X Close

Scientific American editor leaves post after anti-Trump comments 

Scientific American Editor-in-Chief Laura Helmuth. Credit: Springer Nature/YouTube

November 14, 2024 - 10:45pm

The embattled Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American is leaving her role after her anti-Trump social media posts gained national attention.

“I’ve decided to leave Scientific American after an exciting 4.5 years as editor in chief,” Laura Helmuth announced on Bluesky today. “I’m going to take some time to think about what comes next (and go birdwatching), but for now I’d like to share a very small sample of the work I’ve been so proud to support.”

Following last week’s US election, Helmuth made several social media posts suggesting Americans who voted for Donald Trump were racist, sexist, and fascist. “I apologise to younger voters that my Gen X is so full of fucking fascists,” one since-deleted post read.

“Every four years I remember why I left Indiana (where I grew up) and remember why I respect the people who stayed and are trying to make it less racist and sexist,” another post read. “The moral arc of the universe isn’t going to bend itself.”

Under Helmuth’s leadership Scientific American, the longest continuously running magazine in the US, waded into politics to an unprecedented degree. Four years ago, it made a presidential endorsement in support of Joe Biden for the first time in its 175-year history. “Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people — because he rejects evidence and science,” the endorsement read. Four years later, the outlet endorsed Kamala Harris with a similar statement, this time emphasising abortion in addition to climate change and Covid-19.

Helmuth’s tenure also saw the publication of articles that blurred the lines between scientific research and activism. A 2021 article, “From Civil Rights to Black Lives Matter”, addressed what makes various social justice movements successful. “Social movements have likely existed for as long as oppressive human societies have, but only in the past few centuries has their praxis […] developed into a craft, to be learned and honed,” the article read. Several articles argued in favour of abortions, with one headline claiming: “Third-Trimester Abortions Are Moral and Necessary Health Care.”

The outlet published numerous articles promoting transgender medical interventions. It also published articles advocating against age restrictions for these procedures. One such article claimed that “a decade of research shows such treatment reduces depression, suicidality and other devastating consequences of trans preteens and teens being forced to undergo puberty in the sex they were assigned at birth”, a proposition that has come under international scrutiny in recent years.

The former editor’s election-related social media posts drew intense criticism, for which she subsequently apologised. After deleting the offending posts, and clarifying that they do not represent the views of her then-employer, Helmuth wrote: “I respect and value people across the political spectrum. I am committed to civil communication and editorial objectivity.”

Laura Helmuth has been contacted for comment.

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
3 hours ago

SA is a reg and the departure of this particular person won’t make a difference.

Bret Larson
Bret Larson
3 hours ago

One lizard out of the swamp.

Ralph Faris
Ralph Faris
3 hours ago
Reply to  Bret Larson

What’s very sad is that she doesn’t appear to have the slightest bit of self-consciousness about her hyperbolic political views and how completely inappropriate her remarks were for a publication claiming the mantle of science. Her “political activism” blinds her to the actual way in which science has traditionally pursued the truth. Sheesh!