X Close

Ed Miliband’s offshore wind expansion is already doomed

The Labour government intends to ramp up wind power generation without the required grid infrastructure. Credit: Getty

December 13, 2024 - 10:00am

If you venture 17 miles out to sea east off the Angus coast, you’ll find Seagreen, Scotland’s newest and biggest offshore wind farm. A joint venture run by three companies, it boasts 114 giant turbines with a total generating capacity of 1.1 gigawatts (GW). This, its website says, is enough to power more than 1.6 million homes, two-thirds of all the households in Scotland, and is “helping a green economic recovery and supporting high value green jobs”.

However, Seagreen has a problem — one that seems likely to inflict serious damage on Government plans to reduce bills by making Britain a “clean energy superpower” with a net zero electricity system by 2030. As Energy Secretary Ed Miliband today vowed to classify wind turbines as “nationally significant infrastructure projects”, startling facts about Seagreen — buried deep in official data — deserve attention.

Having become fully operational in late 2022, Seagreen generated an impressive quantity of power in the first 10 months of this year, which earned its operators some £70 million. But they were paid almost as much to switch its turbines off – at least £57 million.

The reason for this was simple. Although there were many days when the North Sea wind was blowing steadily, the limited capacity of the power transmission lines across the Scottish border meant Seagreen’s energy could not be supplied to the place where it was needed: England.

Another official dataset shows that Seagreen sold 1.2 million gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity to the grid. But had it not been asked to disconnect its turbines because of the network’s inadequacies, that figure would have been more than three times higher — 3.7 million GWh. And because Seagreen’s customers still needed their electricity, that in turn meant that energy consumers also had to pay for alternative, fossil-fuel power stations to be switched on in England.

This problem with the high-voltage wires, known as “constraint”, is rapidly getting worse. Scotland’s weather makes it an excellent location to build both onshore and offshore wind farms, but by the end of 2022, the country had already installed renewables with an output capacity of 13.9GW — far more than it will ever need. To apply the same arithmetic as the Seagreen website, 13.9GW would be enough to power more than 20 million homes, about eight times as many as the current Scottish total.

Meanwhile, the National Grid openly admits that the power lines across the border have a maximum capacity of just 6.3GW. In fairness to them and Miliband, they plan to spend £4 billion on building two new ones, Eastern Greenlink 1 and Eastern Greenlink 2, involving hundreds of miles of undersea cables linking the Scottish coast with northern England. If built on time, they should be open by 2030, with a further two which are not yet costed projected for the 2030s.

Unfortunately, Miliband’s planned vast expansion of onshore and offshore wind suggests these power lines will be nowhere near sufficient. Each of the four proposed new links will have a capacity of just 2GW but according to the “TEC register”, an official database that records planned energy projects which will need to be linked to the grid, by 2030 Scottish renewable capacity will have grown by another 19GW. That would make it more than twice as big as it is now.

By 2035, a further 33GW of Scottish wind and solar power should have come onstream. By then, new technologies such as using electricity to separate hydrogen from water and storing huge quantities to burn in adapted power stations may have reduced the need to transmit electricity from Scotland to England. But this is unproven, and according to the renewable energy advocate Michael Liebriech its prospects are “overblown”.

Currently, the costs of fixing constraint — known as constraint payments — are adding around £1.5 billion to consumers’ bills each year, and a report published by the National Grid in May claimed they are set to rise steadily until 2030. Meanwhile, the cost of building new Scottish wind farms whose energy may not be used will run to many billions.

Andrew Montford, director of the campaign group Net Zero Watch, is withering about the plans to expand Scottish renewables without considering the cross-border problem. “Construction of these new and planned wind farms should never have been allowed,” he told me. “Questions need to be asked about who authorised such foolishness.”

Miliband, however, remains undaunted. Citing another recent Government report, a department spokesperson insisted: “We can achieve clean power by 2030 with cheaper electricity, even factoring in constraint payments, and a more secure energy system for Britain.” Since the election, there has been a “record-setting round of renewables projects, with enough power for the equivalent of 11 million homes […] We will work with industry to rewire Britain, upgrade our outdated infrastructure to get renewable electricity on the grid, and minimise constraint payments.”

British businesses already face electricity costs more than twice as high as the rest of Europe, and almost five times those in America. If Miliband’s department turns out to be wrong, the political and the economic cost will be immense.


David Rose is UnHerd‘s Investigations Editor.

DavidRoseUK

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Kanefsky
John Kanefsky
1 month ago

Any system is only as good as its weakest link. Building windfarms in Scotland before capacity to move the electricity south was therefore always at best naïve, at worst a scam.
Miliband and his advisers / civil servants don’t understand science and seem to think you can wish into being the things they want. And NESO are too craven to tell them this cannot happen. Science and engineering are not amendable to political wish lists.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, we are burning vast quantities of gas and wood pellets as it is cold, still and cloudy.

Caradog Wiliams
Caradog Wiliams
1 month ago
Reply to  John Kanefsky

In fact Biden had wind/solar farms built in the west of the USA but people didn’t want pylons. They just sort of gave up.

Caradog Wiliams
Caradog Wiliams
1 month ago

There are wind farms in the sea around the Welsh coast which have not yet been connected. All of the time they are corroding away and I believe we pay a Norwegian company to maintain them. We even pay that company for the electricity which they don’t generate.

Gerry Quinn
Gerry Quinn
1 month ago
Reply to  John Kanefsky

It can be both. Naive on one side, scam on the other.
Most scams are that, in fact. Though of course it’s possible to construct blunders out of pure naivity.

