X Close

by Matthew Fraser
Friday, 14
April 2023

China’s panda diplomacy isn’t as cuddly as it seems

What Xi gives, Xi can also take away
by Matthew Fraser
Sinophobic nations can discover that the pandas in their zoos are suddenly recalled home. Credit: Getty  

A panda couple, Huan Huan and Yuan Zi, are set to occupy a French zoo park for another four years according to news this week, a development which will please Emmanuel Macron as much as anyone else.    

The extended lease for the two pandas was a quiet diplomatic victory for the French President on his official visit to China last week. While Macron’s recent remark about Europe not being America’s “vassal” sparked a storm of international controversy, at France’s Beauval Zoo there was a great sigh of relief. The zoo’s two panda superstars are staying until 2027. 

Like what you’re reading? Get the free UnHerd daily email

Already registered? Sign in

After that date, whether France will still boast giant pandas may depend on the temperature of Franco-Chinese relations. China’s “panda diplomacy” is a complex game that is difficult to decode. Often described as Chinese “soft power”, panda diplomacy uses the cuddly creatures as goodwill ambassadors that help China extend its economic and political influence globally. 

They are uniquely Chinese because their only natural habitats are the mountainous regions of their home country. Today, there are an estimated 1,900 pandas in the wild, and about 600 in zoos and breeding centres.

In many cases, the loan of a panda is a symbolic sweetener to Chinese trade deals. France, for example, originally received the animals after a deal to supply the country with uranium for nuclear power. Canada signed a uranium-for-panda agreement with China, too.

But what China gives, China can also take away. States keen to flatter Xi Jinping often find themselves the beneficiary of panda gifts. More hawkish nations can discover that the pandas in their zoos are suddenly recalled home.  

Norway learned this in 2011 after awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to imprisoned Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo. The pandas headed to a Norwegian zoo never arrived, going instead to Edinburgh. What’s more, China stopped buying Norwegian salmon and turned to Scotland for salmon imports. The Scots won a contract to supply China with Land Rovers and Confucius Institutes were set up at Scottish universities.  

In 2010, a panda called Tai Shan at the National Zoo in Washington D.C. was brought home to China. This was a direct response to Barack Obama receiving the Dalai Lama at the White House. In 2019, another two giant pandas were recalled from San Diego Zoo after Donald Trump stepped up his anti-Chinese trade rhetoric. The connection between pandas and politics is never made explicit, but is always understood tacitly. 

Historically, Chinese emperors gave panda bears as presents for many centuries. Under the Communist regime, Mao Zedong offered two giant pandas  — Ling-Ling and Hsing-Hsing — to the United States after then-president Richard Nixon’s historic visit to China in 1972. More recently, as China pursued its strategic interests in the Arctic region, notably Greenland, pandas arrived at Copenhagen Zoo in Denmark.  

Before the 1980s China gifted pandas, but today they are offered strictly on a loan basis. They are usually leased to the host country for roughly $1 million a year, plus the cost of building a panda facility. The leasing fees are said to cover the costs of giant panda “conservation” efforts in China. Animal activists have argued, however, that the creatures are often poorly treated in foreign zoos, and that China’s real motive for their leasing is political.  

For the host zoos, the arrival of a giant panda is a massive publicity coup that promises a huge financial boost. After the arrival of Tian Tian and Yang Guang at Edinburgh Zoo in 2011, the number of visitors soared by more than 50% and overall income increased by £5 million to £15 million. For zoos, pandas are, clearly, good for business. Other countries that have leased giant pandas include Australia, Finland, South Korea, Spain, Germany, and Belgium. Qatar received two pandas in 2022. 

Now that tensions are building again between the United States and China, it can be wondered how long giant pandas will remain in American zoos. Previously, there were pandas in zoos in four American cities — Washington D.C., Atlanta, Memphis, and San Diego. The Memphis Zoo lost its panda this week when 22-year-old Ya Ya, apparently in poor health, was recalled home to China. Today, there are pandas in only two American zoos — Washington D.C. and Atlanta — though two adult pandas in the capital will likely go home by the end of this year. 

If more are brought back from American zoos this year, the reason for their return home will likely be geopolitical. That’s panda diplomacy for you. 

Join the discussion

To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
J Bryant
J Bryant
5 months ago

Interesting article. I didn’t know that pandas were only leased to foreign zoos by China. Half way through the article I wondered why countries accept this leasing arrangement where China can symbolically recall its largesse, then I read, “For the host zoos, the arrival of a giant panda is a massive publicity coup that promises a huge financial boost.” Ah, money. Sometimes I think the world is really quite a simple place.
And for what it’s worth, I believe most zoos should be scrapped. I’ve visited a few and seen too many animals obviously bored, pacing their enclosures and quietly going mad.

Steve Murray
Steve Murray
5 months ago
Reply to  J Bryant

Absolutely zoos should be scrapped.
The “conservationist” argument doesn’t wash either, since it’d be possible to conserve endangered species in such a way that didn’t require the conditions you and I have observed along with others, but unfortunately too many just keep turning up with their kids and cash.
Wildlife parks are a different matter, if not perfect, but then there’s no guarantee of sightings, or not close enough.

B Emery
B Emery
5 months ago

I feel this is very good demonstration of the levels of crazy we are now reaching. Where the state of geopolitics is defined by how many pandas are in the zoo.
Do you think if we put all the animals that represent our various nations in a room they could be worse at diplomacy than people are at the moment.

chris sullivan
chris sullivan
5 months ago
Reply to  B Emery

um- we might see rather a lot of dogs eating dogs and/or sheep – so pretty much the same level of ‘civilisation’ – where is the lion King when we need him/her.