by Tom Chivers
Friday, 13
March 2020
Explainer
11:05

Can we build a herd immunity to Covid-19?

A government adviser floated the idea that we ought to let lots of people get Covid-19 so that the country will develop herd immunity

There’s a lot of talk about “herd immunity” at the moment, since a government adviser has floated the idea, confirmed by the Chief Scientist on the Today programme this morning, that we ought to let lots of people get Covid-19 so that the country will develop herd immunity.

A very important note: NONE OF WHAT FOLLOWS SHOULD BE TAKEN AS ANY SORT OF HEALTH ADVICE OR POLICY RECOMMENDATION. This is just to explain the idea of herd immunity and how it (might) work.

The contagiousness of diseases is measured in something called R0. It is the average number of people each infected person spreads the disease to. An R0 of 1 means that each person gives the disease to an average of one person; an R0 of 100 means they give it to an average of 100 people, etc.

The key to stopping the spread of a disease is to get R0 below 1. If it’s above 1 it will exponentially increase throughout the population; if it’s below 1 it will dwindle to nothing. There are complicating factors but that’s basically it.

One way to reduce R0 is to reduce the number of susceptible people in the population, for instance by vaccinating. Take measles as an example. It’s very infectious: in a susceptible population it has an R0 of about 20. You want to get that below 1. To do that with vaccination alone, you need to vaccinate at least 19 out of every 20 people. Then of the 20 people it would have infected, 19 will be resistant, so the number of infected will not increase.

It’s a simple equation. If your vaccine is perfectly effective, then you need to vaccinate 100% of the population minus (100 divided by R0). For measles, that’s 100 – (100/20) = 95; so you need 95% vaccination for herd immunity from measles.

Vaccination is not the only way of achieving immunity. For some diseases — including measles, and chicken pox — you are usually immune for life once you have it. So you could get herd immunity for measles if >95% of the population had it (and no one new was born).

That’s basically what this part of the government plan seems to be. With Covid-19, the R0 is not well known (and depends on social factors), but Imperial College puts it between 1.5 and 3.5 and the WHO at between 1.4 and 2.5. Let’s take the highest estimate, 3.5. If having the disease once makes you immune forever, then 100-(100/3.5)=71%; herd immunity would be achieved when 71% of the population has had it.

Of course, that assumes perfect immunity. If — as with flu — that’s not the case, the maths is very different. In fact, if the percentage who are still vulnerable after vaccination or exposure is greater than the percentage required for herd immunity, then it becomes impossible to achieve herd immunity, even if 100% of the population is exposed or vaccinated.

At the moment it’s not clear whether Covid-19 will become seasonal, like flu, or will be a once-in-a-lifetime illness like measles. It makes a huge difference to whether herd immunity will work or not.

Comment


  • March 15, 2020
    OK, well your posts would have more credibility if you were to cite the sources you relied on, rather than making out that you are an expert.

  • March 14, 2020
    Please point me to where I’ve claimed to be an expert in immunology. Before you do though please review your contribution above and tell me why you have limited yourself to fueling the speculation engine while hiding any expertise you may have in the field under a bushel.

  • March 14, 2020
    I, like thousands of others have been wrecking my brain trying to think of any sane reason why the UK seem to be doing NOTHING to stop the virus. I keep hearing "Its only a flu", "Why is everyone worried", "Masks are no good", Death rate is only 2%" What the hell is going on folks, This is NOT the...

To get involved in the discussion and stay up to date, join UnHerd.

It's simple, quick and free.

Sign me up