Democratic Senator John Fetterman has claimed that it may not “possible” for the party to win back white men.
In a new interview with Puck’s Tara Palmieri, Fetterman offered a stark assessment of the Democrats’ ability to regain support among white male voters. Asked about how the party could win white men “like himself” back, Fetterman responded: “I’m not sure if that’s possible, to be honest.” He then warned that support among that demographic had been “seriously eroding for a while”. What’s more, “In some cases, people don’t even want to say it publicly […] but they just feel like the other side seems to be saying, ‘Men are the problem.’”
The Pennsylvania Senator, who won a close race in a swing state that backed Donald Trump in both 2016 and 2020, noted that many working-class white men feel talked down to by the Democratic Party. He argued that the party’s messaging has relied too heavily on “shaming and scolding”, which has driven voters towards the Republican Party, particularly in battleground states.
“Their primary currency was shaming and scolding and talking down to people,” Fetterman said. “Telling them, ‘Hey, I know better than you,’ or ‘you’re ignorant,’ or ‘you’re a bro.’ And then by the way, ‘They’re fascists. How can you vote for that?’”
Fetterman’s remarks highlight a growing concern among Democrats about their ability to remain competitive in blue-collar regions that have shifted Rightward over the past decade. He pointed out that many voters prioritise cultural and identity-based issues over specific policy proposals and that Trump has successfully tapped into those sentiments.
“The 2024 election was not about obscure policies. It was a gut-check kind of vote,” Fetterman explained. “People are asking themselves, ‘Who is going to protect or project my personal view of the American way of life?’”
Fetterman also addressed the broader Democratic response to Trump’s administration, cautioning against overreacting to every move the President makes. “We’re a little over two weeks in and now they’re in full-on freakout mode,” he said. “You have to choose which things you’re going to fight against and which things you’re going to ignore.”
He warned against excessive reliance on protests and social media outrage, urging Democrats to focus on long-term political strategy instead. “If we become a boutique kind of proposition, we’re going to lose the argument,” he said.
Despite his concerns about Trump’s policies and executive actions, Fetterman emphasised that this is what the country voted for. “What has limited our power is democracy,” he said, pointing to Republican control of both chambers of Congress and the White House.
Fetterman’s candid remarks reflect the challenges facing Democrats as they seek to rebuild their electoral coalition in a political landscape where working-class white men have increasingly aligned with the Republican Party. “If we don’t speak to these voters in a way that respects where they are coming from, we’ll keep losing them,” Fetterman said. “People want to feel like they’re being heard — not just lectured.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIronic that the candidate who seemed completely compromised mentally during his election campaign two years ago, turns out to be one of the most reasonable Dems in either legislature.
I think he was completely compromised mentally. It seems he was so debilitated that he didn’t get the solidarity memo from the Parrot Choir.
John Fetterman was very compromised by his stroke and then by depression. For a while there he was largely incoherent. Regardless of his politics, it’s good to see he’s recovered.
Yes.
I have high hopes for him. It’s early days still. With luck the Democratic Party will crash and burn but Fetterman will still be standing.
This seems inevitable since women – specifically graduate liberal females – entered the white-collar workplace en masse. And corporations are war machines so this stratum has been mobilised against conservative American. They’ll be back soon enough.
And onward to Gilead TD where you’d be much happier.
> “In some cases, people don’t even want to say it publicly […] but they just feel like the other side seems to be saying, ‘Men are the problem.’”
Last I checked the twittersky, or the instatumblr or whatever kids were calling it now a days it was very starkly said that “Men are the problem”
That being said I find it ironic that if Fettermen would’ve said these things 2 or 3 years ago he would’ve been smeared as a racist monster that hates minorities. Now he is being heralded as the only sane voice in the Democrat party. How the times have changed.
Men don’t like being constantly nagged and told how rubbish they are. Who knew?
Women don’t either!
Women like to dish it out, but can’t take it.
The volume of up-ticks on that bit of misogyny says much about the Unherd subscription base. It’s been evident for some time how many sad males there are on here raging about the unfairness of it all. Snowflakes the lot of them.
Amusing how the immediate reliance on “musigyny” merely confirms my half joking statement.
You can’t keep ignoring the Chagos debacle Unherd.
It has Starmer all over it. Another close lawyer friend, Sands. Matrix Chambers lawyers again. Foreign clients again. International guidelines treated as law. Hermer represented the Islanders. 100 bollion pounds to give away a strategic asset.
Starmer says in Parliament that electromagnetic waves require legal supervision. That’s a radiowave you idiot. You send one out from a walkie talkie.