Steven Carr
Steven Carr
1 month ago

Since the storm, there seems to have been five days of wind drought, with current wind generation at 2 GW.
Luckily, we have gas which is generating 26 GW.
If Ed Milliband’s plans are carried through and implemented, this perfectly normal week in December would have led to massive power cuts, and quite possibly food chains collapsing as freezers are denied power.

Peter B
Peter B
1 month ago

“If Miliband’s department turns out to be wrong” !
Surely “when”.
Has Ed Miliband ever been right about anything ?
I note that it’s forecast to take at least 5 years (2030) to build the needed extra transmission capacity from Scotland to England.
Why that long ? I’m sure it took a fraction of that time when the National Grid was originally built. This stuff isn’t rocket science.
I’d put the actual build time at 1 year and the government and regulatory overhead delay at 4 years (and rising every passing year).

Caradog Wiliams
Caradog Wiliams
1 month ago
Reply to  Peter B

You are correct. The delay is the series of arguments. We are short of skilled labour. When the National Grid set up more regular inspection of existing pylons, they tried to recruit in the UK. Nobody was interested so they sent English teachers to foreign countries and recruited from those countries. The crew have to speak English for safety reasons.

D Walsh
D Walsh
1 month ago

Wind energy like nuclear, natural gas ect are finished, something far cheaper is on the way. Tesla was right

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
1 month ago
Reply to  D Walsh

How does that work?

andy young
andy young
1 month ago
Reply to  D Walsh

A tad gnomic. Pray do tell.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
1 month ago
Reply to  andy young

Presumably he means fusion

Bret Larson
Bret Larson
1 month ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

I went to a cold fusion conference, 35 years ago.

I was a scam.

D Walsh
D Walsh
1 month ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

No, fusion and fission are far too expensive

jim peden
jim peden
1 month ago

“… a total generating capacity of 1.1 gigawatts (GW) … enough to power more than 1.6 million homes”. Still not enough to power a De Lorean time machine though.
Chris Bond has done a careful and detailed analysis of the prospects for Net Zero in the “land of sunshine”. The result is expected to be curtailment and brown- or black-outs without fossil power or energy import.
Australia is of course a major exporter of coal to China for burning in their own power stations. But that apparently doesn’t count.

Rocky Martiano
Rocky Martiano
1 month ago

Miliband must be Two-Tier Keir’s illegitimate brother. He’s a tool.

David Frost
David Frost
1 month ago

He is wrong, it’s not hard to see the problems
Solar doesn’t work at night, wind doesn’t blow when it’s really cold and the transmission doesn’t exist to supply where it is needed
All this adds up to shortages and power cuts, all to give Ed and his friends huge subsidies that we all have to pay for
It’s just a massive scam to redistribute wealth to the rich

Simon Blanchard
Simon Blanchard
1 month ago
Reply to  David Frost

They’ll have to regulate supply with dynamic pricing. Which means compulsory smart meters.

Chris Quayle
Chris Quayle
1 month ago

The most expensive form of transmission, undersea cables. Why can’t they just build more pylons, or would that upset the fragile sensibilities of some ?. When the grid was originally built, there were no such qualms: They just got on with it and delivered. Now, “deliverables”, are a complete mystery to this government. Technically illiterate and no concept of a joined up system at all.

Caradog Wiliams
Caradog Wiliams
1 month ago
Reply to  Chris Quayle

I think the undersea cables just take the power to the coast. From then onwards pylons take over. As you say, pylons are everywhere and after a couple of months you just don’t notice them.

Claire D
Claire D
1 month ago

I’ve just seen the draft plans.
Millipede intends to erect a pylon in your garden. I’m sure that after a couple of months you won’t notice it.

Chris Quayle
Chris Quayle
1 month ago
Reply to  Claire D

That’s a bit of an extreme and unlikely example, but in reality, there are safeguards and there is a process. Still, you want a reliable energy system, and all the benefits that it provides, and that we all take for granted, then there are tradeoffs to get there. Windmills or pylons, you choose.

Nick Wade
Nick Wade
1 month ago

All completely pointless and a colossal waste of money, but someone’s getting rich, no doubt. No wind = no electricity, no matter how many turbines you have.

Hydrogen tech is unproven, it’s volatile fuel to deal with and of course the whole “green hydrogen” process is massively inefficient.

The fundamental problem Milibrain has is physics. You will never generate enough energy to make these “green” power sources self sustaining. All the solar panels, concrete, wind turbines, and other associated infrastructure are made with fossil fuels. A wind turbine will never generate enough energy in its life to make itself, let alone power the country. It’s another Ponzi scheme, like everything the government does.

Oh, and at 0.04% of the atmosphere, CO2 is really not a problem, even if you believe the planet is warming, which itself is questionable given the dodgy data and manipulation used by climate modellers.

Caradog Wiliams
Caradog Wiliams
1 month ago
Reply to  Nick Wade

Maybe the planet is warming, maybe it isn’t. It depends on the model and the model depends on the writer. The chance that the model is right is about 0.01% I think.
The idea that CO2 is responsible is just a nonsense. The problem is that most people, including the government, don’t understand the science. This is COVID again – the government decides to lock down at unbelievable expense, destroying the life of the next generation. So after the green fiasco there will be an expensive enquiry where Miliband says, “I was just obeying orders. It was the experts who were wrong.” And he will get away with it- scot free.

John Tyler
John Tyler
1 month ago

Building more wind farms off Scotland is bit like mass-producing haggis in Cornwall.