Il Tampaccino (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
Until this week, until the world’s leaders saluted him at COP26, hardly a day would pass without the Prince of Wales being bullied. The heir apparent was brutally insulted and mockingly sketched. Or taunted about his ears. Or his most deeply held beliefs. Or the collapse of his first marriage.
Back then Diana — always channeling the popular mood — called him “the boy wonder”, “killer Wales”, and “the great white hope”. She laughed at his medals; she said he’d never succeed his mother. When he tried to pray before bedtime, she’d hit him on the head, and shriek. This was the man’s wife. Imagine what Kelvin Mackenzie’s Sun was saying about him.
Not just the Sun in the Eighties. In more recent times, Charles has been described as a prat, a terrible prat, a dangerous prat, ill-advised, idiotic, the “puppet of sinister gurus”, dismal, a “sower of division and contention”, and “way too grand” — and that’s one article in the Spectator.
Foreigners found this legal national blood sport irresistible too. They joined the hunt. Charles, chuckled a New York Times editorial in 1994, existed for the world’s “amusement”. Perhaps the blackest day for him that year was when the Italian press reduced all those titles to… “Il Tampaccino”. Being embarrassed for the primitivity of your sexploits by a nation that invented a sophisticated cinematic genre called ‘commedia sexy all’italiana’ would have pushed lesser Royalty over the edge. Not the heir apparent. Nor England. Letting the world ridicule our Prince was the one post-war export drive that actually seemed to work.
Other Royal Charlies had it better, didn’t they? A swift release from his troubles on the scaffold. A convenient hiding place in an oak tree. Ours has endured life as a dangling, slow-twirling, impossible to miss piñata. It would be human to feel sorry for him, if he didn’t feel so sorry for himself.
Even his mother baited him. “Charles is hopeless” was her crushing verdict. “Not all the water in the rough rude sea can wash the balm from an anointed king,” Shakespeare makes Richard II claim. Well, with Charles, the rough sea tried. And tried.
Now that sea is washing out at long last. Finally, Charles is respected, admired, and — most shockingly of all — listened to. His balm is pristine again. It’s not the crown he possesses. Rather it’s an apparently merited authority, derived less from his birthright than from the time-weathered correctness of his views on composting.
This week, whether addressing the G20 in Rome, or handshaking dignitaries at COP26, the Prince has been accorded the kind of fulsome respect that he lavishes on the plants at Highgrove. A sedulous, loving attention. Why?
Since 1970 the Prince has issued warnings about climate change. Unlike his jet-age father, he had no faith in a technological future. He rhapsodised about bees and gazed into hedges. He wanted to protect the elephants and conserve the Botswana Bushmen, seeing them in approximately the same way. He experimented with vegetarian diets when the only other person in beef-dripping England to do so was Morrissey. “At the beginning everyone thought he was crackers… They wrote him off completely,” his biographer Penny Junor told the Washington Post. “He’s been saying these things for 50 years, but the world has caught up to Charles hasn’t it? He’s certainly not a crank.” Even Donald Trump admitted a few years ago that he “totally listened” to Prince Charles’s eco-views.
While he waited for his mother to abdicate, Charles yearned to do the right thing. He did this through thoughts, not actions. Winston Churchill told the Queen in a letter that Charles, at the age of two, was “young to think so much”. At a luncheon, Edwina Mountbatten told the eight-year-old Charles that he shouldn’t pluck the stalks out of strawberries. He should hoist the fruit up by the stems and roll them in sugar. Moments later his cousin Pamela Hicks observed that “the poor child was trying to put all the stems back on. That was so sad.” Charles’s entire outlook can be reduced to this desire to put stalks back on strawberries. “All I want to do,” he once dolefully told Jonathan Dimbleby, “is to help other people.”
He believed this desire to save and serve was sharpened on the grindstone of reality, rather than the unintended consequence of an artificial upbringing. “I have come to realise,” he wrote in 2002, “that my entire life has been so far motivated by a desire to heal — to heal the dismembered landscape and the poisoned soul; the cruelly shattered townscape, where harmony has been replaced by cacophony; to heal the divisions between intuitive and rational thought, between mind and body, and soul, so that the temple of our humanity can once again be lit by a sacred flame.” Modernity could be escaped and replaced with… him, in a temple, lighting a flame. More alluring, I suppose, than cutting the ribbon on yet another community centre.
