Headline photo: shot of Sam Bankman-Fried just before sentencing, or still from a Beastie Boys video? You decide!
Hugh Bryant
6 months ago
Still no journalist has had the cojones to investigate the way in which US aid to Ukraine was recycled into Democrat campaign contributions via FTX in 2020.
UnHerd Reader
6 months ago
Romance IS dead. I prefer concierges who tell me where the good restaurants are that the locals eat at.
Peter B
6 months ago
“If The Economist says it, it must be true,” !!!
Hard to read this with a straight face.
Peter B
6 months ago
So:
a. SBF thinks he’s committed no crimes (recent interview).
b. SBF goes on to wonder why no one at either Bear or Lehman faced criminal prosecution when he did.
c. Judge claims that SBF “knew it was wrong” but showed no remorse.
Point b. appears to contradict point a. !
It was always obvious that the whole SBF thing was a fraud.
Double the sentence. Throw away the key.
Then prosecute the bankers and all the rest of the crooks involved.
Studio Largo
6 months ago
What is this ridiculous concept of looking for ‘remorse’ from people like this spoiled, entitled shitweasel? We need to hold sociopathic assholes like this accountable for their ugly behavior instead of imagining that they’re somehow going to redeem themselves.
Main Edition
US
FR
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeHeadline photo: shot of Sam Bankman-Fried just before sentencing, or still from a Beastie Boys video? You decide!
Still no journalist has had the cojones to investigate the way in which US aid to Ukraine was recycled into Democrat campaign contributions via FTX in 2020.
Romance IS dead. I prefer concierges who tell me where the good restaurants are that the locals eat at.
“If The Economist says it, it must be true,” !!!
Hard to read this with a straight face.
So:
a. SBF thinks he’s committed no crimes (recent interview).
b. SBF goes on to wonder why no one at either Bear or Lehman faced criminal prosecution when he did.
c. Judge claims that SBF “knew it was wrong” but showed no remorse.
Point b. appears to contradict point a. !
It was always obvious that the whole SBF thing was a fraud.
Double the sentence. Throw away the key.
Then prosecute the bankers and all the rest of the crooks involved.
What is this ridiculous concept of looking for ‘remorse’ from people like this spoiled, entitled shitweasel? We need to hold sociopathic assholes like this accountable for their ugly behavior instead of imagining that they’re somehow going to redeem themselves.