Main Edition
US
FR
April 15, 2024 - 3:15pm
The House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee has called for an independent review of the Government’s Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU). In a new report the Committee, which is cross-party and serves to scrutinise the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), states that its members are “concerned about the lack of transparency and accountability of the CDU and the appropriateness of its reach”.
The document goes on to recommend that “the Government commission and lay before Parliament an independent review of the activities and strategy” of the Unit within the next 12 months.
Set up within DCMS in 2019, the CDU was active throughout the Covid-19 pandemic in challenging alleged “false and misleading narratives” around lockdowns and vaccine mandates. As of February this year, the Unit has been relocated to the new Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. Last year it was reported that the CDU collaborated with social media platforms to censor online criticism of Government lockdown policies, removing posts and hiding users’ accounts. Prominent critics had their activities monitored by the Unit, which in some cases recommended that they be sanctioned by tech companies such as Meta and Google.
The Culture, Media and Sport Committee report quotes the civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, which describes the CDU as “one of the most opaque units in government outside of the security services”. It claims that this surveillance extended to former Government ministers including Conservative MP David Davis, who recommended last year that the Unit be shut down after it recorded tweets of his which questioned early lockdown modelling.
Conservative MP and former junior minister Paul Scully claimed last year that the anti-disinformation team does not monitor the activities of individual citizens and instead looks at “narratives, trends and attempts to artificially manipulate the information environment online”. He conceded at the time that “the content reviewed may incidentally include personal data”, but told a Committee hearing that the CDU was “not some big, shady intelligence unit”.
The Government official in charge of the Unit during pandemic, Sarah Connolly, later said that one of its main purposes was “passing information over” to the likes of Facebook and Twitter to encourage “the swift takedown” of posts. She remains the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology’s Director for Security and Online Harms.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeAny body or individual who is believes what they’re saying is the truth should not fear open debate.
Something we can all agree – the tools of censorship must be taken down.
They should review the 77th Brigade whilst they’re at it, although the results of any analysis of either will be considered far too sensitive for release to trouble our pretty little heads.
There are any number of these suspect bodies sucking off the public teat:
The Behavioural Insights Team, aka the Nudge Unit
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioural_Insights_Team
The 77th Brigade
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/77th_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)
The Research, Information and Communications Unit
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mind-control-secret-british-government-blueprints-shaping-post-terror-planning
If anything “spontaneous” is going to happen, make sure that it is as “spontaneous” as a performance by the Bolshoi Ballet. But this is very old hat. George Orwell’s “1984” had government agents who organised spontaneous demonstrations, e. g. thanking the Government for raising the meat ration to 20 grams a week.
Thank you for these links William.
Good that Unherd is giving this some column inches. There certainly won’t be a peep on the subject in the MSM.