X Close

The rise of Barstool conservatism should be welcomed

Dave Portnoy, founder of Barstool Sports, has become associated with a type of American male voter. Credit: Getty

December 3, 2024 - 7:00pm

After their electoral defeat in the 2024 election, various figures on the establishment Left and Right are now going through the predictable motions of soul-searching and finger-pointing. The new target are the so-called “Barstool conservatives”, who, according to Matthew Walther in the New York Times, are becoming a dangerous proposition.

In Walther’s piece, titled “I Viewed the Rise of ‘Barstool Conservatism’ With Alarm. And Rightly So”, readers are warned that Barstool conservatives “swung hard” for Donald Trump in the 2024 election. He sees this as a cause for alarm because they will ensure that Trumpism will last — even after the President-elect leaves the White House.

But who, exactly, are Barstool conservatives? According to Walther, they are mostly men who look to Dave Portnoy, Joe Rogan and ESPN personality Pat McAfee as their figureheads. They value “autonomy and ambition but are not doctrinaire about it” and with varying degrees of enthusiasm, have no problem with pornography, homosexuality, drug use, and legalised gambling. Back in 2021, Walther wrote that “on economic questions […] they embrace lower taxes on the one hand and stimulus checks and stricter regulation of social media platforms on the other”. Do these things really sound so bad?

This might sound like a Republican issue, but it’s Democrats who should see an opportunity here. As Walther notes, the people he talks about are not really very political, at least in a partisan way, which is best exemplified by Rogan, who announced his intention to vote for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic primary before endorsing Trump in 2024. If someone like Rogan was willing to be so ideologically flexible, that means there could be hundreds of thousands of voters just like him.

The truth is that “Barstool conservatives” are simply not a political force. A vanishingly tiny amount of people inside this putative ideological bloc would apply this label to themselves, because very few are actually very interested in politics. A much better term for these sorts of people would simply be normal American men. This is why people like Joe Rogan: he’s normal. He also has the same sort of idiosyncratic, non-dogmatic and often contradictory political positions they themselves have.

Sure, Barstool conservatives have some ideas. They didn’t like Covid lockdowns, and they don’t like it when groceries are expensive and homes are unaffordable. They might not be huge fans of some of the more screeching aspects of “woke politics”, but as Walther points out, these opinions are not particularly strongly held. If Democrats returned to focus on bread-and-butter issues instead of hard-Left cultural issues then they might even start winning them back. Normal people, after all, have normal concerns.

If and when Democrats (or Republicans) fail to do this most basic of all political tasks, then they will be punished at the ballot box by non-partisan moderates like Barstool conservatives. The people in America who simply vote for the guy they think is best on issues they care about — regardless of whether that person has a (D) or an (R) next to their name — are hardly “threats” to the democratic system: they are the reason it exists in the first place.


Malcom Kyeyune is a freelance writer living in Uppsala, Sweden

SwordMercury

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

25 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Josef Švejk
Josef Švejk
13 hours ago

I believe the barstool conservatives are too intelligent for the Democratic Party. The latter has been captured by a vocal woke and won’t be attractive to such as I for another generation. You see, the woke don’t have a sense of humour which is one of the characteristics of the barstool when they take the mickey out of the woke. the woke just don’t get it.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
10 hours ago
Reply to  Josef Švejk

Yeah, you’re just so funny and charming….

Josef Švejk
Josef Švejk
9 hours ago

I sure am. Thank you comrade.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
7 hours ago
Reply to  Josef Švejk

Case in point.
Conservatives just don’t do humour.

Josef Švejk
Josef Švejk
7 hours ago

Ha ha. I just won $20 for predicting your reply, comrade.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
6 hours ago
Reply to  Josef Švejk

There’s rent covered for this month!

Josef Švejk
Josef Švejk
6 hours ago

Champers, I never realised the Woke could be so cruel.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 hour ago

Poor old Poo Fash. Have you still got blue hair, or have you shaved it all off? How many TikTok videos have you made of yourself sobbing in your car? Have you started wearing a mask again? Are you troubled by chronic infections from your bull-ring? Have you mislaid your huge glasses? Is your morbid obesity completely out of control? Has the thought of your wife’s Trump-supporting boyfriend driven you to overdose on milk and cookies?

