Main Edition
US
FR
December 8, 2024 - 3:20pm
In the past two weeks, Joe Biden has spared the lives of two turkeys and pardoned his son, Hunter. Earlier this week, Politico reported that he is also considering “pre-emptive pardons” for former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney and his onetime chief medical advisor Anthony Fauci, whom Donald Trump has threatened to prosecute for unspecified crimes once he returns to the White House next month.
Yet there are other acts of mercy which the President could choose before he leaves office. As a Catholic, Biden is a practising member of a Church that is vehemently opposed to capital punishment. His last weeks in power coincide with the season of goodwill, but he has said nothing to suggest he plans to reprieve the 40 prisoners awaiting execution on federal death row in Terre Haute, Indiana. Running for the presidency in 2020, he pledged “to work to pass legislation to eliminate the death penalty at the federal level”, because “we cannot be sure” that the criminal justice system “gets death penalty cases right every time”. However, he has done nothing to make this a reality.
Then again, inconsistency has long been the hallmark of Biden’s attitude to capital punishment. In 1991, he attacked then-President George H.W. Bush in the Senate for being “soft on crime”, on the grounds that his Justice Department had “only four times a year put someone in prison for life and only once gotten the death penalty”. The following year, he sponsored a crime bill which greatly expanded the ability of federal — as opposed to state — courts to pass death sentences, boasting it would “do everything but hang people for jaywalking”.
Indeed, it was not until 2019 that he revealed possible abolitionist leanings, when he said in a speech in New Hampshire: “By the way, congratulations to y’all [for] ending the death penalty here.”
The contradictions continued after Biden became President. In 2021, his Attorney General Merrick Garland announced a formal federal execution moratorium, expressing concern to senators about the death penalty’s “increasing almost randomness or arbitrariness” and its “enormously disparate impact on black Americans and members of communities of colour”. But Garland went on to seek the death penalty earlier this year in a federal trial held in New York, a state that has abolished it, and has contested federal death row appeals. For example, in 2022 his department persuaded the Supreme Court to reinstate the death sentence for the Boston Marathon bomber Dzokhar Tsarnaev, after it was quashed by the First Circuit Court of Appeals.
However, Garland was not wrong when he spoke of its arbitrariness. While more than 200 people sentenced to death since 1973 have been exonerated, the point here is not the possible killing of the innocent but instead the failure of US courts to ensure death sentences are reserved for the “worst of the worst”. A recent report by the Death Penalty Information Center reveals that of the 40 current federal death row inmates, 43% were tried in just three of the 94 federal judicial districts. What’s more, since 1989 73% of the 541 people who have faced federal capital punishment charges were non-white, a percentage far in excess of their proportion in both the US population and among those charged with serious crimes.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeTo think that Biden cares about the death penalty is laughably naive. His stance on the issue, with virtually every issue, is directly related to its utility in furthering his political career. If the Catholic Church is serious about saving death row inmates, throw some cash in an overseas account, and Biden will grant them all pardons.
You beat me to it. The first question is not about morality, ethics, or even justice but “What’s in it for Joe Biden?”.
Whilst the pope busies himself with declaring 2025 a “jubilee year” (yawn), the real question: Is Joe Biden a Catholic?
This article might suggest his adherence to that faith is, like everything else, a mere facade.
He’s a bad Catholic. Many, many people are, even those of us trying to be good often fail. That doesn’t make him not Catholic. Among his positions, support for capital punishment is low down on the list of his divergence from Catholic teaching.
He needs to touch up a few more choir boys to be considered a proper Catholic
Just to note, the Catholic Church has only been “vehemently opposed” to capital punishment for a very short time, and then only as the prudential opinion of 2 or 3 Popes that it is no longer necessary in the modern context (I think they are very wrong). No individual Catholic is bound by that, as tradition and doctrine teaches otherwise.
The doctrine of the Church teaches unambiguously that capital punishment is just when it is necessary and applied fairly. No Pope can change 2000 years of consistent doctrinal teaching. No more than a Pope can say women may be ordained as priests and have it mean anything except that he is committing heresy and is no longer Pope.
He’d hardly be the first pope to commit “heresy”, and it hardly deterred the multitude of previous charlatans whose only aim was earthly wealth and power.
Indeed, it could be argued that every single one of them after Peter did the same.
You don’t understand what heresy is. Personal sin is not heresy, no matter how grievous it may be. Adultery, fornication, theft, even rape and murder are not heresy. They’re grave sins, but do not involve to denial of any Church doctrine.
There’s never been a Pope who committed formal heresy, although some have been accused of privately holding heretical views. The fact that there have been many sinful Popes, some gravely so, doesn’t change that fact.
To those who believe in traditional Christian doctrine, individual sinfulness never surprises us. It’s expected. We’re all sinners. “Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat. 14 How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life: and few there are that find it!”
It is impressive that there are still people who treat Biden as if he is not a demented sociopath and pathological liar.
Also inept. A quote from Obama ” Never underestimate Joe Biden’s ability to f**k something up “.
Or that he still really has a mind.
I can’t speak for the US experience but in the last phase of capital punishment in the UK, between the 1957 Homicide Act and the 1965 Murder Act, 74 men and 1 woman in Britain were convicted of “capital murder” and 32 of them hanged. The rest were given clemency and their sentence commuted to life imprisonment.
All of those convictions have been extensively tested in the intervening years and none of them have been found to have been unsound – meaning no innocent people were hanged. The most famous – James Hanratty, the A6 murderer – was proven guilty beyond doubt using recovered DNA samples in 1997.
On the other hand, since 2010, two people a year have been murdered by people who have previously been convicted of murder and sentenced. And 12 years is the average time a murder spends in prison (despite the 1965 Murder Act stating in its first clause: “No person shall suffer death for murder, and a person convicted of murder shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life”).
Biden is a Catholic in the same sense that a tomato is a fruit. He falls into the category by technicality but exhibits none of the expected qualities.