One of the most arresting images from Narendra Modi’s first term in office as India’s Prime Minister dates from 21st June 2015. He is kneeling on a yoga mat laid out on Rajpath, New Delhi’s great ceremonial boulevard. Behind him, stretching all the way back to India Gate in the far, foggy distance, are some 35,000 people sat on yoga mats of their own. It is a remarkable metaphor of national leadership: a prime minister guiding his people through a series of health-giving bends and stretches. There was even a new Guinness world record into the bargain, for the largest ever yoga session.
Modi had been angling for a moment like this since September of the year before, when he lobbied the United Nations to make 21st June “International Yoga Day”. In an address to the General Assembly, he claimed that “Yoga is an invaluable gift from our ancient tradition. Yoga embodies unity of mind and body, thought and action … a holistic approach [that] is valuable to our health and our well-being. Yoga is not just about exercise; it is a way to discover the sense of oneness with yourself, the world and nature.”
Modi’s successful pitch for yoga at the UN contained eerie echoes of a pitch for Hinduism made by one of his heroes, the religious teacher Swami Vivekānanda, to the World’s Parliament of Religions in Chicago back in 1893. It was a masterclass in using the language of inclusivity to make the case for a particular idea. Hinduism, declared Vivekānanda, is the “mother of all religions” and has “taught the world both tolerance and universal acceptance”. To an audience consisting primarily of American Christians, familiar with Jesus’s claim that “No one comes to the Father except through me”, Vivekānanda offered a contrasting line from the Bhagavad Gita: “Whosoever comes to Me, through whatsoever form, I reach him; all men are struggling through paths which in the end lead to me.”
Vivekānanda’s expansive case for Hinduism was helped by the fact that the concept itself was only around a century old by the late 1800s and remained somewhat flexible. Europeans in colonial-era India had used the term “Hindu” (derived from a Sanskrit word for the Indus River) to describe people on the subcontinent who did not belong to better-understood and apparently more clearly-defined traditions such as Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Indian reformers later used the term “Hinduism” to refer to a broad system of ideas and practices that went beyond “religion” in the narrow confessional sense familiar to modern Westerners and encompassed culture, identity and, in time, a sense of national political purpose.
In the decades running up to Indian independence in 1947, there was nervousness among religious minorities — particularly Muslims — about what this might mean for the role played by Hinduism in a future independent India. The country’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, was among those who advocated for secularism and religious pluralism. Other forces in Indian politics, including the predecessor to Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), encouraged the idea that India is fundamentally a Hindu country and that its politics and institutions ought to reflect that fact.
The vexed politics of “Hinduism” in India — religious tradition versus a more encompassing cultural or national identity — has been mirrored in the West by arguments about yoga, one of whose earliest teachers was Swami Vivekānanda during visits to the United States. Is yoga essentially religious in character? If so, is it wrong to use it purely for its health benefits or to teach it in schools that are subject to rules about the separation of church and state? And given its origins in India, is there something morally wrong or at least a little unseemly about white Westerners making money from promoting it — or even practising it at all?
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI am truly disappointed with this BBC version of Mr Hardinge who I used to admire prior to this post.
You have to be awkwardly ignorant about the nature of Indian politics to make these sweeping assertions.
Nehru, India’s first PM was a Socialist atheist. The tenor of that era was pearls and champagne Socialism of an elite Westernised class who ruled India in denial of their roots.
I grew up in such an ethos. It was ” cool” to debunk your faith and make fun of it, speak Queens English while making fun of those who couldn’t, look down on anything to do with Hinduism as superstitious nonsense.
Since the tenor of politics changed from 1989 with the end of Congress’ dynastic hold on democracy and the advent of a non Western idiom of politics, it is only natural that a more traditional form of soft power as Yoga would reemerge.
You could not expect atheistic Communists to propagate Yoga.
Yoga is not ” essentially religious” as it exists now. It’s origins are in Patanjali’s Yogasutra, however today it is a fitness form which many find convenient and inexpensive. It is also universally accepted in India.
