Steve Bannon’s recent tirade against Elon Musk marks more than just another skirmish in the endless MAGA wars. Fresh from a four-month prison stint and seemingly liberated from any remaining loyalty to Donald Trump’s inner circle, former MAGA mastermind Bannon has positioned himself as the potential leader of a permanent alt-Right opposition to the President-elect’s newly forged alliance with Silicon Valley.

In his first major interview since release, Bannon branded Musk “a truly evil guy” and vowed to have the tech billionaire “run out” of the White House by inauguration day. Bannon’s fury centres on Musk’s advocacy for H-1B visas, which allow companies like Tesla and SpaceX to hire skilled foreign workers. But his complaint runs deeper than immigration policy. “This thing of the H-1B visas, it’s about the entire immigration system being gamed by the tech overlords,” Bannon told Italy’s Corriere della Sera. “They use it to their advantage. The people are furious.”

The forceful language suggests this isn’t merely the grievance of yet another spurned insider — many such cases, when it comes to Trump — but rather the opening salvo in what could become a broader ideological revolt against the dramatic pivot toward the tech industry.

The timing of Bannon’s broadside is also significant. Trump has just tapped Indian-born tech executive Sriram Krishnan as his AI advisor, continuing a pattern of appointments, including a George Soros protege as Treasury Secretary, that has alarmed nationalists and populists in his base. This followed Trump’s June statement on the All-In podcast that he wants to give automatic green cards to foreign graduates.

For Bannon, who once saw himself as the intellectual architect of Trump’s populist revolution, these moves represent more than just policy shifts. They suggest Trump has fully embraced what Bannon calls “techno-feudalism on a global scale”. His attacks on Musk’s South African heritage (“Why do we have South Africans, the most racist people on earth, making any comments at all on what goes on in the United States?”) indicate a willingness to wage unrestricted warfare.

The broader MAGA ecosystem is already showing signs of strain. When Musk’s X platform recently demonetised several prominent Right-wing accounts critical of his immigration stance, it sparked immediate accusations of censorship from figures like Laura Loomer and Ryan Fournier. Preston Parra, head of ConservativeOG media, declared that “the REAL backbone of the Right wing and MAGA” wouldn’t stand idle while “Silicon Valley dweebs” stole their movement.

Bannon, despite his diminished status, remains a prominent figure. His War Room podcast maintains influence among the far-Right grassroots. And his recent prison stay, where he claimed to have learned that black and Hispanic men hate Kamala Harris, can only enhance his credibility with MAGA supporters of colour and the movement’s most militant wing.

More importantly, as a wounded veteran of the previous decade’s MAGA wars, he enters this fight with little left to lose. Previous clashes with Trump saw Bannon eventually bend the knee. But his recent rhetoric is that of someone ready to burn every bridge. His prediction that Musk “won’t fight” because he has “the maturity of a little boy” reads less like political commentary and more like an experienced professional wrestler cutting a promo on a rival.

The irony is that Bannon’s crusade against tech industry influence might actually serve Trump’s interests in the long run. By positioning himself as the voice of authentic MAGA resistance, Bannon could give Trump space to pursue his new coalition-building while maintaining credibility with the base through periodic gestures of defiance and contrarianism.

Yet there’s also real risk here for Trump. If Bannon can rally enough serious far-Right figures beyond mere online provocateurs like Nick Fuentes and Laura Loomer around opposition to H-1B visas and other tech industry priorities, he could create genuine headaches for the incoming administration. His threat to have Musk “run out” of the White House by inauguration day may be bluster, but his ability to make the tech mogul’s life difficult is very real.

The coming months will show whether Bannon can transform his personal grudge into a genuine movement. Regardless of the outcome, his rebellion highlights the inherent volatility of Trump’s attempted fusion of Silicon Valley dynamism with MAGA populism. It turns out that even the most loyal courtiers have their breaking point. If nothing else, we may be witnessing the birth of a permanent alt-Right opposition to Trump 2.0.

---

Oliver Bateman is a historian and journalist based in Pittsburgh. He blogs, vlogs, and podcasts at his Substack, Oliver Bateman Does the Work

MoustacheClubUS

---