African world.
Wokeism is a secular counter-Enlightenment movement. It’s the first time a secular critique of Enlightenment went mainstream and I think this took many by surprise.
There’s also the political angle. It helps Democrats cast the widest net for minority vote at a time of right-wing populism in US. It looked like it was working in pushing the Right back for a while.
But now, a valid question is whether this will all backfire and strengthen right-wing populism after all, by potentially providing confirmation for some of the things far-righters had been saying about the establishment (e.g. political correctness gone mad) for large parts of the population (e.g. trans rights movement, defund police, white fragility, …).
In Australia they are teaching very young children that Jesus was non-binary and wore a dress. We learned this from a video of a bewildered Aussie mum on Alex Belfield’s Voice of Reason podcast this morning. Notwithstanding the fact the religion should not even be taught in schools, this is crazy even by the standards of what passed for education in the West today.
“Notwithstanding the fact the religion should not even be taught in schools,”
Religion SHOULD be taught in schools! To say otherwise is like saying history should not be taught in schools as people disagree on its meaning. Or literature should not be taught as there are too many viewpoints so some must be wrong, and those could hurt innocents…..
As religion has been mans greatest accomplishment in arising from the savanna – grubbing roots and clubbing zebras – into forming structured societies with philosophical concepts, agreed morality, and set organizations of educated leadership.
I did not know you were one with the modern cancel culture, or a knee-jerk atheist.
Am I a reactionary atheist if I object to creationism being taught in schools?
Awaiting approval above for word j ** k, so repeated below with offending letters redacted:
“Notwithstanding the fact the religion should not even be taught in schools,”
Religion SHOULD be taught in schools! To say otherwise is like saying history should not be taught in schools as people disagree on its meaning. Or literature should not be taught as there are too many viewpoints so some must be wrong, and those could hurt innocents…..
As religion has been mans greatest accomplishment in arising from the savanna – grubbing roots and clubbing zebras – into forming structured societies with philosophical concepts, agreed morality, and set organizations of educated leadership.
I did not know you were one with the modern cancel culture, or a knee-*e r* atheist.
“teaching very young children that Jesus was non-binary and wore a dress”
My guess is they will not go into explaining Mohammad wearing a dress as well, but keep him in his dishdasha. Purely to be culturally sensitive, and to avoid any inconvenient beheading.
What the major religions purportedly believe should be taught in schools (would be nice to catch some of the minor ones too) alongside a historical analysis of whether followers of those religions have practised what they preached.
I have a family member in the state school system in a Republican state. Every subject, somehow or another, has to include Wokeness, from computing (you must acknowledge how others feel) to geography (oppression is everywhere), by my estimate 20% of teaching now is Woke, in every subject. I shudder to think what they teach in Oregon, California, etc.
I wish Mr.Gutmann well, and I do, truly, hope it works out. I suspect that it will be massively over-subscribed.
How about looking at what is happening in schools in England?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9557845/School-reports-chaplain-telling-pupils-theyre-allowed-disagree-LGBT-teaching.html?ito=email_share_article-top
Gutmann seems like he would have been fine with actual anti racist policies. But that isn’t what Brearley was implementing. Its policies were distinctly racist. Just calling them anti-racist when they were, in fact, the very opposite, is designed to squelch dissent against racist policies. Bravo to Mr Gutmann for standing up to them.
I also think mr Gutman would merely trim the extreme, but set up a school which would still be way Liberal/Left for a typical, Non-NYC-rich guy. That ‘Thanksgiving will always have a foot note to dead Native Americans, and Imperial India history be about British exploiting the natives., with some bits of architecture, and their religion, and civil rights (and maybe even the millions killed during the partition, but maybe not, depending who is made to be the bad guys.) so much better than normal schools, but Liberal.
Not that it will matter as he clearly explains the entire function of the $54,000 a year school is to feed into $70,000 a year universities and so into $1,000,000 + per year jobs amongst the right sorts of people.
In the Daily Mail today is a NYC liberal school teaching kindergarten children about master***ion using sexual correct cartoon characters. I would have the person presenting this class charged with pedophilia to be a lesson to all adults to not get weirdly into this kind of situation with children.
