We haven’t had a government of national unity since the Second World War.
But according to Emmanuel Macron, we are at war — against the coronavirus. Battling the same enemy, governments around the world are taking extraordinary measures.
Our own government has promised to do “whatever it takes” — and that doesn’t only mean spending whatever it takes. The Emergency Coronavirus Bill (to be tabled today) will give the Government sweeping powers to restrict our movements and curb our civil liberties.
Over the years, there have been other emergencies — for instance, the Global Financial Crisis, the Winter of Discontent and the Three Day Week. But the scale of state intervention that we’re about to experience has no peacetime precedent. As the Prime Minister put it himself “we must act like any wartime government.”
Well, one thing the wartime prime ministers did in the First and Second World Wars was to invite the opposition to join the government. How long before Boris Johnson comes under pressure to do likewise?
It won’t happen immediately. There’s no public clamour to have Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell join the Cabinet. I doubt the offer would be made — or accepted. But when Sir Keir Starmer becomes Labour leader, the scenario becomes more plausible. Former ministers from the Blair and Brown years will probably return to the frontbenches — and could bring their years of experience back into office.
In the months ahead, ministers will roll forward the frontiers of the state, make life-and-death decisions and enforce what amounts to martial law.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeMost assuredly not. Nobody from the current Labour Party, SNP or LibDems should ever be allowed anywhere near the levers of power. I say this not as a Tory – I stopped voting years ago and I only ever voted Tory once – but as someone who can see the obvious and learn from the lessons of history.
Indeed. I see the thin end of a very large wedge here.
NO! Absolutely not! Starmer is a dyed-in-the-wool Remainer/Rejoiner/Rejoiniac, and his only contribution to any government of national unity would be to stymie or delay Brexit by any means possible.
Asolutely not!!! Are you mad. The Labour Party is only interested in banning more “Hate Groups” like the LGB group and Womens rights group. They are just so ridiulous with their attitude that their involvement with any important function of the community would be counter to any public good.
Maybe the SNP.
But there is absolutely no benefit from bringing in any of the bunch of morons, racists and fanatics that make up the Labour Party, and the LibDems – what would be the point?
Do we need a government of national unity?
I’d say no, not yet. But I wouldn’t want to dismiss the idea as firmly as I dismissed the idea of a second referendum on Brexit. That was an absolute No for me, and I don’t think the present situation is going to allow for absolutism of any sort. Let’s remember that there are local authorities up and down the land which have already had to learn the art of cross-party co-operation. Parliament could perhaps learn something from them.
We really don’t need a govt of national unit.
The central planners at the Bank of England and Treasury are already busy taking absolute command and control of the economy in a way that would make Castro or Chavez blush.
Viva el Bailey! Achieving what Corbyn or Kruschev never could, all in a couple of weeks and without any debate or oversight.
But thanks also to the BoE, and especially Mark Carney and his grotesque debt bubble.
Next stop: free money from helicopters. It’s so simple. Why did nobody think of this before?