October 21, 2024 - 9:15pm

From behind the counter at McDonald’s, Donald Trump put into stark contrast the tension between MAGA populism and MAHA populism. MAHA, short for Make America Healthy Again, is a slogan adopted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr as he campaigns on behalf of the Republican candidate.

There’s no question Trump’s trip to McDonald’s served his campaign well, despite the ravings of Keith Olbermann. Viral posts highlighting the resemblance between Trump’s campaign stop and an old Andy Warhol quote help explain why. “The President has so much good publicity potential that hasn’t been exploited,” Warhol wrote decades ago. “He should just sit down one day and make a list of all the things that people are embarrassed to do that they shouldn’t be embarrassed to do, and then do them all on television.”

This is the economic populism of MAGA at its most effective. Populists on the Left, though, are familiar critics of the Golden Arches. The chain underpays workers and pushes toxins on the working class, they say, disproportionately harming black Americans and preying on the poor.

RFK Jr himself deployed this criticism back in 2020 when he posted a quotation from an article published in Truthout. “Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, and the larger food and beverage industry have already seen to the enactment of at least a dozen laws preempting local public health policies like soda taxes, product labeling and restrictions on junk food marketing to kids,” Kennedy quoted from the article. “This has allowed the industry to continue its racist marketing campaigns, target marketing to Black youth and other youth of color. Understanding these tactics is key to undoing and preventing further proliferation of the industry’s preemption push.”

Republicans, especially those with deep ties to corporate America, long rebuked these criticisms as undermining the agency of poor Americans, who can make their own decisions about what to eat, where to work, and how to spend their budget. Does it make any sense for the populist Right to celebrate Trump’s embrace of a company that long fought the minimum wage and violates just about every principle held dear by the high-profile MAHA wing of the movement? MAHA campaigns directly against “Big Food” and it’s hard to get bigger than McDonald’s.

The Wall Street Journal probed this ostensible conflict earlier this month. “It’s not a marketing thing. Trump has bought into it,” Joe Grogan, who worked in Trump’s White House (and not to be confused with podcaster Joe Rogan), told the paper. Kennedy adviser Calley Means agreed, saying: “It’s not about lecturing Americans to eat healthy. It’s about not having completely co-opted institutions provide standards on health and food.”

I asked one high-profile player in MAGA circles, a longtime GOP policy aide, about whether Republicans would — or could — actually fold the MAHA agenda into serious legislative efforts in the White House and on Capitol Hill. Mentioning the food industry’s argument that regulating certain toxins is Government overreach, the person said: “Unfortunately, Republicans are very susceptible to it.”

Debates about whether MAHA is MAGA will surely rage in the months ahead, whatever happens in November. But perhaps a more instructive question is whether MAGA is really a part of the GOP any longer.


Emily Jashinsky is UnHerd‘s Washington D.C. Correspondent.

emilyjashinsky