Yes, one of my daughters attended a university which was about $48k tuition and room and board. The first year all parents got a letter apologizing because some fraternity on campus had a cowboys and Indians party with some questionable dress on the part of the “Indian” attendees. And they were serious. I guess the administrators never attended college themselves. She found it amusing that anyone would apologize for this and any “offense” it caused and so did I. As Jerry Seinfeld famously said…..”if I like their race, how can it be racist?”
They are college kids, showing up at parties inappropriately dressed is what they do. I’m fine with liberal beliefs and my kids were all armed with an explanation of what they might see and how not to over-react. How not to walk around with a huge chip on their shoulders.
A good and brave man. One can only hope that he manages to establish his new type of school in New York, and that this leads to more such schools across the US.
I think the idea of a parallel school system for people who want to avoid the rapid shift in the woke direction is a terrific idea. I’m happy to hear he actually has some momentum and money behind the idea. I applaud his initiative. I’m very worried, however, that what we’ll end up with is 20% of kids getting a decent education while 80% are in public schools getting the indoctrination. I’m just guessing at the percentages. But, even if it was 50/50, it seems like there is a dark future ahead for these kids and our country. I don’t see ‘a more perfect union’ in the future if CRT and all its baggage is allowed to be taught. It is inherently divisive. Its goals include basically tearing down the government and educational structure of the nation and starting over. I applaud parents getting their kids away from this ideology, but there are still going to be millions of kids being indoctrinated. This isn’t going to end well.
A courageous and principled man. Just a question…. I thought that Biden had signed off CRT for all schools at the beginning of the year?
Biden doesn’t have the power to do this. In addition, some states have banned CRT in public schools. Presidents aren’t monarchs.
Raised Catholic but never believing in original sin, I see here a repetition of that obnoxious doctrine: born white, you are born more or less a psychopath, or vicious oppressor, etc. I later learned that the Eastern CHurch has a different and older definition of what is called the sin of Adam and Eve: we all bear the consequences of that sin (the cruelty and inhumanity we so easily inflict on each other and, yes, class and racial oppression) but we bear no guilt. We are only guilty of the sins we ourselves personally commit.
We are only guilty of the wriongs we ourselves commit. And those wrongs can be repaired by a non-ego focused acknowledgement of them, a resolution to do those wrongs no more, and action to perform what reparation we can.
Racism certainly exists and is deeply ingrained in our society. So is the easy assumption of superiority by the class of one’s birth, or by “meritocracy.” The wrongs of society need to be explored with a view to advancing justice. A medieval theological approach does not advance justice or challenge the priviliged to stop fcusing on themselves and their guilt and instead focus on social and class realities with a commitment to advance solutions to the wrongs that are there. I favor ecomnomic security for everyonne and access to certtain resources for everyone. in other words, a well regulated social democratic form of a capitalist economy and democratic governance. But other approaches can be discussed, especially ones that assure economic security and the right to govern one’s own life without hectoring form preachers (religious or secular, right or left) within an orbit of relationship and civic obligations.
Dwelling on one’s guilt is a form of egoistic focus on one’s self. Focusing on shared problems and solutions is one way we escape the human dilemma and harm of egoism.
I am sure there are good aspects of critical race theory. But a far better way to confront and work out solutions to our race (and class) problems are avaiiable. Parents need to discover what has been emppiricalluy proven to solve poverty, class, race and police problems and demand that these solution oriented approaches be taught. A good resource, one that catalogs proven effective solutions, is the Shriver Center at the University of Maryland.
We all remember Martin Luther King’s, “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” This humanistic approach, respectful of people of good will from all backgrounds, did not prevent him from seeing the injustices perpetrated on working class people, especially blacks and other not mainstream white populations, and aiming for radical economic reform as a result.
It certainly seems as though the advance guard of the Woke are adhering to the supposed Jesuit maxim : …give me the child for the first seven years and I will give you the man…..
I applaud Mr Gutmann but Iam appalled that it should come to this. This Woke movement is innately stupid, being unable to see that it represents a most illiberal, racist body of people all proclaiming their egalitarian credentials…….irony does not begin to describe this…..
The next hurdle of course will be what University will these well educated young people attend. I cannot imagine a university that would accept them unless they were prepared to conform…….
Due to their lack of achievement, complete reliance on White people, and their own general unattractiveness, only blacks are racist. Only blacks could be.