by Helena Ivanov
Thursday, 17
November 2022
Analysis
16:31

Russia Today rolls out in Eastern Europe

The opening of RT Balkan has angered the EU
by Helena Ivanov
Strongmen can benefit from soft power.

Belgrade

Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Serbia has had to manage a balancing act. The country negotiated an advantageous gas deal with Russia back in May, but has also had to maintain its accession talks with the European Union, aiding this by voting in favour of most of the UN resolutions adopted since the invasion. This includes one condemning the attack on Ukraine and another that demands Russia to reverse course on ‘attempted illegal annexations’

However, as Russia intensifies its onslaught, Serbia does not seem to be helping itself. On November 15th, the same day that Ukraine saw some of the worst airstrikes since the start of the invasion, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić was seen posing in Chechen traditional clothing next to Turko Daudov, advisor to Head of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Kadyrov. During the appearance, Vučić stressed that “Russian-Serbian relations cannot be destroyed under any kind of pressure.”

That same day saw an even bigger blow for the EU’s efforts in Serbia as Russia Today (RT) launched a Serbian language version of its website. The new site, dubbed RT Balkan, is also expected to get a TV broadcasting licence and start its programme in 2024. 

RT’s editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan promoted the initiative with a provocative tweet: “We launched RT in the Balkans. Because Kosovo is Serbia.” In an official press release, she added that “we were probably not expected anywhere in the world as much as [in Serbia].” 

The EU responded immediately. Notably, Vladimír Bilčík, MEP and the European Parliament’s Standing Rapporteur for Serbia, tweeted: “Actions speak louder than words. To see Russian propaganda making a grand comeback in Serbia via the launch of Russia Today is contrary to Serbia’s commitment to work on alignment with EU foreign policy.” 

In light of high-profile criticism, Serbia has attempted to justify yet another friendly gesture towards Russia. The future lead of RT in Serbia, Jelena Milincic, pointed out: “Now the residents of the region will have access to RT in the Serbian language, which will provide a more complete picture of the modern world.” Alexander Bocan-Kharchenko, the Russian ambassador to Serbia, blamed the EU for hypocrisy, labelling a potential ban as a “cynical forgoing of basic European values.”

RT’s Serbian launch is by no means a surprise. Despite the EU’s advice to the contrary, Serbia kept its doors open to Russian media outlets like Sputnik and, going forward, RT Balkan will seemingly be close to the Moscow-aligned press. Jelena Milincic is the daughter of Ljubinka Milincic, the editor-in-chief of Sputnik’s Serbian edition.

The EU must now think carefully about its approach to Serbia. On the one hand, doing nothing besides the occasional tweet is going to carry costs. Should Serbia get away with its balancing act, we are likely to see more countries attempting to do the same — with Hungary being the likely first contender.

However, forcing Serbia into a corner with restrictions is unlikely to yield productive results, given that 84% of Serbs are against imposing sanctions on Russia. Thus, any such attempt by the EU would be seen as an act of direct interference in another country’s sovereignty. 

Indeed, very few countries are known for responding well to threats — as seen in Italy not that long ago. Just before the country’s elections, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told Italians that the EU has the “tools” available to respond should the outcome go in a “difficult direction”. Naturally, results did indeed go in this “difficult direction” for the EU.

In future, the EU must be both realistic and creative, otherwise it risks carrying costs it may not be able to pay. In the face of Serbian cosying up to the Kremlin, the bloc needs to find a way beyond empty condemnations and ensure its member state produces a clearer stance.

Join the discussion


To join the discussion, get the free daily email and read more articles like this, sign up.

It's simple, quick and free.

Sign me up
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
chris Barton
chris Barton
19 days ago

After the last 2 and half years I wouldn’t try taking the moral high ground with regards to propaganda.

Mike Doyle
Mike Doyle
19 days ago

If only our friends are free to speak, it is not free speech.

Lennon Ó Náraigh
Lennon Ó Náraigh
19 days ago

Typo in headline, surely? As in,

Russia Today trolls out in Eastern Europe

Still, I’d rather it not be censored, it would save me having to see what passes for war news from the “other side” on Telegram.

martin logan
martin logan
18 days ago

Agreed. Whenever I want a laugh, I go to Kotsnews, or Starshe Eddy.
BTW, Kots is also now on Russia’s Human Right Council–presumably with the mission to destroy human rights in Russia.
And Girkin will eventually go to gaol…

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
19 days ago

Why would the EU want Serbia to join? Surely they would be a massive financial drain on the already fractured bloc?

martin logan
martin logan
18 days ago

Serbia is just another expansionist state that somehow feels it has a “historic mission” to lord it over others. It’s past “suffering” somehow makes it uniquely qualified to rule all those around it.
I suspect the end of the war with Russia will solve the problem.
Empires are dead ducks everywhere.

Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
18 days ago

In a vacuum, free speech generally would require tolerance of Russian propaganda. However, the world is not a vacuum. The principles of free speech have often been restricted to some degree during wartime for obvious reasons. Whether the situation with the EU vis a vis Russia rises to that level of severity is an interesting debate. Why the EU wants to invite a country that is historically entwined with and friendly to an openly hostile Russia is, to this reader’s mind, the better question.