Dresden, Germany
It is early evening on a clear day in Dresden, and a neo-Nazi is telling me the Jews had it coming. “They are never going to tell you in history class what the Jews did to Germany in the Weimar Republic,” Konstantin, a clean-shaven and bespectacled 23-year-old, says calmly. I idly wonder if he can tell I’m Jewish.
Konstantin is among hundreds of neo-Nazis from across Europe participating in a march officially commemorating 80 years since the 1945 bombing of Dresden, when up to 25,000 people were killed by Allied air raids on the city. Unofficially, the demonstration relativises Nazi crimes against humanity by presenting the German people as just as much of a victim of World War II as any other.
The march is politically irrelevant: overt neo-Nazism is a losing proposition in modern Germany. But hard-Right politics is having a moment. Barring a freak polling accident, Alternative for Germany (AfD) will finish second in next week’s federal election, capitalising on government failures to deal with mass immigration.
Ten miles away, in the picturesque town of Pirna, AfD MP Steffen Janich is holding an election rally. He is not politically marginal. Germany’s political centre of gravity is shifting towards places like this small town in Saxony, which in 2023 was the first in Germany to elect an AfD mayor.
In the shadow of the medieval town hall, under a brightly painted sundial, Janich tells the audience of middle-aged locals that Germany should stop funding the war in Ukraine, that the Left’s plan for a €15 minimum wage would bankrupt the country, and that the AfD has a plan for mass deportations. By far the longest section, though, is about the inefficiency of wind turbines. “It is madness! We should use every source of energy available to us!” Janich says. The audience applaud wildly, a reminder that the issues which play well in the media are sometimes not those which have most salience on the ground.
I’m approached after the rally by 56-year-old Dirk Mende, who grew up in communist East Germany and trained as a car mechanic. Life was better back then, he says: CEOs made three times more than workers, not 3,000 times more. Now, life is hard. He’s mentally and physically disabled; his pension isn’t enough to live off, so he receives extra money from the government to help pay his rent.
Dirk usually votes for Left-wing parties, including the successor to the East German ruling party, but he’s come to the AfD rally out of curiosity. “I disagree with almost nothing,” he says, adding that most migrants don’t respect German culture and laws.
Disillusionment with how the mainstream parties have dealt with migration comes up in almost every conversation about the AfD. The party has made much of its plan for “remigration”, a term which originated with the white nationalist Identitarian movement and originally referred to mass deportations of non-ethnic Europeans. Early last year, news of an AfD conference planning for remigration so disgusted French Right-wing leader Marine Le Pen that she publicly condemned the German party.
Janich, however, insists there is nothing racist about remigration. He says it means deporting failed asylum seekers and refugees whose home countries are safe to return to. “Skin colour and religion don’t matter to me at all,” he says. He points to a spate of apparent terror attacks committed by migrants. Just two days earlier, an Afghan bodybuilder whose application for asylum had been refused drove into a trade union demonstration in Munich, killing two people and injuring 37 more.
The sense that Germany has reached breaking point over unprecedented levels of immigration is shared across the political spectrum. Last month, Christian Democratic Union leader and favourite to be next chancellor Friedrich Merz sought the AfD’s votes to pass a motion in parliament, a first in postwar history. After the Munich attack, Social Democratic Interior Minister Nancy Faeser highlighted the fact that Germany is the only country which deports people to Afghanistan “despite Taliban rule”. The “firewall” preventing mainstream cooperation with the AfD is holding — for now — but the party has succeeded in shifting the national conversation on immigration to the Right.
At the AfD’s conference this year, delegates chanted “Alice für Deutschland” in support of party leader Alice Weidel, a play on the banned Nazi-era slogan “Alles für Deutschland”. Prominent party figures have previously called for a “180-degree change” in Germany’s approach to historical remembrance. Officially, the AfD distances itself from people like Konstantin. But in practice, the party’s rhetoric and policies give them a political home. He will vote AfD next week.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis article contains basically no information that the average unherd reader hasn’t heard 500 times (here and elsewhere) and seems to be underselling the AFDs chances in the election (the latest spate of terror attacks certainly won’t harm their chances), while the authors Biography makes me think he’s poorly prepared to offer some substantive analysis in general.
I know the BBC has no standards anymore but maybe don’t phone it in on your first article when writing for others Mr Vock.
He was previously a senior journalist at the BBC and Europe correspondent at the New Statesman.
Indeed-
The writer has hung out at some rallies and reported on what he sees and hears.
There is more than one way to write an article…
The politicians in Europe have lost the plot. Does anyone think that if the AfD gets millions of votes and if the other politicians try to group together to keep them out, that everything will resort to a stagnant normal? Now the people have the wind behind them.
Strangely, I was just reading another thread on UnHerd today about young people forming groups on Instagram. This is what the politicians in Europe are doing – they are forming comfortable groups which make them feel safe and cuddly, without thinking about what is happening around them. They are shutting themselves off from the people. They are becoming irrelevant.
It’s a global thing and it has been in play for years.
The Kommentariat (media, politics) was surprised with Trump 1.0, by Brexit, and now by the fact that voters have been “falling for far right narratives”.
At no point do they look themselves in the mirror, and wonder “maybe they have a point and i need to readjust my worldview”.
Most of the fervent support for the hard Right comes from what was the GDR.
Wasn’t it the case that the NASDAP campaigned to gain the constituency of the Left between the Wars?
If only Imperial Germany had followed through on Bethmann Hollweg’s demand for peace talks of December 1916 by agreeing to Woodrow Wilson’s own offer for peace negotiations. Much might have been different.
