One golden autumn afternoon, in a quiet North London suburb, I stumbled across a portal to a possible English future. Hadley Wood sits on the fringes of the city, between Barnet and the M25, seemingly forgotten in its own little world of metroland Tudor houses, dotted with fields of ponies and commemorative plaques to steam age pioneers. Yet between the wisteria and the Jags, there is a sense of unease.
Roving bands of career burglars stalk the area. “They come every day whether you’re inside or not,” explains one local man from behind his wheelie bin. “They don’t seem to care.” Everything is up for grabs, the man tells me, from Amazon packages in doorways to the Lexus in the drive.
Brazenness is hardly surprising. Hadley Wood is one of countless British communities effectively abandoned by the protective arm of the state. In 2018, the area suffered 65 break-ins, a criminal romp that nonetheless failed to stir the short arm of the law. Such an experience now marks suburban life in the capital, with the Met failing to solve a single crime in 160 residential areas of London over the last three years. “The police gave up on this area years ago,” one shrugging resident explains.
Such is the national mood. Trust in the police is at an historic low, with crime recently surging to the fourth-biggest issue in the country. Yet in this vacuum of order, Hadley Wood offers one potential solution. For £100 a month per household, a firm called My Local Bobby will be your private police force, patrolling the lanes and back alleys, responding in 30 seconds to a break-in and even picking your wife up from the station in the dark. I spotted them myself, crawling by in patrol cars as I strolled the empty streets. Behind them, meanwhile, is a team that’ll privately prosecute criminals through the courts, with a conviction rate of 100%, a service recently used by Reform UK after the alleged assault of a police officer at Manchester Airport.
Welcome to 21st-century Britain, where the state increasingly struggles to carry out its basic functions, and where private players now rush to fill the void. Nor, of course, is this merely a function of law and order. Rather, the phenomenon of My Local Bobby represents the loose thread of a fraying social contract. When the state is no longer capable of carrying out its basic functions, after all, why wouldn’t Britain’s narrowing band of middle-class taxpayers plump for something better?
The recent budget offered a grim reminder of this future zero-sum reality facing public service funding in England. Much of the tax revenue raised over the next few years, alongside additional borrowing, will be geared towards funding the NHS: a short-term spending splurge ahead of promised reform that’ll anyway peter out by 2025. This, it seems, is already happening at the expense of other public services. Despite Labour’s mission to “take back the streets”, the Met is set to lose another 2,000 officers amid yet another budget cut. That’s off the back of a decade in which police funding has already fallen by 20% in real terms.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis is truly frightening. The police are all that stands between us and chaos.
It’s not just a question of numbers, it’s how they’re deployed. Recently I witnessed seven police officers who were deployed to question one woman. I reported this to my Police and Crime Commissioner, and received an answer that was only barely adequate.
It’s up to us. If we do nothing, then we are just putting up with inadequate policing.
Taxes become a protection racket if a real service that the citizens want is not delivered but instead your life is disrupted by “the law” for failing to pay up. Only a tiny minority wants the police deployed harassing people for offensive face book posts rather than preventing robbery, fraud and violence.
Its much worse than that; There has been a stealth redefinition of right and wrong. In the old days, the bobby on the beat knew what was right and wrong; so did everybody else; Stealing; obstreperous behaviour(move on, lad);lying; violence… Nowadays, non-crime hate incident takes up 60% of police time. Diversity gives the job to small fat women, such as were supposed to be guarding Trump when he was nearly killed(the woman who couldn’t put here pistol back because she didn’t know diddly squat about weapons).
Why the redefinition of good and bad? Radicals seek to re-engineer society in their likeness.
In the old days, the bobby had probably been in the Normandy landings and seen his friends cut down. He knew what he was protecting and had some perspective on it.
Still amuses me thinking of the ‘small fat’ women trying to run in their riot gear.
Said before and I’ll continue to say – the problem withe the police is that everybody is a graduate. The two things – policing the streets and graduates – do not go together.
The same is true in the NHS (certainly in Wales). If you are in ‘management’ and you want to make a difference, you can only get to Band 4 on the wage scale if you don’t have a degree. So people work hard and try to make a difference but suddenly find themselves reporting to a young graduate (Band 5), the latter calling meeting after meeting because they don’t understand what is going on.
I would refine your point a little. The upper management of the police are all graduates, but also nearly all of them have never been on the beat, on the street, or at a crime scene. They simply have no idea.