On and on he went like this for decades. The self-image was radical: Red Shelley in an Anderson & Sheppard blazer. He referred to himself, his ex-private secretary Mark Bolland said, “as a ‘dissident’ working against the prevailing political consensus”. All that dissent was collected inside a two-volume, 1,012-page treasury of speeches and remarks, retailing for over £320, illustrated with his own watercolours, and bound in stiff bottle green buckram, published in 2015. These heavy volumes appear designed to trouble the shelves of libraries, not their readers. What they reveal, once multiple introductions, glosses, prefaces, preludials, throat-clearings, and fanfares have been macheted through, is a vehement man hostile to the world as it is.
Charles never changes. But the world always does. When he was born in 1948, wars and revolutions had levelled everything. There was a ‘Great Compression’; inequality was suppressed, by accident, bloodletting, and design. For 30 years there were high taxes, good novels, middle-class successes, and an operational meritocracy.
By the Nineties, Tory politicians in Britain could dream of a “classless” society. Charles was most-lambasted in this midlife period, not merely because of the “War of the Waleses”, but because this socially democratic mood made the monarchy itself look ridiculous. “Who knows what fate will produce?” Diana said, ominously, at the time.
Fate dispatched her, then produced a vastly more unequal world. Meritocracy calcified into an aristocracy. It treats national and international institutions as outdoor relief for its favoured families. After Iraq, the financial crisis, and 2016, this elite, viewed from below, began to look like an Ancien Régime. With their fabulous wealth, estates, yachts, villas, servants, and elaborate sex lives, this class resembles the Windsors, just with stronger chins.
Charles looks at ease with them all. Being admired by Jeff Bezos; being hailed by the Prime Minister as a “prophet without honour”. Hanging out with Leonardo DiCaprio. Drinking with Bill Gates, whose ratio of wealth to the average US citizen is roughly the same as the richest Roman aristocrats to the plebs in 400 AD. How right it looked. Those who have taken the glitziest prizes from industrial civilisation now, like Charles, believe it is sick.
So the dissident Prince is accepted at last. A fairytale to replace the old one, about the Princess dying in a tunnel. He believed he had waged a guerrilla war against scientific expertise all his life. Now it agrees with him about hedges and bees, so he gives it his blessing. Typically, his victory is Pyrrhic. All it has taken for Charles to be vindicated is the prospect of the near-term extinction of the human race.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeYet another stab at politicizing the murderous actions of a crazy drug addict from a f**ked up family. The guy’s grandfather was a Republican! That’s why he did it! But the gang mass murders occurring every weekend in America’s big cities barely get mentioned. As long as the perp is a white male, game on! Not a white male? Nuthin’ to see here, folks. And everyone knows it.
Firstly, two wrongs don’t make a right. Secondly, I’m not exactly going to fall over myself weeping at the thought of gangsters killing each other!
It sounds like you are downplaying this atrocity through an enormous dose of ‘whataboutery’. It should be perfectly possible to decry the excesses of the identitarian Left without showing sympathy or even denial to the actions of every right wing nutter going!
Firstly, two wrongs don’t make a right. Secondly, I’m not exactly going to fall over myself weeping at the thought of gangsters killing each other!
It sounds like you are downplaying this atrocity through an enormous dose of ‘whataboutery’. It should be perfectly possible to decry the excesses of the identitarian Left without showing sympathy or even denial to the actions of every right wing nutter going!
Yet another stab at politicizing the murderous actions of a crazy drug addict from a f**ked up family. The guy’s grandfather was a Republican! That’s why he did it! But the gang mass murders occurring every weekend in America’s big cities barely get mentioned. As long as the perp is a white male, game on! Not a white male? Nuthin’ to see here, folks. And everyone knows it.
As soon as the shooter identified as non-binary, the story died a quick death. Haven’t heard anything since. Funny how that works.
As soon as the shooter identified as non-binary, the story died a quick death. Haven’t heard anything since. Funny how that works.
“Earlier this week, 22-year-old Anderson Lee Aldrich entered an LGBTQ nightclub”
A what nightclub?
It’s pretty well known that gays and lesbians tend not to go to the same clubs. Lumping in other letters is mealy mouthing. Why not say gay club and be done?
Agreed, especially given that ‘cis’ lesbians tend to avoid these clubs as of 2022 because they are filled with ‘transbians’ (i.e. autogynephilic male-to-female transsexuals).
Two of the people killed were heterosexual.
They were likely there because gay bars have the best music
They were likely there because gay bars have the best music
Once male always male doesn’t matter what surgery or drugs you take every cell screams maleness!! So MtF is always a lie!!
Two of the people killed were heterosexual.
