Austin, Texas
The 88th Texas legislative session has begun and, if history is to be any guide, the Republican-controlled Congress is positioned to pass laws that will make progressive heads explode. When it comes to the culture war, however, the Lone Star State has lost its place at the vanguard of the American Right to Florida, which wasn’t even considered a red state until Ron DeSantis turned it into one.
Nowhere is this more true than in education. The 87th session coincided with the outbreak of controversy over critical race theory in schools. Texas duly passed a law banning it, but only after Florida had already done so. Meanwhile, laws such as the Stop W.O.K.E. Act — designed to rein in CRT in schools and corporations — and the Parental Rights in Education Act, which prohibits instruction about sexual orientation or gender identity through third grade, also came from Florida. So did the idea of conducting yearly surveys to identify political bias on campus.
In fact, as recent reporting from John Sailer of the National Association of Scholars shows, the ideological monoculture in Texas universities has only grown more entrenched since the last time the legislature gathered in Austin. Mandatory “diversity statements” are commonplace, even if all you want to do is teach the flute. Instruction in the catechisms of intersectionality is similarly widespread, while acolytes of Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo lead the faithful in the study of their scriptures; the School of Information at UT Austin has called for mandatory training in “anti-racist pedagogy”.
All of this, meanwhile, has happened under the nose of boards whose every member was appointed by governor Greg Abbott. Texas Republicans, it seems, are remarkably laissez faire when it comes to what the taxpayer is funding in public universities. If they are not swayed by eloquent arguments from liberals such as Jonathan Haidt, who has stressed the importance of intellectual and political diversity to the health of the academy, you might think that the desire to perpetuate their own species would cause them to pay more attention.
Exactly how Republicans expect to produce conservative judges once everyone working in higher education has pledged obeisance to doctrines created by people who are actively hostile to them is a mystery. Dan Patrick, the Lieutenant Governor, has signalled a desire to end tenure as a way to fight critical race theory, but it seems more likely that this could make life for the handful of remaining dissenters even more precarious.
The contrast with Florida is striking. DeSantis has already limited tenure and this month demanded that universities report their spending on DEI programmes, while appointing a majority of conservatives to the board of a hitherto very progressive New College of Florida. One of those conservatives was Chris Rufo, who recently unveiled pre-baked legislation for the abolition of DEI bureaucracies and “political coercion” that he developed with colleagues at the Manhattan Institute think tank.
It will be interesting to see if the Texas legislature reacts to some of DeSantis’s more aggressive stances on higher education, and how it responds to the possible introduction of an anti-woke liberal arts college in the state.
Sometimes it seems that a rivalry is opening up between the two states: first Abbott sent buses of migrants to sanctuary cities, then DeSantis upped the stakes and flew them to Martha’s Vineyard. The Florida governor proposed taking action against TikTok in September, but Abbott actually banned it from government devices in December.
But when it comes to the culture war Texas Republicans seem stuck in the ‘90s, focused on God, guns, abortion and free markets. DeSantis, however, is a 21st century man who appears to genuinely despise the ideas he rails against, and that gives him the edge.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeYou’re kidding, right? Actually attempting with a straight face to re-animate this vegetable?
The left should treat Joe’s history like they did COVID. Wait a few years, and then pretend it never happened.
Hmm, Biden on immigration. Biden on…wait! Let’s go ask Obama since it turns out he had been running the White House. Remember when Obama once appeared with Biden and the President commented on how the entire room had flocked to Obama and no one even looked at him? They all knew!
Welfare is a Ponzi Scheme, each generation takes more of the risk, and eventually it just won’t work , it’s liabilties 2 vast , not enough coming in
biden had like 99% of billionaires supporting him, he can’t talk about the rich and powerful, when the democrats did all it could to please them
Biden is not an asset, he’s a man with Dementia, who has’nt been right for over 4 years. He put the US / World in a worse position that he got it.
If the Democrats plan is to wheel biden out every so often, they truely are screwed
Biden is sadly a reminder of an elderly Democratic elite, and an insulated White House. His inner circle rallied around him to prop up his own pig-headed pride and denial, to pretend that he was doing just fine and could vigorously lead the country for another four years, when he was clearly in cognitive decline. And of course, the answer to any questions, even after The Disastrous Debate, was to gaslight people with “Ageist!”
As long as he’s alive he’ll have a place in the party, but he should not get too involved in electioneering.
This is a silly article about an old demented man who is lauded for reading a script written by someone else and not messing up as he usually does
Curious (not really) that the author forgot to mention that Biden referred to black people as ‘colored’ in this speech. If that is evidence that the Left is moving on from minute vocabulary policing, and that frankly there is nothing derogatory about the term, then I applaud it. But if Trump would’ve been assailed for his alleged racism over such a comment, then why the silence when Biden does the same? (I think we all know the answer: ‘rules for thee, not for me’. And so the Left’s moral grandstanding and hypocrisy continues, undiminished.)
Biden comes from the old Democrats, so he get a pass, you know the party of the KKK, Jim Crow, and giving how old Biden looks, the confederacy problay. at least he did’nt repeat the story about young black children touching his legs and how he was gonna beat up the local black man
“Maybe …(Biden) will serve as a reminder of the Democratic Party as he represented it in Congress and the White House alike: a friend of workers and especially their earned benefits.”
If this truly had been the manner in which Biden/Harris represented the Democratic Party in Congress and the White House, a Democratic administration might still reside on Pennsylvania Avenue. Instead, Biden is — for good reason — more powerfully remembered as a friend of Wokers and their unearned benefits.
“He assailed the Republican Party for standing for the rich and powerful while defining his own political brand as one that defends the working class.”
He must be senile. Since the end of the Clinton reign the Democrats have been the party of the rich and powerful and the Republicans are now the party of main street and the working class
The younger and more dynamic flank of the party can test out different approaches to castrating children, abolishing national borders and stoking identitarian racism
Oh please!
An essay that smacks of desperation.
Yes. The other message hasn’t been working: “The deplorables outnumber us, so we have to lock them in a room with Sanders/Warren/AOC until they gain enlightenment.”
In the words of the great John McEnroe, “you cannot be serious.”
“he can speak to older generations of voters who remember the solidarity of Franklin Roosevelt”. There aren’t many of them around, though, are there? You’d have to be over 85 to remember him at all, I reckon.
“Economic fairness” is all very well, but who voted for Trump and who voted for Harris? That doesn’t look like a strength for the Democrats to me.
Here’s the problem, when I heard Biden was in the news again my literal first reaction was, “oh yeah, Biden is still alive.” That is usually not a good sign when you want to build a political movement around someone and even worse when it’s not just a figure of speech.
They better be careful when embracing him; apparently he can be a little handsy.
…The poor guy was already an autopen puppet during his presidency, how on earth can he function as a credible voice going forward!