June 28, 2024 - 7:25am

Joe Biden is in the middle of the worst news cycle of his 50-year political career and it’s not nearly bad enough. Perhaps Chuck Todd of NBC News put it best, stunned after the President’s match-up with Donald Trump on Thursday night. “Biden looks like the caricature that conservative media has been painting,” said Todd. “And there were no clips here, you saw it before your eyes.”

Todd and other journalists raced to report on the mid-debate panic among high-level Democrats who realised the President’s performance had left the country shocked at the state of his health. A panel of liberal pundits on MSNBC wondered whether Biden could be replaced on ballots ahead of the Democratic Party’s convention in August.

The New York Times ran a story before CNN’s surprisingly well-moderated event ended, with the headline “I’m Hearing High Anxiety From Democrats Over Biden’s Debate Performance.” Nicholas Kristof, a star Times columnist, followed up shortly after with an article saying he hopes Biden “reviews his debate performance Thursday evening and withdraws from the race, throwing the choice of a Democratic nominee to the convention in August”.

Some journalists credulously repeated spin the Biden campaign rolled out about an hour into the debate, “confirming” reports the President had a cold. In coverage of the whole affair, some outlets also strained to balance Biden’s obvious failure with jabs at Trump’s performance, suggesting there was some equivalence between the two’s shortcomings on the night.

More egregious, though, is the media’s sudden pivot on Biden’s health. Take Todd’s use of the word “caricature” in reference to the Right’s prior attacks on Biden. Even Special Counsel Robert Hur, appointed by Biden’s attorney general, described the President several months ago as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory”. When Biden convened a bizarre press conference in February to rebut Hur’s claim, he confused the President of Egypt with his Mexican counterpart. Leaks from inside the G7 summit earlier this month suggested others in proximity to the President share Hur’s assessment.

When, in early June, the Wall Street Journal published a long report on behind-the-scenes concerns that Biden’s health was “slipping”, Morning Joe mocked the story, joking the paper should have just asked Republican Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene for her opinion. Joe Scarborough called the story “false and biased”. CNN’s Reliable Sources newsletter attempted to pick the Journal story apart, writing: “The Wall Street Journal owes its readers — and the public — better.”

What’s curious is that, as soon as the debate made it impossible to deny Biden’s deterioration, so many people in the media suddenly had sources in the Democratic Party claiming to be shocked — and so many of those journalists claimed to be shocked themselves. Of course, it’s never comforting to see your commander-in-chief lost on stage, fumbling for words with glazed eyes and an empty expression, but it’s also impossible to believe that Biden’s health is news to Beltway insiders.

Which stories weren’t written that should have been? Amid the drip-drip of brave reporting, many of the same people who are now aghast at Biden’s condition told us they had first-hand knowledge that everything was fine, or that every report questioning his health amounted to, dare I say, a “caricature”.

Either they were overstating the quality of their access or they were engaging in dishonest spin. The result is a poorly-informed public with less trust in the media and no choice to vote for another candidate because the Democratic Primary is over.


Emily Jashinsky is UnHerd‘s Washington D.C. Correspondent.

emilyjashinsky