Time and again, women are having to go to court to protect themselves against trans activists.
The cowardice of organisations that won’t stand up for free speech and women’s legal rights is one reason for this. The latest institution to be shamed for its behaviour towards people who hold gender-critical views is Arts Council England (ACE), which has just lost a claim brought by a former employee, Denise Fahmy. The Leeds Employment Tribunal came to the unanimous decision that Fahmy, who had worked for ACE for 15 years, was subjected to harassment because of her gender-critical beliefs.
Her problems began in an internal Microsoft Teams meeting attended by 400 people in April last year. She was shocked to hear that the LGB Alliance, a lesbian and gay rights charity that wanted to make a film about the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, had been accused of transphobia by ACE staff. When a senior executive said it had been “a mistake” to give funding to a “divisive organisation with a history of anti-trans exclusionary activity”, Fahmy challenged him. A grant of £9000, made by an intermediary that receives funds from ACE, was later withdrawn from the Alliance.
The following month, a petition was posted on the ACE staff intranet, attacking people who believe in biological sex. It was taken down after 26 hours, but by then it had been viewed 700 times and signed by more than a hundred of Fahmy’s colleagues. “People signed it, and made comments, citing gender-critical people like me and the LGB Alliance as parasites, neo-Nazis, needing to be stamped out,” she said.
Fahmy was signed off sick and eventually resigned, lodging a claim with the tribunal for harassment and victimisation. She has now succeeded in the first part of her claim and will be awarded compensation at a further hearing. The amount will be increased by 10% because ACE failed to follow the ACAS code of practice when it refused to allow her to appeal against the outcome of her internal complaint.
All of this is scandalous. ACE is a publicly funded body, which means that the cost of defending the case — and Fahmy’s compensation — will be paid for by taxpayers. It’s been clear for more than two years, thanks to the Maya Forstater judgment, that a belief in biological sex is protected in law. So why did ACE waste public money to oppose Fahmy’s claim, instead of offering an apology and asking itself how such a toxic atmosphere was allowed to develop within the organisation?
The irony is that ACE is widely regarded as a “liberal” institution, prepared to take risks on what should be regarded as art. But we know from bitter experience that “liberal” organisations, including Left-wing and centre-left political parties, have been among the first to genuflect before trans activists. They appear to be afraid of their own staff, raising questions about how far gender ideology is influencing other decisions.
ACE distributed close to £900m of public money last year. Are artists and musicians now required to repeat “trans women are women” if they hope to get a grant? Fahmy’s lawyers rightly greeted the decision in her tribunal case as “a victory for women and for common sense”. But I think we are entitled to ask the Culture Secretary, Lucy Frazer, what on earth is going on at the Arts Council — and what she is going to do about it.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIn the mid nineteenth century the Russians extorted a huge area of Siberia and Manchuria from Qing China.
The Chinese have not forgotten and want it back.
Putin’s attempts to bring China “on board” show signs of increasing desperation. President Xi is a much more skilled operator and his using of Russian aggression as a lodestone for further Chinese expansionism has the rest of the world watching with obvious interest. Both Putin and Xi know this.
Now is not the time, i feel, to be less than diplomatic with China. We’re all aware of its failings with human rights, and we’re doing well in the UK to have taken the necessary step of abandoning Chinese input into our 5G networks. The voices from politicians to rescind the invitation of China to the Queen’s funeral are, however, foolish and lacking in political savvy. Such an invitation isn’t an endorsement of the Chinese regime, but the absence of an invitation would be a snub that would reverberate around Beijing.
Biden’s Forcing Russia into China’s arms is showing major signs of increasing negative effects on global balance of power.
Next Biden’s Insane closing of SWIFT may well rush the loss of USA Global Reserve Currency status.
Biden and his equally corrupt mini-me, Boris, are about to bankrupt Eu and UK between the mad and self harm of the covid response, and then having to get into the war which was none of their business.
The Big guy gets his 10%, I wonder if Boris, the little guy, gets 2%?
Biden is the single most destructive force in USA in its history. Boris can claim the same for his – and Truss is saying how great Boris was at covid and this insane war! Truss is bad news. She has them readying the printing presses for Overtime……
You’re sounding very much like Soviet blather about their nation “overtaking and surpassing the West.” It was the basis of all Soviet propaganda.
Up until the year 1991…
There is another possibility, if Russia is humiliated in the Ukraine.
Russia is a vast country (the world’s biggest, about 70 times as large as the UK) with a sparse population and enormous untapped resources, especially in Siberia. These resources would be of great benefit to a country that is rapidly industrialising and has a very large population. Furthermore, much of Russia outside of Moscow is neglected and economically run down.
An economically-damaged, militarily-humiliated Russia might be vulnerable to Beijing’s ‘Belt and Road’ programme, or something like it (for diplomatic reasons China would not want to make it too obvious that it regarded Russia in the same light as central Asia). Although China would not (at this stage) want to meddle in European Russia, Siberia would be a good candidate for Chinese ‘development’.