It was the,farmers movenent that made the,difference.During the Depression small farmers .s were being repossessed, in Schleswig Holstein and round Hamburg
Brilliant. We need mass remigration throughout Europe and we need it now. Muslims can only emigrate to Islamic countries only. Africans to African countries etc.
Europe must remain for Europeans.
The AFD need to win over 25% … if that happens it will be groundbreaking and the start of something great. Liberal globalists will be forced to take their snouts out of the troughs throughout Europe and accept some hard truths.
I’m sure a bunch of racists will vote for the AfD next week. It doesn’t make the party racist. And I’m sure a bunch of Jew haters will vote for other parties as well. I doubt the guys driving over people will be voting AfD though. Funny that.
Yeah. Hilarious.
The “firewall” preventing mainstream cooperation with the AfD is holding — for now — but the party has succeeded in shifting the national conversation on immigration to the Right.
This sentence explains everything about why the AfD, a party displaying very little in the way of governing ability, is still riding high. Please for goodness sake acknowledge that the AfD itself has not “shifted the national conversation on immigration to the Right”. The same goes for the FPÖ in Austria.
This gets things entirely the wrong way around, blaming the voter for “falling for far right narratives” to quote the person currently calling himself PM in the UK instead of placing blame at the elites’ door for being ignorant and arrogant. I’m really at a total loss to understand how this has not become a common understanding across Europe.
What the AfD and the FPÖ have done is make political capital out of the abject failure of establishment parties to take concerns of even moderate voters about illegal immigration seriously. Many of them vote for the far right because these parties are the only ones giving voice to this issue.
I can say with almost 100% certainty that if Merz’s legislative plans after the Aschaffenburg attack had gone through (EDIT: using support from the SPD and the FDP instead of the AfD), support for the AfD would have taken a big hit. Instead, it stayed stable and I’m guessing what happened in Munich will push it further up.
This disconnect between the ruling class and the governed is yawning so wide, it’s a real concern because democracies simply can’t work like this.
This tactic of tainting everyone who opposes your class-based open borders ideology with the H1tler slur isn’t working anymore. Try something new.
Racists don’t care. Their racism makes them think ‘the other’ are always nazis. Nazi is basically an out-group slur, like ‘savage’. Whenever you hear it, it’s a clear sign that the person using it is, in fact, the actual racist.
Except for afghan refugees, who are “bodybuilders”.
The progressive fact-free and evidence-blind agenda on immigration, green energy, human biology, endless debt and drugs has spawned the rise of the right.
So simple and yet the left is completely unable to understand this. AfD was nothing in 2015. When Merkel opened the borders, AfD began its rise.
He was a senior journalist at the BBC. Need one say more?
the situation in the Arab world has changed. Syria is now not at civil war. Syrians should go home and rebuild. Afghans too – go home. All of these have no longer any excuse for “refugee status”.
A neo-Nazi supports AfD therefore AfD supports neo-Nazi. And if you wonder about a possible logical fallacy then here’s a slogan which ends with “fuer Deutschland” ( also the name of the party) and a 8 yo link to something unsavoury
A classic example of “cherry-picking”. One example is plucked from the tree …
> among hundreds of neo-Nazis from across Europe
So Europe has about 350 million people and you could scrape up a few hundred, that’s about 1 in a million ish. If you give me a group of a million people i can find someone that believes anything.
Wow Jews there are stuck between the far-left and far-right. They can’t win. Perhaps moderate parties should accept demographic change is being forced too quickly and it is resulting in political insurgencies that gets channeled through whatever party say they are going to do something about it. EU leaders celebrate Bulgaria and Romania joining Schengen for sake of 2 minutes saved at passport control even though it will make it easier for illegal immigrants from outside bloc to move around. In the uk we haven’t heard anything about remigration, nor is it realistic but inward migration can be lower, those who break rules deported and citizenship more closely guarded. Just think of how uae or saudi work with citizenship.
Summary, a racist Jewish leftist equates all white gentiles with nazis. Are all Jewish leftists genocidal Bolsheviks?
And yes, the German people suffered tremendously, more than any other in ww2 – burnt alive and even killed in their millions after the war ended. The German people were no more responsible for their dictator than any other group. It’s genocidally racist to blame the Germans collectively for what the Nazi party did. People in the UK are terrified of speaking out against woke – does that mean they are responsible for woke?
I was surprised by the faulty premise. One example is plucked from the tree of humanity, and suddenly the entire AfD is tarred with the brush of “far-right”, “Nazi”, and suchlike. Cherrypicking, anecdotal, and other logical fallacies begin likewise …
Essay begins with ‘they are Nazis’. Ends with ‘they are Nazis’. How many millions of German women and children were murdered after the war because they were called ‘Nazis’?
‘Punch a Nazi’ rhetoric is genocidal.
“Afghan bodybuilder” hilarious euphemism for a refugee.
I really appreciate Unherds attempt to not wall itself or its audience into any silo, and articles like this shows that yes, the writers at BBC and establishment media are still just as clueless.
AfD is not “far-right”; it has a platform and specific policy proposals, none of which include persecution of Jews. Any hints or innuendo of this are incorrect.
(Also, are there any “far-left” parties, out of curiousity? By definition, a “far-right” party can only exist in reference to a “far-left” party, but you’ll find that the lazy commentators such as the writer of this article never refer to a “far-left” party. One wonders why this is so.)
Dealing with false asylum seekers is attracting support from across the political spectrum all over Europe.
Will someone please point me to the UNHERD article about a left-wing party in which the writer almost exclusively interviews the pedophiles that plan on voting for that party?
Most of the Germans I know favor the AfD, and not one of them has ever said anything nazi to me.