“Here’s an idea,” wrote Jeremy Clarkson on X. “Instead of national service, which is obviously idiotic, how about kids working on farms.” Cue the inevitable mockery: the lads of Chipping Norton are turning to Chairman Mao for inspiration. Yet, when you think about it, Clarkson’s suggestion is not so stupid.
The same geopolitical events forcing politicians to turn their attention to military budgets and national service are also causing them to reconsider some of the most basic tenets of our economy — including farming. For much of the previous few decades, we took for granted that global supply chains were secure and current account deficits mattered little, because Britain could always attract investment from abroad. After the pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Liz Truss-induced national meltdown, the world looks very different.
Where Britain once looked well-suited to the modern, globalised world economy — an open, liberal floodplain for global cash to wash into — today the country looks particularly vulnerable. Having sold off much of our core infrastructure, we are more dependent than most for some of the basic necessities of modern life: chemicals, steel, oil, gas and, of course, food. Our dependence on such imports contributes to the persistent and increasingly enormous current account deficit, placing pressure on the pound which itself seems to get ever weaker without ever producing the expected export growth.
In a world of high interest rates, low growth and global protectionism, Britain’s persistent trade deficit is a real source of vulnerability. In one sense, we simply buy too much from the rest of the world for the amount that we sell to them. If Britain is to find its way onto a more secure, stable economic footing, then it needs to produce more at home. But what? Energy is a good place to start, but we are dependent on foreign wind turbines and solar panels to go green. Chemicals would have helped, but we sold off our plants. Mass reindustrialisation looks all-but impossible. Producing and eating more British food is one easy and potentially popular way to improve the current account deficit, while also leaving us less vulnerable to sudden shocks.
To get there, however, requires state subsidies and protectionism, which also means more expensive food, just as producing British energy with British infrastructure will also mean more taxpayers’ money upfront. As mad as it sounds, Clarkson might be onto something with his idea of national farm service. It’s also less likely to lead to the breakup of the union than Rishi Sunak’s half-baked plan to impose national service. Remember, the last time a government tried to do that across the whole of what was then a United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, it led to revolution and secession.
Jeremy Clarkson the visionary. I never thought I’d write that.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeBut if kids start learning useful skills and producing their own food, how are we going to brainwash them?
exactly…as long as the kids get game day on the weekends they will work….
Bank of England plus media hysteria meltdown.
“which also means more expensive food”
Yes lets crush the low to medium income earners with yet more costs to their monthly budget, great idea.
Also this idea is not new. Look up ‘Land Girls’.
Right. Yes. Land Girls.
So this isn’t a new idea, but it is a good one.
I imagine it’s one of the few ways we could bring an end to an immigration culture in the UK. Men would work on the land while their womenfolk go to work in the NHS, taking care of the disproportionate number of elderly people.
and men who’ve been mowed down by their tractors.
Jack has had a fear of tractors since he was a kid…his older brother got a toy tractor for xmas and Jack did not…Jack hates tractors and farms….Jack likes to just blow things up……..
England has plenty of farmland; why aren’t more acres under cultivation? Farming too hard for modern youths’ soft little hands?
No the bureaucracy and regulations have killed it.
Farmers have paid massive subsidies to NOT farm all of their land and leave much of it fallow.
Massive subsidies for solar farms too. Stacks round here on prime agricultural land.
How can you write about being self-sufficient in energy and not mentioning fracking? We are huge consumers of foreign natural gas but sit on huge reserves.
Once you have cheap energy, all the other things – chemicals, steel, heavy industry, agriculture – becomes easier.
There are no wealthy countries without access to cheap, reliable energy. Producing it yourself is the ultimate act of self sufficiency.
Might also increase the general appreciation and support for farmers. Lots of inner city kids haven’t the foggiest idea where their food comes from. And, even though I grew up among farmers in a very agricultural area, watching Clarkson’s Farm made me realise how little I knew about how the land is worked.