Perhaps Xi is biding his time, until the outcome of the war in Ukraine is settled. If Russia wins, Putin will be Xi’s best friend and a joint China-Russia geopolitical axis will emerge. If Russia loses, it will be a liability and China will extend its tentacles northwards.
Beginning to feel like this is also a proxy war for China. Just as the West thought the war would be a way to weaken Russia, China sees the war as a way to weaken the West. While Russia is depleting is military capabilities and future influence, the West depletes its economic power and future influence.
‘The enemy of my enemy is my friend’
When Biden set out to crush Russia he just made the real enemy of the world, China, stronger.
Absolutely correct. Astonishing that most have missed this.
Absolutely wrong. Astonishing that some think this is the case,
Well yes, sort of. Putin’s expansionism made it imperative to stop him, whatever the implications re China.
You have to shoot the wolf closest to the sleigh.
Err, Russia is NOT “depleting” its military capabilities. But it is completely destroying Ukraine’s capabilities and its obsolete NATO arms. You’ll note how little HIMARS are being crowed about these days.
Where do you get that disinformation from? The UK Military of Defence, which continue its bizarre daily briefings about a foreign conflict, as if it’s 1982 and we are steaming to the Falklands.
As to “future influence? Are you kidding. It’s the US/UK/EU/NATO which is peeing that away.
“Err, Russia is NOT “depleting” its military capabilities. But it is completely destroying Ukraine’s capabilities and its obsolete NATO arms. You’ll note how little HIMARS are being crowed about these days.”
You have absolutely no evidence to support this.
It was this Ukrainian weakness that made tehm retreat to Kuynsk and Izyum.
They may well fall back east of teh Oskil River.
When Ukraine ignominiously retreats to Moscow, we will know that Putin has won.
If Russia is doing so well why are they having trouble recruiting troops and keeping their forces in the field intact. Winning armies suffer less desertions than losing armies.
How’s the weather in Moscow this time of year, David Jack Smith, or should I call you Sergei?
Autocrats and their regimes have no friends; they don’t understand the concept. For them it is not a question of ‘How to win friends and influence people’, but ‘How to buy allies and manipulate people’.
Putin has been reduced to the rank of “Prince of Moscow.” As in the 14th Century, he is now the vassal of the new ruler of Central Asia–China.
As we see, Prince Putin must regularly go to do obeisance to the Khan. If he is obedient, the Khan may even grant him the title of “Grand Prince.” Perhaps a new cap even?
But if Putin displeases the Khan.
The Khan will just choose a new Prince.
It will be interesting to see how many centuries it will take Russia to free itself from their new “Tatar Yoke.”
Russia is a ethno-nationalist country believing slavs to be the superior race on Earth. China believes Han chinese to be the crown achivement of human evolution, Both countries are practically ruled by nazis. Of course they can’t get along.
It’s win win win for the west. Increased nato border with Russia with Finland and Sweden, bottling up their navy too; stronger Turkey controlling the Black Sea and taking on Russia in Azerbaijan; destruction of a huge proportion of Russian military; and unification of almost all the former Soviet countries, with increased military spending. And a largely unified west to boot. And then China, cursing Putin for doing such a great job on achieving these wins for the west – and delaying its takeover of Taiwan for 10 years at least – and by then India will be our barrier against Chinese expansionism as it stamps its rapidly increasing GDP and authority on Asia.
This article is nonsense Western propaganda…. Although recent Russian humiliations have left Xi Jinping visibly uneasy
Why is it western propaganda? The tone of Chinas comments have changed as the war has taken its course, from no limits of friendship through to being uneasy about the conflict. Your objections seem more to be based on your predetermined opinion than what has actually been said
Correct. To be honest, most people don’t really give a genuine crap about the conflict, and most likely couldn’t point to Ukraine on map. Even those with their virtue-signalling yellow/blue flags in their twitter bios.
They know nothing about the US engineered coup in 2014. The ethnic Russians killed since then. Ukraine’s flouting of the Minsk accords. That Ukraine is a sink of corruption and anti-democratic actions. The Nazi problem. The US inspired provocations. The real reasons for the conflict. Why it’s called a Special Military Operation, and the constraints that puts on Russia. The fact that most of the ground fighting in the Donbass region comes NOT from the large Russian regular army, but local militias with Russian air/ground support. Basic stuff like that.
Even so, the ridiculous government-controlled western corporate media agit-prop is the most insidious I have ever seen.
Ukraine is far better at PR Offensives, than military offensives.
Putin has been retreating for the last six months to LURE UKRAINE INTO A TRAP.
The tens of thousands of dead Russians, the thousands of wrecked Russian vehicles, and destroyed aircraft were actually ingenious means of lulling Ukraine into a false sense of security.
And once Ukraine takes Luhansk, Donetsk and Crimea THE TRAP WILL SPRING.
Wow so it’s local militias that have lost all those hundreds of tanks and guns, and 70,000 soldiers! There’ll be nobody left there to fight their war then.