by Wessie du Toit
Thursday, 25
February 2021
Spotted
17:00

What’s a high-status meme worth?

Christie's auction house is selling Instagram posts under the guise of high art
by Wessie du Toit
In December, an auction of Beeple’s work grossed $3.5 million in three days. Credit: Beeple_crap

Today one of the most prestigious institutions in the art world, the 250-year-old auction house Christie’s, is selling a collection of Instagram posts. Or in its own more reserved language, Christie’s is now “the first major auction house to offer a purely digital work.”

The work in question is “Everydays: The First 5000 Days” by the South Carolina-based animation artist Beeple (real name Mike Winkelmann), an assemblage of images he has posted online over the last thirteen-odd years. Whoever acquires “Everydays” won’t get a unique product — the image is a digital file which can be copied like any other. They’ll just be paying for a proof of ownership secured through the blockchain.

But more significant than the work’s format is its artistic content. Beeple is opening the way for the traditional art world to embrace internet memes. Having already been commissioned by an array of fashionable brands and celebrities, Beeple has the cultural capital to be treated seriously by Christie’s. But his reputation rests on the viral appeal of his pictures, which have brought him 1.8 million Instagram followers. And his work is very much in the spirit of great memes: weird, witty and irreverent takes on politics and pop culture.

One of Beeple’s images shows a gargantuan, naked Donald Trump straddling the Washington Capitol building, giving a thumbs-up as his supporters clash with the police below. Another portrays Jeff Bezos as a giant octopus emerging from the ocean. Beeple himself admits that he has become almost ‘a political cartoonist’.

‘The first emoji’. Credit: Beeple

It’s no mystery why an institution like Christie’s would want to make this transition.

Cash has surged into digital art over the past year, facilitated by a blockchain technology called non-fungible tokens (NFTs). After taking payment in cryptocurrency, an online marketplace such as MakersPlace mints an NFT for a particular artwork, providing a permanent record of authenticity. This allows unique ownership of a work to be bought and sold even if the file itself can still be copied.

Funnily enough, these “crypto collectibles” were developed to answer the demand for rare Pepe the Frog memes. Last week another famous meme, Nyan Cat, was sold for half-a-million dollars. Meanwhile, in December, an auction of Beeple’s work grossed $3.5 million in three days. At that point Christie’s was interested.

The attempt to dress this up in the language of high art, with a Christie’s specialist comparing Beeple’s work to “a Duchampian readymade,” doesn’t quite conceal the jarring implications of the auction. If the demand and the means of securing property rights are there, why shouldn’t Christie’s auction rare Pepes, or maybe an especially funny version of the “distracted boyfriend” meme? It’s really just a question of taste, which will change with time. Yes, Beeple is an original and technically skilled artist. But ultimately, Christie’s is now in the business of selling high-status memes.

Maybe there will be a happy compromise here. You get to enjoy Beeple’s Instagram just as you used to, while a wealthy collector gets the kudos of owning the content. And the artist, at last, has a way to earn money from JPEGs and MP4s. But scarcity has a way of reasserting itself, especially when owning unique works brings social prestige. How long until collectors find a way to restrict access to their prize memes?

Join the discussion


  • Funnily enough I sat in on a couple of discussions regarding the curating etc of digital art at Unseen in Amsterdam a couple of years ago. The Digital Curator of the Tate, or some such, was involved, so it was quite high level.
    As someone whose interest in art ceases around the time the Celts stopped carving spirals on standing stones I found it all somewhat bewildering, but very interesting.

  • When my taxes are used to buy rubbish (like “Merde de l’Artiste”) it concerns me, but if private individuals want to buy this stuff then good luck to them. I just find it amusing that so many tough, shrewd businesspeople. those who have amassed great wealth, get taken for patsys but the Gallery sharks.

  • I have long wondered how the “value” of (say) a painting can suddenly go massively up just because of the name of the artist. Bit like the value of bitcoins I suppose. No reason other than gambling.

  • To get involved in the discussion and stay up to date, become a registered user.

    It's simple, quick and free.

    Sign me up