Once male always male doesn’t matter what surgery or drugs you take every cell screams maleness!! So MtF is always a lie!!
Because that would be exclusive and miss out trans people who are the most important minority in the whole wide world. So many were so quick to point out at least one of the dead was a transman, while not having a clue about the rest. Labels are important when trying to prove the point that trans people are being killed in their thousands simply because they are trans. And then there is the projection of this attitude to the UK so it must be true here too!
who cares?
I’m sure we have the odd few attending The Jockey Club, The Turf, And White’s if only as guests? Are these different sorts of clubs? I’m a tad out of touch with such things.
Agreed, especially given that ‘cis’ lesbians tend to avoid these clubs as of 2022 because they are filled with ‘transbians’ (i.e. autogynephilic male-to-female transsexuals).
Because that would be exclusive and miss out trans people who are the most important minority in the whole wide world. So many were so quick to point out at least one of the dead was a transman, while not having a clue about the rest. Labels are important when trying to prove the point that trans people are being killed in their thousands simply because they are trans. And then there is the projection of this attitude to the UK so it must be true here too!
who cares?
I’m sure we have the odd few attending The Jockey Club, The Turf, And White’s if only as guests? Are these different sorts of clubs? I’m a tad out of touch with such things.
It’s pretty well known that gays and lesbians tend not to go to the same clubs. Lumping in other letters is mealy mouthing. Why not say gay club and be done?
“Earlier this week, 22-year-old Anderson Lee Aldrich entered an LGBTQ nightclub”
A what nightclub?
Is this article a joke? The article you linked was to the Uvalde shooter and was months old. There is no excuse for that level of sloppiness. Here is a tip from an American. If it is several days and you still don’t know many of the relevant details of the shooting, then somewhere it does not fit the “narrative”.
Is this article a joke? The article you linked was to the Uvalde shooter and was months old. There is no excuse for that level of sloppiness. Here is a tip from an American. If it is several days and you still don’t know many of the relevant details of the shooting, then somewhere it does not fit the “narrative”.
With the trend for states to pardon non-violent marijuana users, the result will be more open cells to house violent felons. Whether that pleases the left no one else really cares.
If a few patrons of the club had been legally armed perhaps the death toll might have been less for the patrons and more for the killer.
An armed employee at the door might have noticed a guy wearing tactical gear and carrying an AR-15.
The comment about “increasingly draconian punishments” is risible, given how DAs allow violent perps to bond out, without bail in many cases. The elimination of cash bail and allowing judges to determine a person’s likely danger to society is a cause of a lot of increase in crime. Thank you George Soros.
An armed sentry should not be posted in the front and centre of the killing zone. He (and in my experience it’a usually a he) should be concealed with a good (cctv?) view of the approaches and entrance right up to the power operated door. Re your last paragraph – Forget G Soros, it’s your politicians at all levels you should pour your ire and scorn upon. We Brits have enough of it but you Yanks should put your politicians firmly in their place as public servants.
The “good guy with a gun” argument is pathetically stupid at all times but in a crowded nightclub with panicked patrons it really is the height of insanity.
Still better than a bad guy with a gun.
Still better than a bad guy with a gun.
An armed sentry should not be posted in the front and centre of the killing zone. He (and in my experience it’a usually a he) should be concealed with a good (cctv?) view of the approaches and entrance right up to the power operated door. Re your last paragraph – Forget G Soros, it’s your politicians at all levels you should pour your ire and scorn upon. We Brits have enough of it but you Yanks should put your politicians firmly in their place as public servants.
The “good guy with a gun” argument is pathetically stupid at all times but in a crowded nightclub with panicked patrons it really is the height of insanity.
With the trend for states to pardon non-violent marijuana users, the result will be more open cells to house violent felons. Whether that pleases the left no one else really cares.
If a few patrons of the club had been legally armed perhaps the death toll might have been less for the patrons and more for the killer.
An armed employee at the door might have noticed a guy wearing tactical gear and carrying an AR-15.
The comment about “increasingly draconian punishments” is risible, given how DAs allow violent perps to bond out, without bail in many cases. The elimination of cash bail and allowing judges to determine a person’s likely danger to society is a cause of a lot of increase in crime. Thank you George Soros.
Above all else – Well done to those who counterattacked. Some may have lost their lives but their spirit must live on. One way of dissuading any person(s) from attacking others on the grounds of religious, political or sexual difference is to show that we are not afraid and are united against them.
