Environmental policies could undermine Biden's domestic agenda
The recent passage of the CHIPS act, a $280 billion dollar subsidy, may prove a giant boondoggle. But it also reflects a critical shift in US economic policy away from neoliberal free trade policies to a more nationalistic industrial policy.
This trend may have started with President Trump, but his successor — along with leaders of both parties — have moved in this direction too. The earlier passage of The BuyAmerican.gov Act, the Make PPE in America Act, and the banning of the importation of Chinese products made with forced labour in Xinjiang, reflect this new dynamic.
Like what you’re reading? Get the free UnHerd daily email
Already registered? Sign in
These moves, along with Europe’s plans to boost its own chip production, represent a logical reaction to China’s stated ambitions to dominate the semiconductor market and other advanced technologies. More than any other country, China spends far more to support these industries, and it is time for America to respond in kind.
Although leftists and libertarians alike have criticised the CHIPS act, the bill is a potentially promising step forward in America’s drive to recapture leadership in the semiconductor industry. American semiconductor firms still account for nearly 50% of the global market share, even though barely 12% of the world’s semiconductors are manufactured here.
This could now be changing as new plants go up in places like Columbus, Ohio, where the first of two new Intel plants will employ 3,000 workers, and Arizona, where Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is planning a $12 billion new plant. Meanwhile, South Korea’s Samsung has agreed to build a new $17 billion facility in Texas.
This proactive stance stems in part from the experience of the pandemic when the U.S. couldn’t manufacture medical equipment, notably masks and some drugs, since most production had shifted to China. Even the production of basic chemical products was difficult, while Covid-driven shortage of chips crippled production of automobiles and other goods.
Any drive towards reindustrialisation will be challenged by our piteously underprepared workforce. President Biden has talked about having factory workers and oil riggers “learning to code,” but the deepest shortages are for drivers, machine-tool operators, and welders. As many as 600,000 new manufacturing jobs this decade will go unfilled. The shortage of welders alone could grow to 400,000 by 2024.
A move to bring manufacturing back may also be undermined by grandees in Silicon Valley and Wall Street, which do not want to jeopardise their Chinese market. Apple, for instance, props up and profits from the Communist government’s ever-expanding surveillance state and has announced a $275 billion deal.
Others may fret that the new approach violates America’s commitment to “free markets.” Yet America has long benefited from an expansive industrial policy, from Alexander Hamilton’s encouragement of manufacturers to Abraham Lincoln’s protective tariffs, from the development of industrial infrastructure during the New Deal to the military buildups during the Second and Cold Wars, as well as the the space programme and, arguably, “Operation Warp Speed”.
Perhaps the biggest threat to American reindustrialisation will come from dunderheaded green policies by the Democrats, which could lead to slower construction of new plants and higher costs. Indeed even the projects green-lighted in the new energy and semiconductor bills will be subject to regulatory reviews from a highly partisan bureaucracy as well as numerous lawsuits from green non-profits. New semiconductor plants, after all, will consume water and power in ways that could violate the ‘zero carbon’ guidelines embraced by greens and their administrative satraps. We have seen this in California where there have been no new chip plants, largely due to regulatory issues. In 2008, Intel shut down its last California plant, and company officials doubt they will build one any time in the near future.
It may be a bumpy road, but it is refreshing to see the US rising from the shackles of free trade dogma, which could prolong liberal capitalism as an alternative to the total state autocratic model being perfected in Beijing.