Every time I have this misfortune to encounter Plod, I dream of them having a morning of rifting on the drill square by Brigade of Guards drill s’arnts….
In South Wales police, you must have a degree as an entry requirement OR you enter a ‘degree apprenticeship’ scheme where you are effectively sponsored to get a degree. In Dyfed-Powys Police the entry requirement is a degree.
Completely agree, I live in a small Welsh village and we never see a copper. The biggest village locally used to have a police house and local bobby, the house was sold and the bobby transferred when a new police station was build. Only problem is it’s never staffed and only used by passing patrol cars to stop for a brew!
My wife worked for the Welsh NHS for 20 years but became so disillusioned she left for the reasons you explain. Top of her pay grade but no opportunity to progress and asked to do more and more by kids that can’t even manage to wipe their own noses.
Don’t you know that common sense is forbidden in new Britain. Sorry, but the Blob – bleeding-heart lawyers, limp-wristed lefty teachers and thought-crime obsessed senior police officers will put a stop to your ‘dangerous ramblings’.
It begs the question, what are we actually paying taxes for? The government cannot even perform its most basic functions, namely defend the borders and enforce the Law. What is the point of them? They are just a protection racket, who I pay half my income to, and don’t even get protection.
One particular dodge used by politicians and senior police is to say that the Home Secretary must not interfere with “operational matters”. Obviously the Home Secretary should not instruct the Police to arrest particular people; but that is not a reason why she should not tell all the forces, tomorrow, to prioritise burglary and violence over offensive language.
I wonder if this is just an example of using bureaucracy to ‘defund the police’ in a low profile way?
It seems part of the failure of the State that ‘defunds’ opticians, dentists, non-urgent surgery, tax assessments, and various taxes now depending on online completion.
The State has grown and grown and is hobbled by bureaucracy and regulation, becoming less and less effective. I wonder if there is a bureaucracy/efficiency curve (like the Laffer curve) where further bureaucracy has a negative effect on efficiency? If so we must far along the curve.
It’s not deliberate, but it is exactly as you say – once the bureaucratic functions get to a certain size they simply create more bureaucracy.
Again, Mark Steyn has the perfect bon mot, “Britain: the land where everything is policed except crime”.
By the way, isn’t this local fire departments were started? Private subscriptions to an extinguishing service, subscribers to which were obliged to stand off as non-subscribers’ homes burned?
A perfect storm of civilizational collapse. The government won’t protect you and the government won’t let you protect yourself in any meaningful way. Not to blame the victim, but over here in the former colonies we just shake our heads in astonishment at the very idea that a homeowner can’t simply defend his own property.
Returning to UK after 30 years in the third world, if I’m allowed to call it that, I was expecting something rather better. My daughter warned me “It’s different now, dad”. Should have listened to her. Third world policing is corrupt, sure, but for a small sum it’s far better value than the Met.
A homeowner can defend his property in England as it is covered under self defence laws.
The problem with these private firms though is that they’ll only take on the profitable areas. They’ll happily police the cities with high population density as it will be easy money. They’ll show no interest in rural areas where houses are much more spread out
Indeed that is the logic of profit driven security but has the State provided the universal police service in rural areas desired and the answer seems to be no.
Private policing, private healthcare, private social care for the elderly and private schools. If you want anything done efficiently and expeditiously you have to pay for it. What the hell are we actually paying taxes for?
Too many addle-brained graduates What’s needed is a return to promotion from the ranks.
NO!! Quite the opposite- Army rank structures are needed
Quite Francis! We need Sandhurst-trained Melchetts to replicate the glorious successes of Basra and Helmand! See you in the Mess (etc).
Can you please explain “graduate” in this context? I dont understand the reference as an American.
University degree
I guess The Graduate (Dustin Hoffman) had you puzzled.
I was wondering what “Plastics” had to do with policing, yes.
Someone that has finished university and graduated with a pointless degree in knitting or bean counting.
It would have been interesting to hear in this piece from a police spokesperson about this plain dereliction of duty, even if it (as is likely) would have been a terse “No comment.” Of course I guess that might have drawn police inquiries about the author’s online language.
Spokesperson?… please!!!!!!!