Above all else – Well done to those who counterattacked. Some may have lost their lives but their spirit must live on. One way of dissuading any person(s) from attacking others on the grounds of religious, political or sexual difference is to show that we are not afraid and are united against them.
Not sure why there is an excess of under lining in this article which is distracting. The story is complex where the shooter is obviously quite mentally ill. It’s a story made for politics and sensation and will be spun by the various factions in hopes of generating a change in public attitude. The shooter has made their mark for a few news cycles. We can ask why this person lost all sense of morality that we all once shared.
The difference is that there are mentally ill people the world over, it’s only in the States that they go and shoot up schools, clubs, shops etc. Blaming mental health seems a cop out
The difference is that there are mentally ill people the world over, it’s only in the States that they go and shoot up schools, clubs, shops etc. Blaming mental health seems a cop out
Not sure why there is an excess of under lining in this article which is distracting. The story is complex where the shooter is obviously quite mentally ill. It’s a story made for politics and sensation and will be spun by the various factions in hopes of generating a change in public attitude. The shooter has made their mark for a few news cycles. We can ask why this person lost all sense of morality that we all once shared.
I found this piece far more confusing than enlightening. We are told that in “… 2022, there have so far been 662 mass shootings leading to 671 deaths and 2,616 injuries — many of which, truth be told, are in large metropolitan areas and tied to gang violence.”
Truth be told, indeed. A Washington Times article from June, to which this article links, informs us that of the mass-shootings recorded so far this year “nearly all can be tied to gang beefs, neighborhood arguments, robberies or domestic incidents that spiraled out of control.”
What this means, and what the author fails to reveal, is that the great majority of these incidents are committed by urban black thugs, whose only merit is that their aim is not very good. This Aldrich fellow may be a weird duck, and a would-be tranny to boot, but he’s more like the exception than the rule. Like the Lone Gunman who inspired a lot of cowboy movies, he is a straw man, onto whom anti-gun activists place their vain hopes.
Finally, it is not clear to me what the writer proposes to deal with THAT problem: the plain fact that America’s blacks, who make up 13% of the population, commit the great majority of American crimes, including the most violent ones. He seems to disapprove of locking them up, even though doing so carries the obvious advantage that they cannot be out on the streets shooting other blacks.
I found this piece far more confusing than enlightening. We are told that in “… 2022, there have so far been 662 mass shootings leading to 671 deaths and 2,616 injuries — many of which, truth be told, are in large metropolitan areas and tied to gang violence.”
Truth be told, indeed. A Washington Times article from June, to which this article links, informs us that of the mass-shootings recorded so far this year “nearly all can be tied to gang beefs, neighborhood arguments, robberies or domestic incidents that spiraled out of control.”
What this means, and what the author fails to reveal, is that the great majority of these incidents are committed by urban black thugs, whose only merit is that their aim is not very good. This Aldrich fellow may be a weird duck, and a would-be tranny to boot, but he’s more like the exception than the rule. Like the Lone Gunman who inspired a lot of cowboy movies, he is a straw man, onto whom anti-gun activists place their vain hopes.
Finally, it is not clear to me what the writer proposes to deal with THAT problem: the plain fact that America’s blacks, who make up 13% of the population, commit the great majority of American crimes, including the most violent ones. He seems to disapprove of locking them up, even though doing so carries the obvious advantage that they cannot be out on the streets shooting other blacks.
and the pheasant season has only just started….
aye, aye aye, prrrrrrr… aye, aye, aye…. tap tap tap…
aye, aye aye, prrrrrrr… aye, aye, aye…. tap tap tap…
and the pheasant season has only just started….
I think Mr. Bateman has come closer to understanding mass shootings in the U.S. than anything I’ve read so far. Please click on to his link of being ” blackpilled”. Dark stuff. Our culture is rotting from within regardless of partisanship.
I think Mr. Bateman has come closer to understanding mass shootings in the U.S. than anything I’ve read so far. Please click on to his link of being ” blackpilled”. Dark stuff. Our culture is rotting from within regardless of partisanship.
The shooter was obviously a desperately conflicted individual. That he used a weapon should not cast shade on selling firearms. He could just as easily, for a few dollars more, bought one on the street corner, or were he more technically accomplished, have printed one out in his mother’s basement. Those who frequented the establishment should have realized that, as nails which stuck out, they were candidates to be hammered down. Just an unfortunate confluence of destinies, nothing especially American about it. There was no way it could have been prevented except, as posted above, with better security on site. Mental illness and laws permitting contra-traditional mores are an explosive combination anywhere. Tolerance can only evolve from practicality, it can never be coerced.
