by UnHerd
Wednesday, 5
May 2021
Video
10:56

Hillary Clinton: we must take back the means of production

The former Secretary of State has jettisoned the neoliberal ideas of her past
by UnHerd

When the world’s two great powers, the United States and China, normalised relations in 2000, it was heralded as liberalism’s crowning triumph. That China, an authoritarian country with no democratic history to speak of, could accede to the WTO and acquiesce to a rules-based system underscored the belief that the arc of history bended towards democracy.

“When China joins the W.T.O., by 2005 it will eliminate tariffs on information technology products, making the tools of communication even cheaper, better and more widely available,” announced president Bill Clinton. “We know how much the Internet has changed America, and we are already an open society. Imagine how much it could change China. Now there’s no question China has been trying to crack down on the Internet. Good luck! That’s sort of like trying to nail Jell-O to the wall.”

As the last few years have shown, China did manage to nail Jell-O to the wall; it is now a surveillance state with an iron grip on the Internet and its population. So it was curious to see Hillary Clinton, considered one of the architects of the neoliberal era, talking in rather different terms at a Chatham House talk yesterday. With no mention of her own involvement in the China policy of the past 30 years, she now only stresses the need to reshore supply chains and “take back the means of production”:

It’s time we recognise that we need to rebuild our own supply chains even if that requires a certain level of subsidised industrial productivity. We cannot be dependent on the Chinese market. It’s not only bad for economies, it is bad for our geo-political strategic interests. Look at what happened with the lack of PPE and pharmaceutical ingredients when the pandemic hit. We were at the mercy of China. We cannot let that continue and we need to work together across the Atlantic to figure out how we are going to take back production. Now will it be as low cost? Obviously not. How do we set our tax systems so that there are incentives to return to western democracies to produce things?

I would add that more and more businesses are seeing that unless they are low-cost producers of retail clothing which will probably never come back. But if they are producing anything more sophisticated, increasingly the Chinese government — through coercion, unfair regulation, enforced partnerships or royalty agreements — is slowly stealing that intellectual property anyway. So we have got to get smarter about how we deal with the economic threat. For people who say “but that disrupts the market!” — China has disrupted the market. China is not a free market economy — we tried! We let them into the WTO; we sent the our businesses over there; we made trade deals. They are a controlled top-down economy. You will never compete and win against them unless you take back the means of production. It is way past due for us to do that.

- Hillary Clinton, Chatham House

Join the discussion


  • H Clinton lacks the moral gyroscope without which it is not possible to become a woman worthy of respect, let alone President of the USA. The fact that she failed, twice to become President. says much for the democratic system. I would not pay attention to, let alone follow, one word from this woman.

  • And what would the appalling Hillary Clinton, who has never done a day’s useful work in her life, know about ‘the means of production’? Of course, given her involvement in Libya and other similar ventures she knows quite a lot about ‘the means of destruction’. Will these people ever go away?

  • The economic logic of re-shoring would seem to hurt the Democrat’s middle class voting base. However, I suspect they’ll mitigate its impacts, by turning a blind eye to illegal immigration and using government money to pump up asset prices, for the asset owning classes, who vote for them.

    It will sow the seeds of a future crash but will win elections, so they don’t care.

  • To get involved in the discussion and stay up to date, become a registered user.

    It's simple, quick and free.

    Sign me up