The current state of the American political discourse is best understood through the lens of the 1987 movie The Princess Bride — or more specifically, one scene therein. It’s the part where Miracle Max is decompensating over the insistence of his wife, Valerie, on saying the word, “Humperdinck”, the name of the movie’s evil prince, who is also Max’s most loathed nemesis.
“Why would you say that name!” he screams.
“What? Humperdinck!?” she shrieks back, gleefully.
One gets the sense that these two do this a lot — her Humperdincking, him screaming, which only makes her Humperdinck harder. That this problem has two obvious solutions only illuminates its intractability. Valerie could stop saying the name, but then again, Max could also choose not to react to its every utterance as if he’s been electrocuted. That neither of them are making different choices suggests that something about this dynamic serves them both.
I thought of this scene when the first “Your body, my choice” post from a male Trump voter skittered insect-like across my timeline in the wake of the election — closely followed by a handful of “My body, his choice” remixes by savvy OnlyFans models hoping to cash in on the moment. This crude riff on the feminist war cry that once defined the battle for abortion rights was akin to an inaugural shout of “Humperdinck!”, designed explicitly to trigger a meltdown among liberals. And lo: if you do an internet search for the phrase now, around 5% of the results are of people posting it and 95% are critics freaking out in response. “Women need to be kept safe from the ‘your body, my choice’ peddlers,” The Guardian announced, while CNN warned: “Attacks on women surge on social media following election.” And The New Yorker, for whom the phrase is a harbinger of a “coming era of gender regression”, described it as “A New Rallying Cry for the Irony-Poisoned Right.”
The phrase “irony-poisoned” in that last headline — which graces an essay by Jia Tolentino — struck me as an especially savvy bit of rhetoric. It functions as a preemptive strike against the obvious counterpoint to all this panic. Namely: “your body my choice” is a repulsive thing to say, but also the furthest thing from a legitimate threat.
The men behind these posts are not rapists-in-waiting, announcing their intent to commit sexual violence; they are trolls, gleefully trolling away in the hope of making people Mad Online. But if Tolentino knows this is bait (and she clearly does), she nevertheless cannot help taking it, hook, line, and sinker. The piece is imbued with a near-religious sense of horror at seeing the feminist catechism of “my body my choice” twisted by nonbelievers into something unfathomably malignant. This is beyond distasteful; it is heretical. And unlike the provocations in which the millennial Left once delighted, back in the days when one measly crucifix soaked in urine could trigger a weeks-long meltdown among religious conservatives, this little joke (Tolentino argues) is simply not funny.
It is, of course, difficult to have a sense of humour about the topics one takes most seriously, even for those who generally enjoy making hamburgers of other people’s sacred cows. I was recently reminded of the 1999 Onion article titled, “That’s not funny, my brother died that way,” in which an aggrieved writer takes issue with a scene in the Police Academy movie where a motorcyclist gets his head stuck in a horse’s rear end. (“His life-insurance policy didn’t cover equine-anal suffocations. So now you might understand why I don’t think it’s funny to see that sort of thing played for laughs.”) That this essay is, in itself, funny, speaks to the unfortunate truth that also animates the “your body my choice” brand of trolling: the we-are-not-amused disapproval of another person can be pretty funny, especially when that person has been attempting to scold you into compliance with their preferred political agenda for years on end. It is no coincidence that this anti-feminist edgelording comes hard on the heels of a campaign cycle in which one side’s rhetoric was almost pathologically alienating to men: the more shrill the calls for conformity, the more naughty fun there is to be had in refusing to read the room.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI’ve witnessed the same.
Nowadays the edgy teenagers are the ones who nonchalantly and laughingly poke at the Left’s most sacred totems, to the incredulous gasps of their more righteous and straight-laced peers.
What’s the motivation?
For one, these ‘wayward’ kids grew up in an age of progressive excess and are, therefore, very familiar with the resulting rise of the Progressive Prude, also known as a ‘Karen.’
Everyone is familiar with at least one Progressive Prude in their life: They find the most creative and unlikeliest of ways to be offended about everything and everyone, whilst setting themselves up as the paragon of progressive virtue. They elevate their virtue signaling into an art form that leaves their incredulous audience slack-jawed at their sheer look-at-me audacity.
For many teenagers, this is the only world they’ve known. And they’ve witnessed the behind-the-scenes self-serving duplicity of such self-righteous prudes.
And so they make jokes.
It’s worth remembering that, in all ages, the powerful in society typically play the part of the self-righteous prude, and the powerless resonate with court jesters who take the piss. Using comedy to speak truth to power is the only form of power some will ever know in this life.
I think the left just don’t know how to have fun. Nor are they very smart. “Your body my choice” is one of the great lines of this, admittedly early, century. Not only that but it originates from the mouth of a male. That suggests to me that men know how to have fun and they’re smart enough to play with words, and respond very quickly, that send the opposition off chasing their own tales. Of course the line’s aimed at those stupid, humourless women who don’t like or understand a bit of fun. I wouldn’t like to live in a world without women, but neither would I like to live in a world without male humour which is one of the great tools of survival.
“chasing their own tales”
Sorry Brett, but it’s “chasing their own tails” – unless, of course, you’re referring to a backstory?!
Yes, my writing, attention, is getting worse.
Hmmm…think about it: chasing one’s own tales is actually profound. The chaser is trapped in their own narrative. In effect looking for the golden nugget of truth they know is hidden in the corner. Except the room is round.
It’s a very interesting accident.
Never apologise. It was a brilliant pun. Next time try a catachresis.
It was a brilliant pen.
“Could all the Political People board Golgafrinchan Ark Fleet Ship B, please? Calling all Political People, mandatory departure in ten minutes!”
The present Left are girls. I speak as one who was a Maoist from the age of 15 to 15 and three quarters.