I recommend the YouTube channel Harry’s Farm. He is a neighbour of Jeremy Clarkson and I suspect part of the inspiration for Clarkson to start his show. Harry Metcalfe is also a motoring journalist as well as an arable farmer and is a friend of Clarkson’s. He is much less funny but much better at explaining the mechanics, economics and challenges of farming in an easily digestible and even-handed way. A great companion series to Clarkson’s Farm. Highly recommended.
It’s an idea for sure, but totally lacking in detail and assessment of cost/benefit. Quite poss something in it though and some of our younger would I suspect welcome the opportunity – so long as it wasn’t just a form of cheap labour, housed in tents etc and the benefits are all one way. They’d have to get some useful experience from it that helps them.
Interestingly though Clarkson hasn’t mentioned the c84k asylum seekers currently awaiting assessment. There’s your Land Army Jezza. But no we’ll just have them sit around aimlessly for years or pay a 3rd country a fortune for the same.
Brilliant! Put them to work on open farmland… and watch them disappear.
Almost all the damage done to the UK economy is the result of the acts of politicians. Let’s not encourage them to meddle any more. The idea that an even greater part of the labour force should be under the management and direction of politicians appals me.. Look what happened to the Civil Service , Schools and Hospitals for starters.
Haven’t read it yet, but seen a report Minette Batters has written about tenant farmers being kicked off their land to be replaced by solar farms – more lucrative for land owners. If true, watch out for UK farm produce to rise in price.
I haven’t seen it either but it sounds like hypocrisy, given that the NFU under Batters has been advising its members on how to move into solar farming.
I really like this idea of national service, whether it’s military, infrastructure or even possibly farming. I believe there are 600,000 young people who have simply dropped out of the economy. National service for a year would give them a fresh perspective.
Will you be signing up yourself?
I’m a little too old and I have tax paying career.
Ah; I thought it might be something for others, and not for you
Liz Truss did not cause a financial meltdown!
Oh, so it was a coincidence that the meltdown occurred pretty much immediately after she took over?
It may have happened because she was in office without her having been the one who caused it, surely? The idea of an unpopular leader’s election being a good moment to offload some bad stuff that was going to happen anyway is not fanciful.
Yes. Obviously.
Perhaps we should all start punting ideas? Mine is floating nuclear power plants (a known technology – think of nuclear subs or aircraft carriers). Tether them up to the offshore wind connectors we have now. Build them in volume to sell offshore energy to developing countries. Sail them into UK ports for maintenance. Sell private versions to Big Tech for energy-intensive AI data-centres that can be moored together without land costs with plenty of cooling available. Day-to-day service via drones. That’ll give you ships, steel, abundant energy and tech leadership, and without the land-based environmental regulations and blocking.
This idea and all other potential forms of NS can only work if made mandatory and under strict disciplinary rules. The very notion of a voluntary NS is utterly ridiculous. At the first hurdle, be it the effort required, the necessity to follow instructions or the expectation that one complete a task properly, half the participants will simply clear off. It is less likely to be successful in farming than probably any other occupation.
How quickly our friends on the far right forget their high falutin’ ideals about “freedom” and “liberty” when it means you get to tell some uppity teenagers or ungrateful immigrants what to do, eh?!?!?
Of course, you have no principals. How could you – you voted for clowns like Donald Trump and Boris Johnson!
I have spent the last 3 years learning to seed save, grow and preserve food. Intensely rewarding. 5 years ago I spent a summer building veg beds around vacant council land in weird and wonderful parts of London as part of charity team. Hugely appreciated. Data shows fulfilment in life needs connection to e things: nature, others, and something transcendent. So yes, teaching young people how to grow food gets my vote.
Clarkson is the best Prime Minister Britain never had!
If Jeremy says it then it is worth a try…It may fail but worth a shot.. The USA has your are covered but we are have problems with the far far left right now that is running our administration….and we are kinda in debt…but come WW3 we will win and cover you all and the cannoks…The heck with everyone else.
The country had an agile, flexible and tailored rural workforce; but then came Brexit. Now one of the leading Brexit loons says we need national service to bail out our disintegrating rural economy. It would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic