by Elizabeth Oldfield
Friday, 19
June 2020
Idea
07:00

Inequality is not a ‘Left-wing’ issue

More and more voices on the Right are expressing concern
by Elizabeth Oldfield
Keir Starmer during the Labour leadership contest

Economic inequality is one of the defining issues of our time. Its effects can be discerned in all those issues that more obviously dominate our political life — race, immigration, populism, the EU. It doesn’t get tackled with much political will, however, for one primary reason. It is seen to be ‘owned’ by the Left. The Right in the UK has preferred to speak of ‘equality of opportunity’ and ‘levelling up’ or the straightforward relief of absolute poverty, hampered by fears of state overreach and the shadowy legacy of communism.

Even prior to the pandemic, this was changing.

Earlier this year, Tim Pitt, former conservative advisor to Sajid Javid and Philip Hammond, was arguing in the FT (itself becoming more vocal on the issue) that there were authentically conservative reasons to care about economic inequality — the way it stymies social mobility, hinders growth and threatens social order. In these pages Peter Franklin has been expanding on this, laying out the ways that rampant inequality is driving our dangerous times. Prior to the Trump presidency, there were signs that even Republican candidates had started taking the issue seriously in the US, and they may well need to again.

If you are a straightforward conservative then, there are good reasons to think seriously about reducing inequalities of income and wealth. For those of us who are questioning the very premises on which both current Left and Right-wing orthodoxies rest – that we are rational, utility-maximising individuals — the case is more stark. A tip back towards emphasising rootedness, connectedness and responsibility to others requires us to pay more attention to the way our relationships — including our economic ones — contribute to, or undermine, the common good.

I am most convinced not by the pragmatic economic or sociological arguments, though they are persuasive, but that of character. In Theos’ new report, Simon Perfect argues that high economic inequality makes sin more likely, but you don’t have to buy into the theological language to understand what he means. High inequality creates a terrible environment for the development of virtuous citizens; the rich opt out by isolating themselves from the world’s problems, leaving them with a distorted sense of reality. Meanwhile, those at the bottom of the pile feel envy, resentment and despair. As such, it becomes harder to build social bonds across society.

For rich and poor, the dignity of shared responsibility to each other is humanising and builds trust. And as the pandemic reveals a brief moment of shared vulnerability, now is a good moment to try to face up to the challenge.

Join the discussion


  • I agree with the article, I am not against inequality of income. I am happy that some earn significantly more than others, but there is a point where this ceases to be socially useful and becomes toxic. Some of the wealthy elite remind me of the European monarchies of the 18th Century. Cut off, arrogant, decadent and morally corrupt. We need a society where all feel a need to engage in it. The risk of not addressing this issue is that capitalism becomes tainted by association. If we don’t address this, it’s the left that will benefit.

  • I don’t think its a left wing scam, I think it is a globalist scam to get people to accept lower living standards whilst keeping the rich (right or left) rich.

  • To get involved in the discussion and stay up to date, become a registered user.

    It's simple, quick and free.

    Sign me up