Jonathan Andrews
Jonathan Andrews
12 hours ago

“I Viewed the Rise of ‘Barstool Conservatism’ With Alarm. And Rightly So”,

And the Left wonder why they lost

Steven Carr
Steven Carr
11 hours ago

Every state in America swung Republican. That message doesn’t seem to have got through to the Democrats.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
10 hours ago
Reply to  Steven Carr

And they will swing right back in 2 and 4 years when everyone remembers what a joke Trump is.

Tony Buck
Tony Buck
10 hours ago

But Trump had a fairly good first term. He only lost in 2020 because of the pandemic.

Lost voters often don’t swing back.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
7 hours ago
Reply to  Tony Buck

He lost in a landslide that dwarves the recent result. I guess some of those voters swung back, eh? You just keep on telling yourself it was all about Covid though…

Jeremy Bray
Jeremy Bray
9 hours ago

I think you will find Trump will not be running in 4 years despite the Hysterical Democrats suggesting he is an anti-Democrat determined to cling to power until the crack of doom. Democrats will have a different Republican opponent to invent horror stories about. Who knows it might be another refugee from the Democratic Party that has seen the light like Tulsi Gabbard or RFK jr

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
7 hours ago
Reply to  Jeremy Bray

“I think you will find Trump will not be running in 4 years”
Again, Jezbo, you really need to work on that reading comprehension!
Here’s a clue for you – I didn’t say anything about Trump running again in 4 years!

Andrew Jennings
Andrew Jennings
2 hours ago

I thought you lot believed that if Trump won this would turn out to have been the last ever election and he’d be dictator for life.

Richard Craven
Richard Craven
1 hour ago

Allow me to suggest that you address Poo Fash as “you people” rather than “you lot”, and then stand back and watch the development of they/them’s hilarious woke tantrum.

Josef Švejk
Josef Švejk
3 hours ago

Thank you Malcolm Kyeyune on this article on the demographics of the men who delivered victory to Trump and who left the Democrats because of their move to wokery and activism. The Democratic Party I remember from fifty years ago living in the US was full of barstool conservatives whose values were local as well as ideological and voted accordingly. It is difficult to see how they can be won back from the Republican Party as the Democrats have moved ideologically to the left. It is also a good summary of the difficulties the Democrats face at a local level.

leonard o'reilly
leonard o'reilly
4 hours ago

”I viewed the rise of ‘Barstool Conservatism’ with alarm. And rightly so.”
That’s funny.
“I viewed the rise of ‘Barstool Conservatism’ with alarm. And I found out that I agree with me.”
I strongly suspect that Walther is a metrosexual, a direct descendent of the Continental cheese-eating surrender monkey. In evolutionary biology such males are known as Sneaky Fu—ers because their strategy is to emulate female ways so as to be non-threatening to them. They are sly seducers, unlike the bar stool brutes, who wouldn’t be caught dead with a Merlot in their mitts.
The Sneaky Fu—ers’ politics follows from this.

Su Mac
Su Mac
36 minutes ago

Yes, thanks Malcolm. They are just “normal American men”. I feel quite comforted that they are still out there.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
10 hours ago

Revenge of the incels.
They’ll snap out of it when they realize that being MAGA is not good for your sex life. Unless you’re Matt Gaetz or Pete Hegseth I suppose….

Last edited 10 hours ago by Champagne Socialist
Tony Buck
Tony Buck
10 hours ago

Where’s the connection ?

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
7 hours ago
Reply to  Tony Buck

Think harder, Tone, you’ll get there eventually!

Jeremy Bray
Jeremy Bray
9 hours ago

The Democrats Cult are now promising sex for votes are they? Is that to be the new policy to win back black and Hispanic males that have gone red?

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
7 hours ago
Reply to  Jeremy Bray

You may wish to work on your reading comprehension, Jezza!!!