” Some Muslim groups” he refers to are hardline Sunni fanatics. Most Indians irrespective of caste or religion practice Yoga. Mr Hardinge should know more about syncretic practices where a fusion of Abrahamaic practices with those rooted in Hindu civilizational continuity are very present. Think the shrines of Shirdi Sai, the Bonbibi cult in the Sunderbans etc
The 1960s psychedelic movements which exalted Indian and Hindu mysticism gave Yoga a different life for the West.
What Mr Modi has reclaimed is a traditional form of Indian exercise more for its own diaspora than a Western audience.( Which has its own iterations)
If it is propagated at the UN etc it is merely as a version of Indian ” soft power”and minus the dark trappings the author attaches.
The author’s scurrilous attempts to politicise Yoga are plain crude.
And what does he mean” provoking Pakistan”? Is he aware of the attacks on the border everyday from that country? Or is he sympathetic to the cause of extreme Islamism as Pakistan propounds, including its heartless policies towards all its minorities?
Trashy writing.Expected better from you – Christopher. But then again you cannot take the BBC trope out of even one of its more enlightened authors now succumbing to MDS.
The problem is Nehru.
The Brits complain now about two tier Kier, but Chacha Nehru makes Starmer look like an “islamophobe”.
The most incredible part of course is that he was busy giving special treatment to Indian muslims – after they had openly supported the creation of Pakistan, where Hindus and Sikhs were being wiped out at the same time.
His great grandson bats for every extreme Hinduphobic party such as banned outfits like PFI. Supports separate electorates and Sharia law. It runs in their family.
Did Nehru have a dhimmi mindset?
He was an atheist and a Fabian Socialist. More than “dhimmi” I consider him to be an out- of- touch elitist and one who rose to much more than he deserved through a mix of fortuitous circumstances.
His views on Hinduism was as something inferior practiced by superstitious women.
This appears superficial and shallow as well as a calculated attempt to perhaps gain traction with the British elites of the time.
Read Swapan Dasgupta ” Awakening Bharat Mata” to understand that there were far more nuanced views on Hinduism from many of his contemporaries than his.
Well said, Chris! It seems you’re engaging in a bit of trolling to divert attention from the chaos back home in Britain. When Islamic mobs are at your doorstep, why not take a swipe at something as peaceful as yoga, right? But let’s get real—if yoga isn’t an Indian Hindu practice, who exactly invented it? Perhaps those “barbarian” Anglo-Saxons that the Romans loved to poke fun at?
Yoga is far more than just physical stretches and exercises; it’s about uniting individual consciousness with a supreme force. Swami Vivekananda wasn’t sweating through a workout when he wrote on Bhakti Yoga, Karma Yoga, and the Kundalini traditions of ancient Kashmir Shaivism. This isn’t some fad; it’s a 2,500-year-old kriya yoga tradition.
But hey, if you really want to politicize it, that’s on you. Your Hinduphobia is showing, and it’s as glaring as those mobs in your backyard. Maybe take a page out of Steve Jobs or Zuckerberg’s book and learn from the masters, instead of inventing new ways to critique something timeless.
He obviously knows little about either Partition or the lead up to it.
He probably also doesn’t know that ” secularism” was only introduced into the Indian Constitution in 1972 via the 42nd Amendment when Nehru’s daughter Indira ruled in a coalition government with the Communist party of India ( Marxist and Maoist).
If this is the calibre of Indian history teaching on UK campuses one shudders.
Excluding the India-Pakistan conflict (my knowledge on this is limited, do I don’t have a real opinion) what are exactly the wrongs of the author..? It seems as if you don’t like his “style” or.. sorry to phrase it this way..: the author doesn’t buy the yoga promoting story by prime minister Modi..!
That said, the idea of yoga-practicing as a mere gymnastics tool is very opposing to yoga as a spiritual path and tradition. Both are out there as practicing realities but you can’t believe both at the same time..! The author, to my understanding reflects on this contradiction that could enlarge from Modi’s efforts.
It’s biased nonsense. Please read what the responses of all who disagree.
All I know is that the Atlantist blob doesn’t like the guy being in power, so by the very nature of his existence he and India under him are seen by the blob as a threat.
Yes, and they then go all out with their Commie pals who are also former elites in India, to bash anything which is not as per Leftist paradigms.
