Main Edition
US
FR
January 21, 2021 - 7:00am
It’s been called ‘Putin’s secret palace’ — a £1billion complex built upon on the Black Sea coast. But contrary to the impression given by the latest set of breathless reports, the existence of the palace is not a secret. It’s been known about (though shrouded in mystery) for several years.
As to its ownership, the Kremlin denies it was built for the use of the Russian President — or that he has any relationship to the project. That is disputed by opposition activists — most recently Alexei Navalny, who was detained on his return to Russia this week.
At first sight, a palace might not seem to be the smartest way of hiding ill-gotten gains. If secrecy is of the essence, then a store of value that can be seen from space isn’t exactly subtle. A Swiss bank account is discreet; a private estate 19 times the size of Monaco, not so much.
https://twitter.com/astarwormwood/status/1351599667537207296?s=20
Of course, if you happen to control the courts in your country then that probably doesn’t matter. Indeed, it may be the verdict of history that you really care about. Long after you’ve left your Earthly rewards behind, what will posterity think about your little indulgences? Given enough time, people won’t care about where the money came from, they’ll be too busy gawping at the fixtures and fittings.
Look at our own stately homes and castles. Do we imagine that every penny used to build them was honestly arrived at? Obviously not. The fact is that the grand monuments left behind by our ancestors — from Stonehenge onward — owes their existence to the extreme concentration of wealth.
That said, good taste is essential. A legacy of tacky decor and dodgy architecture will do nothing to rehabilitate a ruler’s reputation.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeNot a well-chosen example in this context. That was a work of art in an exhibition by conceptual artist Maurizio Cattelan, not a part of the plumbing installed by a duke in an excess of bad taste. I presume that part of the artist’s intention was to satirise the taste for opulence, not to pander to it.
Indeed. Examples near me abound.
Glasgow, the second city of the empire, springs to mind.
As so often, the headline bears no relation to the article. It might have done so had Putin and others of his ilk actually created structures of taste and discernment. Even then, the answer might be ‘No’.
But such people will never create of leave anything of taste or discernment as they have spent their entire lives obsessed with politics or making money. Thus their minds either never held the capacity for taste or discernment, or they have not had the time to develop any taste or discernment. Much though I liked Trump’s policies as President, he is no different in this respect.
This lack of taste or discernment seems particularly to affect the political and business leaders of our age, those of past ages often having left buildings and art collections etc of considerable merit.
,
like trying to defund Obamacare?
Wealthy Russians have always looked to pre-revolutionary France (eg Versailles) for guidance in taste. Perhaps Putin should ponder the fate of Louis XVI…
No need to go that far. The last tsar and his whole family.
The tragedy of the Russian people is that their elite always steals.
Russian simply lack taste. But that is not important, the real issue is the Russian elite – they simply don’t care about the people. They just want to steal, steal, steal.
I also don’t understand the fascination with Putin (among the Right in Europe and USA). He is not Bismarck, he is just a thief.
“Putin’s secret palace’. Some ‘secret’ if it’s known about.