X Close

Why didn't we shut the border with India sooner?

Credit: Getty

June 15, 2021 - 11:24am

I went to a birthday party at a Wetherspoons a couple of weeks ago. There were around 30 of us, sitting under a marquee in the pouring rain. You could only order by their app, and since I have the tech skills of the granny in the “do they send emails on a Sunday” meme, I struggled.

We were only allowed to sit down at our tables of six, and every time someone stood up to talk to someone on another table, staff in hi vis jackets — the most symbolic representation of Britain’s decline — would bark at us to sit down.

But we all did our bit to stop the spread, even though we were outdoors, and the risk would have been miniscule.

Meanwhile, some 20,000 people have been allowed to wander in from India, a country blighted by a new, more contagious, variant of Covid, without any proper health quarantines put in place. And now, as a result, we’ve got another month of being barked at, and Freedom Day has been postponed.

Boris is by nature a libertarian, but what that means during a pandemic is libertarianism in the sky, and authoritarianism on the ground; you either have freedom between countries, or freedom within them. Boris Johnson once again chose the former, because it’s the easier thing to do; the rest of us are paying the price.

The Government apparently delayed red-listing India because it didn’t want to ‘offend’ Modi, and for a certain type of Brexiteer India plays a crucial role in their dream of a Global Britain — even though India isn’t even in the top 20 of our biggest export markets. (Nine of those are in the EU, which still dominates Britain’s trade.)

So why is this far-away country so important that we have sacrificed our chance to return to normal life? There is a strain of Tory Commonwealth nostalgia who believe that we have more in common with India than with Germany and France because we both play cricket and have a common history. That’s clearly not true — we have more in common with France or the Netherlands even than with the United States, let alone India — but we do share a not especially happy historical link, one that is somewhat repeating itself.

Robert Tombs called the Raj “the Anglo-Indian Empire”, because it was controlled by an intertwined British-Indian elite, and Indians played such a large part in the wider empire, from Africa to Fiji to the West Indies.

Likewise, in 21st century Britain, people of Indian descent play an increasingly important role in the country’s politics and cultural life, in particular those from the British imperial diaspora. Under Boris Johnson, the UK will increasingly be drawn into the orbit of its former colony, and even the subcontinent’s culture wars (in one of those strange developments in globalised politics, British extreme-Right grifters now market themselves at Hindu nationalists, who share their hatred of Muslims).

Every international treaty, every international relationship, entails a loss of sovereignty, something Brexiteers pretended wasn’t the case. This one will have its costs too, which is something for us to reflect on as we spend another month under house arrest, being bossed around by men in hi vis jackets, because our Prime Minister wanted to avoid “offending” our new trading partner.


Ed West’s book Tory Boy is published by Constable

edwest

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fran Martinez
Fran Martinez
3 years ago

The problem is not India. They seem to be reducing their cases way faster than us (probably because they use ivermectin). In any case, it is is the obsession with driving covid to zero cases that is damaging the UK. There will always be new variants, new viruses, etc, we just need to move on and live our lives.

Peter LR
Peter LR
3 years ago

“ Every international treaty, every international relationship, entails a loss of sovereignty, something Brexiteers pretended wasn’t the case”
No we didn’t; we now have control over relationships. The EU made us totally subservient in so many areas that trade deals do not. We can now make calculated decisions on our own rather than being subjected to EU qualified majority decisions, most of which went against our wishes. We are no longer stuck with the common external tariffs added to all our imports, the majority of which monies went to the EU.
But I do agree that the way Covid was managed was terrible and that Boris is losing his support.

Bill W
Bill W
3 years ago
Reply to  Peter LR

Good point, well made.

Tom Lewis
Tom Lewis
3 years ago

…..and there was me thinking it was a simple case of racism. Or in this case not wanting to offend, or appear racist, to the chitter-arty or Anglo Indian/Pakistani electorate. Which to a certain extent, would be racist, because it would suggest that some communities are indeed less valuable, in a having to pay attention to their concerns or voices, than others.

Last edited 3 years ago by Tom Lewis
Tom Watson
Tom Watson
3 years ago

Depressingly good article, as usual.

Bill W
Bill W
3 years ago

Based on my travels, where I have lived, friends and family, I reckon we have more in common with the Dutch than the French.

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
3 years ago

It is clear that the UK needs a different strategy and mindset to Covid. Many wealthy Western countries are sitting with the immediate solution in front of them right there for the taking and they continue to blather on about variants, lockdowns and shutting borders. Where are they going to after variant Omega?

Last edited 3 years ago by Lesley van Reenen