Do they have beaters, or is it a walk up?
Do they have beaters, or is it a walk up?
The shooter was obviously a desperately conflicted individual. That he used a weapon should not cast shade on selling firearms. He could just as easily, for a few dollars more, bought one on the street corner, or were he more technically accomplished, have printed one out in his mother’s basement. Those who frequented the establishment should have realized that, as nails which stuck out, they were candidates to be hammered down. Just an unfortunate confluence of destinies, nothing especially American about it. There was no way it could have been prevented except, as posted above, with better security on site. Mental illness and laws permitting contra-traditional mores are an explosive combination anywhere. Tolerance can only evolve from practicality, it can never be coerced.
The problem we face in the USA is that our society in general no longer has any recognition of the dignity and sanctity of each individual human life. Beginning in 1973 with R vs W, the ease with which women kill their babies, aided by politicians who insist that killing their babies is the most basic right women have, has led to our societal view of human individuals as objects whose value depends upon the utility of each person: no utility, no value. And this attitude can be seen in every facet of life, including in the endless wars the USA wages throughout the rest of the world without regard to the innocent lives lost or devastated by these unjust wars. Until we remember and reclaim the inherent value, sanctity, and dignity of every single human individual and change societal attitudes accordingly we cannot stop lost, hurting people from acting out their pain. We can have compassion for the pain this Aldrich felt that drove him to this horrible crime without excusing his crime. No policy change or political solution from any political party can solve the problem of violence in our country. This is an issue with the human heart and the heart of our society.
A picture of rampant narcissism replacing any concept of who we are as humans. When we become our own god, addiction and destruction follow. Laws won’t change this, but our consumer celebrity culture has increased it. Our children need the protection of a loving grounded family to even have a chance – this young man didn’t have that.
Of course, celebrities and abortion are to blame!!!!
Not what I said.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/thankful-for-abortions/
Read that article and tell me that acceptance of abortion as a viable means to ending a “problem” person hasn’t led to narcissism and the loss of respect for the dignity and sanctity of human life and the rise of a utilitarian view of human beings.
Not what I said.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/thankful-for-abortions/
Read that article and tell me that acceptance of abortion as a viable means to ending a “problem” person hasn’t led to narcissism and the loss of respect for the dignity and sanctity of human life and the rise of a utilitarian view of human beings.
Exactly. And he didn’t have that because we quit valuing children as human beings long ago. Rampant narcissism is a consequence of our denial of the dignity and sanctity of all individual lives, even those of the unborn – who is more narcissistic than a woman who kills the baby she carries? If I worded my post in a way that sounds supportive of people who think they can create their own realities and force others to play along that was not my intended message. But I will say that we had this discussion about this terrible Colorado Springs incident at our Thanksgiving dinner yesterday and discussed that LGBT, especially the T portion, arises partly from the fact that people don’t feel valued for just being themselves anymore, so they create their own indentities in order to find belonging in the world of identity politics. It’s all rooted in the same utilitarian values our country has adopted starting the last half of the 20th century.
Did anyone at your Thanksgiving dinner point out that this might not happen so much if not every troubled youth could go out and buy military grade hardware over the counter?
Or is it easier for you to blame it all on trans kids and abortion?
See my reply to Billy Bob.
See my reply to Billy Bob.
Did anyone at your Thanksgiving dinner point out that this might not happen so much if not every troubled youth could go out and buy military grade hardware over the counter?
Or is it easier for you to blame it all on trans kids and abortion?
Of course, celebrities and abortion are to blame!!!!
Exactly. And he didn’t have that because we quit valuing children as human beings long ago. Rampant narcissism is a consequence of our denial of the dignity and sanctity of all individual lives, even those of the unborn – who is more narcissistic than a woman who kills the baby she carries? If I worded my post in a way that sounds supportive of people who think they can create their own realities and force others to play along that was not my intended message. But I will say that we had this discussion about this terrible Colorado Springs incident at our Thanksgiving dinner yesterday and discussed that LGBT, especially the T portion, arises partly from the fact that people don’t feel valued for just being themselves anymore, so they create their own indentities in order to find belonging in the world of identity politics. It’s all rooted in the same utilitarian values our country has adopted starting the last half of the 20th century.
I, for one, agree with you Teresa – though this tendency in America is also bolstered by many other angles of denigration of human life (not to mention this privatized identity delirium of the past 50 years).
