Revellers standing shoulder-to-shoulder in a lit-up swimming pool. Young people crowding round a bar, waiting to be served. A couple kissing on a packed dance floor. All these activities are currently illegal in the UK. But pictures from Wuhan offer a tempting glimpse of our future. Despite 2020’s resurgent puritanism, hedonism is going to make a comeback.
Lockdown has disorientated everyone’s social life, with the indefinite suspension of the night-time economy — pubs, bars, nightclubs, restaurants, theatres and music venues. Of course, some pleasure-seeking inevitably has to be sacrificed temporarily for the sake of arresting the spread of the virus and protecting those most vulnerable. But the sacrifice has hit singletons and voluptuaries particularly hard.
The last year has been a puritan’s wet dream: social distancing has devastated all the industries that facilitate casual sex; some countries have imposed alcohol restrictions; the film industry even consulting the old priggish Hays Code for filming intimate scenes; universities restricting parties and hooking up on campus in the interest of public health. And now a third lockdown has once again cancelled all opportunities for us to go out and enjoy ourselves.
Worse, it’s felt as if the risk of spreading the virus has been exploited to bolster an old prejudice: that spending time in these places is inherently immoral. The stench of puritanism, which H.L Mencken summarised as “the haunting fear that someone somewhere might be happy”, has risen to the surface to pollute the nostrils of society. Official Western morality — whether represented by Plato, Christianity or Kant — has always regarded hedonism as fundamentally bad. The new Puritans, like the old ones, like to police the way other people get their pleasure.
You don’t need to have broken any rule to earn their ire: to even complain about what it feels like not being able to date or party, or even socialise with friends over a drink, is regarded as inappropriate, dismissed as inconsequential, in comparison to the noble goal of saving lives.
And so no one protests that the lifestyles of the lustful, the promiscuous, the sluts and fuckbois (“libertine men and scarlet women” as The Music Man refers to them) have been turned upside down. Some hopeful young romantics gave e-dating a go; others tried out “Zoom nightclubs”. The use of online porn has increased and OnlyFans has risen meteorically. But the pleasures of the flesh have been out of bounds.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribePretty well all major bloodlettings have been followed by episodes of relaxed personal morality: the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution and both world wars were followed by massive outbreaks of prolific rumpy-pumpy.
Presumably it’s an evolutionary adaptation to replace the population loss: everyone’s in like Flynn.
What makes you think that lockdown is likely to end? Every time it begins to look like people are starting to relax right on cue the Government announce a new and more terrifying strain of the virus. What are the chances that vaccine will be ineffective against the next variant. This could run and run.
This. There will always be another variant or a new crisis they can use to reassert control. I don’t see them taking their foot off our throat any time soon
The Lockdown will end when the Money Tree ceases to be magical.
“Some predict, or rather salivate over, an explosion of decadence and debauchery ” a “roaring twenties” of the 21st century.”
Boris Johnson, right man, right time.
I don’t know where you stand on Boris…but you have me laughing!
I’m actually a big supporter of Boris and voted for him. But I could not resist an ironic comment 🙂
I wasn’t being entirely ironic though. In a general sense I believe Boris would be an excellent pied piper of a resurgence of the ‘good times’. I suspect he has found this period of restrictions personally so difficult, he will be desperate to prove his liberal credentials going forwards.
His windpipe… © Steve Coogan & Rob Brydon.
Do puritans have wet dreams?
Yes but they have to flog themselves afterwards.
Zoe Strimpel won’t be happy with this.
Great article.
Finally some positivity and hope….Hurrah!!!
Count me in.
I fell about laughing. Lockdown has had a dreadful effect.
Your allowed to the shops once a day.
Nunc est bibendum!
Nunc est bibendum!
In the short to medium term, Mr. Leonard is surely right. When all this is over, there will be some pretty spectacular orgies (I’m waiting for my invite), and Ashley Madison will do a roaring trade. In the meantime, we seek solitary pleasures: alcohol consumption has soared (https://www.bmj.com/content…, as has cannabis consumption in those jurisdictions where it is legal.
To use a nautical metaphor, the post-pandemic orgiasts represent a large wave. But what of the state of the tide? The extreme individualism, which Michel Houellebecq described as atomisation, is still there. This describes the unwillingness of people to commit to the effort of building and sustaining long-term relationships – the ‘little platoons’ described by Burke.
So I suggest we also keep an eye on things like domestic violence, divorce and suicides. I would not be surprised if they follow the same trends as the wild partying.
Ever though about being a voluntier for the NHS vaccination program?
In Tasmania, Australia, we have recently had dance floors and nightclubs opened up to normality. However, there are still limits of 250 people inside and there is a recommendation of keeping a social distance of 1.5m. Social distancing recommendations are not being followed by the young. They just want to party like it is the end of the world. So, Leonard’s analysis is spot on.
Obviously, not following the recommendations could be at the detriment to the most vulnerable if the virus spreads.
A fair enough article in its way, and we do need to offer more sympathy to those whose valued social lives are seriously disrupted by sound lockdown strategies.
But it’s important to distinguish between these scientifically informed strategies, motivated by a desire to save lives, and the anti-social motives of puritans, which are basically irrelevant.
For sure, enjoy yourself when it’s safe, but it won’t be safe for a while yet.
Well said, ColinðŸ‘
It’s perfectly safe for me, a young, healthy person, and it has been all along.