February 26, 2025 - 8:00pm

As part of his shake-up of the US immigration system, Donald Trump has this week proposed to replace its existing investor citizenship programme, known as EB-5, with a new “gold card” scheme. The gold card allows wealthy investors to obtain a path to citizenship in exchange for a hefty $5 million injection into the domestic economy. This raises the contribution threshold significantly as the previous visa only had a $1,050,000 investment minimum, or $800,000 directed to distressed areas.

While standing next to the President, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick promised that candidates for the new gold card will “have to go through vetting […] to make sure they’re wonderful world-class global citizens”. Yet when a reporter asked if Russian oligarchs will simply buy their way to citizenship under the plan, Trump deigned to offer any reassurances, saying: “Yeah, possibly […] I know some Russian oligarchs that are very nice people.”

The exchange highlights the possibility, implicit in many such schemes, of malicious foreign entities using the avenue to buy and exert political or economic influence within the host country — under the benign guise of creating American jobs and opportunities. Indeed, the largest demand for investor citizenship programmes globally comes from none other than “China, the Middle East and Russia”, precisely the places known for running aggressive foreign interference operations and with whom Americans ought to be wary about fostering closer integration.

Other Western countries that have offered their own gold card, such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Ireland, have recently had to shut down these immigration streams after running into problems with adverse side effects of foreign capital infusion, such as heightened risk of money laundering and severe distortions in property markets. In the case of the US, Lutnick himself admitted that the EB-5 programme “was full of nonsense, make-believe and fraud”, asserting that the problem was “the low price”. However, it is not clear that increasing that price to $5 million would fundamentally alter the dynamic, given that the amount is practically chump change for obscenely rich global oligarchs and their foreign government patrons.

For instance, the “wealthy Chinese” often denounced by Trump-aligned border hawks in their efforts against birthright citizenship can simply go through the simpler route of buying a gold card, either for themselves or their proxies. After all, their influence had been such that, during Trump’s first term, the White House openly entertained expanding visas for Chinese investors in March 2020, as the “Wuhan virus” surged. In other words, his record does not inspire confidence.

But the larger question for the administration this time around is what such a policy says about its basic conception of citizenship. As his other immigration reform priorities signal a dramatic tightening of the limits of the American political community, does this anti-globalist president really want to return to the cheap subordination of national civic belonging to the whims and imperatives of borderless, globalised capital? It is bad enough that Trump 2.0 has been so visibly influenced by homegrown oligarchs; does it need to cater to foreign ones, too?


Michael Cuenco is a writer on policy and politics. He is Associate Editor at American Affairs.
1TrueCuencoism