They don’t like nationalism, period.
For the same reason they don’t like families, traditional religion or strong masculinity.
Globalists hate nationalism. That is a far more salient divide than the usual right/left.
Wherever muslims were in a majority, they separated to form Pakistan, genocide most minorities, treated any remaining non muslims as second class citizens – but the likes of this author would be desperate to avoid hurting their “feelings” or causing “islamophobia”.
Where Hindus were in a majority, muslims or other minorities were granted freedom of religion, increased in numbers and even granted special privileges – all of which continues under Modi, incidentally.
But our man is so worried about Yoga.
Couldn’t care less about, for instance , minor Hindu girls in Pakistan getting kidnapped, forcibly converted and married off to middle aged muslims, of course, that would be islamophobia.
He also ignores what is going on in Bangladesh. Hindus being killed, raped , their temples burnt, then being thrown out of jobs on account of their faith…
Repeat of pogroms of the 1930s in Europe..but hey, who cares?
Not this mendacious UH writer Hardinge.
https://www.thejaipurdialogues.com/featured/peaceful-mob-lynches-hindu-boy-in-bangladesh-police-and-army-stand-in-silence/
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bangladesh-violence-hindus-minorities-attacked-temples-set-on-fire-2577703-2024-08-06
What…yoga in the Olympics? I would’ve thought competitiveness kinda defeats the purposes of yoga?
You win the Gold medal for that comment.
Why am I paying for such drivel on UnHerd? Let this chap bore his students and not subject us to this claptrap.
It’s so that others can read and perhaps make comments either supporting or in disagreement with the article, which are often very illuminating, as are those already made before your intervention. You’ve failed to do either. I’m certainly not paying to read non-comments!
If you feel “subject” to the article, mightn’t you wish to consider your sense of agency in the matter?
Because we are not allowed to tell him and similar people, what we think of them, on the Guardian.
It’s for the comments, not their views. We know what their views are, on anything – Trump, X, Starmer, Modi, trans, etc etc.
No wonder they react violently on being labelled NPCs. Too close to the truth.
In an otherwise interesting article, there is something revealing in the following:
given its origins in India, is there something morally wrong or at least a little unseemly about white Westerners making money from promoting it — or even practising it at all?
To the question, no, there is nothing wrong with Westerners engaging in yoga, no more than it is wrong for non-Americans to engage in basketball which was invented in the US. This “appropriation” madness has to stop. You cannot have it both ways. We cannot be lectured to on the one hand about the wonders of multiculturalism and how diversity is our strength while being hectored on the other hand about cultural appropriation.
In a pluralistic society, it is natural for things that pertain to one group to spill into others. It’s okay for someone other than a black kid to do a rap song. It’s okay for someone other than a Mexican to make a taco. It’s okay for someone other than an Asian to engage in martial arts. And it’s okay for someone other than a white American to grill a hot dog.
Although yoga as a spiritual tradition and practice goes back many centuries, my understanding is that many of the current yoga asanas were adopted by a number of 19C yogis from Swedish keep fit exercises used by the British Army in India. Why does my ‘I am not a robot’ keep expiring?
I am not sure this rendition is correct as far as Yoga in India is concerned.
I don’t know about the Western adopted asanas.
Also Yoga has many schools. It’s an ancient Hindu tradition with complexity and variety.
I do recall some years ago on a US campus being asked about ” Hot Yoga”. I didn’t really understand the query but maybe what you say about Swedish calisthenics means an adaptation of the latter to Yoga as is practiced in the West.
In London yoga became very trendy as a way of both keeping fit and ‘chilling out’ and becoming more supple in the early 1980s . I certainly remember the position Modi is ‘utilising’. Some , especially the young teachers , were into the spiritual aspects , relating more to breathing , but most just saw it as healthy exercise .
The later Pilates craze was even more popular for a while .
Whenever someone talks of a diet I smell popery.
It is arid secularism to complain of Modi using the phrase “our ancient tradition”.
There is hardly a western country’s leader who wouldn’t warm to using such a set of words themselves.
And that despite large numbers of their population being outwith aspects of the national majority.