How will Unherd deal with this scandal? Ignore it? Or call Cottee?
I appreciate you’re rather simple, but there is a search bar at the top of your screen. Simply type Chagos into that and you’ll see previous articles discussing the British Indian Ocean Territory
But you see Billy it’s all hotting up nicely. There is a video of Sands, Starmer’s best friend, another Matrix barrister, foreign clients only please, raising up the Mauritius flag. And soon Starmer is going to sign off the first tranche of 9 billion pounds while gifting Chagos to Mauritius.
Sands was with the Mauritius delegation and helped raise their flag on Chagos in 2022.
What slice of the pie do you think he is expecting? Lawyers take their fees very seriously.
We know, all the information (and criticism) are in the UnHerd articles you claim don’t exist
Not the corruption now floating up to the surface. That is the scandal, bubbling away, now.
What corruption? Please enlighten us with your superior knowledge of the subject, bearing in mind it’s common knowledge Starmers friend was negotiating for the Mauritians
So Sands is acting for the Mauritius government and will be on their psyroll?
As was common knowledge, and has been mentioned numerous times before. What has any of it got to do with the article?
Are there lasers from lizards in space somewhere in this at all RL? I think there must be.
And the connection between Chagos and John Fetterman?
I’ve never flagged a comment before as I think it’s rather childish, but I’m now going to start every time this idiot posts his rambling comments that are in no way related to the article. Hopefully if enough start doing it the nonsense will eventually stop
So why have you added five comments to this thread? Why are you defending Unherd? And Starmer?
Find one comment where I’ve defended Starmer you absolute tool. Can you not read?
I have to admit that despite myself I’m finding your interjections of some light relief RL. Keep it going.
You do wonder if Fetterman will cross the floor. He doesn’t seem very happy with his party.
He is even less happy with the Republicans.
The best thing that could happen would be a Fetterman-Vance ticket.
The Democrats need to look at Joe Rogan and aim at convincing that kind of Everyman.
If they get the guys of Ruthless to stop laughing at them and saying genuinely good things about them then it’ll be a landslide.
Exactly! If you win over Rogan then you win over working white men. He’s not stuck to one party. He’s endorsed Dems before.
This is the worst case scenario because the day after tomorrow the same sh.t will come up again.
I want them to die
This is v true. He’s more a Bernie Saunders type of guy in truth, but Democrats sauntered off in another direction and paid for it. Trump’s genius was to jump into the gap albeit he’s no real intent of helping the ‘little guy & gal’ or ‘left behinds’. So the opportunity to course correct and reconnect remains.
John Fetterman, if you are listening, make the Democratic party great again by purging it of the racist, toxic filth that has driven out its white working-class base in the first place.
And we ought not to restrict it to white working class. There are many within the non-white demographics who voted against the patronising identitarian victim-based nonsense the Democrats are peddling. They have an existential problem if they do not move back toward the centre. Early days, but if the same-old same-old we are seeing post election persists, then it’s going to be a long and very hard 4+ years for the blues.
maybe you just need to check your white privilege fetterman?
Part of the important phase of reflection needed. Democrats lost some of their moorings for sure.
But it’s also worth remembering Trump’s 2024 win in the Popular vote was less than that of Hilary’s in 2016, and it was the third lowest margin of victory ever. Those facts are not indicative of quite the cultural shift some like to portray, although unquestionably a shift has occurred. And for many the shift was needed. However the wave Trump rode is not quite as strong as what many of his supporters like to suggest and that’ll become more apparent as he tries to make actual Congressional law. Watch for as an abject a failure as that in his first term on abolishing Obamacare.
A question for Democrats might be – what’s the next ‘vibe’ shift? Where do you need to be in 4 years time and beyond? Here’s a thought – it’ll be anti Billionaires and esp those controlling you via algorithms and social media. The stuff Jonathan Haidt been talking about will become more widely appreciated and the harm that’s been done to a generation generate increasing anger. And guess who’s helped fuel that even saving TikTok because a chance for a ‘grift’?
I like your ideas and I would hope for similar. However I’m afraid you seem a bit over-optimistic. (This is the part where “you may say I’m a dreamer…” plays).
The caption by the photo is incorrect. Pennsylvania’s then 20 electoral votes went to Biden in 2020.
The Democrats no longer believe in democracy. If they had their way, millions of “deplorables” would lose the vote.
Well, he’s not wrong, but his party is. Very.
Why would white men be remotely interested in supporting a political party that has invested years in vilifying them for being white and male?