A colleague I worked with had a Father who had been a sergeant in the Guards and fought in WW2 and boxed as a heavy weight. When he was promoted to Inspector to a new town he went around to various pubs and challenged the hard men to fights and won every one of them. He said to the people in the pubs ” You know where I am, anyone who wants a fight knock on the station door”. He sorted out the town on his own.
Since the late 1960sseveral aspects have taken place
Massive decline in toughness and fighting spirit of middle and upper classes. Pre 1960 boys physical training classes comprised rope climbing, gymnastics and boxing. Many had been in combat. Most of those involved in influencing of crime are terrified of physical violence and have no knowledg of controlling violent people. They live in a world of ideas divorced from reality. Since late 1960s Trotskyists and other left wing middle classes have taken over The Labour Party, Civil Service, much inner city government, criminology, education and influenced the Law. The result is overturning traditionl views on morality and introducing such concepts as ” Property is theft. If it feels good do it. Self control is bad, Express your emotions. Discipline is bad. If a troublemaker is restrained by a member of public they can be prosecuted for assault, so it deters people making citizens arrests.There is a massive decline in toughness, size and unarmed combat skills of police so many are intimidated by the physical violence. The Police used to recruit ex military or had served in them in wars. Robert Mark – WikipediaEthnic minorities are often cut slack which is not afforded to white people, for example Stop and Seach has been stopped., the allowing of Black Lives Mtter demonstration during Covid. Simple changes
a. Increase size, strength, toughness and hand to hand combat skills of Police. Use the techniques developed by Fairbarn , Asst Commissioner of Shanghai Police in 1930s.
William E. Fairbairn – Wikipedia
b. Make resisting arrest a serious crime.
c. Encourage people to make citizens arrest of troublemakers .
d. Bring back boxing and gymnastic and rope climbing in schools so people can defend themselves. Many criminals now prcatice martial arts.
e. Enable people to use any force to defend themselves and property. Only when a criminal is face down on the ground and stopped moving can person not attack them. The criminal must demonstrate they were no possible threat
f. Return to the traditional values whereby men have the responsibility of detering crime and arresting criminals in order that they are taken into custody by the Police. The Police return to the traditional role of supporting the population in detering crime.
Basically return to pre WW2 values when violent crime was largely restricted to docks and pubs in areas of heavy industry.
I didn’t realize things had gotten this bad. Well my friends across the pond is invite you to come to the states while you still can.
When I was a child if I did something wrong and the local bobby saw me I suspect I’d have had a clip round the ear and be told never to do it again. If I went and complained to my dad the chances are I would have had another one on the presumption that the policeman was well within his rights. Nowadays I guess any policeman meeting out that kind of justice could well find himself on a charge in the ECHR.
If only regular citizens had the means by which to protect their property and, on occasion, themselves and loved ones. I wonder what that would look like.
The mining/ heavy industry areas of Britain during the Depression had very low levels of crime due to the following. 1. Methodist teaching of right and wrong. 2. Physically tough brave men who were miners and played rugby with some having been in the Armed Forces, taking responsibity to maintain law and order.3. The Police, Government and Legal System supporting those who maintain law and order.
However a bunch of flabby office working milksops who run away and hide when threatened by violence, will be no use in maintaining law and order and detering criminals.
Plod are badly trained, badly led, ill educated, ill qualified, unfit, with appalling command and control execution, and embody the unique chippy bullying cum inferiority complex of Britain’s lower middle classes.
I believe the original policing model in London was run exactly like this. For a quid a day, you could hire one of the Bow Street Runners, established in 1753 by Henry Fielding. Stout lads, the lot of them!
When I was a child (I’m in my early 50s now) I remember reading about how the police were going to have to fill out forms following an arrest (I can’t remember the details beyond that – too long ago). Even as a child I could see that this meant they would make fewer arrests. And lo and behold, 30 odd years of increasing bureaucracy later, we have a Police force that doesn’t do a lot of policing.
However, it’s wrong to pick out just the police – the same increase in bureaucracy has overburdened the NHS, MOD, and likely much else in the public sector. A bonfire of regulations is required, and the removal of at least half of the management.
When parents can’t even discipline their children with a smack when they are continuously badly behaved, why is it a surprise that as adults we have a generation which is entitled, violent, have few morals and a contempt for law and order
You need to restore the private health industry and get rid of the NHS; then there will be money for legitimate functions of government like policing. Then cut out the repressive Thought Crime crap and protect life and property.