I also suspect that 2 years of lockdown, which falsely masked us and separated us from families and society, was bound to exaggerate these bizarre, violent tendencies in nutty, marginal personalities.
This guy may have had weirdo parents (boo hoo) and been ostracized as a 300lb fat guy (who uses “they/them” pronouns?), but clearly a nut and I wonder how the club bouncers (or doormen?) allowed a guy with Kevlar and a rifle within 100 yards of the place. It would have helped, maybe, if he’d been locked up for the prior bomb threat (either in the slammer or a mental ward)
Almost every first world country allows abortion, yet none of them have the problems that the Americans do regarding shootings so I’d argue abortion and people shooting the place up are completely unrelated
You entirely miss the point. The point is that lack of respect for life and the sacredness of life leads to all these problems. States that allow abortion in the USA have the most liberal abortion laws in the world. Other countries disallow abortion after a certain number of weeks, not up until birth (and even after as in CA). With the legalization of abortion in the USA we had the beginning of the breakdown of the family, and this coincides with the breakdown of the foundational social structure in which children are raised in nurturing homes by two parents who have a vested interest in their children’s well being. People in the USA have always had guns. I grew up in West Texas (in the 1960s); all the young guys with whom I went to school had their own guns for hunting. No mass shootings. Young people in everywhere in the USA at that time had access to guns (before stricter gun laws were in place): no mass shootings. Why now? Why not when gun laws were more lax and young men could easily own them?
Why does it lead to these problems? If that was the case then every major country that allows abortion would have murder rates on par with the Americans surely? The fact is these mass shootings are almost unique to America amongst the developed world, therefore I’d argue that it is something unique to that country that is the underlying cause
Why does it lead to these problems? If that was the case then every major country that allows abortion would have murder rates on par with the Americans surely? The fact is these mass shootings are almost unique to America amongst the developed world, therefore I’d argue that it is something unique to that country that is the underlying cause
You entirely miss the point. The point is that lack of respect for life and the sacredness of life leads to all these problems. States that allow abortion in the USA have the most liberal abortion laws in the world. Other countries disallow abortion after a certain number of weeks, not up until birth (and even after as in CA). With the legalization of abortion in the USA we had the beginning of the breakdown of the family, and this coincides with the breakdown of the foundational social structure in which children are raised in nurturing homes by two parents who have a vested interest in their children’s well being. People in the USA have always had guns. I grew up in West Texas (in the 1960s); all the young guys with whom I went to school had their own guns for hunting. No mass shootings. Young people in everywhere in the USA at that time had access to guns (before stricter gun laws were in place): no mass shootings. Why now? Why not when gun laws were more lax and young men could easily own them?
A picture of rampant narcissism replacing any concept of who we are as humans. When we become our own god, addiction and destruction follow. Laws won’t change this, but our consumer celebrity culture has increased it. Our children need the protection of a loving grounded family to even have a chance – this young man didn’t have that.
I, for one, agree with you Teresa – though this tendency in America is also bolstered by many other angles of denigration of human life (not to mention this privatized identity delirium of the past 50 years).
I also suspect that 2 years of lockdown, which falsely masked us and separated us from families and society, was bound to exaggerate these bizarre, violent tendencies in nutty, marginal personalities.
This guy may have had weirdo parents (boo hoo) and been ostracized as a 300lb fat guy (who uses “they/them” pronouns?), but clearly a nut and I wonder how the club bouncers (or doormen?) allowed a guy with Kevlar and a rifle within 100 yards of the place. It would have helped, maybe, if he’d been locked up for the prior bomb threat (either in the slammer or a mental ward)
Almost every first world country allows abortion, yet none of them have the problems that the Americans do regarding shootings so I’d argue abortion and people shooting the place up are completely unrelated
The problem we face in the USA is that our society in general no longer has any recognition of the dignity and sanctity of each individual human life. Beginning in 1973 with R vs W, the ease with which women kill their babies, aided by politicians who insist that killing their babies is the most basic right women have, has led to our societal view of human individuals as objects whose value depends upon the utility of each person: no utility, no value. And this attitude can be seen in every facet of life, including in the endless wars the USA wages throughout the rest of the world without regard to the innocent lives lost or devastated by these unjust wars. Until we remember and reclaim the inherent value, sanctity, and dignity of every single human individual and change societal attitudes accordingly we cannot stop lost, hurting people from acting out their pain. We can have compassion for the pain this Aldrich felt that drove him to this horrible crime without excusing his crime. No policy change or political solution from any political party can solve the problem of violence in our country. This is an issue with the human heart and the heart of our society.